This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 10 12 48.07 +15 34 48.7 10.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7833,10.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2833 10.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 09 49 11.05 +16 17 58.0 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7833,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2833 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 09 38 01.93 +17 04 21.8 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7833,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2833 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 10 06 55.65 +09 50 56.8 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7833,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2833 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 10 14 11.20 +10 31 49.1 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461138.7833,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260408.2833 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 09 44 57.69 +10 04 48.6 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461138.7833,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260408.2833 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 08.2833* 09 38 22.15 +16 43 48.0 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461138.7833,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260408.2833 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461138.78351137 08.04.2026 06:48:05.382 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5498
Objects passed selection criteria: 5495
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5179.25
Average stars matched: 5082.25 (98.1271 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 01:50:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461138.78351137 08.04.2026 06:48:05.382 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 278
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32871
Objects passed selection criteria: 32778
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30809.8
Average stars matched: 30016.2 (97.4245 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 8 01:51:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461138.78300459
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:47.317 +13:59:14.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:46.843 +13:59:16.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:47.317 +13:59:14.50
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:46.843 +13:59:16.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00198 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b1NjV9t4L3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oMPVbhtKW3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v0mE6LefVp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AmL8nBRcIf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2659 deg
Loaded 4773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3901 out of 4125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4125 out of 7958 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.887154
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.887154
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
2.7 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.b1NjV9t4L3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=7958
Got 7958 stars (including 7414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oMPVbhtKW3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, passed=8039
Got 8039 stars (including 7496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v0mE6LefVp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=6554
Got 6554 stars (including 6177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6554 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AmL8nBRcIf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, passed=6545
Got 6545 stars (including 6162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6545 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 20353_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:12:48.07 +15:34:48.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:47.317 +13:59:14.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:46.843 +13:59:16.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:47.317 +13:59:14.50
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:46.843 +13:59:16.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00198 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cuG29XYRqZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ceaS6SXBBg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SWXftNhTaH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1s7OKJZY28
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec +8.6120 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec 8.6120 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3707 out of 4153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4153 out of 43775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.771580
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.771580
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 180 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cuG29XYRqZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1969, passed=43757
Got 43757 stars (including 41703 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ceaS6SXBBg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1988, passed=43712
Got 43712 stars (including 41658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SWXftNhTaH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1515, passed=35868
Got 35868 stars (including 34322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1s7OKJZY28 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1567, passed=35616
Got 35616 stars (including 34018 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35616 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-47-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-08_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_014850_TTUQ2b1x1_28049_LZOX7vZI/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52268.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52269.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52271.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52407.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52494.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52552.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52582.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52602.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52635.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52656.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52663.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52667.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52674.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52309.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52655.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52263_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:26.36 +14:13:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52267_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52267_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:10.64 +13:46:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52268_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:59.15 +17:08:02.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.420 622968925927389184 150.24637882135 +17.13396720695 13.8248 13.0884 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.420#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52269_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:09.14 +09:48:19.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.222 589055726719629312 143.03781811843 +09.80514458824 13.9240 13.7240 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.222#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52271_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52271_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:03.11 +11:40:01.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.435 613720594324135936 144.51335145024 +11.66684164526 13.7332 13.2884 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.435#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52286_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:48.07 +15:34:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52290_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52300_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52303_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52308_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52309_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52312_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52312_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52315_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52316_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52316_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:35.87 +17:28:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52318_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52318_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52322_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52322_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:25.86 +12:57:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52325_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52325_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:42:58.01 +17:02:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52327_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52327_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52332_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52335_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52335_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:00.87 +14:25:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52338_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52342_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52343_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52343_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52347_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52348_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52348_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52350_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52350_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52351_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52353_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52357_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52358_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52358_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52361_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52364_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52367_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52367_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52368_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52369_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52372_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52373_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52377_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52378_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52380_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52381_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52383_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52383_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52387_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52387_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52388_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52389_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:05.21 +11:30:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52391_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52391_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52392_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52394_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52397_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52400_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52401_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52402_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52405_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52406_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52407_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.22 +17:44:55.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.329 631556425273235200 142.26762277584 +17.74841064601 13.8326 13.1715 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.329#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52409_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52414_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52415_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52418_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52420_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52424_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:51.19 +17:15:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52426_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52428_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52430_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52433_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52434_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52437_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52437_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52438_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52442_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52443_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52444_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52444_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52445_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52445_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52448_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52453_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52455_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52456_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52457_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52458_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52458_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52459_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52460_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52461_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52466_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52471_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.58 +17:51:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52473_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52475_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52477_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:38.45 +11:59:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52478_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52479_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52483_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52485_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52486_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52489_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:12.35 +16:27:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52490_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52494_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:35.26 +10:15:45.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.463 612586826037060992 145.89709976311 +10.26294763606 14.3897 13.6254 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.463#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52497_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52497_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52499_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52504_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:14.02 +10:16:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52508_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:02.26 +17:34:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52512_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:38.60 +17:04:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52513_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52515_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52516_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52522_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52525_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52526_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52527_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52528_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52536_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52537_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52538_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52541_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52543_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52543_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52544_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52544_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52546_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:33:10.76 +15:43:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52547_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52549_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52551_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:25.01 +11:44:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52552_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:33:45.51 +17:03:40.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.038 632757504287677824 143.43917216200 +17.06074612345 14.1214 13.1636 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.038#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52553_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52557_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52560_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52562_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52564_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52568_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52570_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52573_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:35.46 +15:02:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52576_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:23.05 +13:17:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52578_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52579_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52582_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:28:45.71 +11:08:30.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.914 592801968993608576 142.19016520595 +11.14130282192 14.5245 13.8938 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.914#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52584_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52585_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52592_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52595_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52596_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52596_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52597_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52601_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52602_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:19.66 +17:28:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.348 620867694782646400 144.58128553153 +17.47744561267 14.6227 13.9566 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.348#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52603_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:19.58 +15:12:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52608_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52608_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:15.66 +12:26:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52609_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52611_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:05.29 +10:06:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52612_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52615_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52616_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52617_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:16.94 +13:43:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52618_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52623_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52624_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52626_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52629_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52629_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:41:09.29 +13:54:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52630_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52631_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52633_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52635_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:08.27 +16:04:47.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.928 631080027502412416 142.28472521331 +16.07975057099 15.4873 14.9952 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.928#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52637_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52638_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52641_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52651_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52652_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52655_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52656_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:47:41.89 +11:23:10.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.721 612770852500406400 146.92433750925 +11.38626724071 15.1067 14.4976 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.721#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52659_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52660_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:23.52 +15:42:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52663_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:36:50.59 +12:25:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.458 614031133344115328 144.21072791911 +12.42262749301 15.1394 14.4399 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.458#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52667_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52667_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:49.14 +09:46:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.307 589051985803098496 143.20494448433 +09.77638599208 15.1411 14.6918 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.307#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52672_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52674_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:29.82 +12:09:11.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.010 614041033244478976 144.87413940296 +12.15290792685 14.9183 14.4410 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.010#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52675_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52677_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52683_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52693_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52699_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52701_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52703_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52704_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52717_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52720_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 52722_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51588_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102
The candidate 51588_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_01-48-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0102 did not pass the final checks
