######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cam-06-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cam-06-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cam-06-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 174776 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 174776 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
renamed 'Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 523.2116 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 665.3421 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1213.3726 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 627.7227 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1214.2799 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 627.3445 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.31909 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Header: 68 keys total, 3 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-08T23:56:06.4770130' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T04:56:06.4770130' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.2056305208 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T04:56:16.3788666' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.2057451159 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 71.9964986601964 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9996768979854 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.2163888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.163333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.0424483988197 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29378 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29378 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "PRESSURE= 899.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 56: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 57: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 58: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 61: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 68: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits :) Spent 0.529290 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 29235.906676 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=19889.0, right_median=20896.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Header: 68 keys total, 3 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-08T23:57:32.1219743' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-09T04:57:32.1219743' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61139.2066217707 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-09T04:57:42.0223589' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61139.2067363658 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 71.9964987818162 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9996769389275 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1005555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.209166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04980134850991 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29378 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29378 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "PRESSURE= 899.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 56: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 57: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 58: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 61: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 68: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits :) Spent 0.546639 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 29235.906676 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=19889.0, right_median=20896.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.70574626 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:47:16.792 +69:58:46.61 Second-epoch image center 04:48:45.402 +70:00:08.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1284 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:47:16.792 +69:58:46.61 Second-epoch image center 04:48:28.162 +70:01:29.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1114 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:48:45.402 +70:00:08.36 Second-epoch second image center 04:48:28.162 +70:01:29.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.03340 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iBu2ZlttWz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VvHbPnJxNN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gxAVi01FWu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xdCMdzV0Ha Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 17535 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4953 to 100.0749 deg, Dec +62.8164 to +75.4615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4953 to 100.0749 deg, Dec 62.8164 to 75.4615 deg Loaded 14408 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7701 out of 8346 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8346 out of 17535 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930229 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930229 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 2.0 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 4.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 4.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.iBu2ZlttWz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1440, passed=17535 Got 17535 stars (including 16074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17535 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17045 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17045 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17045 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.VvHbPnJxNN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1424, passed=17523 Got 17523 stars (including 16079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17523 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17070 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17071 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17071 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.gxAVi01FWu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=685, passed=14105 Got 14105 stars (including 13415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14105 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13722 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13722 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13722 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.xdCMdzV0Ha (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=663, passed=14063 Got 14063 stars (including 13391 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14063 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012937 (46.6 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010350 (37.3 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 257 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.65" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 204 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2985 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 316 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 281 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 281 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.72" Excluding outliers - 281 stars left (next iteration limit 224) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21216_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21216_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate due to large distance (155.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21339_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21339_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 10.56 04:40:05.37 +66:10:22.3 5146 5556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:18:00.34 +71:13:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21423_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21423_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.47 04:18:00.12 +71:13:47.3 6331 2471 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21438_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21438_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.85 04:37:41.27 +69:31:50.3 5346 3514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21479_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21479_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.89 04:44:11.28 +72:47:37.2 5096 1526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (269.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21491_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21491_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.09 05:13:17.97 +69:36:39.0 3454 3294 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (727.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21531_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21531_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.11 05:49:03.22 +65:02:49.2 0685 5517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21550_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21550_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.21 04:43:17.47 +72:07:28.7 5120 1936 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (169.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21560_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21560_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.26 04:56:29.57 +73:47:55.1 4603 0873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (473.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21565_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21565_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.30 05:37:40.00 +68:39:24.3 2014 3574 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (226.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21568_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21568_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.28 04:49:54.35 +65:20:36.9 4502 6034 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (310.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21584_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21584_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.35 05:15:16.10 +68:12:37.9 3197 4115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21596_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21596_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.25 03:52:24.13 +67:32:32.1 7930 4534 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (468.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21597_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21597_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.48 05:44:35.08 +70:45:55.0 2022 2229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (281.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.39 05:16:44.73 +69:53:05.5 3303 3094 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (234.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21620_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 21620_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.41 05:05:50.82 +70:03:47.6 3883 3080 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (392.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11072_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 11072_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.49 05:40:44.83 +73:57:01.5 2762 0410 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:10:16.80 +68:42:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11047_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 11047_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 10.48 04:10:16.67 +68:42:00.4 6840 3963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 03:43:03.32 +68:35:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 14373_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 14373_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.42 03:43:03.00 +68:35:21.2 8339 3816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (96.9") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits exists and is non-empty The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:47:16.792 +69:58:46.61 Second-epoch image center 04:48:45.402 +70:00:08.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1284 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:47:16.792 +69:58:46.61 Second-epoch image center 04:48:28.162 +70:01:29.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1114 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:48:45.402 +70:00:08.36 Second-epoch second image center 04:48:28.162 +70:01:29.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.03340 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UpkXHMKTh0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ulflhgYiEE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.29z3sFUslz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0YLHOA9Sww Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 121322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.3972 to 100.3253 deg, Dec +62.8165 to +75.4640 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.3972 to 100.3253 deg, Dec 62.8165 to 75.4640 deg Loaded 14499 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6542 out of 8413 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8413 out of 121322 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.798908 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.798908 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.86 04:29:31.30 +66:47:19.9 5794 5184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 3.6 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 3.6 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 15.6 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.UpkXHMKTh0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=10875, passed=121302 Got 121302 stars (including 110227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 121302 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ulflhgYiEE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=10830, passed=121526 Got 121526 stars (including 110505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 121526 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119030 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119030 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.29z3sFUslz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4737, passed=66088 Got 66088 stars (including 61303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66088 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0YLHOA9Sww (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4712, passed=66233 Got 66233 stars (including 61475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66233 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012937 (46.6 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010350 (37.3 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 254 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 205 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.61" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.56" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 307 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 267 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13354 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.51" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 266 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17324 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.62" Excluding outliers - 266 stars left (next iteration limit 217) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-41-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0169.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-42-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-56-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out142465.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141954_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141954_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141959_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141959_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.12 04:34:54.55 +70:39:27.0 5507 2834 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141962_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141962_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.00 04:47:51.75 +71:07:52.9 4864 2523 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141972_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141972_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.79 03:33:41.35 +68:19:54.1 8888 3855 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (722.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141975_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141975_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.72 06:07:29.96 +69:01:38.7 0489 2822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141976_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141976_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.30 03:32:09.93 +66:35:51.2 9223 4854 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141981_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141981_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.53 03:34:34.99 +65:37:16.8 9218 5464 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 141985_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 141985_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.67 04:36:07.20 +72:44:31.6 5461 1571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 142086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.50 04:22:39.14 +68:29:48.8 6168 4133 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142407_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 142407_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 10.56 04:40:05.73 +66:10:23.4 5146 5556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (172.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142432_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 142432_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.23 04:51:14.33 +68:14:12.6 4560 4273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 142457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.36 04:17:16.43 +66:58:53.9 6522 5038 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (574.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142465_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 142465_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.44 05:30:41.84 +64:21:02.2 1753 6251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:13:20.20 +72:06:31.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.703 501158808690643712 063.33474679062 +72.10984642618 12.3061 12.0926 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.703#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142698_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 142698_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.40 04:13:19.99 +72:06:27.6 6517 1927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (699.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143027_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143027_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.86 06:13:28.53 +70:49:39.4 0637 1674 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (691.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143102_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143102_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.43 05:49:28.97 +65:53:39.3 0826 5008 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143112_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143112_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.45 03:12:41.35 +71:10:59.2 9460 1886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (384.