This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 04 50 03.41 +25 52 23.0 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461140.6491,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260410.1491 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 04 47 46.79 +26 42 19.9 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J071.9381+26.7005,2461140.6491,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J071.9381+26.7005 20260410.1491 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 05 28 02.33 +26 14 05.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.6491,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.1491 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 04 45 15.49 +27 17 26.1 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.6491,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.1491 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J081.1693+29.2196,2461140.6491,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J081.1693+29.2196 20260410.1491 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 10.1491 2461140.6491 13.79 05:25:14.66 +30:10:31.1
176.56328 -3.06030 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 3446585056020271488 | 05:25:17.72 +30:10:47.7 (Gaia DR3) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification)
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 3446585056020271488,2461140.6491,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 3446585056020271488 20260410.1491 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 157415224323004416,2461140.6491,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 157415224323004416 20260410.1491 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.6491,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.1491 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0456183+330349,2461140.6491,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0456183+330349 20260410.1491 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GSC 02378-00295,2461140.6491,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GSC 02378-00295 20260410.1491 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044138.29+324246.0,2461140.6491,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044138.29+324246.0 20260410.1491 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6852082,2461140.6491,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6852082 20260410.1491 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 04 43 41.89 +26 52 54.4 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461140.6491,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260410.1491 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 05 06 08.07 +27 03 21.2 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.6491,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.1491 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0459206+291419,2461140.6491,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0459206+291419 20260410.1491 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0452498+323909,2461140.6491,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0452498+323909 20260410.1491 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 10.1491* 04 43 05.20 +26 18 25.6 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461140.6491,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260410.1491 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0459534+335905,2461140.6491,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0459534+335905 20260410.1491 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461140.64937293 10.04.2026 03:34:55.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 23
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12867
Objects passed selection criteria: 12843
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11545.8
Average stars matched: 11239.2 (97.3453 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118864 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 22:37:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461140.64937293 10.04.2026 03:34:55.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 177
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 109228
Objects passed selection criteria: 108972
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90180
Average stars matched: 86828 (96.283 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1945956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 22:39:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.64875572
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:44.892 +29:58:17.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:47.637 +29:58:44.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:44.892 +29:58:17.03
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:47.637 +29:58:44.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01247 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8U7sNvRV71
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NV7DyGHzn3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pLgLQXokhj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6SmBTUFGV5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8U7sNvRV71 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NV7DyGHzn3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pLgLQXokhj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=812, passed=10599
Got 10599 stars (including 9776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10599 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6SmBTUFGV5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=796, passed=10571
Got 10571 stars (including 9769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21035.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21050.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21132.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out21161.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20997_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 20997_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:08.00 +25:59:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21035_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21035_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:24.80 +25:54:50.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.994 148290038022339584 070.35302909075 +25.91340740061 9.8259 8.7659 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.994#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21050_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21050_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:20.07 +25:51:48.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.979 148274984161340032 070.58304763797 +25.86340356733 10.4247 9.6595 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.979#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21084_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21084_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:49.74 +25:34:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21132_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21132_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:33.48 +25:47:55.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.485 148272342757208192 070.63888597603 +25.79784407311 11.1754 10.0786 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.485#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21161_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21161_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:05.77 +32:13:55.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.19)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21167_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21167_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.29 +32:19:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21175_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21175_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:33.96 +33:34:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02594_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 02594_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.86 +33:57:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.10 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 06467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.44 +32:09:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.36 +30:55:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.33 +26:08:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:44.892 +29:58:17.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:47.637 +29:58:44.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:44.892 +29:58:17.03
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:47.637 +29:58:44.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01247 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vLyp1sp39o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DzVUVoZqub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cy8rcTj5cL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vdwLxMD2Ox
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 95 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vLyp1sp39o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DzVUVoZqub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cy8rcTj5cL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6241, passed=66710
Got 66710 stars (including 60390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vdwLxMD2Ox (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=6247, passed=65966
Got 65966 stars (including 59652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65966 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_223539_TTUQ2b1x1_17884_qAlX74QE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113040.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out149392.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159392.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159395.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159396.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159400.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159415.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159421.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159423.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159425.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159478.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159538.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159582.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159700.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159883.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159891.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159927.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160013.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160160.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160222.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160302.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160360.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160494.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160538.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21685.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108162.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114755.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159385.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160441.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31125.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35002.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94638.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159385_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 159385_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159387_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159387_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:16.68 +26:30:05.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159392_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159392_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:11.26 +26:13:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.139 148310550786189568 071.04740417521 +26.23173649654 13.7245 12.9321 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.139#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159395_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159395_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:34.32 +26:51:42.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.978 154398581029768448 072.64453287822 +26.86201081014 13.7629 12.7204 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.978#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159396_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159396_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:14.29 +29:49:31.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.81)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159400_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159400_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:13.49 +28:25:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.981 154802338018772096 071.55568050408 +28.43160114498 13.5103 12.6779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.981#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159402_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 159402_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159406_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159406_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159411_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159411_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:37.59 +32:42:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159415_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159415_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:36.39 +32:03:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.800 180612926807635584 079.40179383630 +32.05435786043 14.1379 13.6128 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.800#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159421_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159421_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:08.54 +33:13:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.945 3449080706897856128 083.03527219342 +33.22122924001 14.0827 13.5655 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.945#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159423_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159423_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:42.39 +26:16:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.745 148325565991790464 070.67682500487 +26.28215899023 12.7560 11.8323 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.745#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159425_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159425_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:31.38 +27:19:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.491 154483891963690752 071.88150830893 +27.32658029912 12.7819 11.9373 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.491#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159427_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159427_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:22.19 +33:12:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159429_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159429_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:38.13 +27:29:49.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.349 154641744898025728 070.90865698067 +27.49662354654 10.6385 9.7292 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.349#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159478_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159478_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:24.81 +25:54:50.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.064 148290038022339584 070.35302909075 +25.91340740061 9.8259 8.7659 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.064#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159533_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159533_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:49.71 +25:34:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159538_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159538_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:06.04 +25:40:39.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.772 148223414489186688 071.02482297558 +25.67728411255 10.9474 9.9307 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.772#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159582_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159582_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:33.42 +25:47:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.204 148272342757208192 070.63888597603 +25.79784407311 11.1754 10.0786 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.204#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159608_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 159608_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159618_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159618_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.61 +32:42:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159641_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159641_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.65 +32:33:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159700_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159700_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:44.59 +25:36:19.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.485 148219939860481920 070.68574837714 +25.60506169542 11.8266 10.7951 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.485#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159705_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159705_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.14 +32:26:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159711_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159711_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:02.98 +25:39:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159758_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159758_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.58 +30:29:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159760_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 159760_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159762_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159762_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.27 +33:11:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159843_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159843_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.93 +28:31:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159863_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159863_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:49.09 +33:17:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159883_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159883_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:16.12 +25:52:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.241 148286808206930560 070.56727146853 +25.87989078132 12.4727 11.5653 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.241#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159891_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159891_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:54.73 +26:05:36.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.274 148296768235457920 070.72745736405 +26.09259064767 12.3236 11.1159 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.274#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:09.91 +33:08:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159898_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159898_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.85 +29:10:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159901_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159901_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.81 +33:11:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159915_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159915_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:08.86 +33:24:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159919_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159919_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:11.15 +25:55:15.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.471 148254922369816320 071.04624294429 +25.92028595483 12.3581 11.1106 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.471#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159927_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159927_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:54.00 +25:44:20.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.475 148269486603204992 070.72490073025 +25.73831833290 12.4875 11.3910 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.475#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159944_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 159944_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.44 +26:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160013_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160013_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:28.13 +25:48:39.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160045_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160045_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:41.08 +33:56:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160071_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 160071_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160106_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160106_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.22 +32:25:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160128_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160128_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.84 +29:47:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160144_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160144_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.62 +30:49:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160150_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160150_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:08.11 +32:35:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160156_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160156_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.66 +30:48:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160160_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160160_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:57.60 +25:53:19.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.305 148280211137280768 070.73952755159 +25.88821546920 13.0652 12.0241 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.305#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160195_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160195_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.64 +29:45:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160197_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160197_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:28.94 +29:54:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160214_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160214_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.87 +33:23:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160216_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 160216_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160219_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160219_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:31.19 +33:17:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.504 3449047274872370048 082.38028307864 +33.29741824540 13.1881 11.9643 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.504#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160222_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160222_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:53.46 +30:38:10.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.921 180178898887590656 078.72397415126 +30.63717704280 13.6575 12.8147 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.921#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160224_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160224_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.10 +31:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160240_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160240_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:52.98 +30:28:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160302_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160302_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.47 +33:19:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.320 181125574102514560 079.39470514612 +33.31907838200 13.8360 12.9389 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.320#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160330_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160330_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:02.98 +26:31:51.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.827 148531754485966848 070.51209233090 +26.52994956973 13.3203 12.5573 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.827#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160358_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160358_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:24.78 +29:23:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160360_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160360_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:33.18 +25:53:47.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.413 148275465197675776 070.63781654571 +25.89653738360 13.3124 12.3727 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.413#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160373_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160373_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.81 +32:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160388_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 160388_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160441_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 160441_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:33.82 +32:17:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160483_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160483_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.03 +31:01:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160494_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160494_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:58.15 +26:00:46.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.602 148291648634444160 070.49172352802 +26.01205609091 12.9700 11.6273 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160499_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160499_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:03.29 +33:20:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160538_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160538_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:59.89 +26:06:47.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.391 148299177712852992 070.49920658146 +26.11329788978 13.6035 12.7496 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.391#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160583_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 160583_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.24 +28:14:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21685_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 21685_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:22.97 +33:51:24.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35002_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 35002_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31125_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 31125_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40673_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 40673_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36623_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 36623_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113040_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 113040_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:28.02 +25:53:05.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.647 153297145255977728 073.86651019217 +25.88344957951 13.0645 12.0494 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.647#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111858_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 111858_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:28.75 +26:19:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18929_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 18929_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.83 +33:57:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.25 +32:53:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108162_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 108162_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.36 +30:55:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.45 +32:09:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.30 +26:08:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94638_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 94638_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.71 +33:55:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41738_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 41738_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.10 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150397_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 150397_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:55.93 +30:38:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 114755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:58.04 +31:19:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16691_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 16691_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.29 +33:55:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149392_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 149392_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:57.44 +26:31:12.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.771 154291511788342144 071.98977839842 +26.51979474095 12.7408 11.7678 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.771#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149078_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 149078_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:28.03 +27:36:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19673_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 19673_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148709_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 148709_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_22-34-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
