This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 16 22.40 +56 39 31.0 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 458335339053030144,2461139.5954,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 458335339053030144 20260409.0954 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 22 15.16 +57 06 19.6 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 458407498805232896,2461139.5954,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 458407498805232896 20260409.0954 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 33 29.34 +57 34 40.0 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 458024765670988416,2461139.5954,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 458024765670988416 20260409.0954 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 31 00.24 +55 31 46.8 12.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 457326678874456320,2461139.5954,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 457326678874456320 20260409.0954 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 18 08.45 +57 09 20.5 13.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 458372619368098688,2461139.5954,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 458372619368098688 20260409.0954 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 08 26.85 +56 27 35.1 13.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3732632,2461139.5954,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3732632 20260409.0954 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 37 00.98 +55 55 59.5 13.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 454676512251868160,2461139.5954,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 454676512251868160 20260409.0954 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 25 48.28 +57 15 45.8 13.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3737107,2461139.5954,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3737107 20260409.0954 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 20 47.16 +54 59 06.3 13.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461139.5954,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260409.0954 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 09.0954* 02 30 40.32 +54 41 13.6 13.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3747594,2461139.5954,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3747594 20260409.0954 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.57101697 21.01.2026 01:42:05.866 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
First image: 2461061.57101697 21.01.2026 01:42:05.866 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Last image: 2461139.59569456 09.04.2026 02:17:38.010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28193
Objects passed selection criteria: 28110
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23019.5
Average stars matched: 22494.5 (97.7193 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 21:29:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.57101697 21.01.2026 01:42:05.866 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
First image: 2461061.57101697 21.01.2026 01:42:05.866 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Last image: 2461139.59569456 09.04.2026 02:17:38.010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 181
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 64 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 180070
Objects passed selection criteria: 179665
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 143831
Average stars matched: 139340 (96.8778 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2003576 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 21:43:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461139.59502281
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
The image scale is 5.85"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:10.973 +54:01:27.77
Second-epoch image center 02:49:12.251 +54:01:19.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:10.973 +54:01:27.77
Second-epoch image center 02:49:25.212 +54:00:36.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:49:12.251 +54:01:19.84
Second-epoch second image center 02:49:25.212 +54:00:36.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03389 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wSOvvv7K7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QSzVMPzi9F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cwuE2fuL0K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMcpmnP2L1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7516 to 57.5292 deg, Dec +48.0573 to +59.3898 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7516 to 57.5292 deg, Dec 48.0573 to 59.3898 deg
Loaded 17277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2719 out of 3044 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3044 out of 30373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.987231
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.987231
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.3 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
3.4 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
3.4 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
15.4 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wSOvvv7K7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3498, passed=30373
Got 30373 stars (including 26827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 933.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 933.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012965 (46.7 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010372 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.17"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 769 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.17"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.05"
Excluding outliers - 753 stars left (next iteration limit 790)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QSzVMPzi9F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3509, passed=30339
Got 30339 stars (including 26798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 749 (Dec 48.0 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.21"
Excluding outliers - 774 stars left (next iteration limit 821)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cwuE2fuL0K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=985, passed=15705
Got 15705 stars (including 14705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15705 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012949 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010359 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 361 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 304 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.86"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 298 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 425 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 369 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 367 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.12"
Excluding outliers - 367 stars left (next iteration limit 327)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AMcpmnP2L1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1030, passed=16270
Got 16270 stars (including 15227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16270 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52039_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52044_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:06.87 +57:08:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52058_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52058_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:16.43 +57:10:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52067_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52067_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:09.74 +57:06:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52069_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:56.80 +57:10:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52084_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:03.79 +57:10:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50031_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 50031_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22984_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 22984_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29967_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 29967_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (253.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27074_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 27074_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09711_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 09711_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:30.64 +56:04:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.85"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:10.973 +54:01:27.77
Second-epoch image center 02:49:12.251 +54:01:19.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:10.973 +54:01:27.77
Second-epoch image center 02:49:25.212 +54:00:36.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:49:12.251 +54:01:19.84
Second-epoch second image center 02:49:25.212 +54:00:36.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03389 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jULyiwuG5Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zxTSL0clHR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NKRUKowRZa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dESavjENhx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 197036 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7290 to 57.6401 deg, Dec +48.0573 to +59.3943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7290 to 57.6401 deg, Dec 48.0573 to 59.3943 deg
Loaded 17344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2032 out of 3100 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3100 out of 197036 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.835968
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.835968
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 170 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.1 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
3.1 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
3.0 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
15.5 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jULyiwuG5Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=59, blended=28728, passed=196977
Got 196977 stars (including 167958 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 196977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 933.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 933.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012965 (46.7 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010372 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 695 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.22"
Excluding outliers - 711 stars left (next iteration limit 748)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zxTSL0clHR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=57, blended=28752, passed=197331
Got 197331 stars (including 168267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 197331 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 749 (Dec 48.0 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 696 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 749 (Dec 48.0 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 735 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.28"
Excluding outliers - 727 stars left (next iteration limit 764)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NKRUKowRZa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=7149, passed=90654
Got 90654 stars (including 83398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90654 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012949 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010359 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 337 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 283 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 276 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 358 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 356 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.29"
Excluding outliers - 356 stars left (next iteration limit 303)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dESavjENhx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=7462, passed=93621
Got 93621 stars (including 86065 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 93621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-42-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-43-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-16-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_211827_TTUQ1b1x1_12977_9xpjxUsm/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224207.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224333.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224621.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 534s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224147_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224147_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224148_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224148_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224162_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224162_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (97.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224171_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224171_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:31.59 +56:40:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224174_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224174_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (182.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224175_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224175_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224183_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224183_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (659.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224186_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224186_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224188_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224188_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224190_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224190_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224192_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224192_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (193.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224196_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224196_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224203_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224203_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (208.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224207_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224207_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224210_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224210_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224212_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224212_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:38.58 +57:03:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224213_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224213_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224221_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224221_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:28.01 +54:18:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224249_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224249_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (915.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224258_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224258_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (227.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224270_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224270_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224271_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224271_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (637.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224272_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224272_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (700.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224273_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224273_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224279_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224279_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:23.37 +56:52:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224288_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224288_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (316.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224306_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224306_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:53.79 +54:50:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224307_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224307_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224308_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224308_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:45.36 +54:50:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224309_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224309_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (884.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224315_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224315_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (686.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224316_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224316_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224319_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224319_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (178.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224320_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224320_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224322_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224322_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (899.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224333_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224333_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224336_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224336_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224337_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224337_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (817.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224340_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224340_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (320.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224341_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224341_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224343_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224343_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224352_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224352_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:16.68 +56:34:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224356_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224356_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:39.13 +57:02:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224363_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224363_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224371_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224371_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224374_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224374_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (699.