This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461140.7639,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260410.2639 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0517 Aur,2461140.7639,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0517 Aur 20260410.2639 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.74878402 21.01.2026 05:58:04.939 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
First image: 2461061.74878402 21.01.2026 05:58:04.939 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Last image: 2461140.76423435 10.04.2026 06:20:19.848 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15256
Objects passed selection criteria: 15237
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13180
Average stars matched: 12940.2 (98.181 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 01:24:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.74878402 21.01.2026 05:58:04.939 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
First image: 2461061.74878402 21.01.2026 05:58:04.939 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Last image: 2461140.76423435 10.04.2026 06:20:19.848 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 72
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 92396
Objects passed selection criteria: 92241
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 79928.8
Average stars matched: 77755 (97.2804 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1872876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 01:25:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.76358353
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:03:32.164 +53:59:57.77
Second-epoch image center 07:04:03.307 +53:58:53.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:03:32.164 +53:59:57.77
Second-epoch image center 07:04:05.562 +53:58:55.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0836 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:04:03.307 +53:58:53.31
Second-epoch second image center 07:04:05.562 +53:58:55.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZP7XkNwxoP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KZC0MaCWke
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XjbUzjYsws
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0v9LhktZPh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 91.3130 to 121.2908 deg, Dec +47.7376 to +59.3600 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 91.3130 to 121.2908 deg, Dec 47.7376 to 59.3600 deg
Loaded 10799 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7179 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 16224 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930979
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930979
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.1 pix Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
3.0 pix fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
3.0 pix fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.4 mag. Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZP7XkNwxoP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1235, passed=16224
Got 16224 stars (including 14963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16224 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KZC0MaCWke (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1255, passed=16194
Got 16194 stars (including 14916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XjbUzjYsws (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, passed=10338
Got 10338 stars (including 9612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0v9LhktZPh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=729, passed=10287
Got 10287 stars (including 9550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20938_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 20938_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:05.08 +51:46:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13357_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 13357_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:02.56 +50:29:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01384_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 01384_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:49.83 +57:11:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lyn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:03:32.164 +53:59:57.77
Second-epoch image center 07:04:03.307 +53:58:53.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:03:32.164 +53:59:57.77
Second-epoch image center 07:04:05.562 +53:58:55.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0836 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:04:03.307 +53:58:53.31
Second-epoch second image center 07:04:05.562 +53:58:55.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uqBjpsBDPs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AdEJo1f6TK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vHgoOPIrYR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ue41gfQQVy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 100224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 91.2717 to 121.2915 deg, Dec +47.6901 to +59.3673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 91.2717 to 121.2915 deg, Dec 47.6901 to 59.3673 deg
Loaded 10865 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6357 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 100224 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.807343
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.807343
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.0 pix Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.5 mag. Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uqBjpsBDPs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=8010, passed=100214
Got 100214 stars (including 92046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AdEJo1f6TK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=7948, passed=100328
Got 100328 stars (including 92219 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vHgoOPIrYR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=4857, passed=61081
Got 61081 stars (including 56133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ue41gfQQVy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=4717, passed=60814
Got 60814 stars (including 55978 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_23-58-47_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-19-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_012120_TTUQ1b1x1_7951_h4K4X7GD/wcs_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118308.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118324.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118336.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118344.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118347.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118357.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118386.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out118388.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out118375.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118345.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69081.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118308_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118308_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:40.03 +49:02:23.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.047 979065527728997760 104.91763794052 +49.04078330683 15.1228 14.5950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.047#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118313_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118313_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118319_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118319_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:00.35 +50:18:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118324_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118324_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:05.71 +49:28:06.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.022 981954425810498560 116.02238024240 +49.46916573536 13.8790 13.3419 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.022#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118326_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118326_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:43.79 +55:53:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118336_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118336_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:35.15 +50:03:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.278 967976952962670848 098.64547180973 +50.06679305246 14.5191 13.9376 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.278#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118341_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118341_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:08.99 +48:50:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118344_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118344_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:11.31 +54:23:08.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118345_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 118345_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118347_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118347_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:45.82 +50:58:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.440 992235787244247552 098.44068618075 +50.97290488735 14.1641 13.6676 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.440#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118349_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118349_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:19.90 +51:40:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118352_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118352_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.48 +49:03:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118357_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118357_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:08.66 +51:02:37.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.757 992090514270490752 099.53665736922 +51.04342154205 13.8357 13.2946 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.757#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118359_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118359_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:33.22 +48:54:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118361_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118361_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:34.18 +52:25:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118362_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118362_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:27.23 +57:57:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118364_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118364_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:55.68 +52:42:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118367_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118367_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:22.20 +50:25:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118369_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118369_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:22.99 +58:57:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118370_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118370_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:54.77 +50:54:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118375_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118375_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:41.68 +49:51:44.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.30)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118381_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118381_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:19.90 +49:21:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118383_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118383_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:05.60 +51:16:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118385_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118385_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:03.67 +48:56:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118386_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118386_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:58.54 +55:40:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.904 997165993086872064 093.49354354964 +55.67280738851 12.5444 12.0697 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.904#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118388_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118388_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:09.76 +57:02:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.021 998262794592645248 098.04118765071 +57.03615081118 10.8634 10.3840 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.021#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118397_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118397_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118413_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118413_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118420_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118420_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118422_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118422_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118431_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118431_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118432_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118432_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118462_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118462_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118473_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118473_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118483_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118483_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:27.84 +52:59:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118497_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118497_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.76 +49:06:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118506_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118506_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118511_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118511_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:30.75 +52:47:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118534_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118534_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118536_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118536_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118540_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118540_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:28.95 +51:40:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118546_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118546_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118551_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118551_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:48.73 +58:14:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118557_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118557_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:55.38 +58:10:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118567_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118567_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:10.26 +56:43:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118582_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118582_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:45.98 +57:54:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118586_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118586_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118592_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118592_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118596_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118596_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118607_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118607_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:03.37 +52:27:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118612_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118612_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:39.61 +57:07:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118621_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118621_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118652_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118652_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118655_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118655_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118657_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118657_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118664_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118664_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118667_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118667_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118678_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118678_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118686_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118686_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118694_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118694_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118700_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 118700_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69081_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 69081_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81406_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81406_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:36.36 +50:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16720_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 16720_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:49.17 +57:15:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81677_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81677_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:02.56 +50:29:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07703_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 07703_fd_Lyn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-20-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks