This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.4632* 09 52 59.86 +61 39 13.8 13.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.9632,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.4632 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.4632* 09 25 33.50 +57 09 58.5 12.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J141.3826+57.1678,2461139.9632,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J141.3826+57.1678 20260409.4632 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.80465266 12.02.2026 07:18:31.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
First image: 2461083.80465266 12.02.2026 07:18:31.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Last image: 2461139.96355874 09.04.2026 11:07:21.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7957
Objects passed selection criteria: 7929
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6067.25
Average stars matched: 5870 (96.7489 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 06:13:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.80465266 12.02.2026 07:18:31.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
First image: 2461083.80465266 12.02.2026 07:18:31.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Last image: 2461139.96355874 09.04.2026 11:07:21.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42469
Objects passed selection criteria: 42356
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34884.5
Average stars matched: 33471.2 (95.9488 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 06:14:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.96282147
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:01.501 +61:59:55.06
Second-epoch image center 10:16:48.852 +61:59:39.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0251 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:01.501 +61:59:55.06
Second-epoch image center 10:16:46.564 +61:59:37.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:16:48.852 +61:59:39.88
Second-epoch second image center 10:16:46.564 +61:59:37.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00453 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HmQ8nAjGQl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AI1zU608Dz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6tz78JqnWT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s1fQB8X83U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1814 to 172.7537 deg, Dec +55.2233 to +67.4954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1814 to 172.7537 deg, Dec 55.2233 to 67.4954 deg
Loaded 7313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4374 out of 4626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4626 out of 8063 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.0 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HmQ8nAjGQl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=579, passed=8063
Got 8063 stars (including 7472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AI1zU608Dz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, passed=8067
Got 8067 stars (including 7471 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6tz78JqnWT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, passed=4237
Got 4237 stars (including 3882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s1fQB8X83U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=4111
Got 4111 stars (including 3787 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:01.501 +61:59:55.06
Second-epoch image center 10:16:48.852 +61:59:39.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0251 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:01.501 +61:59:55.06
Second-epoch image center 10:16:46.564 +61:59:37.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:16:48.852 +61:59:39.88
Second-epoch second image center 10:16:46.564 +61:59:37.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00453 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uArxnnCzZz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4b6vxCi82L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iAMNEbxOEO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pg7IajfeCg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43866 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1814 to 172.7853 deg, Dec +55.2077 to +67.4954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1814 to 172.7853 deg, Dec 55.2077 to 67.4954 deg
Loaded 7330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4142 out of 4663 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4663 out of 43866 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.823856
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.823856
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uArxnnCzZz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1995, passed=43855
Got 43855 stars (including 41791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4b6vxCi82L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2030, passed=43635
Got 43635 stars (including 41525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iAMNEbxOEO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=937, passed=26450
Got 26450 stars (including 25460 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pg7IajfeCg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1043, passed=26687
Got 26687 stars (including 25591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-18-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-19-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-06-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060813_TTUQ1b1x1_18181_qyoLtjac/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52863.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53296.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54013.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54194.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54296.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54547.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07462.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52861_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:24.95 +63:04:39.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.657 1052880106987273472 153.10392225178 +63.07726222286 14.6139 13.9466 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.657#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52863_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:48.19 +65:09:45.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.193 1058694427554364160 160.94966258587 +65.16233989430 14.7809 14.2574 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.193#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52864_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:40.68 +65:42:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:33.03 +64:55:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52873_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:14.86 +62:05:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52874_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:22:14.43 +65:07:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53047_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53100_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53121_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53121_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53176_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53176_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53218_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53237_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53254_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53254_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:57.38 +63:32:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53281_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53296_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:40.49 +57:37:51.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.497 1026088650750736256 140.16876245809 +57.63086488353 11.6955 11.2911 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.497#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53347_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53387_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53431_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53431_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53501_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53501_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53549_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53549_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53553_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53553_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53557_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53557_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53567_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53567_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53587_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53661_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53671_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53671_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53689_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53791_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53808_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53808_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53818_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53818_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53854_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53855_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53868_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53887_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53887_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53920_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53920_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53929_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53929_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53931_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53956_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53977_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:10.90 +61:43:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53992_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54013_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:36:47.48 +56:59:18.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.710 1025427019628594816 144.19782675317 +56.98922490922 13.4603 13.0260 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.710#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54014_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54055_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54089_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54089_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54095_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54095_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:47:52.51 +65:28:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54103_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54103_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54111_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54111_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54113_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54113_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54146_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54194_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:19.47 +60:44:15.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.353 1048644822557283072 155.83130731837 +60.73754117652 13.7846 12.9570 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.353#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54198_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54198_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54203_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54203_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:14.63 +61:44:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54204_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54215_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54215_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:01.54 +66:17:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54220_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54220_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54259_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54259_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54267_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54267_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54268_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54268_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54280_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54280_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54288_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54288_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:03.86 +63:36:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54296_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54296_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:10.33 +65:27:46.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.624 1059544693640043904 158.79219383474 +65.46341606838 14.1333 13.6266 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.624#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54318_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54318_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54319_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54319_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:45.24 +65:26:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54346_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54346_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54360_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54360_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54364_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54364_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54369_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54369_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54388_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54388_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54392_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54392_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54399_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54399_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54423_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54436_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54436_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:57.18 +58:41:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54458_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54458_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54480_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:01:03.54 +67:04:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54512_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54512_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54534_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54534_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54539_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54539_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54547_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54547_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:17.03 +65:01:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.359 1058724664124219776 159.57131699315 +65.03256805637 14.0413 13.5523 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.359#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54558_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54558_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54582_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54584_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54584_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54834_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54834_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54842_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54842_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:28.15 +66:31:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.771 1066559852702911744 148.86712435358 +66.51810206807 14.2610 13.7521 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.771#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54844_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54844_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54845_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54845_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54877_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54877_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54903_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54903_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54911_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54911_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:06:20.93 +62:37:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.793 1052797162579127680 151.58873259974 +62.63252780395 14.5839 14.0498 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.793#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54931_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54931_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54961_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54999_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 54999_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55010_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 55010_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55012_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 55012_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55015_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 55015_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55025_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 55025_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_06-07-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks