This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.8435,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.3435 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.3435* 17 32 00.07 -15 28 54.3 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J173159.44-152859.0,2461138.8435,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J173159.44-152859.0 20260408.3435 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J259.8173-16.9275,2461138.8435,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J259.8173-16.9275 20260408.3435 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.8435,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.3435 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.8435,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.3435 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.3435* 18 04 32.03 -14 54 31.4 11.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4146790275791496192,2461138.8435,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4146790275791496192 20260408.3435 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4118225891441798656,2461138.8435,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4118225891441798656 20260408.3435 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.3435* 17 26 08.41 -15 53 08.5 12.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J261.5336-15.8843,2461138.8435,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J261.5336-15.8843 20260408.3435 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461138.84375578 08.04.2026 08:14:50.499 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8768
Objects passed selection criteria: 8735
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6533.25
Average stars matched: 6346.25 (97.1377 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116244 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 03:17:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461138.84375578 08.04.2026 08:14:50.499 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 195
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 125284
Objects passed selection criteria: 124934
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 91477.5
Average stars matched: 86767.5 (94.8512 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1968992 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 03:20:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461138.84314521
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:56.261 -18:00:09.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1513 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:57.364 -17:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1561 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:56.261 -18:00:09.04
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:57.364 -17:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00733 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Cbkp9hDq3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c0NW3XKL49
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOG1XDPamy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0HYfkQqmdl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.0365 to 275.0296 deg, Dec -23.3066 to -12.5656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.0365 to 275.0296 deg, Dec -23.3066 to -12.5656 deg
Loaded 14544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9713 out of 10414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10414 out of 15752 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846952
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846952
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3Cbkp9hDq3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1456, passed=15752
Got 15752 stars (including 14271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c0NW3XKL49 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1474, passed=15602
Got 15602 stars (including 14101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AOG1XDPamy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=581, passed=6181
Got 6181 stars (including 5592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0HYfkQqmdl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=560, passed=6178
Got 6178 stars (including 5611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6178 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20711.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 20711_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:58:05.21 -19:17:55.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:56.261 -18:00:09.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1513 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:57.364 -17:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1561 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:56.261 -18:00:09.04
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:57.364 -17:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00733 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DbrQ46FCGI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TQ883cRtnf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U63ji2HQmA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zvyx5Kd30Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 179796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.0045 to 275.0499 deg, Dec -23.3098 to -12.5486 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.0045 to 275.0499 deg, Dec -23.3098 to -12.5486 deg
Loaded 14601 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9967 out of 12785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12785 out of 179796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.613163
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.613163
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 100 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DbrQ46FCGI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17851, passed=179768
Got 179768 stars (including 161620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 179768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TQ883cRtnf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=17987, passed=181054
Got 181054 stars (including 162799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 181054 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U63ji2HQmA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4267, passed=64565
Got 64565 stars (including 60230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zvyx5Kd30Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4343, passed=65280
Got 65280 stars (including 60866 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-13-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_031535_TTUQ2b1x1_8048_jEGsMKRZ/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out191690.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207370.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207390.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207398.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207405.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207413.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207416.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207421.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207423.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207428.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207431.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207432.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207442.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207445.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207447.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207450.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207464.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207477.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207480.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207490.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207492.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207495.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207503.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out62153.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85879.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out207494.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out128222.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207461.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out208285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out208348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207370_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207370_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:40.06 -20:28:49.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207378_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207378_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:56.41 -18:07:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207385_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207385_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:59.58 -17:12:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207387_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207387_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:59.05 -18:19:48.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.857 4123263372728344704 264.74582915261 -18.33018212695 12.9910 12.2251 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.857#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207388_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207388_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:03.38 -15:15:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207390_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207390_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:20.51 -21:38:08.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.016 4069968837130091776 270.83601004968 -21.63600271771 12.0286 10.7003 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.016#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207396_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207396_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207398_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207398_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:11.00 -14:16:05.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.70)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207400_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207400_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:11.29 -16:51:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207404_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207404_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:56.05 -18:34:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207405_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207405_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:03.42 -14:59:21.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207406_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 207406_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207413_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207413_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:25.97 -14:41:23.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.443 4146987947361508608 270.85859033859 -14.69007208071 12.7433 11.8004 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.443#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207415_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207415_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207416_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207416_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:51.29 -20:02:36.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.953 4094984204133541504 271.21376607821 -20.04378678273 13.4118 12.9035 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.953#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207421_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207421_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:38.85 -20:55:44.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.891 4118895592743759232 266.16233102794 -20.92959735972 12.7922 12.0106 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.891#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207423_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207423_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:47.93 -16:21:22.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207424_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207424_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:40.23 -15:45:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207427_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207427_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:18.00 -19:47:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207428_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207428_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:30.37 -14:54:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.086 4146790241431763328 271.12594152074 -14.91135359570 12.8584 11.8725 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.086#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207431_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207431_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:01.57 -20:39:57.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.058 4070894836400812672 271.00665191576 -20.66627515410 13.0283 12.5938 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.058#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207432_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207432_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:14.48 -18:17:25.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.383 4143450951562889472 270.06056831512 -18.29075731361 12.9214 12.3307 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207436_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207436_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:50.30 -21:26:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207440_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207440_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:46.00 -20:35:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207442_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207442_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:30.18 -16:04:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.065 4135405039030227328 260.37690891497 -16.07495185381 12.8221 12.3629 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.065#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207445_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207445_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:25.46 -13:50:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.413 4149455217107964288 265.35669524497 -13.84079447647 12.4052 11.9020 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.413#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207447_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207447_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:38.38 -16:51:48.