This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 5615941804236711296,2461140.6562,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 5615941804236711296 20260410.1562 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 5615843943401597824,2461140.6562,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 5615843943401597824 20260410.1562 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 5615838518864178048,2461140.6562,9.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 5615838518864178048 20260410.1562 9.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.58536956 20.03.2026 02:02:45.930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
First image: 2461119.58536956 20.03.2026 02:02:45.930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Last image: 2461140.65656418 10.04.2026 03:45:17.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24133
Objects passed selection criteria: 24103
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21859
Average stars matched: 21215.5 (97.0561 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 22:52:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.58536956 20.03.2026 02:02:45.930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
First image: 2461119.58536956 20.03.2026 02:02:45.930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Last image: 2461140.65656418 10.04.2026 03:45:17.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4353
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 207 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 176323
Objects passed selection criteria: 175915
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 164723
Average stars matched: 156016 (94.7143 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1980896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 22:58:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.65576050
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.277 -18:00:10.82
Second-epoch image center 07:06:42.584 -18:00:26.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.277 -18:00:10.82
Second-epoch image center 07:06:45.514 -18:00:27.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0212 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:42.584 -18:00:26.41
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:45.514 -18:00:27.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01161 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1mOvdoioCJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DrcIGg4eMJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6b8kIDndiE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZalCGzxD2g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits) and catalog (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat) found
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.1612 to 115.0502 deg, Dec -23.2829 to -12.5257 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.1612 to 115.0502 deg, Dec -23.2829 to -12.5257 deg
Loaded 26339 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16840 out of 17916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17916 out of 24825 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.889893
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.889893
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.6 pix CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.3 pix fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
2.3 pix fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.6 mag. CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
14.4 mag. fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
14.4 mag. fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1mOvdoioCJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2249, passed=24825
Got 24825 stars (including 22559 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DrcIGg4eMJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2223, passed=25041
Got 25041 stars (including 22804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6b8kIDndiE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1841, passed=19168
Got 19168 stars (including 17304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 922.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 922.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012811 (46.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010249 (36.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -12.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 602 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 628 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -12.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 693 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 673 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.51"
Excluding outliers - 672 stars left (next iteration limit 690)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZalCGzxD2g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1858, passed=19022
Got 19022 stars (including 17137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19022 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012868 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010294 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -11.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 666 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 624 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.89"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 619 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -11.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 692 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.13"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 664 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.53"
Excluding outliers - 664 stars left (next iteration limit 680)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field CMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31698.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31700.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31712.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31716.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31717.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31719.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31721.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31937.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32064.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32308.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32321.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32324.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32343.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32373.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31713.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32270.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31698_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31698_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:17.71 -20:32:26.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.685 5620182066524190464 113.07397502800 -20.54104666554 11.9884 11.7253 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.685#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31700_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31700_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:07.42 -21:33:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.368 5619820262782624896 111.03130442939 -21.55226959384 11.3609 10.4523 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.368#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31703_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31703_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:28.92 -21:48:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31704_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31704_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31705_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31705_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:14.44 -22:57:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31709_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31709_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:46.53 -13:35:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31710_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31710_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:27.67 -17:47:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31711_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31711_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:02.37 -13:22:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31712_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31712_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:39.63 -20:43:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.816 5620304563297166848 111.16535331513 -20.73278531267 11.2259 10.9549 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31713_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 31713_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31714_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31714_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:23.96 -15:05:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31715_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31715_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:03.63 -21:07:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31716_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31716_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:09.93 -15:26:47.