This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.8470,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.3470 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J258.0673-22.1995,2461140.8470,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J258.0673-22.1995 20260410.3470 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4113298357001241984,2461140.8470,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4113298357001241984 20260410.3470 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4117615937412600064,2461140.8470,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4117615937412600064 20260410.3470 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J253.3773-23.1961,2461140.8470,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J253.3773-23.1961 20260410.3470 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.8470,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.3470 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.8470,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.3470 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4107917145348464256,2461140.8470,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4107917145348464256 20260410.3470 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.8470,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.3470 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.8470,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.3470 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.8470,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.3470 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461140.84733137 10.04.2026 08:19:59.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7270
Objects passed selection criteria: 7264
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6544.25
Average stars matched: 6367.75 (97.303 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 05:12:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461140.84733137 10.04.2026 08:19:59.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 183
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 106083
Objects passed selection criteria: 105901
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88586.2
Average stars matched: 84670.2 (95.5794 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2011644 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 05:15:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.84671310
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:17:06.364 -26:02:16.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0752 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:17:08.924 -26:03:03.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0901 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:17:06.364 -26:02:16.39
Second-epoch second image center 17:17:08.924 -26:03:03.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01622 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lk3cNkTUT6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZBOMa48yZi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.an2WUjz7V2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EnHzBHGJwn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Loaded 11388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7042 out of 7452 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7452 out of 10772 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815328
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815328
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.8 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
2.8 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Lk3cNkTUT6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=949, passed=10772
Got 10772 stars (including 9801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZBOMa48yZi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=936, passed=10621
Got 10621 stars (including 9668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.an2WUjz7V2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=521, passed=7582
Got 7582 stars (including 7050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7582 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EnHzBHGJwn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=541, passed=7631
Got 7631 stars (including 7086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20666.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 20580_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20666_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 20666_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:00.41 -27:41:13.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.339 6033426575487304832 254.00159752003 -27.68632997532 11.0228 10.0845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.339#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.13 -25:10:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 06085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:49.86 -26:39:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:49:01.04 -29:38:59.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:17:06.364 -26:02:16.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0752 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:17:08.924 -26:03:03.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0901 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:17:06.364 -26:02:16.39
Second-epoch second image center 17:17:08.924 -26:03:03.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01622 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EY8CM6TNcc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k4tNCgTPtT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ll8RmU4zDC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XAwhc4kZjb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 143168 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Loaded 11498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8059 out of 9812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9812 out of 143168 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596166
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596166
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 122 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EY8CM6TNcc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=11615, passed=143155
Got 143155 stars (including 131260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 143155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k4tNCgTPtT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=11364, passed=142792
Got 142792 stars (including 131150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ll8RmU4zDC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5799, passed=80332
Got 80332 stars (including 74431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XAwhc4kZjb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=5918, passed=82005
Got 82005 stars (including 75970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_042102_TTUQ2b1x1_21031_mMU2MnCd/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118291.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out119632.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out120903.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out154006.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out154049.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out154105.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out155921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166759.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166765.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166769.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166773.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166787.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166790.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166791.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166795.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166820.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166829.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166834.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166840.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166849.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166850.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166855.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166857.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166862.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166880.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166890.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166900.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166901.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166908.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166923.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167680.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167696.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167818.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167932.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168073.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168084.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168087.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168093.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168107.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168109.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168118.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168144.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out164807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166822.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166835.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166750_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166750_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:27.52 -23:36:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166759_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166759_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:16.25 -24:48:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.588 4110408806081776000 262.31698026935 -24.81260579198 13.7499 12.7281 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.588#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166765_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166765_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:51.36 -26:02:39.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.597 4112006881872051328 256.46436758696 -26.04460156738 13.1059 12.2581 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.597#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166769_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166769_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:18.27 -28:22:54.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.200 4059828591146659840 261.07513549009 -28.38162650687 13.8820 13.2064 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.200#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166772_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166772_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:36.25 -22:07:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166773_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166773_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.88 -22:28:09.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:14.57 -29:23:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.663 4058806801250669568 262.56024475503 -29.39955364297 13.5811 13.0323 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.663#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166790_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166790_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:34.48 -25:49:27.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166791_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166791_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:40.17 -22:44:44.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.091 4125799941645195776 252.91587436728 -22.74601269244 13.2447 12.3939 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.091#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166795_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166795_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:59.75 -29:37:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.783 4060016405851056640 264.24920329034 -29.63015586392 13.1281 12.1378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.783#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166801_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166801_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:09.84 -26:55:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:21.17 -27:51:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:27.81 -26:50:39.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.939 4061579322894080384 263.36536374021 -26.84393595110 13.2979 12.3937 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.939#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:29.07 -30:01:55.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.564 4058531614100533632 263.37101676626 -30.03209762484 12.9865 12.2358 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.564#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:57.98 -29:01:24.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.239 4060119274533227648 264.24197244983 -29.02357998636 12.7663 11.3263 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.239#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166822_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 166822_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166825_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166825_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:00.05 -22:31:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166829_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166829_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:59.90 -22:12:02.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166832_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166832_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.37 -26:15:38.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:39.35 -29:42:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.553 4058750760516061824 262.66436920612 -29.70142416876 13.1126 12.5184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.553#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166835_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 166835_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166840_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166840_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:37.24 -22:39:28.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166845_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166845_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:27.03 -22:03:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:47.53 -29:15:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:03.49 -24:44:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.737 6034821129855707008 253.01310298230 -24.73598368539 12.4321 11.5192 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.737#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166850_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166850_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:53.84 -29:36:01.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.16)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166851_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166851_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:41.51 -23:39:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166853_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166853_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166855_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166855_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:46.05 -29:32:15.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166857_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166857_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:45.01 -26:10:09.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166861_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166861_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:07.63 -24:57:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.678 4110085657148903424 261.28128407778 -24.96363034529 13.2837 12.2653 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.678#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166862_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166862_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:05.49 -21:50:20.