This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8493,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3493 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461139.84964765 09.04.2026 08:23:19.557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7198
Objects passed selection criteria: 7190
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6357.75
Average stars matched: 6195.75 (97.4519 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113992 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 04:57:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461139.84964765 09.04.2026 08:23:19.557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 105599
Objects passed selection criteria: 105422
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90511.8
Average stars matched: 86732.5 (95.8246 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1888972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 04:59:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.84899858
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:56.833 -25:58:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0372 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:59.378 -25:59:35.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:56.833 -25:58:51.90
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:59.378 -25:59:35.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RlGOOGVEIA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mHnZbJMO9t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YtQ52zfQWQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P7HeXpX9Sz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Loaded 11388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7042 out of 7452 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7452 out of 10772 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815328
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815328
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RlGOOGVEIA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=949, passed=10772
Got 10772 stars (including 9801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mHnZbJMO9t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=936, passed=10621
Got 10621 stars (including 9668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YtQ52zfQWQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=7005
Got 7005 stars (including 6510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P7HeXpX9Sz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=498, passed=7013
Got 7013 stars (including 6508 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20577_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 20577_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.14 -25:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 06085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:49.82 -26:39:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:49:03.66 -29:35:48.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:56.833 -25:58:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0372 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:59.378 -25:59:35.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:56.833 -25:58:51.90
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:59.378 -25:59:35.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fT0dgu8EhU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dM7DR3LjJq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v2gQQYqRhb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B6r3X3gNcD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 143168 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Loaded 11498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8059 out of 9812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9812 out of 143168 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596166
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596166
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fT0dgu8EhU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=11615, passed=143155
Got 143155 stars (including 131260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 143155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dM7DR3LjJq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=11364, passed=142792
Got 142792 stars (including 131150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v2gQQYqRhb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4966, passed=80008
Got 80008 stars (including 74929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80008 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B6r3X3gNcD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5105, passed=79669
Got 79669 stars (including 74442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79669 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-22-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0316.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_032357_TTUQ2b1x1_5150_sxUnO49p/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166773.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166780.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166784.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166786.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166794.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166797.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166809.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166811.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166816.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166824.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166833.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166834.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166843.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166845.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166846.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166848.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166862.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166870.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166876.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166877.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166879.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167379.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167614.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167659.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167738.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167755.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167769.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167790.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167805.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167814.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167824.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167843.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167863.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167866.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167165.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167685.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167834.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167853.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166773_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166773_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:12.37 -27:24:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.908 4108729611311092736 257.05108023506 -27.40319625370 13.1339 12.0266 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.908#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166780_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166780_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:55.01 -22:44:15.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166784_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166784_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:40.32 -23:32:06.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166786_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166786_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:13.60 -26:23:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.442 4109259992598647936 258.05634101283 -26.39413566199 13.3781 12.7910 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.442#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:17.36 -28:05:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.687 6033728043498996992 251.82125661829 -28.08441051700 13.2969 12.3756 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.687#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:57.62 -27:15:49.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:00.00 -22:31:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166809_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166809_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:21.15 -27:51:15.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166810_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166810_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:26.31 -27:12:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:01.50 -29:11:51.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.372 4058780687842214912 263.50592589762 -29.19797744905 12.9684 12.3799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.372#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:01.74 -27:58:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.919 4108487826229710720 257.00683432938 -27.97919735850 12.2336 10.9072 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.919#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:15.66 -30:00:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.323 6031102684611404800 252.06487921955 -30.01637317446 12.9019 12.0595 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.323#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166818_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166818_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:16.82 -25:14:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:55.93 -24:58:57.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:26.99 -22:03:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:24.07 -22:44:46.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.046 4125764864658328320 253.60044906232 -22.74713917967 12.9787 12.2598 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.046#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:34.63 -26:21:07.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:54.15 -26:34:37.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.484 6034322226456228608 253.47523408420 -26.57686502443 12.4533 11.4246 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.484#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:41.90 -23:39:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166843_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166843_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:54.77 -24:08:25.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166845_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166845_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:32.25 -25:03:53.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.343 4113062275562972416 255.38443250565 -25.06511947851 12.7660 11.9342 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.343#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:31.33 -29:30:11.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.937 6029471559116448000 255.13041795957 -29.50439380017 13.2099 12.4473 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.937#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166848_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166848_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:47.78 -22:32:41.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.870 4117558522277136512 263.69897452058 -22.54464142710 11.5637 10.1750 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.870#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166856_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166856_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:02.36 -29:20:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166862_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166862_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:35.61 -29:32:34.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:31.29 -23:31:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166870_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166870_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:05.00 -26:14:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.272 6034416818813156480 254.02109482999 -26.24245884129 12.4437 12.0845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.272#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166876_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166876_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:50.67 -22:17:26.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.149 4117582024343849984 263.46111243395 -22.29062302000 12.0940 11.1581 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.149#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166877_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166877_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:12.84 -22:45:38.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.118 4114655227425943424 260.30322381108 -22.76073315941 11.8740 11.3007 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.118#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166878_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166878_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:21.19 -29:30:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166879_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166879_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:17.32 -28:40:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.235 4060326021469302528 264.07182414654 -28.66847116336 11.0834 10.2773 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.235#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166916_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 166916_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:03.66 -29:35:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167111_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167111_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:46.50 -27:53:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167125_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167125_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:36.30 -29:05:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167127_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167127_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:08.95 -28:58:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167165_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167165_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167182_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167182_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:25.01 -29:46:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167216_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167216_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:50.52 -22:12:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167245_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167245_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:18.35 -28:11:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167326_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167326_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:22.06 -29:04:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167361_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167361_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167364_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167364_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:30.52 -26:45:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167369_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167369_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:26.74 -29:10:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167373_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167373_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:29.33 -26:11:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167379_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167379_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:55.67 -29:26:44.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.540 4059321926843053312 260.23244972079 -29.44558253036 12.9789 12.2431 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.540#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167472_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167472_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:10.09 -30:03:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167506_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167506_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.83 -28:24:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167534_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167534_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:11.49 -23:31:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167544_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167544_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:15.41 -27:57:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167581_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167581_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:44.67 -24:49:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167608_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167608_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167610_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167610_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:09.67 -26:55:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167614_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167614_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:52.74 -23:45:33.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.206 4114103852345589888 259.21968835577 -23.75931434867 13.5586 11.9387 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.206#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167659_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167659_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:27.01 -26:29:09.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.293 4108329217276198272 260.36194543697 -26.48528482965 13.3268 12.2812 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.293#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167685_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167685_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167689_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167689_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:11.68 -25:23:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167695_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167695_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:36.66 -26:21:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167699_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167699_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:14.78 -28:55:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167720_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167720_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:11.11 -23:58:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167734_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167734_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:32.23 -22:38:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167738_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167738_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:00.55 -30:02:24.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167751_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167751_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:49.13 -27:48:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167755_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167755_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:54.07 -28:33:12.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.925 6032774663838497920 254.22498888977 -28.55404709514 13.4660 12.7574 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.925#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167765_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167765_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167769_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167769_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:35.55 -22:33:26.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167790_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167790_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:55.00 -25:40:54.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.285 4109940246741030272 260.72852263849 -25.68214603203 14.3769 12.5160 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.285#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167805_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167805_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:15.42 -26:10:53.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.321 4111963176280564992 257.06403623263 -26.18184065394 12.4339 10.8592 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.321#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167814_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167814_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:25.25 -29:07:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.422 4107351029886859520 259.10471735547 -29.13274050076 13.0995 11.9811 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.422#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:24.27 -25:52:33.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.803 4109209719936424960 259.10091935665 -25.87581962835 12.2924 10.9304 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.803#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:26.11 -24:25:05.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.494 4111241445619640064 261.35851752822 -24.41841499690 12.1415 10.5643 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.494#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.55 -24:46:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167843_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167843_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:55.31 -27:19:59.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.656 6030318767206675456 255.98004531570 -27.33372345857 14.4229 12.6847 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.656#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167853_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 167853_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:14.25 -24:34:57.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.98)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167866_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 167866_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:03.18 -23:20:14.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.609 4114226344816041344 260.01285040929 -23.33772768310 13.5380 12.4707 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.97 -27:23:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:49.24 -30:04:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:01.77 -23:23:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:35.00 -28:33:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71997_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 71997_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:49.84 -26:39:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154456_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 154456_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:08.31 -24:54:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:17.36 -27:12:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154362_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 154362_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:25.34 -22:10:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:32.25 -28:07:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73856_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 73856_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:19.04 -26:34:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:01.84 -23:25:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45520_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 45520_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:00.01 -28:24:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:47.03 -29:29:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.14 -25:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:02.54 -29:28:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 157265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:19.40 -24:58:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:10.92 -25:14:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:03.07 -29:43:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 43863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:57.56 -28:23:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 68045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:31.29 -26:48:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317
The candidate 127742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_03-23-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0317 did not pass the final checks
