This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7219,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2219 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7219,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2219 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.7219,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.2219 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461139.72222481 09.04.2026 05:19:50.224 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14341
Objects passed selection criteria: 14318
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12982
Average stars matched: 12614.8 (97.1711 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 00:23:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461139.72222481 09.04.2026 05:19:50.224 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91532
Objects passed selection criteria: 91290
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84280.8
Average stars matched: 81036.8 (96.151 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1948856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 9 00:25:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.72150006
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:15.321 +29:58:56.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0580 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:18.535 +29:59:34.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0675 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:15.321 +29:58:56.42
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:18.535 +29:59:34.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01576 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VGISvbWyGt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3S5y7HWwMw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eEb6SjiXjZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pPRkwV4F76
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VGISvbWyGt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3S5y7HWwMw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eEb6SjiXjZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=885, passed=11763
Got 11763 stars (including 10866 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pPRkwV4F76 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=845, passed=11780
Got 11780 stars (including 10917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21286.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 20697_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:22.39 +30:08:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21246_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 21246_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:05.84 +29:16:49.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.700 878810751838797184 117.27447783851 +29.28035185692 11.9965 11.3214 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.700#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 21268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:34.34 +26:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 21272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:02.99 +28:20:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 21286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:56.28 +29:49:21.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.498 879649709273689088 113.48463189173 +29.82264463077 12.1778 11.4809 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.498#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.05 +29:09:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:14.03 +33:22:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:15.321 +29:58:56.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0580 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:18.535 +29:59:34.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0675 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:15.321 +29:58:56.42
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:18.535 +29:59:34.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01576 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lj4RfQM9Va
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.leedjUkoZQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kzhQpYf7Lp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2RObecEWI0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
1.9 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lj4RfQM9Va (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.leedjUkoZQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kzhQpYf7Lp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=4860, passed=77456
Got 77456 stars (including 72459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2RObecEWI0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=4737, passed=77392
Got 77392 stars (including 72536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77392 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-18-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-09_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_002042_TTUQ1b1x1_26826_3mxTgyMk/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109317.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109320.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109321.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109324.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109327.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109365.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109367.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109369.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109373.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109382.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109384.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109391.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111182.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111360.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112124.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112133.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112220.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112259.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112341.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112433.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112668.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112805.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112914.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112915.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112938.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112960.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113079.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113114.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113197.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113225.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113252.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113261.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:35.40 +28:23:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.149 876116536033101440 121.39747295683 +28.38981173659 14.8986 14.3943 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.149#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:32.39 +34:39:45.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.776 904121750027497856 124.88472095814 +34.66240885966 15.1020 14.4973 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.776#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109321_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109321_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:17.32 +34:49:08.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.728 893678279348957696 113.32200052020 +34.81848420852 15.0438 14.5549 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.728#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109324_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109324_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:09.60 +28:05:49.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.692 683954029853424256 122.28951514442 +28.09713948215 15.2248 14.7667 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.692#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109327_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109327_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:14.88 +32:46:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.495 892498400292816128 114.56212441119 +32.77606486027 15.2974 14.7951 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.495#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:47.91 +33:27:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.585 892753040314730112 114.19915382561 +33.45900367739 14.2235 13.2505 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.585#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109348_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109348_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:04.58 +26:37:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:09.63 +32:16:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.775 892425214050293760 114.79049094566 +32.27525482328 14.8639 14.4534 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.775#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:07.33 +34:03:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109365_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109365_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:52.16 +33:13:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.878 710891961654070272 127.96718425740 +33.22287386594 14.1086 13.6604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.878#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109367_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109367_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:52.79 +27:29:42.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.591 683676746764203776 123.21984276335 +27.49476448315 14.0085 13.3882 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.591#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109369_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109369_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:09.28 +26:53:19.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109373_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109373_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:40.69 +34:18:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.444 893602344327259776 113.41935272385 +34.30335275754 13.9048 13.3073 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.444#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109375_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109375_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:46.82 +34:16:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109377_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109377_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:21.34 +34:19:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109379_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109379_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:49.28 +31:37:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109382_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109382_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:13.80 +29:33:45.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.441 878923898457477376 117.30772663823 +29.56223506407 14.2027 13.5273 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.441#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109384_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109384_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:41.51 +30:29:40.