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143240_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143240_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.45 05:21:00.16 +67:06:38.1 2738 4716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (337.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143244_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143244_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.62 05:25:26.31 +70:14:33.1 2899 2789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.57 04:05:43.20 +68:39:31.6 7092 3963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143297_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143297_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.70 03:54:13.78 +74:39:03.0 7162 0292 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143335_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143335_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.70 03:56:13.97 +71:48:01.6 7333 2018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (442.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143337_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143337_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.73 05:37:08.54 +69:27:27.2 2174 3107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143403_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143403_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.64 04:36:43.09 +67:22:38.6 5369 4826 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (764.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143412_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143412_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.81 05:47:42.06 +63:51:33.9 0540 6250 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143436_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143436_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.64 04:11:02.71 +72:56:31.6 6580 1414 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143471_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143471_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.73 04:33:23.92 +68:43:12.1 5569 4009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143499_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143499_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.71 04:27:18.03 +71:47:05.7 5874 2154 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143511_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143511_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.98 04:56:31.64 +71:52:14.5 4483 2040 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (228.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143534_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143534_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.01 05:07:30.39 +69:56:47.8 3789 3136 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (392.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143536_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143536_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.01 05:20:49.66 +66:51:42.4 2718 4867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143592_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143592_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.94 04:49:50.29 +72:55:04.8 4846 1432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (175.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143598_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143598_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.93 04:48:44.65 +66:46:07.2 4637 5168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.94 04:00:15.13 +68:19:46.9 7417 4125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143662_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143662_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.80 04:10:29.42 +66:38:08.0 6942 5216 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (133.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143676_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143676_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.97 04:49:57.10 +72:52:38.9 4840 1457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143681_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143681_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.13 04:57:04.93 +70:39:47.5 4379 2765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (96.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143716_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143716_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.10 04:22:19.03 +65:59:06.0 6245 5662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (206.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143739_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143739_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.10 05:04:54.40 +69:24:20.7 3883 3483 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (431.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143814_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143814_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.00 05:39:55.06 +70:57:04.2 2284 2186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143917_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 143917_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.43 04:46:01.00 +67:30:32.1 4828 4727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (472.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 144004_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 144004_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.39 05:51:56.40 +73:15:25.4 2163 0663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (799.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80133_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 80133_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 14.42 05:52:42.19 +64:13:32.2 0283 5930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 03:49:32.17 +65:31:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 42995_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 42995_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 6.68 03:49:32.49 +65:31:50.9 8311 5717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 03:50:22.55 +71:19:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 100036_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 100036_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 6.78 03:50:22.62 +71:20:02.2 7657 2255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:53:51.67 +66:22:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98220_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 98220_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 6.92 04:53:40.48 +66:23:45.5 4320 5377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89415_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 89415_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.25 04:33:41.69 +66:25:29.6 5542 5407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66572_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 66572_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.86 03:29:42.34 +68:46:23.8 9036 3541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26591_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 26591_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.76 04:31:00.60 +69:36:29.5 5703 3466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (99.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55699_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 55699_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.66 04:41:55.74 +72:44:54.1 5197 1558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (263.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89441_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 89441_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.29 05:13:31.76 +69:53:19.1 3471 3124 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 46725_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 46725_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.35 03:30:08.95 +68:45:42.8 9015 3554 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:18:00.65 +71:13:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25862_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 25862_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.52 04:18:00.82 +71:13:46.3 6331 2471 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 66789_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.93 04:44:11.18 +72:47:34.9 5096 1526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 131855_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 131855_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.90 04:37:41.88 +69:31:52.2 5346 3514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120725_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 120725_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.35 03:28:21.57 +70:56:48.7 8767 2247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:10:16.78 +68:42:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12095_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 12095_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 10.53 04:10:16.65 +68:42:01.6 6840 3963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20853_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 20853_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.34 04:23:13.96 +74:11:26.2 6009 0684 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (182.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78292_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 78292_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 12.92 05:02:19.98 +73:01:52.5 4298 1305 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 99603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 13.50 04:15:10.61 +65:25:31.4 6711 5974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85227_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 85227_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.92 04:29:31.67 +66:47:19.7 5794 5184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118219_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 118219_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 11.47 03:43:03.25 +68:35:19.5 8339 3816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (182.