Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OR Boo,2461139.9018,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OR Boo 20260409.4018 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Dra-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-09-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 76838 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 76838 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits

renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 553.5543
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.4907
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1011.8677
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.2610
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1012.7562
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 508.4352
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.82795
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 12.6999998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Header: 68 keys total, 3 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-09T04:37:59.1718730' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T09:37:59.1718730' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.4013792938 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T09:38:09.0733282' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.4014939005 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.94283822618 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9996939001099 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 69.2188888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 348.081388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.06935832734739 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20297 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20297 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.6999998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.6999998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 56: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 57: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 58: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 68: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits :)
Spent 0.530622 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 12.6499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Header: 68 keys total, 3 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-09T04:38:44.3568047' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T09:38:44.3568047' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.4019022686 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T09:38:54.2600837' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.4020168982 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.942838160697 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9996938698178 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 69.1855555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 347.776666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.06959411277663 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20297 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20297 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.6499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.6499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 56: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 57: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 58: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 68: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits :)
Spent 0.505898 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits

fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.90149503
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits'
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.362 +54:00:16.41
Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.874 +53:59:56.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0056 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.362 +54:00:16.41
Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.478 +53:59:54.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:31:46.874 +53:59:56.78
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:46.478 +53:59:54.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00113 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00113 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZSIogMQnXv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xNZ6kG1x4Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1iNGKBaOaE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I1KIoWlpns
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7982 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 217.5393 to 247.2829 deg, Dec +47.5969 to +59.4288 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 217.5393 to 247.2829 deg, Dec 47.5969 to 59.4288 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4411 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 7982 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897565
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897565
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
2.3 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
3.2 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
3.2 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
15.3 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZSIogMQnXv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, passed=7982
Got 7982 stars (including 7472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xNZ6kG1x4Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, passed=7960
Got 7960 stars (including 7443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1iNGKBaOaE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7799
Got 7799 stars (including 7256 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I1KIoWlpns (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=553, passed=7804
Got 7804 stars (including 7246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7804 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21719.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 20257_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 12.19 | 15:59:11.21 +51:10:04.5 | 2200 4809 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:59:11.21 +51:10:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 20422_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 9.67 | 15:38:39.34 +57:01:33.0 | 4207 1361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:38:39.34 +57:01:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21719_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 21719_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 12.23 | 15:44:39.92 +56:20:20.9 | 3697 1763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:44:39.91 +56:20:20.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.346 1598617858711237248 236.16632741881 +56.33873769632 12.2771 11.7659 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.346#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21847_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 21847_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 12.35 | 15:30:48.19 +53:01:12.6 | 4882 3785 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:30:48.20 +53:01:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.362 +54:00:16.41
Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.874 +53:59:56.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0056 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.362 +54:00:16.41
Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.478 +53:59:54.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:31:46.874 +53:59:56.78
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:46.478 +53:59:54.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00113 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00113 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lsox1I7Vl8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oLfmP8c8fb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4BHbPTXhV2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TnBaHNx5Pm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 217.4621 to 247.3603 deg, Dec +47.5969 to +59.4298 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 217.4621 to 247.3603 deg, Dec 47.5969 to 59.4298 deg
Loaded 6623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4621 out of 41852 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787741
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787741
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
2.2 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
2.9 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.9 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Lsox1I7Vl8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1864, passed=41838
Got 41838 stars (including 39899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41252 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oLfmP8c8fb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1954, passed=41968
Got 41968 stars (including 39934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41968 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4BHbPTXhV2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2624, passed=33455
Got 33455 stars (including 30797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33455 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TnBaHNx5Pm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2604, passed=33586
Got 33586 stars (including 30952 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-46-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-47-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0578.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out57439.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out59342.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out59612.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out60762.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out60797.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 52469_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.37 | 15:52:11.87 +53:33:28.6 | 2957 3411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:52:11.87 +53:33:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 52471_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.20 | 15:55:51.44 +56:02:02.3 | 2743 1892 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:55:51.50 +56:02:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 53429_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 11.52 | 15:04:35.43 +57:07:54.3 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53594_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 53594_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 11.72 | 15:03:43.75 +56:29:37.3 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53872_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 53872_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 12.22 | 15:36:08.58 +56:45:15.8 | 4413 1528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54797_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 54797_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 12.86 | 15:38:19.41 +50:20:20.1 | 4174 5409 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:38:19.44 +50:20:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55023_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 55023_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 12.97 | 15:47:25.49 +53:54:04.0 | 3396 3227 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55253_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 55253_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.10 | 15:20:05.02 +51:59:23.7 | 5887 4379 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:20:05.00 +51:59:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55896_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 55896_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.41 | 15:26:16.44 +52:02:57.4 | 5310 4364 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:26:16.49 +52:02:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56157_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 56157_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.48 | 15:22:04.94 +55:39:51.0 | 5607 2167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:22:04.95 +55:39:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56194_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 56194_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.57 | 15:46:09.77 +49:45:13.0 | 3401 5745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:46:09.78 +49:45:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57008_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57008_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.74 | 15:09:39.97 +50:14:25.4 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57089_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57089_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.82 | 15:47:06.62 +55:07:40.2 | 3458 2487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57210_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57210_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.06 | 15:46:55.00 +53:05:55.4 | 3419 3714 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:46:54.93 +53:05:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57300_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57300_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.91 | 15:43:13.15 +51:26:06.3 | 3723 4733 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:43:13.15 +51:26:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57323_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57323_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.56 | 15:20:03.55 +57:52:00.2 | 5714 0824 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57334_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57334_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 13.68 | 15:02:40.30 +53:38:36.0 | 7398 3255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57439_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57439_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.18 | 16:01:00.44 +50:24:22.6 | 1981 5256 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 16:01:00.48 +50:24:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.666 1403468941511336064 240.25212982566 +50.40649882574 14.0889 13.5981 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.666#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57683_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57683_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.16 | 15:22:43.04 +52:09:24.7 | 5638 4288 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:22:43.03 +52:09:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57756_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57756_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.12 | 15:52:36.39 +49:57:35.2 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57905_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57905_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.27 | 15:51:35.65 +53:58:43.9 | 3027 3160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:51:35.59 +53:58:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57971_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57971_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.01 | 15:35:59.50 +52:03:02.0 | 4407 4373 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:35:59.54 +52:03:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57978_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 57978_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.26 | 15:46:54.59 +53:36:29.5 | 3434 3406 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:46:54.54 +53:36:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58098_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 58098_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.17 | 15:33:36.35 +53:03:27.9 | 4627 3764 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:33:36.44 +53:03:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58240_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 58240_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.06 | 15:19:17.56 +50:12:12.5 | 6018 5457 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:19:17.61 +50:12:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58530_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 58530_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.37 | 16:01:11.74 +51:53:58.5 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59139_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59139_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.36 | 15:44:36.93 +57:19:53.4 | 3723 1161 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:44:36.95 +57:19:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59218_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59218_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.32 | 15:06:17.69 +51:07:15.0 | 7224 4812 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59342_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59342_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.68 | 15:55:49.45 +51:13:21.9 | 2522 4800 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:55:49.34 +51:13:20.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.067 1403808518805305856 238.95612892198 +51.22349358353 15.0496 14.5475 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.067#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59357_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59357_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.04 | 15:07:31.19 +54:46:35.1 | 6899 2616 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59442_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59442_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.22 | 15:48:20.07 +54:23:52.1 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59612_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59612_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.89 | 15:43:38.36 +50:28:06.7 | 3663 5319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:43:38.42 +50:28:06.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.538 1402777967172512256 235.91055303180 +50.46827796577 14.6991 14.1300 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.538#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59766_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59766_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.60 | 15:35:19.11 +50:02:22.4 | 4464 5593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59876_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59876_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.34 | 15:14:00.43 +52:42:20.5 | 6422 3913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59879_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 59879_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.56 | 15:25:12.38 +56:39:06.6 | 5322 1579 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60085_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60085_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.66 | 15:43:16.22 +50:20:33.8 | 3696 5396 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60281_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60281_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.74 | 15:43:37.08 +49:50:28.7 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60358_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60358_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.92 | 15:58:33.31 +50:49:03.9 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60380_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60380_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.43 | 15:43:22.05 +53:40:41.8 | 3753 3376 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60403_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60403_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.59 | 15:43:17.78 +50:55:02.5 | 3705 5047 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60467_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60467_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.74 | 16:00:43.31 +55:46:11.3 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60502_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60502_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.49 | 16:00:03.38 +53:20:18.0 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60559_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60559_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.86 | 15:59:37.55 +53:59:53.7 | 2313 3094 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60598_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60598_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.84 | 15:57:34.00 +52:44:05.1 | 2433 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60623_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60623_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.39 | 15:09:44.53 +57:44:32.6 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60651_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60651_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.65 | 15:49:31.86 +51:48:04.8 | 3139 4487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60686_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60686_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.56 | 15:07:23.52 +54:14:03.0 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60762_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60762_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.98 | 15:54:15.22 +51:33:17.4 | 2686 4610 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:54:15.23 +51:33:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.033 1404207057411012608 238.56433857162 +51.55516661274 14.8101 13.9451 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.033#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60797_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60797_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 15.00 | 15:45:17.66 +52:34:15.3 | 3554 4039 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:45:17.48 +52:34:13.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60875_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 60875_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 14.73 | 15:15:45.44 +54:12:15.4 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36166_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 36166_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 09.40202 | 2461139.90202 | 9.69 | 15:38:39.35 +57:01:33.0 | 4207 1361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_043927_TTUQ2b1x1_23942_2uv3Or47/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 15:38:39.34 +57:01:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14200_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
Preparing report for the candidate 14200_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:04:27.20 +51:52:03.2
########### Completed Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
15:04:27.20 +51:52:03.2
###################################################################################
15:04:27.20 +51:52:03.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
15:04:27.20 +51:52:03.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
15:04:27.20 +51:52:03.2 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
15:04:27.20 +51:52:03.2
15:44:39.91 +56:20:20.8
16:01:00.48 +50:24:22.8
15:55:49.34 +51:13:20.7
15:43:38.42 +50:28:06.9
15:54:15.23 +51:33:18.1
15:45:17.48 +52:34:13.4
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.90149503 -observatory V36
23:34:34.95 -05:14:30.0 Mercury (0.2mag)
02:36:45.10 +15:13:47.6 Venus (-3.9mag)
23:59:04.24 -01:12:10.8 Mars (1.2mag)
07:09:52.08 +22:50:38.6 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:26:13.09 +00:30:24.7 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:46:20.85 +19:43:07.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:09:57.87 -00:20:54.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:25.55 -22:52:27.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:48:55.50 -28:03:40.8 Moon (-10.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 9 04:43 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.90149503:
07:10:00.07 +22:50:22.9 Io (5.7mag)
07:10:03.68 +22:50:15.9 Europa (5.9mag)
07:10:03.80 +22:50:08.8 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:09:23.27 +22:51:40.7 Callisto (6.5mag)
07:13:28.40 +22:41:28.9 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:09:49.15 +22:50:42.9 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:13:30.76 +23:10:53.0 Elara (17.3mag)
07:08:18.03 +23:34:06.1 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:18:20.18 +22:47:57.8 Carme (18.5mag)
00:26:20.61 +00:30:14.0 Titan (8.8mag)
00:26:16.68 +00:30:36.0 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:26:06.35 +00:31:34.1 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:26:25.02 +00:30:11.4 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:27:55.02 +00:39:54.5 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 9 04:43 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.90149503:
15:04:47.87 -11:11:20.6 JWST
17:53:49.58 +36:39:43.0 Chandra
19:16:09.56 -04:53:45.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 9 04:43 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.90149503 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:48:55.23 -28:24:23.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:02:10.05 -69:59:01.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:31:07.54 +31:23:41.2 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:53.10 +09:45:31.3 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:08:21.20 +28:58:45.2 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:21:37.64 +25:51:20.1 15.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:14.58 +31:57:20.0 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:14.51 -00:52:11.6 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:55:05.49 +17:58:19.0 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:42:39.90 -11:36:59.6 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:10:58.59 -12:57:43.1 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:47:12.08 +62:32:13.3 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:24:20.39 -03:38:27.8 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:41:09.87 +85:01:15.1 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:15:20.44 +63:33:14.6 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
04:58:37.93 +15:54:21.4 10.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:23:18.70 +05:18:21.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:44.15 +13:30:50.2 14.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:20:31.91 -23:24:33.5 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:11:14.78 +46:58:31.1 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
14:06:09.85 +40:26:27.0 14.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:15:06.51 -25:12:43.7 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:03:40.07 +19:45:38.9 9.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:56:59.45 +02:36:01.9 17.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
02:20:17.55 +03:40:39.9 10.5mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:40:27.22 +35:55:57.0 14.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:30:03.94 -10:03:45.8 12.2mag 10P/Tempel
15:08:58.81 +03:50:39.6 13.4mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:04:43.12 -01:44:55.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
17:58:27.45 -09:51:48.9 17.8mag 40P/Vaisala
10:38:13.87 -04:39:15.6 16.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:38:29.21 +16:21:15.6 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
06:58:51.99 +38:24:45.0 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:20:32.37 -12:15:18.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:45:53.71 +18:55:22.6 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
00:51:04.18 +06:55:28.5 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels
22:42:41.97 -11:20:09.8 14.6mag 88P/Howell
01:51:57.38 +18:50:51.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:42:37.63 +31:55:09.6 16.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:21:03.47 +41:24:26.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:23:05.22 +13:37:32.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:34:38.23 +13:40:10.0 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
00:52:01.15 +10:50:52.1 11.0mag 141P/Machholz
01:01:44.04 +02:23:43.5 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
23:50:27.31 -01:24:17.4 13.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:31:20.45 +04:06:25.3 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:44:01.82 -04:49:44.7 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:30:02.34 +31:18:16.0 17.9mag 164P/Christensen
06:24:19.04 +24:26:33.6 17.9mag 198P/ODAS
15:03:07.30 -00:48:04.5 17.4mag 210P/Christensen
21:19:05.18 -13:02:44.8 17.5mag 218P/LINEAR
17:14:15.25 -14:42:39.8 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
05:20:22.96 +34:09:19.5 16.6mag 240P/NEAT
07:35:28.51 -05:54:24.5 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
15:44:59.40 +06:32:22.6 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:31:52.24 +21:20:06.4 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS
05:26:23.64 +45:25:12.5 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 9 04:43 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.22 -11:25:16.10 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.16 17.22
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 9 04:43 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Apr 9 04:43 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:13:40.950 +40:54:21.62 AT 2026iga 2026-03-30.81 20.28
15:50:48.070 +48:03:43.08 AT 2026ifz 2026-03-30.81 20.51
15:50:43.720 +47:30:42.19 AT 2026ify 2026-03-30.81 21.34
17:38:02.570 +25:54:11.91 AT 2026ifx 2026-03-27.88 20.89
16:42:02.490 +40:59:30.50 AT 2026ifw 2026-03-27.86 21.32
16:24:14.050 +39:37:35.59 AT 2026ifv 2026-03-27.86 20.81
16:16:45.660 +38:01:36.33 AT 2026ifu 2026-03-27.86 21.15
16:28:23.190 +36:11:26.67 AT 2026ift 2026-03-27.86 21.53
16:16:10.610 +36:40:26.87 AT 2026ifs 2026-03-27.86 20.03
16:42:08.700 +33:28:34.26 AT 2026ifr 2026-03-27.86 21.24
16:45:41.760 +34:10:06.31 AT 2026ifq 2026-03-27.86 21.64
16:50:17.550 +33:04:52.33 AT 2026ifp 2026-03-27.86 19.99
16:52:21.140 +31:25:32.03 AT 2026ifo 2026-03-27.86 19.73
16:06:48.970 +28:22:45.47 AT 2026ifn 2026-03-27.85 21.37
16:26:20.250 +28:06:35.30 AT 2026ifm 2026-03-27.85 20.13
17:01:36.800 +29:43:13.81 AT 2026ifl 2026-03-27.85 20.62
17:06:26.770 +28:47:25.16 AT 2026ifk 2026-03-27.85 21.39
16:47:18.680 +27:13:25.92 AT 2026ifj 2026-03-27.85 20.26
15:55:49.720 +37:36:32.33 AT 2026ifi 2026-03-24.80 21.32
16:05:53.820 +48:45:26.80 AT 2026ifh 2026-03-23.81 21.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 9 04:43 tns_transients_list.txt