Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7355,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2355 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 146697 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 146697 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits

renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 536.2055
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 493.8357
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 988.4320
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.9881
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 987.7190
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 474.9674
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.84338
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.6299991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-09T00:38:34.6647916' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T05:38:34.6647916' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.2351234257 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T05:38:44.5666229' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.2352380324 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 159.998970862911 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000343734092 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 63.1455555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 227.022222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.12052297142845 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20334 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20334 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.6299991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.6299991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 19.101528 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits :)
Spent 0.517922 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-09T00:39:19.5097595' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T05:39:19.5097595' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.2356424653 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T05:39:29.4117165' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.235757072 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 159.99897086688 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000343680791 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 63.0280555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 227.343333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.1216873583464 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20334 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20334 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 19.101528 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits :)
Spent 0.507761 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits

fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.73523917
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:13.022 +13:59:13.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0534 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:12.453 +13:59:13.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:13.022 +13:59:13.39
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:12.453 +13:59:13.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00230 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Hb9T1vubX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jyFEvOfpTI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACWIc05sAR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KCmjOtZ0VP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6443 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6604 to 168.1630 deg, Dec +8.4830 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6604 to 168.1630 deg, Dec 8.4830 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 4341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3437 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 6443 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884591
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884591
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
2.1 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
3.0 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
3.0 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1Hb9T1vubX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=439, passed=6443
Got 6443 stars (including 5991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jyFEvOfpTI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, passed=6432
Got 6432 stars (including 5975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ACWIc05sAR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=577, passed=6311
Got 6311 stars (including 5733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6311 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 873 stars left (next iteration limit 960)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KCmjOtZ0VP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=643, passed=6292
Got 6292 stars (including 5647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:13.022 +13:59:13.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0534 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:12.453 +13:59:13.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:13.022 +13:59:13.39
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:12.453 +13:59:13.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00230 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xpmezbcGpx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fEiBBM179U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jgKZPDkWty
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wtrvxoFOxl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.5870 to 168.1630 deg, Dec +8.4530 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.5870 to 168.1630 deg, Dec 8.4530 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 4366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3641 out of 34456 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.780204
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.780204
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
1.9 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.9 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
2.9 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xpmezbcGpx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1356, passed=34443
Got 34443 stars (including 33015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fEiBBM179U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1357, passed=34514
Got 34514 stars (including 33102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 878 stars left (next iteration limit 965)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jgKZPDkWty (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2450, passed=25850
Got 25850 stars (including 23384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25850 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 883 stars left (next iteration limit 971)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wtrvxoFOxl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2639, passed=26328
Got 26328 stars (including 23674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 884 stars left (next iteration limit 972)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-38-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56790.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51901_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 51901_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51903_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 51903_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 14.11 | 10:56:59.70 +15:30:14.0 | 2324 2292 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:56:59.71 +15:30:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 52557_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 11.42 | 10:24:41.12 +17:14:18.6 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 52764_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 11.93 | 10:42:37.32 +16:45:02.5 | 4413 1528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 53383_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 12.65 | 10:40:17.92 +14:09:04.5 | 4774 3096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54777_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 54777_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 13.75 | 10:38:47.72 +16:07:40.5 | 4974 1897 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:38:47.70 +16:07:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54859_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 54859_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 13.75 | 10:28:21.66 +15:46:16.3 | 6497 2077 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:28:21.61 +15:46:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55022_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 55022_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 13.88 | 10:49:14.96 +15:10:52.6 | 3458 2487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55202_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 55202_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 13.79 | 10:48:08.01 +14:13:05.7 | 3625 3069 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:48:08.00 +14:13:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55857_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 55857_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 14.08 | 10:28:28.76 +15:46:30.2 | 6480 2075 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:28:28.73 +15:46:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56790_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 56790_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 14.86 | 10:56:37.49 +14:43:49.7 | 2377 2761 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:56:37.55 +14:43:49.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.172 3969148744758829312 164.15642138907 +14.73049617912 14.7878 13.9328 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.172#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57049_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 57049_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 14.57 | 10:55:01.12 +14:46:57.1 | 2614 2730 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:00.98 +14:46:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57104_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 57104_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 09.23576 | 2461139.73576 | 14.50 | 10:25:57.58 +10:18:53.4 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_010332_TTUQ2b1x1_7376_ZpOYnbNy/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-39-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:23:23.75 +12:50:17.3
########### Completed Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:23:23.75 +12:50:17.3
###################################################################################
10:23:23.75 +12:50:17.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:56:37.55 +14:43:49.9
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.73523917 -observatory V36
23:33:48.66 -05:18:32.9 Mercury (0.2mag)
02:35:57.13 +15:09:36.1 Venus (-3.9mag)
23:58:35.60 -01:15:18.6 Mars (1.2mag)
07:09:48.29 +22:50:45.1 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:26:08.52 +00:29:56.2 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:46:18.86 +19:43:01.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:09:56.51 -00:21:03.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:24.97 -22:52:26.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:40:59.04 -27:57:57.0 Moon (-10.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 9 01:08 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.73523917:
07:09:54.35 +22:50:34.6 Io (5.7mag)
07:09:57.79 +22:50:27.4 Europa (5.9mag)
07:10:02.28 +22:50:11.3 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:09:18.20 +22:51:49.0 Callisto (6.5mag)
07:13:24.95 +22:41:40.4 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:09:51.22 +22:50:37.0 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:13:27.08 +23:11:02.8 Elara (17.3mag)
07:08:13.54 +23:34:17.8 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:18:16.57 +22:48:03.1 Carme (18.5mag)
00:26:15.45 +00:29:45.4 Titan (8.8mag)
00:26:12.97 +00:30:05.8 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:26:02.16 +00:31:07.0 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:26:20.06 +00:29:42.6 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:27:50.58 +00:39:27.0 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 9 01:08 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.73523917:
15:04:44.19 -11:02:02.1 JWST
17:43:29.66 +38:34:24.3 Chandra
17:50:18.00 -41:14:19.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 9 01:08 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.73523917 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:48:49.98 -28:23:49.9 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:02:03.38 -69:59:32.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:31:05.70 +31:23:37.9 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:53.48 +09:44:18.8 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:08:18.11 +28:58:23.5 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:21:26.19 +25:51:03.6 15.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:13.25 +31:57:12.7 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:13.59 -00:53:18.5 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:55:07.21 +17:57:27.3 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:42:42.72 -11:37:07.8 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:11:04.17 -12:59:23.5 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:47:00.70 +62:31:40.5 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:24:27.24 -03:38:21.0 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:41:16.07 +84:59:55.9 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:15:17.40 +63:33:20.8 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
04:58:14.71 +15:50:21.7 10.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:23:24.50 +05:16:42.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:40.61 +13:28:13.5 14.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:20:23.16 -23:26:08.6 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:11:06.65 +47:01:10.0 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
14:06:51.13 +40:17:32.3 14.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:14:51.41 -25:11:16.5 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:03:02.09 +19:46:08.7 9.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:57:03.90 +02:35:23.4 17.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
02:18:06.44 +03:43:05.2 10.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:39:57.38 +35:53:51.5 14.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:29:44.57 -10:04:14.7 12.2mag 10P/Tempel
15:09:11.99 +03:51:31.6 13.4mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:04:46.35 -01:45:16.1 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
17:58:22.76 -09:52:12.2 17.8mag 40P/Vaisala
10:38:15.73 -04:40:09.4 16.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:38:13.73 +16:19:31.9 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
06:58:34.46 +38:26:52.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:20:19.21 -12:16:31.9 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:45:27.76 +18:51:44.9 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
00:50:42.25 +06:53:29.4 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels
22:42:10.52 -11:23:04.6 14.6mag 88P/Howell
01:51:29.71 +18:48:04.6 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:42:19.56 +31:54:35.5 16.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:20:53.38 +41:29:06.4 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:22:49.91 +13:36:23.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:34:18.66 +13:38:53.4 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
00:51:10.26 +10:47:04.7 11.0mag 141P/Machholz
01:00:54.08 +02:19:59.4 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
23:49:42.97 -01:27:30.1 13.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:30:29.09 +04:02:33.8 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:43:33.97 -04:54:42.0 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:30:05.04 +31:18:57.1 17.9mag 164P/Christensen
06:24:00.59 +24:26:50.9 17.9mag 198P/ODAS
15:03:25.17 -00:49:16.1 17.4mag 210P/Christensen
21:18:33.98 -13:05:08.6 17.5mag 218P/LINEAR
17:14:10.84 -14:43:47.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
05:20:01.79 +34:08:27.0 16.6mag 240P/NEAT
07:35:24.36 -05:55:34.4 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
15:45:02.65 +06:31:40.1 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:31:49.10 +21:20:03.0 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS
05:26:09.49 +45:25:48.9 17.4mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 9 01:08 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.22 -11:25:16.10 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.16 17.22
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 9 01:08 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Apr 9 01:08 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:50:17.550 +33:04:52.33 AT 2026ifp 2026-03-27.86 19.99
16:52:21.140 +31:25:32.03 AT 2026ifo 2026-03-27.86 19.73
16:06:48.970 +28:22:45.47 AT 2026ifn 2026-03-27.85 21.37
16:26:20.250 +28:06:35.30 AT 2026ifm 2026-03-27.85 20.13
17:01:36.800 +29:43:13.81 AT 2026ifl 2026-03-27.85 20.62
17:06:26.770 +28:47:25.16 AT 2026ifk 2026-03-27.85 21.39
16:47:18.680 +27:13:25.92 AT 2026ifj 2026-03-27.85 20.26
15:55:49.720 +37:36:32.33 AT 2026ifi 2026-03-24.80 21.32
16:05:53.820 +48:45:26.80 AT 2026ifh 2026-03-23.81 21.26
16:27:03.110 +44:45:26.84 AT 2026ifg 2026-03-23.81 21.9
16:41:17.580 +44:27:03.47 AT 2026iff 2026-03-23.81 22.17
16:30:53.670 +55:47:08.39 AT 2026ife 2026-03-30.85 20.99
16:07:35.060 +52:45:21.40 AT 2026ifd 2026-03-30.82 20.79
12:49:57.980 +19:52:49.93 AT 2026ifc 2026-03-20.70 19.71
15:58:08.890 +36:23:36.27 AT 2026ifb 2026-03-18.81 20.34
15:47:02.670 +48:09:28.72 AT 2026ifa 2026-03-30.81 20.31
15:30:58.600 +53:17:16.37 AT 2026iez 2026-03-23.80 21.21
10:25:53.600 +03:15:54.45 AT 2026iey 2026-03-24.63 22.18
19:10:17.892 -22:37:27.97 AT 2026iex 2026-03-30.80 18.87
12:44:39.935 -44:03:37.93 AT 2026iew 2026-03-31.50 19.02
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 9 01:08 tns_transients_list.txt