This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.6050,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.1050 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SW Aur,2461139.6050,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SW Aur 20260409.1050 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1050* 05 26 46.17 +26 12 42.6 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6050,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1050 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J084.0200+34.1788,2461139.6050,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J084.0200+34.1788 20260409.1050 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 156424671722775680,2461139.6050,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 156424671722775680 20260409.1050 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 156173566457470080,2461139.6050,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 156173566457470080 20260409.1050 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1050* 04 39 27.94 +28 28 40.8 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 157948762341287936,2461139.6050,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 157948762341287936 20260409.1050 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1050* 04 43 37.11 +27 14 31.4 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6050,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1050 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1050* 04 24 54.43 +28 10 19.1 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.6050,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.1050 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J084.1105+34.1192,2461139.6050,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J084.1105+34.1192 20260409.1050 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6050,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1050 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 09.1050 2461139.6050 13.93 05:25:14.75 +30:10:30.6
176.56358 -3.06010 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 3446585056020271488 | 05:25:17.72 +30:10:47.7 (Gaia DR3) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification)
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 3446585056020271488,2461139.6050,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 3446585056020271488 20260409.1050 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461139.6050,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260409.1050 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.1050* 04 29 51.49 +26 06 45.0 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IQ Tau,2461139.6050,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IQ Tau 20260409.1050 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053200.50+335655.5,2461139.6050,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053200.50+335655.5 20260409.1050 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461139.60542184 09.04.2026 02:31:38.447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 33
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16083
Objects passed selection criteria: 16065
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15061.8
Average stars matched: 14633.8 (97.1584 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 21:35:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461139.60542184 09.04.2026 02:31:38.447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 1784 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126190
Objects passed selection criteria: 125916
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110045
Average stars matched: 106193 (96.4998 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1955508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 22:19:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.60465206
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:47.255 +29:59:21.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:50.098 +29:58:52.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0420 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:47.255 +29:59:21.59
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:50.098 +29:58:52.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01307 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.baDlnv9cLc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PFIOHBGrKx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sus6rRoGuf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OInb8lFR1L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.baDlnv9cLc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PFIOHBGrKx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sus6rRoGuf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=786, passed=13941
Got 13941 stars (including 13144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OInb8lFR1L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=787, passed=13931
Got 13931 stars (including 13126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13931 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21383.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21391.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21438.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21471.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 650s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21140_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21140_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.73 +34:09:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21250_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21250_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21271_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.46 +34:26:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.77 +32:44:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:30.49 +30:07:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21377_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21377_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:41.85 +30:35:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21380_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21380_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:57.88 +32:57:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21383_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21383_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21389_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21389_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:03.82 +30:21:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:33.94 +33:34:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:26.05 +31:41:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:16.16 +30:37:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:16.49 +33:02:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:21.63 +31:46:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:55.57 +30:50:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.59 +31:07:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21435_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21435_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:51.17 +30:08:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21456_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21456_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:41.47 +31:27:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:01.68 +25:52:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 21471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.47 +28:30:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.43 +26:08:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05448_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 05448_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:39.25 +32:37:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 02594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.96 +33:57:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 06467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.38 +32:09:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.24 +32:10:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.28 +30:55:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 662s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:29:54.77 +33:14:14.5
04:38:19.49 +31:18:47.5
05:26:46.17 +26:12:42.6
05:36:03.36 +34:10:58.4
05:10:59.45 +30:52:56.8
05:09:58.97 +30:03:55.3
04:39:27.94 +28:28:40.8
04:43:37.11 +27:14:31.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:47.255 +29:59:21.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:50.098 +29:58:52.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0420 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:47.255 +29:59:21.59
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:50.098 +29:58:52.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01307 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SISMYbuSrC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4h4gWB11G3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YAfwAWySyf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VMpq3CN1iP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SISMYbuSrC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4h4gWB11G3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YAfwAWySyf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=14, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6401, passed=83157
Got 83157 stars (including 76652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80514 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VMpq3CN1iP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6582, passed=84031
Got 84031 stars (including 77347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-30-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213242_TTUQ1b1x1_20153_1G9JlsaR/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160899.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160904.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160908.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160931.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161462.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161580.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161649.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161704.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161738.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161779.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161795.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161810.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161838.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161953.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161988.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162087.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119951.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161720.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161837.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161908.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 42s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:55.48 +32:03:15.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:29.78 +30:52:52.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.125 3446866634076020352 080.62431726002 +30.88063924143 14.2423 13.4015 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.125#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.81 +33:56:00.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160919_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160919_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:59.89 +34:14:52.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.963 184985688845153664 075.49977224708 +34.24737810838 13.9685 13.4079 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.963#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160920_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160920_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:09.43 +25:39:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160923_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160923_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.59 +29:52:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160931_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160931_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.58 +30:15:54.