This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8024,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3024 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8024,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3024 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8024,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3024 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.8024,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.3024 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
First image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Last image: 2461139.80358543 09.04.2026 07:16:59.781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4074
Objects passed selection criteria: 4072
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3814.25
Average stars matched: 3710.75 (97.2865 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 02:23:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
First image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Last image: 2461139.80358543 09.04.2026 07:16:59.781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49559
Objects passed selection criteria: 49495
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45439.5
Average stars matched: 43476.2 (95.6794 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 155504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 02:24:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.80126565
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.569 -17:59:57.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0053 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:21.914 -18:00:26.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:19.569 -17:59:57.72
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:21.914 -18:00:26.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RGLQkTmJjR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s5FujnobQ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e4jFekTLHP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2KdvYZifQU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.8483 to 261.6981 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.8483 to 261.6981 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5709 deg
Loaded 6005 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4226 out of 4388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4388 out of 6528 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922522
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922522
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
2.9 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RGLQkTmJjR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, passed=6528
Got 6528 stars (including 6093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s5FujnobQ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 5826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e4jFekTLHP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, passed=5093
Got 5093 stars (including 4805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5093 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2KdvYZifQU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, passed=5434
Got 5434 stars (including 5109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20244.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20221_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 20221_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:18.20 -15:36:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 20244_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 20257_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:14.75 -20:10:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20068_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 20068_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:35.09 -19:02:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:55:39.87 -20:42:03.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.569 -17:59:57.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0053 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:21.914 -18:00:26.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:19.569 -17:59:57.72
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:21.914 -18:00:26.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gSHB6B5ma9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KigxeNoaRE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1uXHVJUxlB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5jV2XVH9ih
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 75508 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.7958 to 261.7403 deg, Dec -23.2809 to -12.5618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.7958 to 261.7403 deg, Dec -23.2809 to -12.5618 deg
Loaded 6050 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4660 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 75508 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.684879
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.684879
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.69
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gSHB6B5ma9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4239, passed=75506
Got 75506 stars (including 71154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KigxeNoaRE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=4544, passed=72943
Got 72943 stars (including 68297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72943 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1uXHVJUxlB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2757, passed=58413
Got 58413 stars (including 55576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5jV2XVH9ih (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=3107, passed=48703
Got 48703 stars (including 45541 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-13-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0261.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_022136_TTUQ2b1x1_10756_RGo2mQ21/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90515.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90532.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90540.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90557.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90564.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90965.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91147.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91154.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91183.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91207.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91221.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91248.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91254.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91300.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91309.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91361.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91363.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91381.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90702.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90515_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90515_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:37.39 -15:11:51.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.091 4326866743960052736 248.90639320791 -15.19821599132 13.8726 12.9434 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.091#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90532_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90532_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:34.34 -20:22:25.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.126 4127808478836594944 256.89280011714 -20.37311146710 12.6786 11.3222 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.126#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90539_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90539_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:25.77 -21:12:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90540_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90540_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:13.37 -14:29:22.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90557_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90557_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:48.85 -14:05:11.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.145 4326685290184345088 250.95377610552 -14.08680588033 12.2605 11.1160 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.145#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90564_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90564_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:25.78 -21:11:04.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.710 4116026485866803328 257.85662340140 -21.18452614391 12.9345 12.2021 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.710#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90678_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90678_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:38.44 -18:28:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90702_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 90702_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90707_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 90707_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90746_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90746_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:22.18 -18:24:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90772_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90772_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:32.99 -21:29:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90815_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90815_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:02.71 -20:00:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90817_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90817_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:06.20 -17:28:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90844_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90844_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:59.07 -18:53:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90848_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90848_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:07.07 -22:05:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90890_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90890_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:15.59 -16:53:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90902_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90902_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:24.14 -19:04:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90924_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90924_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:26.52 -19:48:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90935_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90935_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:30.73 -19:24:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90965_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 90965_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:41.34 -22:00:01.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.614 4115530262526414080 256.42243068978 -22.00053194877 12.7301 11.3816 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.614#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91001_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91001_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:18.07 -14:08:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:29.46 -20:57:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91072_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91072_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:49.37 -19:52:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91083_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91083_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.92 -21:30:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91091_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91091_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:31.19 -18:48:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91101_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91101_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:28.40 -15:18:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91110_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91110_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:33.27 -14:06:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91144_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91144_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:24.42 -17:34:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91146_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91146_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:12.16 -14:55:33.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.399 4139471514045788288 257.05077274254 -14.92604134407 13.0476 11.7216 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.399#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91147_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91147_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:01.66 -16:29:43.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.378 4135891190644046336 257.75730600875 -16.49536266748 13.2319 11.9647 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.378#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91154_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91154_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:40.86 -15:50:15.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.832 4325359725836077440 247.92045856812 -15.83775354149 13.6523 12.6778 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.832#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91168_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91168_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:32.10 -17:08:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91170_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91170_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:15.05 -16:17:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.189 4138891418584474752 255.81294404805 -16.29146264575 12.6101 11.1908 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:54.39 -15:38:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91183_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91183_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:32.14 -21:31:30.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.684 4129831167888739584 250.38407718633 -21.52504920015 13.8438 12.9338 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.684#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91198_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91198_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:31.13 -19:17:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91207_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91207_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:00.30 -16:39:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.587 4325167311300465664 247.25141717085 -16.65666456941 13.8120 12.9115 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.587#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91219_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91219_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:22.20 -20:51:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91221_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91221_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:25.12 -18:21:15.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.744 4323777666043320960 247.10546895324 -18.35421786625 13.8564 12.8959 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.744#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91225_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91225_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:18.32 -17:18:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91239_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91239_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:31.14 -16:15:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91242_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91242_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:13.03 -14:40:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91248_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91248_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:55.40 -15:33:38.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.006 4325571828499834496 247.48138515716 -15.56097299712 13.7839 12.9055 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.006#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91254_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91254_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:35.57 -17:42:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.276 4323734544571495168 248.14883830408 -17.70049599921 14.0999 13.4526 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.276#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91274_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 91274_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91300_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91300_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:07.61 -16:43:32.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.187 4133751579675495680 253.28173868411 -16.72562358704 13.3028 12.0281 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.187#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91309_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91309_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:18.32 -16:40:10.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.038 4324276981763433344 249.82657677201 -16.66949687355 14.0729 13.4027 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.038#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91325_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91325_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:48.29 -17:32:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91346_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91346_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:27.50 -18:53:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91351_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91351_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:08.06 -16:07:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91361_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91361_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:19.61 -15:30:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.284 4325951434892794752 250.58193761652 -15.50298371309 14.2913 13.5196 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.284#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91363_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91363_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:58.15 -16:09:17.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.770 4325855055825500928 250.99305838017 -16.15474971127 13.8658 13.0162 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.770#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 91381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:39.15 -16:27:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.515 4324295467302650240 249.66349372908 -16.45683937086 14.2038 13.6005 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.515#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29642_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 29642_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:36.96 -19:22:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32447_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 32447_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:35.08 -19:02:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48442_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 48442_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:55.72 -17:18:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25341_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 25341_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:43.61 -19:48:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17606_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 17606_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:39.87 -20:42:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12243_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 12243_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:57.61 -21:20:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23203_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 23203_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:39.44 -20:03:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66299_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 66299_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:27.05 -15:03:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262
The candidate 27431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-16-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262 did not pass the final checks