This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7951,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2951 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7951,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2951 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2951* 17 24 07.91 -12 37 35.7 13.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7951,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2951 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 16434709,2461138.7951,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 16434709 20260408.2951 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7951,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2951 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1724353-081657,2461138.7951,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1724353-081657 20260408.2951 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J171458.22-124903.8,2461138.7951,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J171458.22-124903.8 20260408.2951 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2951* 17 22 36.30 -13 27 57.3 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1722365-132755,2461138.7951,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1722365-132755 20260408.2951 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1658313-134631,2461138.7951,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1658313-134631 20260408.2951 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 16525075,2461138.7951,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 16525075 20260408.2951 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1713575-134255,2461138.7951,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1713575-134255 20260408.2951 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2951* 17 18 57.30 -13 07 53.3 11.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J171857-1307.9,2461138.7951,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J171857-1307.9 20260408.2951 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J171559.34-105433.0,2461138.7951,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J171559.34-105433.0 20260408.2951 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J170049-1002.0,2461138.7951,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J170049-1002.0 20260408.2951 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7951,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2951 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J165908.02-110539.3,2461138.7951,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J165908.02-110539.3 20260408.2951 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2897 Oph,2461138.7951,8.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2897 Oph 20260408.2951 8.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J171906.18-100032.7,2461138.7951,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J171906.18-100032.7 20260408.2951 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461138.79536304 08.04.2026 07:05:09.367 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4250
Objects passed selection criteria: 4240
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3757.25
Average stars matched: 3691.5 (98.25 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 02:09:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461138.79536304 08.04.2026 07:05:09.367 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 134
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 43509
Objects passed selection criteria: 43436
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36675.8
Average stars matched: 35458 (96.6797 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 02:10:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461138.79481045
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:26.597 -10:00:48.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0292 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.449 -10:00:53.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:26.597 -10:00:48.45
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:29.449 -10:00:53.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01177 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.77zxdYsyKG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YrzDTQJ7fP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DiZYdCpmhr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jgqz3z4DRg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.9 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.9 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.77zxdYsyKG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=458, passed=6287
Got 6287 stars (including 5821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YrzDTQJ7fP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=6127
Got 6127 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DiZYdCpmhr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, passed=3949
Got 3949 stars (including 3653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jgqz3z4DRg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, passed=3915
Got 3915 stars (including 3625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20224.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20225.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20230.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.02 -12:12:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20205_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20205_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.53 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20214_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.07 -09:57:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20217_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.70 -06:38:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.84 -10:28:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:53.37 -10:37:27.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.483 4335283986507083648 257.22240501042 -10.62417454111 9.7180 8.2310 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.483#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20225_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20225_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:48.95 -10:01:57.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.238 4335986673220812672 255.20361018585 -10.03253027693 9.9917 8.5449 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.238#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20230_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:59.41 -06:29:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.901 4352790101405845120 250.49668818161 -06.48371420314 10.9998 9.6224 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.901#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20231_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.86 -12:43:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:41.29 -09:26:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:44.47 -08:04:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.11 -09:32:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02723_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 02723_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:39.48 -11:38:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:26.597 -10:00:48.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0292 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.449 -10:00:53.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:26.597 -10:00:48.45
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:29.449 -10:00:53.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01177 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oQSWw8i0bd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JDh1pctfAi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8fFzRnbe6K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OI6OJC6Kgx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739902
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739902
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.7 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oQSWw8i0bd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3753, passed=64663
Got 64663 stars (including 60806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JDh1pctfAi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3159, passed=61397
Got 61397 stars (including 58163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8fFzRnbe6K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1754, passed=30515
Got 30515 stars (including 28740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OI6OJC6Kgx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1838, passed=31271
Got 31271 stars (including 29404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-04-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_020550_TTUQ2b1x1_13678_gorqSkyJ/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out18477.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75144.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78574.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78576.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78583.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78584.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78585.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78904.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78961.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78974.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78985.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79004.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79010.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79020.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79037.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79041.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79089.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31248.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37654.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78818.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78919.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79081.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78574_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78574_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:12.28 -11:07:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.585 4337119002694166016 251.30016236376 -11.12550455792 13.4819 12.5497 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.585#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78576_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78576_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:57.56 -08:30:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.653 4336574675719628288 256.73992635430 -08.50206591499 13.2077 11.9519 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.653#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78583_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78583_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:02.99 -09:02:26.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.275 4359530137749003136 259.26203922694 -09.04196129583 12.7234 11.7506 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.275#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78584_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78584_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:16.79 -12:49:18.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78585_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78585_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:29.71 -10:26:55.