This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.3826* 13 58 37.42 +60 47 48.7 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.8827,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.3827 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.3826* 13 54 32.29 +58 23 44.3 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J208.6345+58.3960,2461139.8827,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J208.6345+58.3960 20260409.3827 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.97079390 21.01.2026 11:17:46.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
First image: 2461061.97079390 21.01.2026 11:17:46.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Last image: 2461139.88290640 09.04.2026 09:11:13.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6819
Objects passed selection criteria: 6790
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5277.75
Average stars matched: 4789.75 (90.7536 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 04:16:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.97079390 21.01.2026 11:17:46.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
First image: 2461061.97079390 21.01.2026 11:17:46.593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Last image: 2461139.88290640 09.04.2026 09:11:13.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 71
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34243
Objects passed selection criteria: 34130
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26950.8
Average stars matched: 24253 (89.9901 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 04:17:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.88239707
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits'
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:44.994 +61:59:50.60
Second-epoch image center 13:42:53.102 +62:00:01.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:44.994 +61:59:50.60
Second-epoch image center 13:42:54.173 +62:00:07.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:53.102 +62:00:01.68
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:54.173 +62:00:07.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00271 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vtPzCsKebo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5O2WMvX1sK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLRvSv96Ui
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RwHMi93rsm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7319 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 185.5940 to 224.2880 deg, Dec +55.3216 to +67.4698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 185.5940 to 224.2880 deg, Dec 55.3216 to 67.4698 deg
Loaded 6560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4008 out of 4159 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4159 out of 7319 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.902023
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.902023
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vtPzCsKebo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, passed=7319
Got 7319 stars (including 6865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7319 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5O2WMvX1sK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=437, passed=7236
Got 7236 stars (including 6793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JLRvSv96Ui (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, passed=6526
Got 6526 stars (including 6129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RwHMi93rsm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=6501
Got 6501 stars (including 6099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:44.994 +61:59:50.60
Second-epoch image center 13:42:53.102 +62:00:01.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:44.994 +61:59:50.60
Second-epoch image center 13:42:54.173 +62:00:07.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:53.102 +62:00:01.68
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:54.173 +62:00:07.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00271 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Z3jdJLuM9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EgYeJ5Oxxl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7lpsOyzAwy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PlpKuzz5WJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35607 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 185.5600 to 224.3140 deg, Dec +55.2558 to +67.4714 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 185.5600 to 224.3140 deg, Dec 55.2558 to 67.4714 deg
Loaded 6614 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3801 out of 4182 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4182 out of 35607 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793004
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793004
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4Z3jdJLuM9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1490, passed=35600
Got 35600 stars (including 34052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35600 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EgYeJ5Oxxl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1519, passed=35642
Got 35642 stars (including 34063 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35642 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7lpsOyzAwy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1702, passed=31109
Got 31109 stars (including 29362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PlpKuzz5WJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1756, passed=30935
Got 30935 stars (including 29138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-17-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-10-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0356.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_041157_TTUQ2b1x1_6057_Ixx8HV4E/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51887.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51888.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51890.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56924.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out57672.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out57860.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out58103.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out59210.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out58326.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51887_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51887_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:03:28.08 +60:17:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.971 1660884542221525120 210.86667831848 +60.29519911417 15.0099 14.4600 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.971#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51888_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51888_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:12:37.46 +60:38:33.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.096 1660486244134412416 213.15551374733 +60.64264932965 15.0796 14.6256 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.096#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51890_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51890_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:24:01.68 +60:23:03.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.018 1663178673232971392 201.00737048334 +60.38457670953 14.3568 13.7985 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.018#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51892_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51892_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:51:01.99 +64:34:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51894_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51894_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:42:49.48 +65:40:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51896_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51896_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:15:12.97 +59:08:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51897_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 51897_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:50:04.13 +58:38:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 52653_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 52808_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 52987_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 53200_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 53482_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:02.74 +59:37:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53966_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 53966_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 53977_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:59:17.85 +64:24:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54422_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 54422_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:26:44.01 +62:59:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54450_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 54450_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:11.17 +59:56:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54500_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 54500_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:59:37.12 +60:54:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55094_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 55094_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:07:33.27 +63:02:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55500_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 55500_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:09:18.02 +60:54:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55624_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 55624_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55809_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 55809_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:16:02.98 +58:13:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55893_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 55893_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55947_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 55947_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:45:24.38 +60:49:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56040_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56040_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56337_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56337_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56426_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56426_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56434_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56434_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:53:21.53 +58:40:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56442_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56442_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56624_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56624_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:15:11.89 +63:12:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56638_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56638_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:27:17.66 +64:44:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56924_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 56924_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:08:50.95 +66:06:45.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.971 1671563480186813440 212.20963599286 +66.11280056502 14.6035 14.0973 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.971#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57004_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57004_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:59.09 +61:54:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57029_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57029_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57057_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57057_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57070_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57070_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:31:11.21 +57:50:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57089_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57089_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:57:23.81 +59:58:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57115_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57115_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57265_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57265_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:34:21.90 +64:55:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57646_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57646_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57672_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57672_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:20:13.71 +62:22:50.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.626 1666778749180090752 215.05699678752 +62.38142145968 14.5214 13.7648 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.626#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57701_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57701_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57860_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 57860_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:56:30.70 +59:47:02.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.310 1660799914186024960 209.12797281302 +59.78436278778 14.7179 14.1987 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.310#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58052_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58052_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:18:21.01 +60:14:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58063_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58063_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58103_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58103_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:14:55.28 +57:54:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.923 1566399247439633408 198.73025067003 +57.91678225348 14.8810 14.2546 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.923#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58190_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58190_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58231_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58231_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58259_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 58259_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58326_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:22.65 +58:45:02.0 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.73)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58354_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58354_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58363_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58363_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58567_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58567_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58610_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58610_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58862_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58862_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58879_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 58879_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58978_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 58978_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:56.05 +60:08:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59028_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 59028_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59117_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 59117_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59210_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357
The candidate 59210_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_04-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0357 did not pass the final checks