This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2907* 10 06 27.09 +19 16 32.2 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7907,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2907 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2907* 10 17 19.00 +21 03 53.2 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7907,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2907 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2907* 09 57 35.66 +20 14 53.1 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7907,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2907 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2907* 09 53 03.51 +19 26 33.1 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J148.2713+19.4322,2461138.7907,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J148.2713+19.4322 20260408.2907 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2907* 10 02 00.43 +17 55 11.0 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461138.7907,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260408.2907 14.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461138.79093759 08.04.2026 06:58:47.008 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6621
Objects passed selection criteria: 6585
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4964.5
Average stars matched: 4584 (92.3356 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112108 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 02:02:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461138.79093759 08.04.2026 06:58:47.008 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 175
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33986
Objects passed selection criteria: 33866
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27000
Average stars matched: 24888.5 (92.1796 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 02:03:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461138.79043551
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:14.569 +22:00:23.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:14.278 +22:00:30.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0566 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:14.569 +22:00:23.46
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:14.278 +22:00:30.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00218 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gHTfeZX61
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h3W2xY1ZRh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i4tWBjyAOk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EB6qI53tJP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7416 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.6263 to 161.4713 deg, Dec +15.9835 to +27.7570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.6263 to 161.4713 deg, Dec 15.9835 to 27.7570 deg
Loaded 5159 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3609 out of 3783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3783 out of 7416 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939489
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939489
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.4 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0gHTfeZX61 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7416
Got 7416 stars (including 6953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 901 stars left (next iteration limit 991)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h3W2xY1ZRh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=7467
Got 7467 stars (including 6987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i4tWBjyAOk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=345, passed=5746
Got 5746 stars (including 5390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EB6qI53tJP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=5753
Got 5753 stars (including 5386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:14.569 +22:00:23.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:14.278 +22:00:30.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0566 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:14.569 +22:00:23.46
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:14.278 +22:00:30.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00218 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qByArmScwp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MrGpt7dSPI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DccrsGto7o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DVBYIjLTls
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.6171 to 161.4713 deg, Dec +15.9835 to +27.7791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.6171 to 161.4713 deg, Dec 15.9835 to 27.7791 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3446 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 36419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820111
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820111
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.3 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qByArmScwp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1750, passed=36394
Got 36394 stars (including 34600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36394 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MrGpt7dSPI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1825, passed=36174
Got 36174 stars (including 34311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 891 stars left (next iteration limit 981)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DccrsGto7o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1283, passed=30890
Got 30890 stars (including 29561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DVBYIjLTls (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1283, passed=30899
Got 30899 stars (including 29577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30899 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-03_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_020022_TTUQ2b1x1_1070_XaFAyh4S/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51981.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54805.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out57111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57453.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51981_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 51981_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:16.77 +20:39:23.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.554 627872923881083520 150.06991135157 +20.65667797733 14.8144 14.1490 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.554#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51985_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 51985_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:09.46 +17:46:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51989_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 51989_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:59.64 +20:07:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 52498_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 52794_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53022_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53162_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53162_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:32.69 +24:49:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53259_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53265_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53265_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53268_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53476_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53501_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53501_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53549_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53549_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53587_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53659_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53659_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53671_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53671_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53730_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53730_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53732_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53732_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53733_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53807_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53807_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53856_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53856_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53939_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53939_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53970_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 53970_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54036_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54036_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:06:11.66 +23:48:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54049_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54056_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54058_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54109_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
Preparing report for the candidate 54119_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54123_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54123_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54166_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54166_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54170_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54170_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54172_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54261_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54267_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54267_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54285_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54285_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54325_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54325_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54348_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:55.93 +20:47:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54423_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54509_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54509_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54538_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54538_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54581_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54581_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54606_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54606_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54626_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54626_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54634_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54634_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54647_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54647_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54714_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54714_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54801_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54801_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54804_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54804_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54805_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54805_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:00.41 +21:15:24.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.217 629454811875931904 150.00177276826 +21.25678330482 14.4291 13.9215 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.217#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54831_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54831_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54859_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54859_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54893_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54893_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:28.57 +18:55:29.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.027 623659694107418496 152.36920318428 +18.92473121342 14.1987 13.6471 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.027#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54896_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54896_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54931_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54931_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54993_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 54993_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55017_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55017_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:01:35.55 +23:50:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55088_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55088_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55103_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55103_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55183_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55183_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55411_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55411_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55464_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55464_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55530_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55530_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55537_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55537_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55575_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55575_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55651_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55651_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55659_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55659_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55679_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55679_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55699_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55699_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55739_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55739_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55752_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55752_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55756_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55756_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55775_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55775_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55798_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55798_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55809_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55809_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:35.36 +21:35:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55875_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
Preparing report for the candidate 55875_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55911_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55911_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55929_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55929_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55954_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55954_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55977_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55977_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55987_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 55987_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56132_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56132_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56133_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56153_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56153_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:16.11 +19:05:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56256_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
Preparing report for the candidate 56256_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56333_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56333_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:58.74 +25:45:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56346_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56346_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:58:17.97 +24:02:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56435_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56435_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56477_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56477_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56531_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56531_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56539_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56539_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56547_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56547_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56604_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56604_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56622_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56622_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56631_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56631_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56645_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56645_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56696_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56696_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56769_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56769_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56894_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56894_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56982_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56982_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56986_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 56986_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57010_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57010_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57013_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57013_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57016_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57016_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:05.73 +23:53:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57078_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57078_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57109_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57109_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57111_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57111_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:15.36 +25:36:00.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.003 643580169038344320 148.81426405378 +25.60025554380 15.2248 14.7699 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.003#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57154_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
Preparing report for the candidate 57154_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57326_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57326_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57340_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57340_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57357_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57357_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57373_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57373_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57424_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57424_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57453_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
Preparing report for the candidate 57453_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57490_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57490_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57515_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57515_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57549_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57549_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57630_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 57630_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12871_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 12871_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51233_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114
The candidate 51233_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-58-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0114 did not pass the final checks