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.695 879039622056083840 117.42334631372 +30.49436300971 13.6780 13.2735 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109386_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109386_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:47.16 +34:02:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109388_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109388_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:48.58 +32:39:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109389_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109389_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:16.43 +31:50:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109390_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109390_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:08.49 +30:49:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109391_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109391_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:02.10 +30:26:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.082 900759512189051136 124.00865017279 +30.44318430660 12.8611 12.2212 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.082#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109397_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109397_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:36.38 +27:55:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109864_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 109864_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:23.77 +27:43:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.97 +31:51:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110485_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110485_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:30.09 +35:02:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110589_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110589_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:32.67 +32:29:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110690_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110690_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:20.20 +32:28:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110761_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110761_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:17.72 +29:14:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110866_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110866_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.24 +30:58:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110881_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110881_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:35.11 +30:18:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110941_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 110941_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:33.84 +30:50:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111085_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111085_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:52.96 +31:03:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111146_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111146_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:00.76 +34:54:13.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.338 905736107974535168 120.50318891950 +34.90329556528 14.0364 13.4277 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.338#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.27 +31:46:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111182_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111182_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:21.96 +26:35:03.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
Preparing report for the candidate 111257_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:33.99 +27:31:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:12.36 +32:59:51.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.868 901632593140773504 124.80143468764 +32.99715073465 14.0351 13.4306 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.868#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111388_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111388_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.73 +30:36:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111426_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111426_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:53.96 +33:54:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111488_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111488_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.23 +31:15:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111527_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111527_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:11.18 +31:36:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111577_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111577_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:20.99 +29:53:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111597_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111597_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:37.14 +29:27:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:30.23 +29:36:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111719_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111719_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:58.60 +32:57:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111756_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111756_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.23 +25:13:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 111889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:02.17 +27:17:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:37.90 +28:46:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112124_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112124_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:21.66 +33:13:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.995 881981983890876416 116.09057915355 +33.22248067351 14.5055 14.0674 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.995#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112133_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112133_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:37.05 +33:53:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.602 905390689524903296 121.65370600021 +33.89059300935 14.5667 14.0765 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:08.75 +34:39:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112220_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112220_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:42.69 +32:18:04.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.132 892907075021845120 111.42792525461 +32.30068716023 14.7438 14.2677 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.132#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112259_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112259_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:23.74 +28:44:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.520 707488389050654208 126.59848211476 +28.74222027389 14.7799 14.3040 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.520#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:12.96 +29:50:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112301_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112301_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:20.09 +30:56:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:22.01 +33:47:36.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.947 711307061653372032 128.59173933007 +33.79304321440 14.7731 14.2997 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.947#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112433_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112433_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:15.89 +32:16:18.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.279 880415557777638272 114.81612655983 +32.27189641264 14.6533 13.9925 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.279#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112500_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112500_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:29.83 +35:07:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
Preparing report for the candidate 112518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112542_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112542_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:10.82 +26:27:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112668_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112668_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:07.97 +31:55:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.363 710516134835901568 127.78293002705 +31.91800977500 14.7550 14.2863 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.363#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112764_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112764_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:13.45 +31:49:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112805_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112805_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:54.77 +31:55:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.626 710519192852632064 127.47775052759 +31.93182549926 14.9415 14.4385 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.626#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.66 +29:07:08.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.472 885549482509354880 111.21107835405 +29.11870232570 14.7688 14.2559 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.472#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112915_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112915_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:10.09 +25:16:29.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.897 870228788705392128 111.54181195557 +25.27440470779 14.6062 13.9799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.897#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112938_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112938_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:36:08.81 +30:07:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.115 707832261313234816 129.03705022879 +30.13262003908 15.0102 14.4872 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.115#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112960_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 112960_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:30.69 +33:23:52.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.936 903051375457509120 126.37770578448 +33.39719691158 15.1838 14.7093 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.936#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:36.88 +32:54:20.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.852 892522933146103040 114.65359012049 +32.90523968980 15.0556 14.5760 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.852#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113114_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113114_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:00.87 +25:18:19.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.829 678868616776795136 127.50353083061 +25.30523040983 14.8422 14.2932 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113197_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113197_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:53.45 +33:49:12.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.281 893330833674812544 111.47308257466 +33.82004936672 15.1081 14.6502 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.281#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113225_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113225_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:30.07 +31:24:13.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.963 892085293159119360 111.37499738165 +31.40334942169 15.1045 14.5401 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.963#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113252_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113252_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:17.42 +34:27:09.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.541 902659090324923776 124.57267578926 +34.45227309802 14.9654 14.3719 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.541#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113261_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113261_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:29.59 +30:34:47.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.801 708045600927589248 127.37342193298 +30.57934564760 15.0260 14.4011 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.801#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113350_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 113350_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.06 +29:09:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
Preparing report for the candidate 13346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-19-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0116 did not pass the final checks