This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2454* 10 12 34.22 +15 35 52.9 10.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7453,10.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2454 10.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2454* 09 49 05.75 +16 18 50.5 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7453,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2454 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2454* 09 37 54.64 +17 03 16.0 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7453,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2454 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2454* 10 06 52.70 +09 53 27.5 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7453,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2454 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2454* 09 26 21.66 +13 45 32.6 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7453,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2454 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.2454* 10 07 25.94 +13 56 58.4 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DI Leo,2461139.7453,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DI Leo 20260409.2454 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461139.74567793 09.04.2026 05:53:36.573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7885
Objects passed selection criteria: 7879
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7377.5
Average stars matched: 7189.75 (97.4551 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113360 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 00:57:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461139.74567793 09.04.2026 05:53:36.573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 133
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44167
Objects passed selection criteria: 44023
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41685.8
Average stars matched: 40298.2 (96.6715 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 00:58:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.74502235
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:51.758 +13:59:46.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0707 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:50.807 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:51.758 +13:59:46.66
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:50.807 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00487 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XqUhUZYn9f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TWDauQ1PyT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nslNrphZJl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgvRPFqSk4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2659 deg
Loaded 4773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3901 out of 4125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4125 out of 7958 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893593
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893593
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XqUhUZYn9f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=7958
Got 7958 stars (including 7414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TWDauQ1PyT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, passed=8039
Got 8039 stars (including 7496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nslNrphZJl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=6854
Got 6854 stars (including 6383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6854 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pgvRPFqSk4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=482, passed=6842
Got 6842 stars (including 6354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6842 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20459.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20631.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 20459_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:53.76 +13:45:44.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.365 615252690762513152 148.47407164870 +13.76232360056 12.3737 11.9022 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.365#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 20528_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 20631_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:57.92 +15:51:32.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.700 616670407927284864 149.49114466629 +15.85895832467 12.3345 12.2388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.700#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:12:34.22 +15:35:52.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:51.758 +13:59:46.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0707 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:50.807 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:51.758 +13:59:46.66
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:50.807 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00487 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pm8WlTUiDn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HddcwtZ7Ux
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DDZaRm9rfn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5laFXdtomK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec +8.6120 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec 8.6120 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3707 out of 4153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4153 out of 43775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782622
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782622
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pm8WlTUiDn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1969, passed=43753
Got 43753 stars (including 41699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HddcwtZ7Ux (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1988, passed=43712
Got 43712 stars (including 41658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DDZaRm9rfn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1747, passed=40196
Got 40196 stars (including 38385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40196 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5laFXdtomK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1767, passed=40236
Got 40236 stars (including 38406 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_005427_TTUQ1b1x1_16401_Xj6AqUe6/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52940.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52943.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52944.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52945.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52951.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53186.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53332.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53374.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53427.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53436.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53624.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53644.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53713.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53815.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53892.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53904.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53912.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53990.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53997.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54003.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54046.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54073.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54087.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54105.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54108.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54115.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54119.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54138.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54175.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54189.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54217.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out54079.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53315.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53484.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53969.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:53.27 +17:04:41.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.433 620191632570339328 146.47208872674 +17.07792757136 14.8302 14.1790 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.433#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52943_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:19:54.30 +09:41:31.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.908 590781792471723264 139.97608714620 +09.69177783497 14.3506 13.8847 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.908#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52944_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:26.42 +14:13:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.104 617688285112042240 144.85994735336 +14.22116762209 14.3632 13.5959 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.104#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:10.56 +13:46:52.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.197 617493534115012864 143.04411524310 +13.78102034593 14.2978 13.8045 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.197#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:59.14 +17:08:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.254 622968925927389184 150.24637882135 +17.13396720695 13.8248 13.0884 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.254#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:28:20.09 +13:16:31.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.904 617368602106278528 142.08361223688 +13.27518362786 13.2556 12.7492 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.904#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53012_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:34.23 +15:35:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53031_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53082_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53082_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53088_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53088_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53097_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53113_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53134_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53134_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53142_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53142_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 53154_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53158_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53186_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:42:57.97 +17:02:42.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.818 620571887499794944 145.74136033695 +17.04507553996 12.6459 12.1184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.818#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53198_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53237_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53252_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53315_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 53315_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53329_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53332_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53332_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:01.92 +18:05:20.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.432 621105116279215744 147.00812682680 +18.08875983232 13.3479 12.8699 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.432#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53353_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53353_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53371_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53371_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53374_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53374_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.19 +17:44:55.