This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7480,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2480 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7480,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2480 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7480,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2480 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7480,14.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2480 14.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461140.7480,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260410.2480 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461140.74843887 10.04.2026 05:57:35.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14275
Objects passed selection criteria: 14257
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12706.5
Average stars matched: 12355.2 (97.2357 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 00:59:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461140.74843887 10.04.2026 05:57:35.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90834
Objects passed selection criteria: 90594
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82986.8
Average stars matched: 79889.2 (96.2675 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1882000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 01:01:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.74751230
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.373 +30:00:00.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0021 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.937 +30:00:02.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:00.373 +30:00:00.31
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:57.937 +30:00:02.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00881 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4SgUzeL71c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iUra2PHXrg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hd70TX1ZUr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rWgI8EWk3v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4SgUzeL71c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iUra2PHXrg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hd70TX1ZUr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=774, passed=11245
Got 11245 stars (including 10457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rWgI8EWk3v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=766, passed=11160
Got 11160 stars (including 10378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11160 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21271.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21299.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21216_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 21216_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:05.85 +29:16:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 21271_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:13.83 +29:14:55.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.147 878679184103246464 115.55765901807 +29.24888914211 12.3463 11.7805 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.147#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 21272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:16.33 +32:43:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21299_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 21299_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:49.72 +29:07:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.781 877149763429460480 119.20740831128 +29.12392235186 12.2731 11.8954 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.781#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.03 +29:09:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.98 +33:22:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.373 +30:00:00.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0021 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.937 +30:00:02.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:00.373 +30:00:00.31
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:57.937 +30:00:02.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00881 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xf1uz9ajCa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nIBCX4hCDJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.caAfvtSO3f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KBTqj9pDGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xf1uz9ajCa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nIBCX4hCDJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.caAfvtSO3f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4093, passed=74835
Got 74835 stars (including 70627 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74835 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KBTqj9pDGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=4136, passed=74668
Got 74668 stars (including 70418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74668 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-56-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_005835_TTUQ1b1x1_31321_MfHX5lQg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109320.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109321.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109322.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109333.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109337.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109342.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109368.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111525.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111620.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111654.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111657.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111763.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111774.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111797.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112148.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112163.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112191.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112242.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112270.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112295.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112337.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112498.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112546.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112805.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112868.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112884.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112947.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112975.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113105.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112471.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:07.19 +31:19:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:08.91 +34:41:48.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.151 882405295866752128 119.03671078605 +34.69642577436 15.1308 14.7732 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.151#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109321_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109321_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:31.27 +25:58:00.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.491 682670762344256256 122.38086877444 +25.96640347766 14.7501 14.2473 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.491#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:10.72 +31:45:46.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.454 880897418748844416 118.04454813406 +31.76238655308 15.0812 14.5643 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.454#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:05.86 +34:59:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109331_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109331_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109333_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109333_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:13.94 +34:41:10.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:12.73 +32:52:16.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.631 881349902143303040 119.30314735831 +32.87080580884 14.6940 14.2718 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.631#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109342_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109342_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:30.58 +32:41:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.696 881754556782266880 117.37754733218 +32.69145375339 14.7217 14.2464 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.696#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:04.54 +26:37:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:46.85 +28:36:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.729 873331473079821184 113.44516506100 +28.60069010481 14.2069 13.8743 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.729#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:53.14 +33:18:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:33.74 +25:30:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:21.38 +34:19:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:37.46 +34:30:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:46.78 +34:16:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109361_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109361_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:08.14 +30:48:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:40.66 +34:18:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109365_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109365_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:13.87 +29:33:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109366_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109366_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:16.42 +31:50:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109368_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109368_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:50.47 +26:39:14.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.812 683139974635246208 124.46016055709 +26.65413725614 13.3082 12.7357 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.812#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109806_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109806_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:23.77 +27:43:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109966_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109966_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:52.92 +33:08:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109989_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 109989_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:37.12 +32:14:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110228_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 110228_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.79 +31:51:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110419_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 110419_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:30.08 +35:02:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110460_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 110460_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110611_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 110611_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.36 +25:02:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110679_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 110679_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:32.71 +32:29:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110718_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 110718_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:20.22 +32:28:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 110811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:17.71 +29:14:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111001_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111001_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:53.00 +31:03:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111071_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111071_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.19 +30:58:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111091_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111091_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:33.79 +30:50:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111269_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111269_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:11.12 +31:36:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111276_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111276_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:33.94 +27:31:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111378_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111378_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:22.05 +26:35:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111396_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111396_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:29.48 +30:45:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111398_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111398_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:12.41 +32:59:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111427_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111427_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.24 +31:15:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111490_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111490_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.23 +31:46:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111525_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111525_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:36.68 +34:05:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.602 894147221059208448 116.40303338796 +34.09289436652 14.2566 13.8287 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.69 +30:36:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111566_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111566_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:21.03 +29:53:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111620_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111620_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:09.42 +32:59:16.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.960 881785617985566720 117.78866185672 +32.98825824039 14.2387 13.7756 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.960#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111634_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111634_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:03.42 +34:00:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111649_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111649_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.61 +32:11:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111654_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111654_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:46.46 +31:22:41.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111656_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111656_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:52.18 +33:13:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111657_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111657_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:47.40 +29:01:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.985 684428022444098048 123.69696264421 +29.02237225222 14.2376 13.4722 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.985#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111660_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111660_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.60 +25:44:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111763_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111763_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:25.92 +25:37:37.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.430 868793788592032256 115.85813241014 +25.62715979899 14.1943 13.7522 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.430#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111767_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111767_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:58.66 +32:57:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111774_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111774_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:36.10 +28:26:46.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.904 873446268965282688 111.90127459097 +28.44604731333 14.3511 13.9113 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.904#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111797_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111797_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:27.64 +32:17:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.222 892566020259012864 113.36420067264 +32.28985622340 14.4315 13.8633 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.222#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111851_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111851_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:29.74 +27:51:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111895_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111895_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:34.52 +26:10:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111903_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111903_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:54.03 +33:54:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:24.17 +34:11:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111953_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 111953_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:37.86 +28:46:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112080_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112080_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:21.62 +33:13:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112087_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112087_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:43.19 +30:12:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112145_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112145_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:08.78 +34:39:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112148_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112148_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:34.22 +32:16:53.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.961 880975930750876672 117.89290488787 +32.28094460521 14.5215 13.9212 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112161_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112161_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:44.34 +32:43:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112163_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112163_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:46.34 +32:01:41.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.215 877919254065971712 121.69376868459 +32.02810326375 14.5812 14.0301 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.215#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112191_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112191_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:07.08 +33:14:10.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.819 881993941079781888 116.02937909621 +33.23604628742 14.6205 14.1528 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.819#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112242_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112242_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:34.68 +32:28:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.584 902010893860570752 122.89399745211 +32.47408977581 14.7886 14.0026 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.584#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112252_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112252_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:51.64 +33:09:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112270_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112270_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:37.84 +25:23:07.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.115 873841337238842624 118.90670177518 +25.38610069014 14.6545 14.0216 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.115#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112295_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112295_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:13.56 +29:28:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.201 707691798702348416 128.30526652542 +29.46954315423 14.8323 14.3692 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.201#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112302_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 112302_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:29.73 +35:07:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.87 +29:07:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:13.08 +31:55:27.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.795 881046746172481408 119.55415284779 +31.92361489732 14.8178 14.3306 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.795#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112471_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 112471_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112498_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112498_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:46.02 +30:39:08.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.398 900809883565360768 123.19177383773 +30.65169520567 14.5888 13.9923 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.398#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112546_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112546_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:12.32 +32:48:10.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.142 892472836647558656 114.80125881980 +32.80243595346 14.6184 14.1479 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.142#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112717_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112717_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:57.00 +28:28:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112805_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112805_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:29.40 +29:14:18.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.679 704671921297650176 128.62266605466 +29.23808459675 14.9077 14.4407 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.679#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112868_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112868_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:25.79 +33:14:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.247 902997224509909376 126.35768891105 +33.24482293220 15.2331 14.7748 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.247#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112884_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112884_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:04.12 +33:03:00.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.194 881830285645469056 117.51714531463 +33.04961292575 14.7104 13.7704 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.194#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112930_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112930_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:10.01 +25:16:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112947_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112947_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:58.36 +32:12:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.991 709240048512560000 126.99364233313 +32.20212060610 14.8166 14.0497 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.991#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112975_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 112975_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:15.66 +27:16:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.384 874484826418272000 120.06423739465 +27.28318812584 14.9738 14.3915 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.384#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113052_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 113052_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:10.41 +34:36:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.543 894539265673731968 117.04329174759 +34.60728219481 14.5724 13.5074 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113056_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 113056_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113105_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 113105_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:56.44 +33:11:05.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.345 901543429619658624 125.98528045417 +33.18475963087 15.0169 14.4214 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.345#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113170_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 113170_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:26.57 +31:22:29.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.170 708977471392149760 127.11112583887 +31.37445821251 15.1212 14.6616 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.170#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.99 +33:22:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_00-57-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks