This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J248.5025-29.7600,2461139.8100,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J248.5025-29.7600 20260409.3100 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J246.8152-26.0183,2461139.8100,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J246.8152-26.0183 20260409.3100 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.8100,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.3100 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
R Sco,2461139.8100,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
R Sco 20260409.3100 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TW Sco,2461139.8100,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TW Sco 20260409.3100 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SSS_J162544.5-273520,2461139.8100,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SSS_J162544.5-273520 20260409.3100 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
First image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Last image: 2461139.81032405 09.04.2026 07:26:41.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5842
Objects passed selection criteria: 5837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5407
Average stars matched: 5257.25 (97.2304 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112544 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 02:43:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
First image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Last image: 2461139.81032405 09.04.2026 07:26:41.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59180
Objects passed selection criteria: 59092
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52556.8
Average stars matched: 50881 (96.8115 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 02:45:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.80973155
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:21.784 -25:58:37.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:24.094 -25:59:21.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:21.784 -25:58:37.82
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:24.094 -25:59:21.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01486 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.StzWNMJ8cL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MSrEIOlpX2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dRQbeAtw0S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JcuuOuEmRI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.6487 to 253.8106 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.4499 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.6487 to 253.8106 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.4499 deg
Loaded 8190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5578 out of 5823 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5823 out of 8752 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.788280
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.788280
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.StzWNMJ8cL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, passed=8752
Got 8752 stars (including 8042 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MSrEIOlpX2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=689, passed=8852
Got 8852 stars (including 8148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dRQbeAtw0S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, passed=6232
Got 6232 stars (including 5756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JcuuOuEmRI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=6252
Got 6252 stars (including 5779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6252 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20535.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20466_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 20466_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:09.33 -28:22:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20486_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 20486_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:51.96 -28:28:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20515_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 20515_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:16.94 -25:47:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 20525_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:57.48 -29:49:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20535_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 20535_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:34.13 -28:19:54.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.906 6233567241086658176 237.39200586114 -28.33203870700 11.7417 10.9492 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.906#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01392_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 01392_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:42.43 -29:55:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06191_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 06191_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:57.15 -24:53:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03020_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 03020_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:12.85 -28:34:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:21.784 -25:58:37.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:24.094 -25:59:21.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:21.784 -25:58:37.82
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:24.094 -25:59:21.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01486 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M4QUx1JlzI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sXMtxflYeq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GJa5wUNBNK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kagMERF79Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.5879 to 253.8599 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.3796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.5879 to 253.8599 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.3796 deg
Loaded 8263 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6163 out of 6991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6991 out of 85371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596036
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596036
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.72
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.7 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M4QUx1JlzI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4769, passed=85367
Got 85367 stars (including 80428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sXMtxflYeq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4773, passed=84610
Got 84610 stars (including 79676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GJa5wUNBNK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3335, passed=50655
Got 50655 stars (including 47266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50655 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kagMERF79Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3367, passed=50750
Got 50750 stars (including 47321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-25-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_023737_TTUQ2b1x1_10255_MwjzQ41V/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101100.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101116.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101322.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101578.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101679.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101699.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101715.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101737.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101760.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69647.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101100_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101100_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:05.51 -24:02:45.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.142 6236861927678277248 237.52251604108 -24.04627011053 14.1247 13.5633 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.142#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101115_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 101115_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101116_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101116_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:17.16 -25:50:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.210 6047212905081612928 248.82277230237 -25.83473495908 12.5203 11.4557 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.210#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101121_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101121_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:19.52 -28:35:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101122_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 101122_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101127_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101127_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.90 -29:22:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101128_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101128_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:24.23 -25:54:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101215_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:39.92 -26:28:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101221_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101221_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:02.93 -26:17:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101224_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101224_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:21.92 -26:30:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101230_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101230_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:21.41 -26:31:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101234_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101234_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:47.99 -21:55:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101258_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:00.15 -25:36:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101259_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101259_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:23.94 -26:30:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101273_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101273_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:29.76 -26:29:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101322_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101322_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:42.21 -26:29:40.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.42)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101331_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101331_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101345_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101345_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.36 -23:11:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101348_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101348_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.82 -26:54:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101360_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101360_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:19.13 -29:18:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101363_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101363_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:57.72 -27:25:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101365_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101365_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:02.81 -25:08:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101368_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101368_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:38.01 -26:28:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101370_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101370_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:52.09 -24:29:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101408_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101408_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:31.09 -26:10:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101417_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101417_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:35.71 -26:28:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101423_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101423_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:01.86 -26:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101432_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101432_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:42.82 -21:49:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101452_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101452_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:38.56 -24:05:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101474_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101474_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:42.39 -29:43:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101491_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 101491_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101498_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101498_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:16.93 -27:11:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101499_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101499_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:54.08 -26:48:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101551_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101551_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:36.11 -28:31:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101556_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101556_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:34.97 -27:53:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101578_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101578_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:11.91 -27:56:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.933 6042051213389415680 242.30011102192 -27.93466459090 13.5283 12.7671 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.933#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101617_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101617_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:50.42 -28:01:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101629_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101629_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:54.53 -22:57:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101679_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101679_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:11.35 -24:39:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.008 6047580210677410816 247.79705669549 -24.66054130946 11.5730 9.9093 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.008#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101699_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101699_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:13.45 -25:06:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.980 6235898721136189184 240.05603190468 -25.10338318165 14.3528 13.6332 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.980#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101709_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101709_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:03.95 -22:02:05.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.862 6242882406673906944 243.01631636973 -22.03514435795 14.2159 13.5882 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.862#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101715_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101715_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:20.74 -22:26:39.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.737 6243400792049092480 239.83647322149 -22.44484063232 14.0262 13.0550 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.737#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101734_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101734_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:18.82 -21:54:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101737_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101737_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:18.98 -26:54:06.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.775 6043151377849184768 240.32878141846 -26.90216320276 14.1306 13.4150 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.775#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101760_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 101760_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:16.65 -24:12:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.450 6047661398442508544 248.81985131833 -24.19973178367 13.5697 12.4240 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.450#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69647_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 69647_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76483_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 76483_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:39.28 -22:19:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69181_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 69181_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.36 -22:53:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13364_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 13364_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:16.38 -29:56:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71388_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 71388_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36525_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
Preparing report for the candidate 36525_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96014_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 96014_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:52.81 -22:57:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41875_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 41875_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:31.82 -26:55:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59113_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 59113_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:57.14 -24:53:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74688_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 74688_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:46.56 -21:49:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57579_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 57579_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.73 -25:08:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 28999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:09.32 -28:22:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11594_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 11594_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:42.42 -29:55:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33479_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 33479_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:40.87 -27:54:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79343_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 79343_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:05.51 -21:49:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67931_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 67931_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:35.16 -22:41:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26638_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272
The candidate 26638_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-26-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0272 did not pass the final checks