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.346 631556425273235200 142.26762277584 +17.74841064601 13.8326 13.1715 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.346#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53390_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53390_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53392_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53392_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53427_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:04.35 +11:19:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.898 589907680727810048 143.01865088990 +11.31888988863 13.7321 13.3383 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.898#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53436_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:19:23.80 +16:28:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.422 631775429950362880 139.84917254958 +16.46710514793 13.7077 13.1026 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.422#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53462_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53462_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53484_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 53484_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53503_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53503_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53517_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:51.15 +17:15:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53523_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53523_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:35.52 +15:44:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53531_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53544_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53544_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:12.31 +16:27:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53571_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53571_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:40.45 +13:49:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53586_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53586_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53599_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:43.09 +09:03:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53612_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:08.64 +09:16:16.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.536 589006008177670912 142.53597585786 +09.27040714792 14.2922 13.3769 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.536#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53644_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:38.67 +17:04:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.632 631317792595150720 142.66065068095 +17.07286623806 14.1208 13.4621 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.632#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53648_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53648_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53666_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53666_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53667_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53667_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53668_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53668_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53683_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53683_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53689_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53690_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53693_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53693_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53713_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53713_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:27.12 +09:50:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.212 3878982537808764544 148.61316876007 +09.84813075840 14.5391 13.9604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.212#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53731_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53757_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53775_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53797_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53801_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53801_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53814_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53814_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53815_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:15.70 +12:26:04.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.044 614065978414526464 144.81512551520 +12.43472381158 14.5791 14.0724 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.044#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53843_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53843_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53860_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53884_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:01.24 +19:07:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:22.86 +13:18:01.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.283 617556515515475584 144.84595914555 +13.29950302932 14.5990 14.1385 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.283#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53894_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53904_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:50.97 +09:48:47.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.717 589250963048147968 141.21237239746 +09.81293962674 14.6224 13.9433 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.717#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53909_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53911_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53912_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:59.58 +10:41:37.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.051 592584201267004160 139.74793267946 +10.69332857044 14.4234 13.6494 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.051#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53915_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53915_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53928_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53942_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53942_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:14.71 +15:05:04.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.682 630552841739624064 141.06086027683 +15.08407665646 15.0582 14.4351 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.682#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53959_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53959_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53969_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 53969_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:56.89 +09:04:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.789 3876615770310300160 153.98679672336 +09.07795477341 15.0039 14.4957 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53992_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53997_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:48.66 +12:14:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.591 614000248234966784 143.70201015802 +12.24728501579 14.8184 14.2885 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.591#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54003_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:41.69 +16:02:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.300 631650605316743808 139.17387886711 +16.03803940346 14.9565 14.3470 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.300#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54028_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54028_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54046_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:27:45.90 +13:04:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.591 593345338191404672 141.94132983984 +13.07460557649 15.0551 14.4939 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.591#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54066_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54072_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54073_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:20.23 +15:53:44.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.277 630899845032810624 140.08403102218 +15.89544346166 14.9773 14.4378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.277#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54079_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54079_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:33.59 +14:12:41.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54087_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:53.17 +11:19:58.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.514 593402753314157696 139.47115988758 +11.33269711789 14.8135 14.2142 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.514#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54088_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54088_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54099_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54099_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54105_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54105_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:21:48.03 +11:57:04.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.736 593535622422475776 140.44996210912 +11.95068379435 14.9719 14.3620 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.736#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54108_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54108_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:53.18 +14:13:27.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.554 618417055163233792 141.47171430765 +14.22425342652 14.9111 14.3687 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.554#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54115_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:05.53 +12:10:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.496 593695292126576256 139.02278920932 +12.18241558360 14.8842 14.4000 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.496#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54119_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:09.43 +12:01:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.652 593583622976965504 139.28932001118 +12.02662645265 15.1035 14.5763 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.652#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54122_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54122_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54138_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54138_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:41.44 +16:21:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.933 631712281047059968 139.17256972505 +16.36291564061 14.8825 14.3897 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.933#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54153_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54175_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:34.85 +09:25:22.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.988 3876781178090906624 152.39526746529 +09.42222854996 14.9408 14.3090 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.988#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54180_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54180_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54189_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54189_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:20.17 +09:37:55.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.549 588614410240178048 144.58369704014 +09.63176376860 14.9642 14.4388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.549#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54217_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 54217_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-53-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks