This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J080.8851+51.2270,2461139.6620,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J080.8851+51.2270 20260409.1620 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 267035227943030272,2461139.6620,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 267035227943030272 20260409.1620 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051304.01+564819.3,2461139.6620,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051304.01+564819.3 20260409.1620 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461139.66227836 09.04.2026 03:53:30.850 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19018
Objects passed selection criteria: 18920
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14274.2
Average stars matched: 12986.8 (90.9803 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 23:03:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461139.66227836 09.04.2026 03:53:30.850 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 136972
Objects passed selection criteria: 136546
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101503
Average stars matched: 92810.8 (91.4367 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1904756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 23:05:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.66172383
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:38:48.695 +54:00:18.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:38:47.296 +54:00:20.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:38:48.695 +54:00:18.48
Second-epoch second image center 05:38:47.296 +54:00:20.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XYjTTqCHDV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.17Y6bVSmvF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XYHCIoFagq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.75S3I3QoBu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4455 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4455 deg
Loaded 11842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7480 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 21171 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946929
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946929
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XYjTTqCHDV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1951, passed=21171
Got 21171 stars (including 19188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.17Y6bVSmvF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1992, passed=21135
Got 21135 stars (including 19116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XYHCIoFagq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1265, passed=14961
Got 14961 stars (including 13685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14961 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.75S3I3QoBu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1251, passed=14919
Got 14919 stars (including 13660 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out34506.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31063_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 31063_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:06.83 +51:47:49.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.655 971915128735113216 092.27840343477 +51.79731752041 10.3963 10.0575 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.655#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32846_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 32846_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:46.35 +54:26:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32994_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 32994_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:56.19 +51:37:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 33520_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.20 +50:18:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33928_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 33928_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:35.99 +52:48:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34437_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 34437_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:51.00 +55:53:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34506_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 34506_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:45.75 +50:55:11.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.318 215168245100074112 084.69053041126 +50.92003751245 11.9445 11.0939 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.318#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34573_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 34573_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:19.12 +57:48:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12298_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 12298_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:20.31 +53:54:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.56 +50:07:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:38:48.695 +54:00:18.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:38:47.296 +54:00:20.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:38:48.695 +54:00:18.48
Second-epoch second image center 05:38:47.296 +54:00:20.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EoxdhLiVpu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YFgc2if23U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yUk8o95Ray
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.efgrzNuboP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 155080 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4472 deg
Loaded 11908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6184 out of 8396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8396 out of 155080 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.800893
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.800893
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EoxdhLiVpu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=17009, passed=155028
Got 155028 stars (including 137750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YFgc2if23U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=17172, passed=155805
Got 155805 stars (including 138361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yUk8o95Ray (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=9847, passed=86152
Got 86152 stars (including 76212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86152 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.efgrzNuboP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=9903, passed=86659
Got 86659 stars (including 76662 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_230028_TTUQ2b1x1_10808_mUQ2M015/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177311.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177329.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177347.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out188933.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out189967.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out189995.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out190028.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out191831.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193215.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196971.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177311_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 177311_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:14.05 +52:54:46.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177324_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
Preparing report for the candidate 177324_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177329_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 177329_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.22 +50:11:50.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.152 211378056720501376 089.46370724407 +50.19798480780 14.2436 13.6275 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.152#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177342_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
Preparing report for the candidate 177342_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177347_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 177347_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:30.31 +50:57:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.658 214651818232466176 088.87595879877 +50.96668776760 13.2375 12.5619 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.658#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178931_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 178931_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179107_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 179107_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:55.36 +54:33:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179444_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 179444_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179516_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 179516_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:55.80 +51:37:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180929_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 180929_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180931_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 180931_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181299_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 181299_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.54 +54:23:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181734_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 181734_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183146_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 183146_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:08.17 +51:03:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 183837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:45.54 +49:53:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183987_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 183987_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:45.97 +56:56:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185285_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 185285_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:15.13 +54:54:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185302_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 185302_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.30 +56:56:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185346_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 185346_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:46.43 +55:17:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186235_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 186235_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186560_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 186560_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186991_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 186991_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:14.21 +50:00:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187451_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 187451_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:02.04 +50:57:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187665_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 187665_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.42 +52:33:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187673_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 187673_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:46.49 +56:55:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188043_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 188043_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:12.50 +56:22:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188178_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 188178_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:25.54 +52:43:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188629_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 188629_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188712_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 188712_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.37 +50:23:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188841_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 188841_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188933_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 188933_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:31.40 +57:16:16.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.748 999032796327834880 090.63063591747 +57.27208905744 14.2683 13.7448 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.748#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189045_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189045_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:49.31 +51:04:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189428_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189428_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:08.78 +50:16:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189697_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189697_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:42.17 +57:49:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:02.14 +51:43:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189942_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189942_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:06.65 +54:48:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189967_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189967_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:45.63 +53:11:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.749 216044349708663808 088.94028640681 +53.18695200866 14.7155 14.1118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.749#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189995_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 189995_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.47 +50:51:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.908 971771642467902208 092.24745849435 +50.86441721274 14.3388 13.5664 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.908#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190028_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 190028_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:49.23 +49:49:40.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.686 211474504506295808 087.45485434230 +49.82784058472 13.7425 12.9701 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.686#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190270_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 190270_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:50.57 +49:49:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190482_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 190482_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:22.98 +50:56:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190649_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 190649_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:30.75 +51:10:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190733_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 190733_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:52.98 +54:15:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191070_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 191070_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:27.51 +55:39:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191493_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 191493_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:24.82 +56:05:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191563_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 191563_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:38.41 +57:44:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191831_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 191831_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.05 +54:32:06.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.028 264272777993251328 089.49554962799 +54.53510378519 14.2432 13.5136 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.028#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191846_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 191846_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:01.20 +58:13:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191990_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 191990_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:19.76 +52:20:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192675_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 192675_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:18.72 +50:13:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193215_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 193215_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:36.75 +53:12:11.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.893 972622183431637760 090.40272470996 +53.20313125214 14.6608 14.0894 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.893#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195512_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 195512_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:18.19 +56:50:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196971_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 196971_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:28.76 +51:47:22.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.141 214978510624797184 088.37032561040 +51.79066470923 15.3448 14.7813 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.141#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197842_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 197842_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:14.11 +55:04:47.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.861 265233579357892608 086.80875961837 +55.08001627691 14.9034 14.2411 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.861#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27904_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 27904_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.17 +50:18:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138205_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 138205_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 66885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:35.93 +52:48:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.69 +52:02:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28410_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 28410_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:37.16 +50:14:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.54 +50:07:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98888_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 98888_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:44.91 +54:17:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:23.81 +55:49:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130580_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 130580_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.43 +56:02:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:57.01 +56:05:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120364_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
Preparing report for the candidate 120364_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91599_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 91599_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:20.31 +53:54:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:50.95 +55:53:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.18 +51:37:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33827_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113
The candidate 33827_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_22-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0113 did not pass the final checks