This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.9369,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.4369 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.9369,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.4369 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.9369,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.4369 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461136.93719946 06.04.2026 10:29:24.033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4260
Objects passed selection criteria: 4250
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3850
Average stars matched: 3779.75 (98.1753 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 06:23:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461136.93719946 06.04.2026 10:29:24.033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44285
Objects passed selection criteria: 44226
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40315.5
Average stars matched: 38980.5 (96.6886 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 06:24:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.93659880
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:49.765 -09:59:46.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0679 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:52.564 -10:00:24.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0789 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:49.765 -09:59:46.13
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:52.564 -10:00:24.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01559 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RHgdEojkfA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uZvmEVdySB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hgylsdnP9H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jgP0DpKBqo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RHgdEojkfA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=458, passed=6287
Got 6287 stars (including 5821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uZvmEVdySB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=6127
Got 6127 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hgylsdnP9H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=317, passed=4504
Got 4504 stars (including 4184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jgP0DpKBqo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, passed=4495
Got 4495 stars (including 4162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 20195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.98 -12:12:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 20212_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.49 -11:47:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 20232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.68 -06:38:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.06 -09:32:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:49.765 -09:59:46.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0679 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:52.564 -10:00:24.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0789 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:49.765 -09:59:46.13
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:52.564 -10:00:24.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01559 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V2BEFjUwsa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aCpw0ikfIL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hyivc6jBc7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hA6j74KT7y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739902
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739902
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.V2BEFjUwsa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3753, passed=64663
Got 64663 stars (including 60806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aCpw0ikfIL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3159, passed=61397
Got 61397 stars (including 58163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hyivc6jBc7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2317, passed=41094
Got 41094 stars (including 38725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hA6j74KT7y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2341, passed=41543
Got 41543 stars (including 39156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-28-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0435.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_053437_TTUQ2b1x1_31364_V9tmMbc0/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78577.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78584.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78594.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78982.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78986.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79023.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79132.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79178.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79194.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79206.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79216.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79218.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79234.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79242.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79265.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79278.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79290.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79309.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79314.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79328.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79340.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78678.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78857.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78577_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78577_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:05.10 -09:57:59.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.625 4335241689668881664 255.52080325762 -09.96662820865 14.0732 13.0959 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.625#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78584_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78584_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:54.89 -07:09:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.003 4340543603456902912 252.47872553590 -07.16591637642 14.0324 13.2062 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.003#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78587_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78587_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:44.49 -05:55:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78589_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78589_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:28.69 -06:41:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78594_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78594_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:18.10 -06:32:32.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.693 4340825387670750592 251.82557715584 -06.54249665477 13.6284 12.8061 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.693#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78595_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78595_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:24.88 -10:36:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78596_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78596_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:55.67 -07:16:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78603_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78603_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.82 -07:56:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78678_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
Preparing report for the candidate 78678_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78682_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78682_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.82 -12:43:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78691_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78691_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.22 -14:03:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78745_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78745_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.20 -10:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78770_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78770_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.12 -08:49:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78792_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78792_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.17 -06:07:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78800_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78800_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78817_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78817_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.90 -08:56:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78826_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78826_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.62 -08:58:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78839_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78839_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.75 -07:33:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78844_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78844_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.72 -09:15:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78855_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78855_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.75 -07:07:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78857_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
Preparing report for the candidate 78857_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78863_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78863_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.72 -10:50:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78883_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78883_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:12.18 -07:32:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78894_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78894_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.11 -05:56:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78905_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78905_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:37.47 -08:12:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78918_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78918_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:24.42 -12:50:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78920_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78920_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:29.48 -12:43:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.71 -11:48:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78967_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78967_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:01.98 -08:47:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78972_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78972_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:28.14 -13:23:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78981_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78981_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:37.07 -07:37:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78982_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78982_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:17.74 -09:40:59.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.171 4337855469326344704 251.57405822309 -09.68260774429 13.6036 12.7051 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.171#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78984_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78984_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.10 -06:50:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78986_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78986_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.39 -07:46:27.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.358 4339837643975797120 254.73467746659 -07.77399541195 13.3567 12.2370 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.358#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78994_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 78994_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:36.90 -06:35:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79000_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79000_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:54.62 -06:37:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79001_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79001_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:11.83 -06:46:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79022_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79022_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.10 -11:20:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79023_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79023_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:22.50 -10:42:40.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.395 4337389688712836608 250.34347080372 -10.71144039566 14.1659 13.2835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.395#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79077_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79077_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.42 -11:05:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79103_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79103_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:32.83 -09:10:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79109_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79109_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:10.85 -07:49:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79111_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79111_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:49.15 -07:35:45.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.468 4339743468229840896 252.70485053503 -07.59614382269 14.0781 13.3322 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.468#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79126_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79126_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:10.13 -06:42:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79129_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79129_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:12.87 -09:59:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79132_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:06.87 -06:30:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.870 4340872666670761600 251.77839271693 -06.50734539488 14.1046 13.3016 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.870#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79141_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79141_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.37 -07:07:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79158_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79158_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:44.69 -06:20:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79167_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79167_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:46.02 -07:55:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79178_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79178_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:36.22 -11:02:45.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.574 4337123778697862400 251.15050800604 -11.04611866683 13.9144 12.9170 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.574#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79181_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79181_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:35.68 -08:44:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79194_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79194_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:40.63 -06:59:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.449 4340025458603559680 254.91920076328 -06.99150266682 13.9442 12.9934 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.449#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79197_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79197_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:33.12 -09:06:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79206_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79206_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:45.64 -05:53:43.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.312 4341240796909072128 252.94037262329 -05.89610854555 14.3642 13.7672 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.312#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79215_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79215_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:02.37 -06:21:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79216_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79216_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:02.96 -07:06:59.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.504 4339973025642856064 255.76240455864 -07.11653756506 14.0284 13.0924 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.504#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79218_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79218_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:32.93 -07:12:41.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.581 4340540957757740160 252.63724197200 -07.21179674484 13.6458 12.5704 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.581#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79234_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79234_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:45.19 -06:01:47.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.456 4341140466472867200 253.18788505686 -06.02972987219 14.2654 13.6483 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.456#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79239_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
Preparing report for the candidate 79239_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:35.54 -06:39:20.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79251_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79251_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:27.77 -08:10:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79265_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79265_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:34.53 -06:53:32.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.812 4340613662963287552 252.14371366358 -06.89222988750 13.9477 13.1532 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.812#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79278_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79278_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:29.44 -05:59:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.569 4341139229522239616 253.37223739411 -05.99210747374 14.2060 13.4806 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.569#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79289_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79289_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.21 -05:51:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79290_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79290_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:45.14 -06:27:47.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.805 4341050272159279104 253.93805028659 -06.46336012597 14.2630 13.4731 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.805#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79309_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79309_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:32.14 -07:26:32.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.900 4340465400692146432 251.88373205319 -07.44244791164 13.8195 12.8689 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.900#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79314_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79314_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:14.42 -07:09:11.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.463 4340157331279241984 253.30940817523 -07.15308265325 14.3277 13.5040 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.463#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79322_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79322_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:19.00 -09:45:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79328_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79328_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:54.01 -06:52:49.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.260 4361011837042863744 256.72441198167 -06.88033421535 14.2229 13.3799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.260#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79340_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79340_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:35.52 -08:41:06.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.811 4336521452484398848 256.14802366127 -08.68466412320 14.2045 13.3207 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.811#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79346_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79346_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:23.68 -07:45:37.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.472 4360695693090812160 257.09857041620 -07.76047871494 14.3764 13.4903 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.472#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79347_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 79347_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:43.28 -11:22:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.98 -12:12:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:52.45 -07:54:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.52 -10:59:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.42 -10:40:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.81 -10:28:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:46.50 -10:37:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.06 -09:32:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.49 -11:47:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436
The candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_05-29-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0436 did not pass the final checks