This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J124.4664+38.7875,2461140.7954,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J124.4664+38.7875 20260410.2954 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7954,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2954 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7954,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2954 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
First image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Last image: 2461140.79703339 10.04.2026 07:07:33.685 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10206
Objects passed selection criteria: 10191
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8891.25
Average stars matched: 8650.75 (97.2951 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 02:09:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
First image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Last image: 2461140.79703339 10.04.2026 07:07:33.685 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57544
Objects passed selection criteria: 57390
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51991.5
Average stars matched: 50076 (96.3157 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 155012 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 02:10:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.79385446
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:43.955 +38:01:29.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0309 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:44.213 +38:01:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:43:43.955 +38:01:29.77
Second-epoch second image center 08:43:44.213 +38:01:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00233 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uh2mxvyQel
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ATnWCGdcjF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uq9zdjOZPP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SDt9iQDjtx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10321 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 119.9860 to 141.1683 deg, Dec +32.0300 to +43.3754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 119.9860 to 141.1683 deg, Dec 32.0300 to 43.3754 deg
Loaded 6986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4957 out of 5292 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5292 out of 10321 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.911564
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.911564
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.1 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
15.4 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Uh2mxvyQel (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=776, passed=10321
Got 10321 stars (including 9534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ATnWCGdcjF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=799, passed=10235
Got 10235 stars (including 9422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uq9zdjOZPP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, passed=7551
Got 7551 stars (including 7033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SDt9iQDjtx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=7678
Got 7678 stars (including 7135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7678 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20468.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20468_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 20468_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:02.81 +42:25:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.906 916514276863962624 129.26167347930 +42.43180513674 11.5696 11.1835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.906#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20638_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 20638_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:46.96 +40:07:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09197_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 09197_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:47.71 +42:09:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lyn-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:43.955 +38:01:29.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0309 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:44.213 +38:01:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:43:43.955 +38:01:29.77
Second-epoch second image center 08:43:44.213 +38:01:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00233 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZnGggrdL15
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.imjwVWP1R3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bVaYbs4LWc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wr14byNeLt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 58327 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 119.9105 to 141.2591 deg, Dec +31.9813 to +43.3876 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 119.9105 to 141.2591 deg, Dec 31.9813 to 43.3876 deg
Loaded 7080 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4555 out of 5331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5331 out of 58327 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 108 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.0 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
2.0 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
15.6 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZnGggrdL15 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3509, passed=58308
Got 58308 stars (including 54702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.imjwVWP1R3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=3533, passed=58654
Got 58654 stars (including 55027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58654 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bVaYbs4LWc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2185, passed=44235
Got 44235 stars (including 41979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wr14byNeLt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=2052, passed=48226
Got 48226 stars (including 46088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48226 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-02-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_020835_TTUQ1b1x1_7865_doyUk3XB/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72754.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72755.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72763.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74013.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74162.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74259.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74319.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74395.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74597.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74612.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74626.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74697.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74728.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74819.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74853.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75172.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75178.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75211.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74271.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74358.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75022.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72754_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72754_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:33.93 +42:22:56.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.821 816880587604243712 138.14078865600 +42.38201650362 14.4144 13.8856 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72755_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72755_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:58:06.17 +38:02:22.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72756_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72756_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:09.34 +38:15:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72760_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72760_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:36.50 +38:21:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72763_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72763_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:08.42 +40:06:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.857 911777271533780864 128.53512138977 +40.11409616582 14.1886 13.7152 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.857#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72765_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72765_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72910_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72910_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72922_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72922_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72994_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 72994_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73047_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73047_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73056_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73056_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73064_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73064_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73083_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73083_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73128_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73128_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73155_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73155_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73200_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73200_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:30.81 +36:26:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73233_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73233_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73246_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73246_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73416_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73416_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73468_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73468_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73686_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73686_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73717_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73717_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73743_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73743_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73750_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73750_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73758_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73758_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:35.51 +36:53:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73794_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73794_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73797_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73797_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:29.15 +41:19:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73844_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73844_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:54:36.13 +40:09:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73851_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73851_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73905_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73905_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:01.83 +33:36:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73909_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73909_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:02:44.32 +35:34:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73916_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73916_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:52.37 +36:46:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73930_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73930_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:41.24 +42:04:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73956_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73956_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:38:16.10 +36:59:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73991_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 73991_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74013_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74013_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:04.10 +41:09:19.