This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 10 12 21.37 +15 36 49.8 11.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 09 41 47.00 +11 28 57.2 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461140.7455,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260410.2455 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 09 49 01.60 +16 19 36.5 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 09 37 48.27 +17 01 60.0 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 10 06 51.15 +09 55 53.9 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 09 38 00.25 +16 42 42.3 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 10 13 37.87 +17 33 31.0 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,14.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 14.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.2455* 09 41 17.35 +10 22 19.2 15.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.7455,14.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.2455 14.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461140.74586684 10.04.2026 05:53:52.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5668
Objects passed selection criteria: 5664
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5440.25
Average stars matched: 5325.75 (97.8953 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 00:56:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461140.74586684 10.04.2026 05:53:52.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 56
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33248
Objects passed selection criteria: 33156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31642.2
Average stars matched: 30796 (97.3256 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 00:57:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.74517867
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:30.259 +14:00:44.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:30.901 +14:01:10.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0273 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:30.259 +14:00:44.74
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:30.901 +14:01:10.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00759 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aH7g7bsasn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OY1QTWyv4P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UTEqifkKnK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QImoDsVSkA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2659 deg
Loaded 4773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3901 out of 4125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4125 out of 7958 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.887154
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.887154
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.7 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aH7g7bsasn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=7958
Got 7958 stars (including 7414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OY1QTWyv4P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, passed=8039
Got 8039 stars (including 7496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UTEqifkKnK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=7239
Got 7239 stars (including 6840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QImoDsVSkA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=7302
Got 7302 stars (including 6899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20354.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 20354_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:12:21.37 +15:36:49.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:30.259 +14:00:44.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:30.901 +14:01:10.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0273 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:30.259 +14:00:44.74
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:30.901 +14:01:10.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00759 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XRnjVW8Qnx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NNMpbGDxdC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r6jVlWc2bO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QSRajUbsmw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec +8.6120 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec 8.6120 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3707 out of 4153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4153 out of 43775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.771580
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.771580
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XRnjVW8Qnx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1969, passed=43757
Got 43757 stars (including 41703 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NNMpbGDxdC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1988, passed=43712
Got 43712 stars (including 41658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r6jVlWc2bO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1761, passed=37860
Got 37860 stars (including 36059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37860 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QSRajUbsmw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1724, passed=37333
Got 37333 stars (including 35574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-52-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_005439_TTUQ2b1x1_13166_x7vTbUVP/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52266.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52524.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52527.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52530.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52549.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52528.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52448.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52266_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52266_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:47.63 +13:28:01.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.476 614608415603897600 146.19852502074 +13.46702356650 14.7543 14.2354 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.476#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52274_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52274_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:10.61 +13:46:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52275_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52275_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:28:36.13 +14:34:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52281_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52281_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52283_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52283_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:09.13 +09:48:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52285_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52285_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:01.96 +18:05:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52298_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:21.37 +15:36:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52332_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52340_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:25.85 +12:57:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52341_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:35.87 +17:28:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52352_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:00.86 +14:25:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52365_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52365_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52385_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:51.22 +17:15:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52389_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:04.44 +11:19:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52401_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:26.93 +16:46:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52403_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52403_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.53 +17:51:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52404_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52414_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:12.29 +16:27:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52433_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:14.12 +10:16:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52434_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:02.28 +17:34:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52443_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:59.76 +09:40:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52445_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52445_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:33:10.72 +15:43:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52448_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52469_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:27.07 +09:50:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52472_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:19.62 +15:12:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52476_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:34.33 +16:56:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52484_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:19.59 +17:28:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52491_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:35.38 +15:02:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52496_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52496_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:15.69 +12:26:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52514_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:17.28 +12:14:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52524_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:43.40 +14:18:37.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.991 617913581916882944 143.68106705034 +14.31034365741 15.1610 14.7047 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.991#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52527_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:10.20 +10:17:29.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.560 612632490129367936 147.04273064969 +10.29115875717 14.9558 14.3306 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.560#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52528_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:28.96 +16:21:44.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52530_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:29.71 +16:52:56.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.653 631285876693332096 142.37361662215 +16.88218026686 14.9209 14.2240 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.653#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52537_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52548_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125
The candidate 52549_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_00-53-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125 did not pass the final checks