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207450_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207450_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:37.06 -21:30:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.243 4070061848943103616 271.15500961419 -21.51031738995 12.8884 12.5051 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.243#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207454_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207454_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:00.64 -19:48:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207458_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207458_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:11.65 -19:57:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207461_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 207461_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207463_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207463_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:07.17 -21:07:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207464_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207464_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:50.93 -16:03:11.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.868 4144421996481686528 271.21322644606 -16.05275061620 12.7124 12.0646 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.868#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207466_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207466_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:11.33 -22:08:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207467_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207467_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207477_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207477_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:19.98 -22:02:09.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.73)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207478_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207478_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:13.95 -13:51:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:34.16 -21:44:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.121 4069962892896217984 270.89269590545 -21.74471564508 12.5855 12.2166 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.121#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207482_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207482_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:16.40 -20:21:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207487_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207487_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:12.19 -16:38:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207490_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207490_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:54.62 -21:31:12.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.340 4070066659306475520 271.22768840242 -21.52058140599 12.3405 12.0474 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.340#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207492_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207492_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:16.69 -21:41:51.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.586 4117120534332463488 266.31966117832 -21.69760303013 11.7321 10.6479 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.586#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207494_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207494_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:56.17 -14:33:01.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=11.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.81)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207495_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207495_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:07.12 -21:17:22.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.585 4070074149727376768 271.27965019865 -21.28966168484 12.1924 11.8141 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.585#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207500_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207500_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:36.65 -19:52:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207501_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207501_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:22.80 -17:55:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207503_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207503_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:06.85 -21:13:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.324 4070098682580568448 271.27892307925 -21.22029435220 12.1600 11.4727 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.324#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207504_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207504_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:50.70 -15:32:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207565_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207565_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.23 -19:17:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:02.21 -19:52:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207682_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207682_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:25.62 -19:57:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:57.15 -18:43:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207720_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207720_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:57.93 -14:45:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207880_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207880_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:59.46 -17:21:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207896_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207896_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:35.80 -16:43:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207964_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207964_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:01.39 -15:31:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207978_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 207978_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:36.64 -20:58:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:30.56 -16:24:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208071_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208071_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.30 -14:03:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208081_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208081_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:54.13 -14:31:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208101_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208101_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:27.51 -18:36:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208131_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208131_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.64 -16:13:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208160_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208160_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:00.61 -20:28:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208177_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208177_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:39.63 -19:31:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208206_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208206_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:56.42 -19:47:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208226_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208226_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.33 -14:20:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208285_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 208285_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208326_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208326_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.58 -15:44:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208345_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 208345_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:02.78 -15:54:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208348_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 208348_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70901_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 70901_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:39.68 -18:34:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 62153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:30.18 -19:01:25.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.673 4120084478436808576 265.12514287595 -19.02424874990 11.2371 9.8933 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.673#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191700_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 191700_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:40.91 -13:48:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177723_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 177723_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25679_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 25679_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:58.01 -21:11:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49659_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 49659_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:39.67 -19:39:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 44480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:49.36 -19:58:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200172_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 200172_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:22.30 -14:12:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31292_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 31292_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:08.92 -20:59:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35707_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 35707_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:39.48 -20:32:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175775_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 175775_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.22 -14:38:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 85879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:15.34 -17:56:35.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.385 4143522321068380288 271.06377356942 -17.94378716730 12.8959 10.7362 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.385#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191690_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 191690_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:18.84 -15:59:05.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.288 4124855431164026880 264.57854796659 -15.98605139430 10.6768 9.8030 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.288#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191635_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 191635_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:33.77 -18:31:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191623_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 191623_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191581_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 191581_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:11.01 -21:28:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191478_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 191478_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:14.80 -21:44:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136842_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 136842_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:00.51 -15:16:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178698_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 178698_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.56 -14:56:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120701_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 120701_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:00.28 -16:20:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 197176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:17.24 -16:53:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 21013_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:52.94 -21:36:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 90291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:56.25 -17:40:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128222_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 128222_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33957_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 33957_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:58.95 -20:38:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136162_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 136162_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:46.93 -15:06:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91868_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 91868_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:52.71 -17:31:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 86018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:16.14 -17:55:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 32153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:19.67 -20:43:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142858_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166
The candidate 142858_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_03-14-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0166 did not pass the final checks