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.558 909693731359174272 123.76728923399 +41.15549423594 13.8186 13.2956 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.558#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74062_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74062_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:35.54 +38:27:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74064_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74064_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:16.05 +35:18:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74070_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74070_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74077_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74077_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74107_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74107_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:13.39 +38:54:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74118_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74118_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:23:53.65 +39:08:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74125_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74125_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74145_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74145_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:48.18 +36:08:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74149_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74149_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74162_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74162_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:33.37 +40:25:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.413 914612121748287872 125.63867979553 +40.42933329385 14.0088 13.3117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.413#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74190_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74190_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:26.94 +39:57:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74193_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74193_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:52.24 +39:24:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74229_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74229_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74246_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74246_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:51.26 +34:53:29.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.645 905866709339985920 122.21382992076 +34.89111814853 14.1241 13.7184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.645#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74257_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74257_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:16.91 +40:35:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74259_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74259_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:17.97 +33:56:54.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.786 903102846345525888 126.32543857942 +33.94855448775 13.9911 13.3111 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.786#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74271_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
Preparing report for the candidate 74271_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74287_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74287_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:34.28 +42:03:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74289_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74289_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74295_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74295_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:09.82 +38:17:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74319_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74319_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:42.01 +36:37:06.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.788 906275452787562624 122.67480006895 +36.61809845741 14.0141 13.5568 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.788#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74358_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
Preparing report for the candidate 74358_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74369_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74369_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:51.90 +36:23:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74380_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74380_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:27.22 +39:21:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74395_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74395_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:16.02 +38:32:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.486 908361741741808000 124.81751335350 +38.53759744869 14.5301 14.0173 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.486#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74401_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74401_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74419_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74419_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:10.82 +37:44:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74434_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74434_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:55:33.93 +41:40:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74440_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74440_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:56:20.63 +41:25:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74442_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74442_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74524_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74524_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:02.68 +35:24:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74553_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74553_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74567_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74567_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74597_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74597_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:20.85 +35:50:37.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.675 904662469230072448 126.58643170992 +35.84353783893 14.5389 13.9451 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.675#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74612_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74612_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:21.43 +36:31:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.716 906268855717802880 122.58977438752 +36.52141768844 14.3662 13.8435 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.716#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74618_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74618_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:51:02.13 +40:57:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74626_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74626_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:16.73 +33:46:51.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.768 710415117205865216 130.81952868489 +33.78036552791 14.2107 13.6576 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.768#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74656_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74656_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74673_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74673_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74697_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74697_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:51:44.10 +36:32:00.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.620 717902894470354304 132.93371177032 +36.53333048694 14.4774 13.9004 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.620#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74728_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74728_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:38:22.30 +37:00:19.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.297 909944213852291968 129.59321913675 +37.00506612754 14.5033 13.9458 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.297#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74737_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74737_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:23:54.80 +39:12:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74805_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74805_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74815_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74815_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74816_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74816_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74818_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74818_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74819_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74819_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:00.86 +34:46:33.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.350 903249528068497536 127.25344010170 +34.77638393405 14.5980 14.0146 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.350#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74853_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74853_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:12.76 +42:01:51.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.740 921813029557203456 122.80389768111 +42.03032758709 14.5219 13.5925 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.740#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74896_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74896_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74937_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74937_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74968_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74968_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74973_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 74973_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75021_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75021_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75022_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
Preparing report for the candidate 75022_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75042_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75042_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75081_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75081_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75139_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75139_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75154_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75154_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75160_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75160_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75161_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75161_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75172_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75172_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:51:24.28 +42:12:43.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.016 912949488368776192 132.85144990757 +42.21181106636 15.2591 14.7935 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.016#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75177_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75177_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75178_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75178_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:09.31 +37:58:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.378 910939100076029056 127.78910414355 +37.97007061076 15.1420 14.5859 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.378#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75182_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75182_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75186_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75186_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75211_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75211_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:38:16.88 +43:05:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.308 916694871648850176 129.57037510972 +43.09086026257 14.9613 14.2102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.308#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75248_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75248_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75274_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 75274_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44662_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 44662_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:47.70 +42:09:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 52435_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:46.98 +40:07:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15712_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 15712_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:31.47 +35:24:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48639_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152
The candidate 48639_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-07-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0152 did not pass the final checks