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85083_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 85083_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 7.14 04:50:54.95 +68:12:41.8 4577 4293 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:06:03.76 +68:40:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48815_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 48815_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 6.97 04:06:03.83 +68:40:58.2 7072 3953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 03:49:14.87 +70:52:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75385_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 The candidate 75385_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 6.88 03:49:15.11 +70:52:22.9 7759 2520 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits **** FOUND 04:20:39.75 +65:09:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 04:13:20.20 +72:06:31.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.70574626 -observatory V36 23:33:40.44 -05:19:15.8 Mercury (0.2mag) 02:35:48.64 +15:08:51.5 Venus (-3.9mag) 23:58:30.51 -01:15:52.0 Mars (1.2mag) 07:09:47.63 +22:50:46.2 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:26:07.71 +00:29:51.2 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:46:18.51 +19:42:60.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:09:56.26 -00:21:04.7 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:24.86 -22:52:26.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 18:39:13.11 -27:56:36.2 Moon (-10.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 9 00:03 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.70574626: 07:09:53.11 +22:50:37.1 Io (5.7mag) 07:09:56.67 +22:50:29.6 Europa (5.9mag) 07:10:02.00 +22:50:11.8 Ganymede (5.3mag) 07:09:17.32 +22:51:50.5 Callisto (6.5mag) 07:13:24.35 +22:41:42.5 Himalia (15.3mag) 07:09:51.29 +22:50:37.1 Thebe (16.2mag) 07:13:26.44 +23:11:04.5 Elara (17.3mag) 07:08:12.75 +23:34:19.9 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:18:15.94 +22:48:04.1 Carme (18.5mag) 00:26:14.54 +00:29:40.4 Titan (8.8mag) 00:26:12.29 +00:30:00.4 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:26:01.42 +00:31:02.2 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:26:19.18 +00:29:37.6 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:27:49.80 +00:39:22.2 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 9 00:03 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461139.70574626: 15:04:40.32 -11:00:08.5 JWST 17:40:31.14 +38:50:56.1 Chandra 17:34:54.80 -44:53:28.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 9 00:03 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461139.70574626 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:48:49.02 -28:23:44.0 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:02:02.20 -69:59:37.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:31:05.38 +31:23:37.3 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:53.54 +09:44:06.0 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:08:17.56 +28:58:19.7 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:21:24.17 +25:51:00.7 15.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:13.03 +31:57:11.3 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:30:13.43 -00:53:30.3 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:55:07.50 +17:57:18.1 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:42:43.22 -11:37:09.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:11:05.17 -12:59:41.3 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:46:58.66 +62:31:34.8 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:24:28.44 -03:38:19.8 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:41:17.06 +84:59:42.0 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:15:16.89 +63:33:21.9 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 04:58:10.61 +15:49:39.1 10.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:23:25.52 +05:16:25.4 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:18:39.97 +13:27:45.7 14.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:20:21.62 -23:26:25.5 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:11:05.22 +47:01:38.3 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 14:06:58.43 +40:15:56.6 14.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:14:48.74 -25:11:01.2 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 23:02:55.40 +19:46:14.0 9.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:57:04.69 +02:35:16.6 17.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 02:17:43.01 +03:43:31.4 10.3mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 23:39:52.07 +35:53:29.4 14.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:29:41.10 -10:04:19.8 12.2mag 10P/Tempel 15:09:14.28 +03:51:40.7 13.4mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:04:46.93 -01:45:19.9 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 17:58:21.89 -09:52:16.3 17.8mag 40P/Vaisala 10:38:16.08 -04:40:18.9 16.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:38:10.99 +16:19:13.5 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 06:58:31.39 +38:27:15.1 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:20:16.86 -12:16:45.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 03:45:23.17 +18:51:06.4 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 00:50:38.36 +06:53:08.3 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels 22:42:04.92 -11:23:35.6 14.6mag 88P/Howell 01:51:24.81 +18:47:35.1 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:42:16.37 +31:54:29.5 16.3mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:20:51.64 +41:29:55.9 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:22:47.20 +13:36:11.6 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:34:15.20 +13:38:39.9 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 00:51:01.24 +10:46:24.4 11.0mag 141P/Machholz 01:00:45.22 +02:19:19.7 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz 23:49:35.11 -01:28:04.3 13.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 01:30:19.99 +04:01:52.7 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz 00:43:29.02 -04:55:34.8 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring 10:30:05.54 +31:19:04.3 17.9mag 164P/Christensen 06:23:57.34 +24:26:54.0 17.9mag 198P/ODAS 15:03:28.31 -00:49:28.8 17.4mag 210P/Christensen 21:18:28.40 -13:05:34.2 17.5mag 218P/LINEAR 17:14:10.01 -14:43:59.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 05:19:58.06 +34:08:17.7 16.6mag 240P/NEAT 07:35:23.63 -05:55:46.8 17.7mag 242P/Spahr 15:45:03.22 +06:31:32.5 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:31:48.55 +21:20:02.3 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS 05:26:07.00 +45:25:55.5 17.4mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 9 00:03 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31 11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39 16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02 02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54 01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97 18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89 11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73 02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93 08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43 14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91 17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82 16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19 18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94 13:01:07.22 -11:25:16.10 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.16 17.22 10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15 08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54 06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42 12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32 08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73 12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 9 00:03 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag 00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Apr 9 00:03 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:52:21.140 +31:25:32.03 AT 2026ifo 2026-03-27.86 19.73 16:06:48.970 +28:22:45.47 AT 2026ifn 2026-03-27.85 21.37 16:26:20.250 +28:06:35.30 AT 2026ifm 2026-03-27.85 20.13 17:01:36.800 +29:43:13.81 AT 2026ifl 2026-03-27.85 20.62 17:06:26.770 +28:47:25.16 AT 2026ifk 2026-03-27.85 21.39 16:47:18.680 +27:13:25.92 AT 2026ifj 2026-03-27.85 20.26 15:55:49.720 +37:36:32.33 AT 2026ifi 2026-03-24.80 21.32 16:05:53.820 +48:45:26.80 AT 2026ifh 2026-03-23.81 21.26 16:27:03.110 +44:45:26.84 AT 2026ifg 2026-03-23.81 21.9 16:41:17.580 +44:27:03.47 AT 2026iff 2026-03-23.81 22.17 16:30:53.670 +55:47:08.39 AT 2026ife 2026-03-30.85 20.99 16:07:35.060 +52:45:21.40 AT 2026ifd 2026-03-30.82 20.79 12:49:57.980 +19:52:49.93 AT 2026ifc 2026-03-20.70 19.71 15:58:08.890 +36:23:36.27 AT 2026ifb 2026-03-18.81 20.34 15:47:02.670 +48:09:28.72 AT 2026ifa 2026-03-30.81 20.31 15:30:58.600 +53:17:16.37 AT 2026iez 2026-03-23.80 21.21 10:25:53.600 +03:15:54.45 AT 2026iey 2026-03-24.63 22.18 19:10:17.892 -22:37:27.97 AT 2026iex 2026-03-30.80 18.87 12:44:39.935 -44:03:37.93 AT 2026iew 2026-03-31.50 19.02 14:52:16.530 -15:21:39.90 AT 2026iev 2026-04-02.23 19.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 9 00:03 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 04 09.20674 2461139.70674 6.83 04:20:39.16 +65:10:09.9 6373 6155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_235827_TTUQ1b1x1_27402_jzdPSMmy/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_23-57-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