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31717_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31717_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:50.24 -22:09:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.650 2928786204004243712 105.21042784803 -22.16444430385 10.7747 10.0984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.650#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31718_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31718_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:37.12 -15:06:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31719_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31719_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:19.77 -17:01:14.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.870 3027306191061315328 113.58291272513 -17.02065658549 10.9250 10.7015 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.870#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31720_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31720_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:11.43 -13:55:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31721_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31721_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:22.42 -18:34:07.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.905 5716720463045531520 113.59368035602 -18.56885921471 10.4071 9.4723 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.905#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31722_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31722_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:19.56 -16:29:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31723_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31723_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:18.42 -21:45:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31725_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31725_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:19.64 -22:37:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31748_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31748_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (251.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31765_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31765_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (254.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31783_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31783_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (270.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31813_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31813_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (266.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31821_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31821_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (231.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31833_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31833_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (288.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31846_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31846_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (270.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31854_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31854_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:26.62 -20:47:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31856_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31856_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:13.47 -23:02:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31882_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31882_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31895_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31895_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:52.02 -22:07:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31897_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.39 -22:18:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31901_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (231.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31928_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31928_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:31.72 -14:29:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31937_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31937_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:10.33 -20:13:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.520 2929870597348970496 110.29288954188 -20.22625485674 10.8114 10.7818 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.520#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31955_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31955_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (285.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31957_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31957_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (257.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31969_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31969_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:15.47 -22:45:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31987_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 31987_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:20.56 -21:53:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32008_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32008_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32021_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32021_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (249.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32028_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32028_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (242.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32037_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32037_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:12.20 -22:48:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32064_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32064_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:48.41 -14:25:26.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.083 3030163787424669312 112.95201868981 -14.42412728989 11.4187 11.2479 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.083#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32069_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32069_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:26.08 -20:36:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32074_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32074_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (226.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32078_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32078_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:51.75 -23:11:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32079_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32079_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:10.62 -23:03:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32119_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32119_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:46.34 -22:07:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32120_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32120_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (245.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32138_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32138_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (265.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32141_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32141_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:16.36 -13:56:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32161_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32161_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:42.65 -22:31:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32171_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32171_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:25.25 -21:58:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32179_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32179_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:09.15 -21:13:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32181_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:25.23 -22:21:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32183_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:04.92 -22:23:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32185_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (258.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32203_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32203_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:25.26 -15:26:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32206_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:01.77 -22:01:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32209_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32209_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32226_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32226_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32246_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32259_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32259_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (258.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32270_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 32270_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32274_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32274_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32289_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32289_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:02.70 -13:30:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32303_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32303_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:35.43 -16:59:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32308_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32308_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:09.46 -21:22:12.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.569 5620020889294782208 112.03957415960 -21.37010747930 11.7350 11.5613 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.569#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32314_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32314_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32321_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32321_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:42.80 -13:14:43.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.853 3032810724226732416 110.42886140532 -13.24547328732 11.8814 11.4519 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.853#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32324_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32324_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:32.76 -17:05:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.544 3027902573038584960 109.88716639890 -17.09916643655 11.7645 11.3561 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.544#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32338_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32338_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:17.58 -13:51:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32340_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32340_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:53.04 -13:00:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32343_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32343_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:09.71 -21:53:11.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.059 5619054418576341888 114.54102493087 -21.88680870673 11.8557 11.6492 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.059#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32353_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32353_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:41.19 -22:25:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32359_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32359_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (249.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32373_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
The candidate 32373_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:33.31 -22:25:13.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.003 5618215078889802496 109.88984119011 -22.41936619736 11.4208 10.4486 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.003#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00757_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 00757_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field CMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.277 -18:00:10.82
Second-epoch image center 07:06:42.584 -18:00:26.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.277 -18:00:10.82
Second-epoch image center 07:06:45.514 -18:00:27.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0212 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:42.584 -18:00:26.41
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:45.514 -18:00:27.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01161 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JWRZ9Goft4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X2QVYoQMya
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tn5SKNnhP7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CWKeVHsIuc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits) and catalog (wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat) found
'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 168330 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.1085 to 115.0669 deg, Dec -23.2855 to -12.5190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.1085 to 115.0669 deg, Dec -23.2855 to -12.5190 deg
Loaded 26459 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16791 out of 21694 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21694 out of 168330 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.693579
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.693579
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3890 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
ERROR Too many candidates before filtering (3890)... Skipping SE run (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JWRZ9Goft4 (5) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=22187, passed=168280
Got 168280 stars (including 145932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 168280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-02-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X2QVYoQMya (5) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=22583, passed=170230
Got 170230 stars (including 147481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 170230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_21-03-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Tn5SKNnhP7 (5) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=58, blended=19012, passed=162084
Got 162084 stars (including 142825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162084 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 922.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 922.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012811 (46.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010249 (36.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -12.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 589 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -12.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.80"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 632 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.62"
Excluding outliers - 632 stars left (next iteration limit 647)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-44-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CWKeVHsIuc (5) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=18994, passed=161752
Got 161752 stars (including 142512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 161752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012868 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010294 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -11.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 632 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 591 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 392 (Dec -23.6 to -11.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 658 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.94"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 628 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 113662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.57"
Excluding outliers - 628 stars left (next iteration limit 643)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_224620_TTUQ1b1x1_22804_aIgkvjlS/fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_22-45-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8
########### Completed CMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1
###################################################################################
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1 -- a known variable star
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8 -- a known variable star
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9 -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
3 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
07:37:32.71 -22:53:52.1
07:37:56.35 -22:52:28.8
07:38:31.44 -22:40:05.9
07:32:17.71 -20:32:26.2
07:24:07.42 -21:33:08.6
07:24:39.63 -20:43:58.3
07:33:09.93 -15:26:47.5
07:00:50.24 -22:09:51.9
07:34:19.77 -17:01:14.1
07:34:22.42 -18:34:07.8
07:21:10.33 -20:13:34.6
07:31:48.41 -14:25:26.9
07:28:09.46 -21:22:12.6
07:21:42.80 -13:14:43.8
07:19:32.76 -17:05:58.1
07:38:09.71 -21:53:11.7
07:19:33.31 -22:25:13.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461140.65576050 -observatory V36
23:38:04.71 -04:55:36.6 Mercury (0.2mag)
02:40:21.22 +15:32:43.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:01:12.96 -00:57:58.4 Mars (1.2mag)
07:10:09.59 +22:50:12.1 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:26:33.49 +00:32:33.5 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:46:29.84 +19:43:36.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:03.93 -00:20:16.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:28.02 -22:52:27.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:28:31.37 -26:01:45.9 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 9 22:52 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461140.65576050:
07:10:02.99 +22:50:23.6 Io (5.7mag)
07:10:17.86 +22:49:52.4 Europa (5.9mag)
07:10:08.61 +22:50:06.4 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:09:47.76 +22:51:02.6 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:13:44.20 +22:40:39.4 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:10:05.52 +22:50:20.4 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:13:47.64 +23:10:11.1 Elara (17.3mag)
07:08:38.59 +23:33:15.9 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:18:36.75 +22:47:36.5 Carme (18.5mag)
00:26:43.32 +00:32:24.2 Titan (8.8mag)
00:26:32.46 +00:32:49.6 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:26:25.08 +00:33:36.6 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:26:46.97 +00:32:22.1 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:28:14.87 +00:41:58.6 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 9 22:52 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461140.65576050:
15:09:56.73 -11:47:22.2 JWST
19:12:47.07 +14:42:31.2 Chandra
07:55:15.54 -35:48:53.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 9 22:52 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461140.65576050 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:49:18.90 -28:26:49.8 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:02:40.17 -69:56:45.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:31:15.86 +31:23:58.0 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:51.36 +09:50:58.5 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:08:34.72 +29:00:22.7 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:22:29.18 +25:52:37.4 15.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:21.08 +31:57:55.8 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:19.01 -00:47:09.5 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:54:57.55 +18:02:11.7 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:42:27.36 -11:36:21.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:10:33.78 -12:50:10.8 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:48:02.64 +62:34:37.0 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:23:48.82 -03:38:58.7 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:40:35.22 +85:07:09.0 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:15:34.35 +63:32:54.5 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:00:21.69 +16:12:18.4 10.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:22:52.54 +05:25:48.4 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:59.85 +13:42:41.0 14.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:21:11.21 -23:17:24.7 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:11:51.19 +46:46:40.1 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
14:03:05.02 +41:06:02.8 14.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:16:14.26 -25:19:23.7 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:06:40.30 +19:42:43.2 9.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:56:39.81 +02:38:55.8 17.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
02:29:47.08 +03:30:24.2 10.9mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:42:40.95 +36:05:16.5 14.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:31:32.39 -10:01:28.2 12.2mag 10P/Tempel
15:08:02.29 +03:46:38.7 13.5mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:04:29.07 -01:43:19.8 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
17:58:48.78 -09:50:00.0 17.8mag 40P/Vaisala
10:38:06.81 -04:35:15.3 16.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:39:38.72 +16:29:05.8 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:00:11.50 +38:15:19.1 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:21:31.37 -12:09:42.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:47:50.58 +19:11:49.4 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
00:52:42.87 +07:04:28.0 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels
22:45:03.22 -11:06:53.3 14.6mag 88P/Howell
01:54:02.02 +19:03:24.2 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:43:59.14 +31:57:49.3 16.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:21:50.36 +41:03:36.4 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:24:14.05 +13:42:42.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:36:06.20 +13:45:57.1 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
00:55:51.10 +11:07:57.4 10.9mag 141P/Machholz
01:05:29.61 +02:40:40.9 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
23:53:47.77 -01:09:39.1 13.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:35:12.16 +04:23:54.8 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:46:07.03 -04:27:13.6 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:29:51.55 +31:15:12.7 17.9mag 164P/Christensen
06:25:42.41 +24:25:20.8 17.9mag 198P/ODAS
15:01:48.18 -00:42:42.1 17.5mag 210P/Christensen
21:21:25.51 -12:51:43.1 17.5mag 218P/LINEAR
17:14:35.80 -14:37:25.7 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
05:21:58.38 +34:13:23.0 16.7mag 240P/NEAT
07:35:47.63 -05:49:09.7 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
15:44:45.05 +06:35:34.1 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:32:06.70 +21:20:24.1 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS
05:27:27.44 +45:22:33.6 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 9 22:52 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.22 -11:25:16.10 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.16 17.22
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 9 22:52 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Apr 9 22:52 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:18:48.927 -23:32:12.08 AT 2026ike 2026-02-12.51 20.2
08:47:41.490 -21:46:40.10 AT 2026ikd 2026-03-28.41 19.49
08:34:30.248 -07:09:24.85 AT 2026ikc 2026-03-29.44 19.28
13:21:25.078 +79:09:18.53 AT 2026ikb 2026-03-25.43 20.7322
09:05:18.124 -19:48:21.41 AT 2026ika 2026-03-09.36 20.58
08:38:25.468 +06:11:03.79 AT 2026ijz 2026-03-09.32 21.99
08:00:34.010 +04:48:18.04 AT 2026ijy 2026-03-09.31 21.07
09:02:07.082 +07:27:03.87 AT 2026ijx 2026-02-17.43 21.29
10:37:20.784 +30:59:50.95 AT 2026ijw 2026-03-10.33 20.2
16:00:37.915 +06:38:30.61 AT 2026ijv 2026-03-28.57 20.5
13:51:30.137 +25:53:04.17 AT 2026iju 2026-03-28.41 20.07
12:52:01.341 -19:06:48.80 AT 2026ijt 2026-01-28.59 20.22
11:38:25.995 -11:34:40.48 AT 2026ijs 2026-01-16.56 21.1
07:12:41.661 +56:25:20.59 AT 2026ijr 2026-01-19.40 20.76
09:34:48.813 +06:57:40.76 AT 2026ijq 2026-01-26.43 21.57
10:49:59.384 +25:17:19.22 AT 2026ijp 2026-04-04.17 19.836
08:20:22.449 +03:44:22.06 AT 2026ijo 2026-04-02.18 19.8276
06:41:34.987 -19:08:36.17 AT 2026ijn 2026-02-05.26 20.38
12:35:13.975 +41:45:24.96 AT 2026ijm 2026-04-02.31 19.9925
13:25:11.624 +08:21:44.99 AT 2026ijl 2026-03-27.40 20.8103
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 9 22:52 tns_transients_list.txt