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166866_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 166866_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166867_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166867_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166872_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 166872_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166877_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166877_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:24.94 -29:13:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166880_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166880_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:17.81 -29:37:29.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166883_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166883_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:02.42 -29:20:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166887_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166887_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:30.29 -28:58:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166890_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166890_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:29.20 -29:18:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.572 6032606855213304064 253.12245994947 -29.31596026916 12.6184 12.1045 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166891_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166891_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:31.16 -23:31:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166893_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166893_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:53.23 -26:34:49.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.332 6034322230784769536 253.47216423425 -26.58054945732 12.6081 11.8647 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166897_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166897_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:46.81 -27:59:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166900_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166900_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:44.03 -29:03:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.644 6029685139243593728 254.93368959965 -29.05961844451 12.4352 11.6536 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.644#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166901_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166901_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:10.00 -28:15:40.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166908_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166908_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:55.75 -29:24:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.744 4058773678458535040 263.48228491372 -29.40506755796 12.6718 11.8532 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.744#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166911_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166911_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:35.54 -29:32:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166917_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166917_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:14.67 -25:15:25.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166923_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 166923_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:23.30 -25:19:27.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.253 6034772476468154880 252.59772786952 -25.32450641811 11.5390 11.3423 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.253#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167235_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167235_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:08.97 -28:58:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167250_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167250_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:46.50 -27:53:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167275_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167275_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:36.26 -29:05:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167387_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 167387_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167413_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167413_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:21.98 -29:04:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167437_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167437_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:18.35 -28:11:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167494_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167494_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:30.58 -26:45:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167536_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167536_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:26.76 -29:10:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167540_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167540_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:29.23 -26:11:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167680_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167680_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:03.61 -28:44:48.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.558 4059647515327634048 262.01391759694 -28.74673951392 13.5908 12.9345 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.558#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167696_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167696_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:27.31 -28:06:08.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.394 4107919924074825216 259.86383504508 -28.10257469926 13.4336 12.7716 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.394#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167728_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167728_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167744_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167744_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:10.22 -30:03:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167761_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167761_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.84 -28:24:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167785_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167785_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:44.62 -24:49:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:11.34 -23:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167818_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167818_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:45.84 -28:38:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.366 4107507675935784832 259.19005213866 -28.64106578278 14.0325 12.9153 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.366#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167854_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167854_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:14.32 -25:42:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167881_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167881_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:14.69 -28:55:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167897_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 167897_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167912_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167912_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:36.68 -26:21:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167914_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167914_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:21.26 -28:03:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167921_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 167921_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167932_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167932_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:21.04 -30:16:01.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.313 6028798834191608320 258.08724446119 -30.26719643948 13.5778 12.1673 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.313#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167956_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 167956_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167969_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167969_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:40.98 -29:44:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167973_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167973_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:33.95 -22:13:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167975_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 167975_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:52.71 -23:45:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168004_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168004_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:11.15 -23:58:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168024_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168024_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:25.15 -29:07:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:32.20 -22:38:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168071_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 168071_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168072_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168072_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:01.23 -28:41:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168073_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168073_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:41.26 -27:38:50.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.965 4060542453451025408 264.17132774102 -27.64741099449 13.7283 12.8773 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.965#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168084_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168084_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:53.64 -24:34:42.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.739 4110324491626217216 263.47268105805 -24.57922393795 13.9586 13.1216 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.739#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168087_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168087_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:17.34 -22:09:31.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.635 4117589201126446336 263.57177329245 -22.15888433991 13.5260 12.5367 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.635#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168093_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168093_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:02.29 -28:29:02.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.393 4060364396907616256 263.50945895819 -28.48402963028 13.6469 12.8078 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.393#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168107_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168107_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:06.77 -29:06:14.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.90)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168109_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168109_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:31.22 -27:34:01.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168118_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168118_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:16.17 -28:59:37.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.392 4059587184042949376 262.31740853581 -28.99371585210 13.3702 12.3269 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.392#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168125_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168125_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:55.02 -25:40:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168144_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 168144_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:58.33 -22:49:00.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.835 4116707019246281088 263.74255075928 -22.81712342509 13.5160 12.4248 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.835#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 157265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:19.23 -24:58:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 120903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:27.47 -23:17:13.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154006_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 154006_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:01.74 -24:34:59.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.684 6046872155255386240 252.25718404368 -24.58388196843 12.2461 11.0996 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.684#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:35.04 -28:33:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73856_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 73856_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:19.02 -26:34:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71997_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 71997_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:49.88 -26:39:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:17.43 -27:12:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:32.17 -28:07:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:01.79 -23:25:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 164807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:01.77 -23:23:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154362_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 154362_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:25.44 -22:10:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154105_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 154105_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:13.92 -22:20:26.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.62)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18902_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 18902_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:01.06 -29:38:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154049_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 154049_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:49.65 -22:37:56.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:47.08 -29:29:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.14 -25:10:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:49.28 -30:04:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118291_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 118291_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:46.97 -24:44:59.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.92 -27:23:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:11.01 -25:14:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:03.16 -29:43:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 127742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:48.73 -23:36:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:02.55 -29:28:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 43863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:57.49 -28:23:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33974_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 33974_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:08.63 -28:59:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119632_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 119632_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:35.51 -23:14:40.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155921_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239
The candidate 155921_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_03-19-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0239 did not pass the final checks
