This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2868* 10 02 39.34 +03 30 43.2 9.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7868,9.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2868 9.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2868* 10 06 03.26 +07 57 02.7 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7868,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2868 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2868* 10 08 55.23 +02 54 56.5 13.2 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7868,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2868 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2868* 10 06 55.58 +09 50 57.9 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7868,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2868 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2868* 09 59 52.28 +02 17 45.0 14.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7868,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2868 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2868* 10 15 27.36 +03 51 59.2 14.9 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7868,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2868 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461138.78710731 08.04.2026 06:53:16.072 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6360
Objects passed selection criteria: 6331
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4893.5
Average stars matched: 4516.25 (92.2908 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 01:56:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461138.78710731 08.04.2026 06:53:16.072 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 158
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37424
Objects passed selection criteria: 37291
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29912
Average stars matched: 27737 (92.7287 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136660 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 01:57:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461138.78659182
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:25.831 +06:01:07.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:24.511 +06:01:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:25.831 +06:01:07.88
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:24.511 +06:01:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00576 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.so9RPMFCeo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UPhCtnwLUL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xuj8mTivKv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v5XOnG4VXO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3190 to 162.3131 deg, Dec +0.6159 to +11.3378 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3190 to 162.3131 deg, Dec 0.6159 to 11.3378 deg
Loaded 4762 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 3983 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3983 out of 7065 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.859046
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.859046
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.so9RPMFCeo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, passed=7065
Got 7065 stars (including 6535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UPhCtnwLUL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, passed=7072
Got 7072 stars (including 6542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7072 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xuj8mTivKv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=370, passed=6035
Got 6035 stars (including 5656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6035 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v5XOnG4VXO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=382, passed=6028
Got 6028 stars (including 5637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
Preparing report for the candidate 20360_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21208_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 21208_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:15.68 +04:42:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:02:39.34 +03:30:43.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:25.831 +06:01:07.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:24.511 +06:01:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:25.831 +06:01:07.88
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:24.511 +06:01:14.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00576 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mxdT9DrQmV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0wqTULxrKx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pt2RC0cTHK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tyhKsga0Zf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3030 to 162.3131 deg, Dec +0.6160 to +11.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3030 to 162.3131 deg, Dec 0.6160 to 11.3418 deg
Loaded 4769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 4077 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4077 out of 40894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736338
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736338
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
1.9 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.5 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mxdT9DrQmV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1744, passed=40882
Got 40882 stars (including 39070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0wqTULxrKx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1745, passed=40944
Got 40944 stars (including 39124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pt2RC0cTHK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1355, passed=33396
Got 33396 stars (including 32002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33396 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tyhKsga0Zf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1424, passed=33623
Got 33623 stars (including 32166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33623 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-52-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_015423_TTUQ2b1x1_21008_sAkoeXb6/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out57445.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out57848.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54320.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55716.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57701.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52408_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 52408_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:39.34 +03:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 52710_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:55.87 +04:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 52843_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 53143_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53622_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 53622_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 53750_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53832_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 53832_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53882_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 53882_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
Preparing report for the candidate 53901_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 53960_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54029_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54029_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54111_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54111_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54134_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54134_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54156_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54156_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54183_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54183_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54289_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54289_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54320_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
Preparing report for the candidate 54320_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54322_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54322_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54368_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54368_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54396_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54396_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54455_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54455_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54471_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54471_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54511_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54511_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54539_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54539_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54560_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54560_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54566_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54566_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54570_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54570_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54592_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54592_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54606_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54606_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54631_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54631_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54733_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54733_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54748_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54798_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54798_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54899_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54899_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54900_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54900_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54915_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54915_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54938_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 54938_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55011_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55011_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55030_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55030_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55041_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55041_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55127_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55127_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55128_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55128_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55135_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55135_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55169_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55169_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55178_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55178_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55257_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55257_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55340_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55340_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55342_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55342_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55379_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55379_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55449_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55449_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55640_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55640_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:06:13.58 +09:10:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55687_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55687_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55693_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55693_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55710_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55710_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55716_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
Preparing report for the candidate 55716_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55769_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55769_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55782_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55782_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55825_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55825_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55897_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55897_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55923_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55923_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55953_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 55953_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56042_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56042_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56088_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56088_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56217_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56217_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56225_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56225_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:02.86 +09:22:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56241_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56241_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56377_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56377_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56397_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56397_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:20.80 +05:15:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56407_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56407_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56418_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56418_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56481_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56481_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56604_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56604_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:10.56 +04:12:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56657_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
Preparing report for the candidate 56657_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56680_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56680_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56721_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56721_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56746_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56746_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56792_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56792_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56825_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56825_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56846_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56846_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56857_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56857_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56860_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56860_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56985_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 56985_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57044_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57044_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57059_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57059_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57078_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57078_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57101_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57101_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57104_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57104_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57342_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57342_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57355_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57355_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57417_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57417_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57445_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57445_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:40.17 +09:44:03.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.158 3876724896839315072 153.91740504738 +09.73384624394 15.0768 14.4704 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.158#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57458_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57458_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57525_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57525_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57537_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57537_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57562_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57562_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57565_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57565_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57621_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57621_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57639_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57639_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57658_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57658_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57701_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
Preparing report for the candidate 57701_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57718_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57718_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57804_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57804_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57848_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 57848_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:33:23.65 +04:17:29.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.967 3858555535909971456 158.34827318116 +04.29155063097 15.2133 14.8489 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.967#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22890_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108
The candidate 22890_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-53-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0108 did not pass the final checks