This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.4080* 13 15 58.47 -10 09 04.3 11.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9080,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4080 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9080,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4080 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9080,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4080 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9080,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4080 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.4080* 13 19 05.71 -05 56 58.1 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9080,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4080 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.91653473 12.02.2026 09:59:38.601 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
First image: 2461083.91653473 12.02.2026 09:59:38.601 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Last image: 2461140.90842848 10.04.2026 09:47:58.221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5688
Objects passed selection criteria: 5673
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4955
Average stars matched: 4835.25 (97.5832 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 05:02:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.91653473 12.02.2026 09:59:38.601 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
First image: 2461083.91653473 12.02.2026 09:59:38.601 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Last image: 2461140.90842848 10.04.2026 09:47:58.221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 27
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35450
Objects passed selection criteria: 35369
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32321.8
Average stars matched: 31293.2 (96.8179 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137184 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 05:03:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.90758056
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits'
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.168 -10:01:55.86
Second-epoch image center 12:51:42.340 -10:01:28.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.168 -10:01:55.86
Second-epoch image center 12:51:39.813 -10:01:27.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0565 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:42.340 -10:01:28.22
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:39.813 -10:01:27.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01037 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UBDRE329SK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Su76aWdyr0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.flvYTiNdmG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UXuz6NjMWT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5802 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.7646 to 200.9715 deg, Dec -15.3188 to -4.7215 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.7646 to 200.9715 deg, Dec -15.3188 to -4.7215 deg
Loaded 4162 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3297 out of 3464 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3464 out of 5802 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862167
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862167
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
2.0 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UBDRE329SK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=462, passed=5802
Got 5802 stars (including 5326 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5802 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Su76aWdyr0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5807
Got 5807 stars (including 5351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.flvYTiNdmG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=4184
Got 4184 stars (including 3851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UXuz6NjMWT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=4155
Got 4155 stars (including 3820 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20449.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20444.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 20444_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20449_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:57:04.36 -10:23:08.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.936 3625837131023200896 194.26790239152 -10.38559052745 12.0757 11.5785 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.936#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20461_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20461_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:21:52.58 -13:53:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
13:15:58.47 -10:09:04.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.168 -10:01:55.86
Second-epoch image center 12:51:42.340 -10:01:28.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.168 -10:01:55.86
Second-epoch image center 12:51:39.813 -10:01:27.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0565 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:42.340 -10:01:28.22
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:39.813 -10:01:27.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01037 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gJ9PzYVP6N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mS6DullD8I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1JDIUOfdl5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HNwxPtVG8u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36874 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.7357 to 200.9789 deg, Dec -15.3221 to -4.7187 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.7357 to 200.9789 deg, Dec -15.3221 to -4.7187 deg
Loaded 4179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3331 out of 3622 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3622 out of 36874 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
1.8 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gJ9PzYVP6N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1452, passed=36859
Got 36859 stars (including 35346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36859 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mS6DullD8I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1454, passed=36904
Got 36904 stars (including 35373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36904 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1JDIUOfdl5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=925, passed=28285
Got 28285 stars (including 27314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HNwxPtVG8u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=883, passed=28085
Got 28085 stars (including 27150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_03-59-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_04-00-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-46-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_044850_TTUQ1b1x1_32360_fMuJ8NNt/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52732.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52736.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52738.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52740.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53234.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53636.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53724.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53736.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53750.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53765.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52974.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52732_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:48.58 -05:15:36.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.983 3680630949396324864 187.45296577517 -05.26026089768 14.1180 13.6139 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.983#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52736_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:11:57.12 -09:17:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.210 3624717312789833344 197.98799880932 -09.29794723403 13.9222 13.4424 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.210#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52738_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:22:20.09 -07:29:47.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.671 3631319570877097600 200.58352383347 -07.49650807657 13.0372 12.3041 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.671#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52739_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:55:54.32 -13:02:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52740_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:00:31.68 -06:04:22.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.099 3677372065650752512 195.13229414283 -06.07282920470 11.6274 10.9820 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.099#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52910_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:15:58.47 -10:09:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52974_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53043_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:38:28.95 -11:32:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53098_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53098_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:10:11.92 -07:43:06.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.589 3628495161728158208 197.54936483842 -07.71879667887 13.1214 12.6597 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.589#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 53161_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53234_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:13:03.21 -12:17:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.947 3621589374007620736 198.26310581497 -12.28499326174 13.3912 12.8652 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.947#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53252_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:07:24.59 -12:51:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53257_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:58.13 -06:00:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 53324_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53456_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 53456_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53486_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53486_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:06:40.69 -05:37:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53636_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:15:34.66 -07:39:08.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.000 3628358070667271808 198.89449464278 -07.65262787598 15.1852 14.8046 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.000#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53705_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53705_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:18:31.72 -08:27:42.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.935 3624974701590069120 199.63186605611 -08.46214224133 14.6293 14.0092 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.935#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53724_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:51:05.85 -05:44:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.524 3678325204793083904 192.77446090108 -05.74847899710 14.8618 14.3138 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.524#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53736_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:12:11.42 -08:09:28.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.377 3628231455031464064 198.04793762140 -08.15768086553 14.7548 14.1602 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.377#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53750_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:00:13.96 -07:44:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.961 3628867385069196544 195.05868093947 -07.73933506928 14.8794 14.1899 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53765_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 53765_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:53:43.22 -07:17:40.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.663 3675671533479401088 193.43053672237 -07.29474432995 14.7970 14.1378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.663#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04483_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 04483_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-47-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks