Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.8131,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.3131 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 115000 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 115000 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 491.2199
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 573.1830
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 976.3826
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 549.6467
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 977.9251
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 550.7070
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.98767
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.8500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-09T02:30:14.9344624' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T07:30:14.9344624' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.3126728474 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T07:30:24.8352057' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.312787442 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 144.000502667244 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995272018385 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.4294444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.115 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.53994799506853 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20324 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20324 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.8500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.8500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits :)
Spent 0.649823 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.7700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-09T02:31:13.6297547' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T07:31:13.6297547' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.3133521876 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T07:31:23.5311811' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.3134667939 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 144.000502763686 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995271732564 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.345 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.092222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.54260656222117 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20324 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20324 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.7700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.7700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits :)
Spent 0.609613 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits

fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.81278859
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41
Second-epoch image center 09:36:01.085 +70:00:00.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0191 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41
Second-epoch image center 09:36:03.747 +70:00:45.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:01.085 +70:00:00.75
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:03.747 +70:00:45.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01294 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SAOJxczdk5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I00kxztXtT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z0ostAQKcw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eTum4SGBrl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9450 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6936 to 171.9946 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6936 to 171.9946 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 9371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5144 out of 5451 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5451 out of 9450 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910180
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910180
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.2 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
3.0 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SAOJxczdk5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=712, passed=9450
Got 9450 stars (including 8721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I00kxztXtT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=727, passed=9454
Got 9454 stars (including 8716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z0ostAQKcw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=912, passed=8487
Got 8487 stars (including 7571 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eTum4SGBrl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=828, passed=8454
Got 8454 stars (including 7623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20634.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20674.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 20634_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 12.21 | 10:01:27.56 +66:38:04.8 | 3269 5164 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:01:27.54 +66:38:04.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.137 1066479244756842880 150.36501382301 +66.63431300962 11.2892 10.0289 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.137#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20674_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 20674_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 12.34 | 09:51:54.17 +68:51:16.0 | 3927 3868 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 09:51:54.15 +68:51:16.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.766 1070094473348726656 147.97506740492 +68.85451359590 12.2195 11.6936 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.766#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01472_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 01472_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 9.40 | 10:55:39.70 +71:52:09.1 | 1087 1458 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:39.68 +71:52:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41
Second-epoch image center 09:36:01.085 +70:00:00.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0191 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41
Second-epoch image center 09:36:03.747 +70:00:45.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:01.085 +70:00:00.75
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:03.747 +70:00:45.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01294 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ujje9LZxp7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2AmtrQG0TG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rq9VYSQop4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wNhvWyRgea
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 53181 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6936 to 172.5256 deg, Dec +62.8166 to +75.4852 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6936 to 172.5256 deg, Dec 62.8166 to 75.4852 deg
Loaded 9539 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4809 out of 5497 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5497 out of 53181 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.784760
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.784760
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.0 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.6 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ujje9LZxp7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2966, passed=53168
Got 53168 stars (including 50099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2AmtrQG0TG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2952, passed=53157
Got 53157 stars (including 50104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rq9VYSQop4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3972, passed=37536
Got 37536 stars (including 33524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37536 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wNhvWyRgea (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3889, passed=37351
Got 37351 stars (including 33430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-30-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out67341.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out67485.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out67564.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out67590.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out67576.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66305_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 66305_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 12.11 | 09:10:21.88 +67:05:27.9 | 6303 4883 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 09:10:21.86 +67:05:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66694_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 66694_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 13.16 | 08:46:51.34 +72:23:40.5 | 7027 1520 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 08:46:51.18 +72:23:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66773_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 66773_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 13.34 | 08:51:20.47 +73:44:01.8 | 6675 0760 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 08:51:20.56 +73:44:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66881_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 66881_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 13.53 | 09:17:48.37 +69:53:16.1 | 5736 3234 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 09:17:48.71 +69:53:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66939_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 66939_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 13.89 | 10:07:01.26 +66:17:23.6 | 2910 5335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:07:01.31 +66:17:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66973_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 66973_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 13.87 | 09:41:04.57 +70:16:30.3 | 4533 3034 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 09:41:04.52 +70:16:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67178_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67178_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.09 | 08:50:42.50 +67:42:10.6 | 7383 4351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 08:50:42.20 +67:42:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67193_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67193_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.19 | 10:34:34.31 +70:33:26.7 | 1864 2515 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:34:34.51 +70:33:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67237_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67237_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.25 | 10:21:19.44 +68:45:51.4 | 2321 3725 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:21:19.48 +68:45:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67260_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67260_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.08 | 10:02:40.28 +70:44:34.3 | 3464 2683 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:02:40.41 +70:44:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67341_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67341_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.59 | 10:01:08.19 +66:05:28.2 | 3254 5495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:01:08.18 +66:05:27.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.963 1066382625172616448 150.28457139007 +66.09070875995 14.5392 14.0283 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.963#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67370_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67370_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.23 | 09:25:37.67 +71:17:49.8 | 5293 2407 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 09:25:37.35 +71:17:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67485_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67485_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.46 | 09:49:14.97 +71:34:35.8 | 4158 2233 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 09:49:14.93 +71:34:35.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.411 1119753709858859776 147.31327695023 +71.57594944021 14.5084 13.8906 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.411#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67512_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
Preparing report for the candidate 67512_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67564_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67564_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.86 | 10:38:34.17 +66:01:53.4 | 0967 5134 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:38:34.24 +66:01:52.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.468 1059597504557842304 159.64530587219 +66.03198632145 15.2967 14.8235 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.468#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67565_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67565_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.85 | 10:30:02.86 +68:17:41.1 | 1787 3908 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:30:02.96 +68:17:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67576_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67576_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.77 | 10:55:43.55 +71:29:14.9 | 1009 1677 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:43.72 +71:29:17.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67590_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 67590_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 14.96 | 10:40:43.30 +65:06:55.6 | 0688 5645 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:40:43.31 +65:06:57.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.957 1058737789544222592 160.17995488173 +65.11599395827 14.9677 14.5083 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.957#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07659_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276
The candidate 07659_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 09.31347 | 2461139.81347 | 9.64 | 10:55:39.69 +71:52:09.1 | 1087 1458 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_023939_TTUQ2b1x1_6135_fJecpBa0/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-31-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:39.68 +71:52:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:34:09.31 +72:24:49.4
########### Completed UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:34:09.31 +72:24:49.4
###################################################################################
10:34:09.31 +72:24:49.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:34:09.31 +72:24:49.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:34:09.31 +72:24:49.4 -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_apass.txt
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:34:09.31 +72:24:49.4
10:01:27.54 +66:38:04.6
09:51:54.15 +68:51:16.0
10:01:08.18 +66:05:27.2
09:49:14.93 +71:34:35.5
10:38:34.24 +66:01:52.9
10:40:43.31 +65:06:57.0
10:55:43.72 +71:29:17.1
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.81278859 -observatory V36
23:34:10.26 -05:16:39.9 Mercury (0.2mag)
02:36:19.49 +15:11:33.3 Venus (-3.9mag)
23:58:48.97 -01:13:51.0 Mars (1.2mag)
07:09:50.04 +22:50:42.1 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:26:10.65 +00:30:09.5 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:46:19.78 +19:43:04.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:09:57.14 -00:20:59.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:25.24 -22:52:26.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:45:06.44 -28:01:35.8 Moon (-10.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 9 02:44 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.81278859:
07:09:57.32 +22:50:28.5 Io (5.7mag)
07:10:00.63 +22:50:21.8 Europa (5.9mag)
07:10:03.01 +22:50:10.1 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:09:20.53 +22:51:45.2 Callisto (6.5mag)
07:13:26.55 +22:41:35.0 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:09:50.23 +22:50:39.0 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:13:28.78 +23:10:58.2 Elara (17.3mag)
07:08:15.62 +23:34:12.3 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:18:18.24 +22:48:00.7 Carme (18.5mag)
00:26:17.86 +00:29:58.7 Titan (8.8mag)
00:26:14.72 +00:30:19.9 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:26:04.12 +00:31:19.6 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:26:22.38 +00:29:56.0 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:27:52.66 +00:39:39.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 9 02:44 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.81278859:
15:04:48.34 -11:06:42.3 JWST
17:49:33.95 +37:47:28.0 Chandra
18:28:34.90 -28:33:46.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 9 02:44 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.81278859 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:48:52.45 -28:24:05.6 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:02:06.48 -69:59:17.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:31:06.55 +31:23:39.4 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:53.31 +09:44:52.6 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:08:19.56 +28:58:33.5 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:21:31.52 +25:51:11.2 15.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:13.85 +31:57:16.2 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:14.01 -00:52:47.3 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:55:06.42 +17:57:51.4 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:42:41.41 -11:37:04.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:11:01.55 -12:58:36.7 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:47:06.03 +62:31:55.7 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:24:24.07 -03:38:24.2 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:41:13.34 +85:00:32.7 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:15:18.78 +63:33:17.8 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
04:58:25.52 +15:52:13.6 10.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:23:21.81 +05:17:28.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:42.28 +13:29:26.5 14.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:20:27.24 -23:25:24.1 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:11:10.42 +46:59:55.7 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
14:06:31.89 +40:21:42.7 14.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:14:58.44 -25:11:57.0 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:03:19.75 +19:45:54.8 9.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:57:01.82 +02:35:41.4 17.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
02:19:07.82 +03:41:56.9 10.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:40:11.32 +35:54:49.9 14.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:29:53.65 -10:04:01.3 12.2mag 10P/Tempel
15:09:05.88 +03:51:07.4 13.4mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:04:44.83 -01:45:06.3 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
17:58:24.99 -09:52:01.3 17.8mag 40P/Vaisala
10:38:14.83 -04:39:44.3 16.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:38:20.95 +16:20:20.2 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
06:58:42.59 +38:25:53.0 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:20:25.36 -12:15:57.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:45:39.84 +18:53:26.4 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
00:50:52.48 +06:54:24.9 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels
22:42:25.22 -11:21:43.0 14.6mag 88P/Howell
01:51:42.62 +18:49:22.1 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:42:27.97 +31:54:51.3 16.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:20:58.02 +41:26:55.9 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:22:57.05 +13:36:55.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:34:27.79 +13:39:29.1 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
00:51:34.00 +10:48:50.7 11.0mag 141P/Machholz
01:01:17.38 +02:21:43.9 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
23:50:03.66 -01:26:00.3 13.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:30:53.05 +04:04:21.7 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:43:46.97 -04:52:23.3 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:30:03.75 +31:18:38.1 17.9mag 164P/Christensen
06:24:09.17 +24:26:42.8 17.9mag 198P/ODAS
15:03:16.85 -00:48:42.7 17.4mag 210P/Christensen
21:18:48.58 -13:04:01.5 17.5mag 218P/LINEAR
17:14:12.94 -14:43:16.0 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
05:20:11.64 +34:08:51.4 16.6mag 240P/NEAT
07:35:26.28 -05:55:01.8 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
15:45:01.15 +06:31:59.9 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:31:50.55 +21:20:04.5 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS
05:26:16.07 +45:25:31.8 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 9 02:44 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.22 -11:25:16.10 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.16 17.22
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 9 02:44 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Apr 9 02:44 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
17:38:02.570 +25:54:11.91 AT 2026ifx 2026-03-27.88 20.89
16:42:02.490 +40:59:30.50 AT 2026ifw 2026-03-27.86 21.32
16:24:14.050 +39:37:35.59 AT 2026ifv 2026-03-27.86 20.81
16:16:45.660 +38:01:36.33 AT 2026ifu 2026-03-27.86 21.15
16:28:23.190 +36:11:26.67 AT 2026ift 2026-03-27.86 21.53
16:16:10.610 +36:40:26.87 AT 2026ifs 2026-03-27.86 20.03
16:42:08.700 +33:28:34.26 AT 2026ifr 2026-03-27.86 21.24
16:45:41.760 +34:10:06.31 AT 2026ifq 2026-03-27.86 21.64
16:50:17.550 +33:04:52.33 AT 2026ifp 2026-03-27.86 19.99
16:52:21.140 +31:25:32.03 AT 2026ifo 2026-03-27.86 19.73
16:06:48.970 +28:22:45.47 AT 2026ifn 2026-03-27.85 21.37
16:26:20.250 +28:06:35.30 AT 2026ifm 2026-03-27.85 20.13
17:01:36.800 +29:43:13.81 AT 2026ifl 2026-03-27.85 20.62
17:06:26.770 +28:47:25.16 AT 2026ifk 2026-03-27.85 21.39
16:47:18.680 +27:13:25.92 AT 2026ifj 2026-03-27.85 20.26
15:55:49.720 +37:36:32.33 AT 2026ifi 2026-03-24.80 21.32
16:05:53.820 +48:45:26.80 AT 2026ifh 2026-03-23.81 21.26
16:27:03.110 +44:45:26.84 AT 2026ifg 2026-03-23.81 21.9
16:41:17.580 +44:27:03.47 AT 2026iff 2026-03-23.81 22.17
16:30:53.670 +55:47:08.39 AT 2026ife 2026-03-30.85 20.99
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 9 02:44 tns_transients_list.txt