This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 02 31.26 +03 34 10.4 9.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,9.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 9.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 34 25.83 +01 30 55.9 12.0 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 21 18.22 +10 50 13.2 12.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 40 16.00 +08 53 02.3 12.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 05 56.93 +07 58 12.0 12.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 08 45.21 +02 59 53.2 13.2 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 36 58.32 +05 22 16.7 13.5 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 06 52.64 +09 53 28.5 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 09 59 44.42 +02 22 37.1 14.7 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 15 15.59 +03 58 16.9 14.9 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,14.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 14.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2522* 10 06 46.02 +06 05 07.6 14.9 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7522,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2522 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461139.75256715 09.04.2026 06:03:31.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7204
Objects passed selection criteria: 7191
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6673.25
Average stars matched: 6487.25 (97.2128 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112672 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 01:10:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461139.75256715 09.04.2026 06:03:31.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 54
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41419
Objects passed selection criteria: 41324
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38969.2
Average stars matched: 37555.8 (96.3728 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140468 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 01:11:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.75178127
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:18.749 +06:01:19.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:19.987 +06:00:39.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0471 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:18.749 +06:01:19.26
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:19.987 +06:00:39.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01228 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hx1dXoi8zm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6Lmn1BCFeV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8iCEitYWPW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.orx2IkF1j9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3190 to 162.3131 deg, Dec +0.6159 to +11.3378 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3190 to 162.3131 deg, Dec 0.6159 to 11.3378 deg
Loaded 4762 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 3983 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3983 out of 7065 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.859046
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.859046
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hx1dXoi8zm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, passed=7065
Got 7065 stars (including 6535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6Lmn1BCFeV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, passed=7072
Got 7072 stars (including 6542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7072 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8iCEitYWPW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=6361
Got 6361 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.orx2IkF1j9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=6382
Got 6382 stars (including 5911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 20326_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20428_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 20428_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:43.89 +01:28:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20494_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 20494_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20521_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 20521_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:32.51 +06:04:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 20524_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:00.03 +04:38:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 20528_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:49.83 +07:20:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 20531_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:15.67 +04:42:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:02:31.26 +03:34:10.4
10:34:25.83 +01:30:55.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:18.749 +06:01:19.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:19.987 +06:00:39.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0471 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:18.749 +06:01:19.26
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:19.987 +06:00:39.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01228 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6O8Yn471kL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SfkztQSLon
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fsZpU5UM4Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gsmzP7IhOB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3030 to 162.3131 deg, Dec +0.6160 to +11.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3030 to 162.3131 deg, Dec 0.6160 to 11.3418 deg
Loaded 4769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 4077 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4077 out of 40894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736338
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736338
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
1.9 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.4 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6O8Yn471kL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1744, passed=40882
Got 40882 stars (including 39070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SfkztQSLon (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1745, passed=40944
Got 40944 stars (including 39124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fsZpU5UM4Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1598, passed=37592
Got 37592 stars (including 35941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37592 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gsmzP7IhOB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1605, passed=37598
Got 37598 stars (including 35926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_010427_TTUQ1b1x1_7813_oTSd8rBJ/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52779.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52785.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52797.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53980.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54150.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54154.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54206.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54227.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54232.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54243.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54244.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54255.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54259.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54264.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54281.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54339.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53057.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53084.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53160.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53287.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53955.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52779_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:53.09 +01:40:05.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52782_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52785_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:25.87 +04:18:28.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.597 3848997172091946240 150.60790101861 +04.30765265479 14.8838 14.4135 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.597#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52786_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:00.10 +08:24:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52790_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:56.09 +05:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52791_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:19.85 +08:08:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52792_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52792_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:58:51.12 +09:03:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52797_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:16.38 +05:04:16.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.424 3849852832656542208 147.06842997950 +05.07075844668 13.5784 13.0837 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.424#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52802_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:21.68 +00:51:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52822_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:31.27 +03:34:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 52998_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:25.83 +01:30:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53057_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53057_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53084_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53117_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53117_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:39.10 +03:33:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53160_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53287_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53287_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53367_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53518_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53650_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:02.89 +09:22:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53736_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:49.79 +10:22:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53786_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53786_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:29.57 +07:09:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53840_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53840_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:20.52 +05:41:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53874_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53874_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:47.50 +01:31:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53940_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:55.11 +03:41:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53955_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 53955_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53980_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 53980_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:03.94 +03:15:28.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.143 3836667764094267520 152.26645081237 +03.25771208402 14.6552 14.1029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.143#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54150_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54150_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:36.94 +09:49:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.431 3879306648925393792 148.90403652789 +09.83329746752 14.8584 14.3384 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.431#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54154_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54154_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:32.43 +01:49:58.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.426 3846558042984848512 146.63492877901 +01.83248921144 14.6642 13.9829 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.426#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54161_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54161_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:44.33 +09:02:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54206_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:07.88 +08:59:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.254 3869202618102331392 162.28310090624 +08.98380079877 14.5970 14.0751 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.254#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54209_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54209_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:09.03 +05:57:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54219_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54219_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:19.94 +01:38:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.889 3846675690728968064 148.08352850621 +01.64238848388 14.9622 14.4183 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.889#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54227_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54227_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:05.23 +05:53:15.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.457 3859161607334905472 160.27240373047 +05.88786371562 14.9252 14.4284 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.457#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54229_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54229_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:23.45 +02:00:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54232_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54232_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:28.14 +01:45:06.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.527 3856297688782185472 155.61793750253 +01.75205952041 14.1243 12.8880 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.527#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54243_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:02.72 +09:04:06.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.215 3878786000105286528 147.76158916002 +09.06835960014 15.2364 14.7316 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.215#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54244_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54244_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:47:03.02 +03:28:03.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.612 3809477356935437056 161.76287532535 +03.46729908058 14.9156 14.2684 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.612#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54246_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54246_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:06.03 +04:48:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.724 3858228358185771392 161.52472352651 +04.80984659905 14.9167 14.2282 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.724#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54255_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54255_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:23.72 +08:13:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.925 3868762680308448000 161.09857388790 +08.23128702773 14.8155 14.0610 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.925#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54258_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 54258_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54259_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54259_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:24.42 +09:48:49.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.144 3869546425940271744 161.10178556516 +09.81335073698 15.0068 14.5255 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.144#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54264_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54264_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:07.21 +07:04:17.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.916 3862537967025997440 158.77979142404 +07.07158323179 14.7075 13.9239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.916#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54277_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54277_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:48.47 +05:00:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54281_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54281_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:18.91 +09:29:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.903 3869516150715132928 160.82831244102 +09.49370762954 15.2369 14.6272 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.903#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54285_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 54285_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54324_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54324_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:05.45 +06:40:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54339_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 54339_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:31.60 +10:47:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.248 3882290384181055872 158.88145156175 +10.78939181469 15.0288 14.4198 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.248#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02584_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154
The candidate 02584_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-03-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0154 did not pass the final checks