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.661 4334424920034397056 253.87448991613 -10.44913498570 13.8148 12.9478 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.661#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.80 -07:56:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78608_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78608_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.18 -06:23:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78635_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78635_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.88 -12:43:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78653_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78653_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.18 -14:03:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78664_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 78664_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78672_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78672_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.14 -10:10:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78749_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78749_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.77 -10:50:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78758_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78758_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.13 -06:07:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78765_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78765_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.95 -08:56:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78780_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78780_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.58 -08:58:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78790_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78790_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.75 -07:07:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78807_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78807_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.72 -07:33:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78818_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 78818_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78823_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78823_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:11.75 -06:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78842_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78842_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:24.57 -12:50:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78849_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78849_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.09 -05:56:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78851_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78851_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:28.27 -13:23:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78853_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78853_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:17.66 -09:41:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78888_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78888_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:30.38 -09:15:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78897_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78897_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.10 -11:20:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78904_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78904_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:57.06 -14:19:20.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.674 4140177258767878656 254.73755890012 -14.32270417911 12.0794 10.4097 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.674#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78913_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 78913_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78919_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 78919_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78923_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78923_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:37.07 -06:35:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78924_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78924_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:33.08 -09:06:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.31 -07:07:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:21.28 -08:16:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.39 -07:46:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78960_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78960_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:53.13 -07:16:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:18.89 -10:43:41.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.863 4142951949381645952 259.82888799743 -10.72824546463 12.6344 11.1338 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.863#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.78 -08:16:35.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.609 4359829862039805952 258.51983166159 -08.27578006101 12.6648 10.7692 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78974_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78974_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:47.65 -10:00:05.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.501 4334676948711718528 252.69842969489 -10.00152948821 12.2018 10.6575 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.501#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78975_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78975_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.43 -11:05:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78985_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78985_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:58.26 -06:30:42.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.469 4352788933174733440 250.49220593189 -06.51146692402 14.1645 13.3267 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.469#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78991_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 78991_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:18.97 -09:45:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79004_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79004_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:48.62 -06:00:44.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.976 4341094218265279872 254.45222692317 -06.01283574042 13.8988 13.0458 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.976#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79010_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79010_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:16.46 -05:51:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.241 4341249936598874752 252.56878017305 -05.86678527949 14.2260 13.4032 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.241#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79014_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79014_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:31.83 -07:45:25.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79020_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79020_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:22.92 -05:52:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.988 4341252410500310272 252.84560576931 -05.88061469589 14.1405 13.3432 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.988#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79033_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79033_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:34.48 -06:53:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79037_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79037_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:13.10 -06:53:59.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.266 4340780032816022656 251.80423700125 -06.89967616471 14.0022 13.1414 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.266#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79038_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79038_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:13.57 -06:09:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79039_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79039_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:42.75 -09:48:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79041_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79041_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:08.54 -06:31:09.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.265 4340829064162954624 252.03523085280 -06.51925215466 14.0233 13.1906 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.265#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79054_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79054_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:04.24 -06:25:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79081_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 79081_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79089_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 79089_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:13.23 -08:19:02.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.937 4338883100381040000 250.80506390887 -08.31719130553 14.1511 13.3196 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.937#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 56578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 18254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:46.49 -10:37:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:13.99 -10:18:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.84 -10:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 28198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:09.06 -11:33:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13199_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 13199_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:52.41 -07:54:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.48 -10:59:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.11 -09:32:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10274_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 10274_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55909_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 55909_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41558_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 41558_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.24 -09:23:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10760_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 10760_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.30 -13:46:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.51 -09:32:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18477_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 18477_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:33.31 -12:46:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.981 4142259080958582144 257.13905115354 -12.78337898701 12.5318 11.0672 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.981#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11527_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 11527_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:34.31 -13:39:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11316_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 11316_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33539_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 33539_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:03.25 -10:42:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 15540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:54.25 -06:24:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:39.49 -11:38:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.01 -12:12:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.53 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32666_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 32666_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16637_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 16637_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:14.32 -13:01:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09657_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 09657_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:26.48 -13:55:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 19815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.76 -12:34:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18857_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 18857_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:10.13 -12:42:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38705_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 38705_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:23.15 -09:55:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37654_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 37654_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18100_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 18100_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:11.74 -12:48:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16202_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 16202_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.68 -06:38:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38227_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 38227_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.04 -09:57:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31248_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 31248_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 33915_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38218_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 38218_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.39 -10:40:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75144_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 75144_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_02-05-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