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224376_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224376_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (823.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224377_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224377_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224378_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224378_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:53.51 +56:13:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224380_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224380_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224382_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224382_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:32.54 +56:18:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224388_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224388_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (591.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224396_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224396_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (311.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224398_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224398_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224400_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224400_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224403_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224403_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (507.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224404_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224404_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:00.19 +57:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224405_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224405_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224406_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224406_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (830.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224413_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224413_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (193.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224419_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224419_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224420_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224420_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (137.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224421_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224421_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224422_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224422_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224427_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224427_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224429_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224429_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224430_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224430_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (211.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224432_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224432_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224436_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224436_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (593.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224437_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224437_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224438_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224438_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (932.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224446_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224446_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224447_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224447_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (897.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224448_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224448_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (590.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224449_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224449_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (874.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224450_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224450_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (331.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224451_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224451_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224454_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224454_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (207.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224455_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224455_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224456_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224456_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (952.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224458_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224458_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224459_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224459_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (487.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224460_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224460_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224462_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224462_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:14.09 +55:10:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224466_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224466_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (223.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224468_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224468_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (902.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224469_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224469_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224471_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224471_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224473_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224473_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:07.92 +57:12:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224479_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224479_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224480_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224480_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224482_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224482_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (647.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224491_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224491_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:46.17 +57:05:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224492_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224492_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (178.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224493_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224493_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:56.10 +58:34:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224494_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224494_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224496_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224496_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:25.41 +56:56:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224497_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224497_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (542.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224499_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224499_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (455.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224500_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224500_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:42.16 +56:50:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224503_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224503_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224504_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224504_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (497.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224507_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224507_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224508_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224508_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (409.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224512_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224512_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (281.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224514_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224514_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (319.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224517_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224517_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (210.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224522_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224522_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224524_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224524_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224526_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224526_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224531_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224531_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (495.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224532_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224532_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:02.58 +55:59:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224533_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224533_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (570.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224535_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224535_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224536_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224536_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:54.49 +56:38:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224538_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224538_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (938.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224539_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224539_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (845.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224541_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224541_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (600.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224545_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224545_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224546_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224546_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224548_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224548_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (351.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224555_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224555_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (334.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224557_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224557_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (860.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224564_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224564_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:23.25 +58:20:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224566_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224566_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (362.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224567_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224567_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224575_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224575_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224577_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224577_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (191.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224578_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224578_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224584_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224584_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224585_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224585_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:58.04 +56:28:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224593_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224593_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (301.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224595_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224595_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (290.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224600_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224600_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (330.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224603_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224603_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224615_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224615_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (589.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224621_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 224621_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224646_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224646_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (274.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224667_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224667_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (706.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224668_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224668_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224670_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224670_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (167.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224679_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224679_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (181.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224706_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224706_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (346.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224708_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224708_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (486.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224716_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224716_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224736_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224736_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (375.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224739_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 224739_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (661.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04821_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 04821_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (608.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103215_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 103215_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (161.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91416_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 91416_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (252.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113502_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 113502_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (172.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29366_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 29366_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:42.90 +57:30:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120416_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 120416_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (263.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194279_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 194279_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04249_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 04249_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:51.23 +59:02:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105543_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 105543_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58297_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 58297_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:30.89 +56:04:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104586_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 104586_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161291_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 161291_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (290.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147582_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 147582_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (772.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104415_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 104415_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (349.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158216_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 158216_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (256.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78740_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 78740_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (196.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62774_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 62774_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (214.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153193_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 153193_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208099_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 208099_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50673_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 50673_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:46.15 +56:29:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188800_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 188800_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103303_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 103303_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134234_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 134234_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-17-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