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.146 159183651337204992 069.13986603395 +30.26454447697 13.7918 13.0694 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.146#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 160934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:40.94 +32:42:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:22.58 +33:12:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161051_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 161051_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161056_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161056_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.69 +34:09:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161172_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161172_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:46.18 +26:12:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.66 +32:33:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161198_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161198_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.62 +34:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161222_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161222_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:37.11 +27:14:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.09 +32:26:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.45 +34:06:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161298_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161298_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.95 +28:31:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161320_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161320_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.21 +34:24:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.40 +33:11:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161461_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161461_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.88 +29:10:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161462_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161462_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:17.26 +31:00:39.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.111 3446907075487882624 079.82265522809 +31.01043937508 13.5420 13.1287 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.111#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.54 +26:10:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161512_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161512_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.78 +33:11:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161532_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161532_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.70 +29:45:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.66 +30:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.69 +30:48:35.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.276 156422846362375296 077.67444411638 +30.80988224670 13.6874 13.0052 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.276#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161595_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161595_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.58 +33:23:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161607_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161607_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.15 +32:25:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161634_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161634_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:35.45 +29:13:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161649_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161649_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:23.79 +33:30:02.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:08.10 +32:35:11.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.765 180841629521370880 080.28294911546 +32.58602194019 13.7077 12.7724 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.765#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161709_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161709_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.13 +31:04:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.062 157415228620573952 074.85060359407 +31.08187579391 13.3801 12.4281 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.062#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:32.55 +32:47:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161720_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 161720_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161736_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161736_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.85 +30:56:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161738_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161738_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:31.29 +33:17:49.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.947 3449047274872370048 082.38028307864 +33.29741824540 13.1881 11.9643 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.947#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:28.80 +29:54:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161757_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161757_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.02 +31:46:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161770_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161770_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:55.85 +32:37:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.45 +28:16:21.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161785_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161785_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.25 +32:55:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:51.99 +32:38:24.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:25.34 +27:00:30.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.780 3442172780279067392 082.35563561679 +27.00871166985 14.0103 13.2705 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161837_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 161837_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:27.94 +30:36:27.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.385 3447594407693148928 083.86815248604 +30.60760430387 14.5416 13.7681 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.385#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.07 +31:15:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161871_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161871_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:52.94 +30:28:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161882_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161882_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:08.53 +33:13:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161903_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161903_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.88 +32:02:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 161908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161923_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161923_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:39.63 +33:59:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161953_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161953_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:24.69 +29:23:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.811 3446475409798943744 079.60267897699 +29.39093254945 14.1255 13.4745 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.811#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:36.04 +33:07:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161980_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161980_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:52.48 +34:01:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161988_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161988_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:52.33 +26:28:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.640 3421640225263768960 077.46844359089 +26.47922171137 14.1527 13.2575 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.640#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161996_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 161996_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:29.40 +34:32:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:51.40 +32:23:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.090 157599225019503360 075.96384113575 +32.39673361141 13.8759 12.8211 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.090#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162017_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162017_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:33.79 +32:17:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162019_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162019_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.12 +33:06:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162027_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162027_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.52 +32:27:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:08.31 +30:12:44.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.214 3446632163221892864 080.78488050397 +30.21170364765 14.0445 13.3011 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.214#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162091_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162091_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:50.85 +32:54:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:58.53 +31:27:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:03.38 +33:20:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:08.68 +25:52:45.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.192 151241711347514240 066.28579883300 +25.87932153419 13.6537 12.7378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.192#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 162330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:42.03 +29:51:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 119951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.47 +32:53:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 42363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:39.26 +32:37:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 18929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.96 +33:57:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111528_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 111528_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:01.64 +25:52:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.28 +30:55:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.38 +32:09:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.51 +31:18:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.40 +26:08:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.47 +28:30:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 04447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.31 +35:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133098_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 133098_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.00 +28:25:38.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.23 +32:10:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 13161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 150745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:55.96 +30:38:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:57.99 +31:19:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08993_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 08993_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:20.61 +34:37:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19673_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 19673_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:52.54 +33:59:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 94638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:20.32 +29:14:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108063_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 108063_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:09.42 +26:11:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.76 +33:55:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 52105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:02.64 +31:54:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-31-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
