This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1023* 05 22 27.48 +28 21 10.6 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3445560547403404416,2461139.6023,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3445560547403404416 20260409.1023 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J078.2225+30.7487,2461139.6023,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J078.2225+30.7487 20260409.1023 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J075.1959+32.5193,2461139.6023,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J075.1959+32.5193 20260409.1023 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3909530,2461139.6023,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3909530 20260409.1023 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1023* 04 42 29.65 +27 44 32.4 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.6023,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.1023 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.6023,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.1023 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 180866609052473728,2461139.6023,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 180866609052473728 20260409.1023 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3904164,2461139.6023,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3904164 20260409.1023 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1023* 04 43 36.85 +27 14 30.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6023,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1023 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1023* 05 26 45.95 +26 12 42.1 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6023,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1023 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6023,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1023 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1023* 04 45 10.21 +28 17 54.7 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.6023,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.1023 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461139.60258337 09.04.2026 02:27:33.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12824
Objects passed selection criteria: 12803
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11468
Average stars matched: 11156.5 (97.2837 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118864 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 21:40:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461139.60258337 09.04.2026 02:27:33.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 99 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 110530
Objects passed selection criteria: 110268
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97426
Average stars matched: 94028.2 (96.5125 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1945956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 21:45:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.60202420
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.069 +30:00:25.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.623 +30:00:29.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:01.069 +30:00:25.91
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:59.623 +30:00:29.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kd3act97q5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BgZyDPrEYA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pvdc3HUDCY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xOMCyN3nzm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Kd3act97q5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BgZyDPrEYA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pvdc3HUDCY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=863, passed=11213
Got 11213 stars (including 10334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xOMCyN3nzm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=807, passed=11245
Got 11245 stars (including 10417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20989.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 110s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20989_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 20989_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20991_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 20991_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.17 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 113s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:22:27.48 +28:21:10.6
05:12:50.05 +30:44:45.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.069 +30:00:25.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.623 +30:00:29.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:01.069 +30:00:25.91
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:59.623 +30:00:29.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1eNU7uRJKK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r0mGqQwLnh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f3TU3Ez2kK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n4STDfUzYf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1eNU7uRJKK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r0mGqQwLnh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f3TU3Ez2kK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=7439, passed=84813
Got 84813 stars (including 77263 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84813 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n4STDfUzYf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7424, passed=85174
Got 85174 stars (including 77643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-26-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213459_TTUQ2b1x1_6759_iFQPPVgE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159397.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159398.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159415.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159425.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159431.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159446.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159908.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160239.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160406.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160430.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160552.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160568.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160615.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160640.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160675.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160707.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160734.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160759.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160777.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160790.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out159408.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out160381.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159430.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159433.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159469.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159470.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159734.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160756.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 187s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159397_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159397_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:29.23 +32:12:51.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159398_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159398_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:26.52 +28:46:32.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.619 3422520800935876992 078.36064372372 +28.77572818418 14.7993 14.1727 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.619#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159408_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159408_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:12.15 +32:26:57.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159415_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159415_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:16.05 +26:29:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.619 3421698194438405376 076.81733541963 +26.49943100449 14.4987 13.7468 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.619#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159417_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159417_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:11.69 +30:25:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159424_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159424_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159425_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159425_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:58.17 +27:06:33.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159430_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159430_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:16.37 +30:39:49.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159433_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159433_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159437_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159437_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:40.13 +28:23:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159441_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159441_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:37.04 +27:48:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159444_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159444_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:10.87 +31:43:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159445_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159445_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:59.88 +34:14:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159446_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159446_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:27.40 +34:08:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.625 182766084107855872 080.36502764840 +34.13901511135 14.3046 13.8117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.625#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159449_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159449_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:59.19 +32:04:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159460_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159460_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:05.12 +26:28:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159462_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159462_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:32.02 +29:23:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159464_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159464_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159468_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159468_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:59.40 +29:19:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159469_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159469_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159470_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159470_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159481_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159481_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:24.92 +29:02:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159504_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159504_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:52.00 +31:06:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159505_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159505_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.59 +28:44:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159509_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159509_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:03.62 +26:37:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159511_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159511_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:15.75 +26:10:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159599_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159599_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159627_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159627_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159638_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159638_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159734_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159734_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159743_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 159743_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159770_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159770_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.73 +28:37:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159773_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159773_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159826_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159826_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.91 +28:31:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159845_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159845_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.48 +32:33:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159908_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159908_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:50.80 +34:04:01.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.452 182533846637165440 081.46151522312 +34.06705917337 13.5478 12.9599 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.452#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159911_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159911_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:16.51 +27:54:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159916_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159916_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.57 +33:12:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159928_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159928_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159982_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159982_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.92 +33:11:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159983_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 159983_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.76 +29:47:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160043_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160043_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.64 +29:45:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160054_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160054_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.25 +31:44:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160065_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160065_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.67 +30:49:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160078_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160078_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160173_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 160173_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160196_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160196_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.96 +29:10:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160204_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160204_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.60 +32:27:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160239_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160239_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:15.54 +34:09:18.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.994 182535976940858496 081.56532604506 +34.15471783496 14.2630 13.6030 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.994#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160250_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160250_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160270_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160270_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.08 +31:04:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160275_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160275_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.72 +33:23:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160283_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160283_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.06 +30:28:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160297_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160297_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.68 +28:40:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160343_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160343_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.11 +31:46:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160356_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160356_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160381_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160381_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:20.44 +27:26:16.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160388_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160388_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.03 +29:22:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160390_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160390_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.83 +32:02:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160406_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160406_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:03.46 +33:54:25.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.875 173553173097221376 070.76425342970 +33.90615752589 14.2932 13.6810 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.875#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160430_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160430_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:22.79 +27:02:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.838 153842949700834176 075.34550301686 +27.03689645342 14.5357 13.6497 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.838#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160437_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160437_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.91 +31:25:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160448_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160448_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.62 +32:23:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160474_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160474_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:30.95 +32:40:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160490_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160490_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:50.66 +32:54:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160498_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160498_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:24.27 +32:46:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160552_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160552_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.38 +31:04:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.042 157415159901097856 074.85629577418 +31.07568225164 14.2970 13.6352 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.042#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160562_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160562_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.76 +30:10:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.70 +26:10:36.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.722 3421065631655041024 079.93250055586 +26.17642461832 12.1278 10.2903 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.722#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160591_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160591_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:03.07 +29:38:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160615_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160615_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:57.17 +32:26:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.570 161156175198864256 072.73777006236 +32.45017540885 14.0846 13.1594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.570#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160625_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160625_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:06.66 +29:08:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160640_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160640_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:23.19 +26:02:22.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.483 153464889498614528 072.59634369343 +26.03931356875 14.3002 13.3711 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.483#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160651_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160651_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:09.71 +28:58:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160675_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160675_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:30.09 +32:25:20.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.827 181560087353128832 076.62550010027 +32.42256514025 14.4232 13.8415 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.827#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160707_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160707_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:18.21 +29:00:47.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.156 155812140666613760 076.07606507361 +29.01283639758 14.7067 13.9078 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.156#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160734_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160734_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:40.77 +29:35:13.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.844 155911749547975680 076.17014424803 +29.58701656884 14.8623 14.1355 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.844#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160756_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 160756_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160759_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160759_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:39.87 +33:12:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.172 160933631469430784 074.16639991082 +33.20285289176 14.7241 13.8901 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.172#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160777_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160777_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:47.00 +29:48:14.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.468 158182893893933312 070.44630259883 +29.80406381935 14.7499 13.8834 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.468#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160790_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 160790_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:31.35 +26:52:36.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.242 153669226863389312 072.88130551153 +26.87697211767 14.5232 13.6181 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.242#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62841_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 62841_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.43 +32:53:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-27-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
