This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.3353* 18 40 30.25 +05 39 18.6 12.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
2MASS J18402979+0539236,2461136.8353,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
2MASS J18402979+0539236 20260406.3353 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.3353* 18 56 13.85 +02 20 03.2 12.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J185613.89+022001.3,2461136.8353,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J185613.89+022001.3 20260406.3353 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J190225.09+033525.3,2461136.8353,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J190225.09+033525.3 20260406.3353 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.3353* 18 47 10.19 +02 18 45.0 12.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 13914760,2461136.8353,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 13914760 20260406.3353 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0631 Oph,2461136.8353,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0631 Oph 20260406.3353 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 14044223,2461136.8353,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 14044223 20260406.3353 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0891 Oph,2461136.8353,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0891 Oph 20260406.3353 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
2MASS J19061358+0216209,2461136.8353,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
2MASS J19061358+0216209 20260406.3353 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1563 Aql,2461136.8353,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1563 Aql 20260406.3353 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
First image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Last image: 2461136.83559281 06.04.2026 08:03:05.219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13413
Objects passed selection criteria: 13390
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11325
Average stars matched: 11122 (98.2075 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 03:08:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
First image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Last image: 2461136.83559281 06.04.2026 08:03:05.219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 194
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117934
Objects passed selection criteria: 117767
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 100534
Average stars matched: 96961 (96.4462 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1894976 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 03:11:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.83506928
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:25.588 +05:59:45.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0768 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:27.054 +05:59:41.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0711 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:25.588 +05:59:45.49
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:27.054 +05:59:41.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AlW3DLuOok
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rksQhd6dZ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pz4f7rVdyD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.21ypw4AiXc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
The reference image (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17031 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 274.8858 to 290.8648 deg, Dec +0.6585 to +11.3165 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 274.8858 to 290.8648 deg, Dec 0.6585 to 11.3165 deg
Loaded 13648 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10048 out of 10700 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10700 out of 17031 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810355
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810355
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
2.1 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
14.8 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AlW3DLuOok (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1444, passed=17031
Got 17031 stars (including 15563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rksQhd6dZ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1468, passed=16916
Got 16916 stars (including 15414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pz4f7rVdyD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=816, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 8623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.21ypw4AiXc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=786, passed=9559
Got 9559 stars (including 8767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20759.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20759_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 20759_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:37.21 +06:52:41.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.823 4477443688863400320 276.15487823539 +06.87806098207 11.6325 11.1663 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.823#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:25.588 +05:59:45.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0768 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:27.054 +05:59:41.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0711 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:25.588 +05:59:45.49
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:27.054 +05:59:41.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6RSIo6LnPW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TpmykBdFAE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SQtDOtma1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SjyXbRdyg5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 147350 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 274.8613 to 290.8654 deg, Dec +0.6327 to +11.3181 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 274.8613 to 290.8654 deg, Dec 0.6327 to 11.3181 deg
Loaded 13685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9356 out of 12073 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12073 out of 147350 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.621929
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.621929
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 129 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
2.0 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6RSIo6LnPW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=17153, passed=147336
Got 147336 stars (including 129905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 147336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TpmykBdFAE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=17458, passed=150232
Got 150232 stars (including 132473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 150232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SQtDOtma1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=7163, passed=78948
Got 78948 stars (including 71663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SjyXbRdyg5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=7210, passed=79646
Got 79646 stars (including 72314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-02-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_030341_TTUQ2b1x1_16850_MdS4BclU/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out157890.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170720.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170732.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170733.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170735.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170740.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170772.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170787.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170792.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170794.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170795.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170798.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170801.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170805.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170816.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170823.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170827.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170875.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170957.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171084.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171085.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171114.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171169.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171193.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171195.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171289.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171304.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171333.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out43157.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12932.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130690.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170800.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170710_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170710_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:36.18 +08:04:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170720_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170720_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:21.41 +04:34:21.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.802 4284356394629763200 276.08940485985 +04.57223396638 13.8193 12.9151 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.802#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170725_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170725_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170732_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170732_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:25.87 +06:11:32.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170733_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170733_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:14.68 +04:30:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.119 4283472795287712512 278.31146532289 +04.51653329967 13.3710 12.0984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.119#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170735_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170735_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:27.74 +05:11:48.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170736_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170736_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:43.58 +09:44:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170739_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170739_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:39.20 +05:47:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170740_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170740_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:18.00 +05:59:30.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.370 4285548230891819904 280.07556479925 +05.99206548894 13.8616 13.1390 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.370#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170746_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170746_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:28.88 +10:05:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170753_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170753_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:24.19 +07:59:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170757_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170757_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170761_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170761_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:44.14 +08:12:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170762_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170762_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170772_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170772_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:12.54 +07:46:34.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170773_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170773_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:10.80 +03:50:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170780_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170780_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:32.84 +04:21:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170783_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170783_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:18.11 +07:32:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170787_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170787_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:39.22 +09:06:25.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.508 4479500909475519232 279.91334699468 +09.10672576005 12.7632 11.5921 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.508#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170790_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170790_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:59.90 +09:44:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170792_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170792_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:45.98 +08:13:00.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.925 4307451597702097152 286.44240401379 +08.21675877411 12.7235 11.4353 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.925#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170794_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170794_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:59.59 +06:23:57.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.596 4476855523167451520 276.24867629616 +06.39988936256 13.1775 12.2801 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.596#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170795_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170795_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:11.88 +09:09:14.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.543 4287388985155232512 280.79907267857 +09.15418629363 13.9020 13.3403 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170798_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170798_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:39.29 +09:24:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.296 4308990712127012864 288.91477576397 +09.41014453710 12.0601 10.6616 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.296#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170800_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 170800_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170801_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170801_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:57.69 +04:39:45.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170802_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170802_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:59.28 +06:48:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170805_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170805_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:25.98 +05:31:36.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170806_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170806_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:15.29 +05:04:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170816_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170816_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:58.96 +04:25:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.011 4284198168031686144 277.74574964348 +04.42435172569 12.8349 11.9718 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.011#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170821_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170821_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:43.70 +06:26:58.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.691 4306043123306192128 288.68146702762 +06.44992880979 11.8469 10.9940 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.691#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170823_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170823_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:50.00 +09:49:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.154 4479825269723556480 279.95819300493 +09.83101645669 12.4042 11.6877 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.154#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170827_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170827_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:40.82 +09:55:09.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.513 4479794586474053376 279.17013030454 +09.91935704692 11.3495 10.3843 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.513#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170861_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170861_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170874_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170874_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.52 +09:45:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170875_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170875_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:55.79 +09:50:20.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.574 4480224048838658432 277.48201458212 +09.83906354030 11.6750 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.574#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170877_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170877_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170896_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170896_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:31.12 +08:01:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170901_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170901_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:32.45 +06:39:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170911_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170911_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170920_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170920_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170933_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170933_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:01.15 +04:04:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170957_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170957_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:25.50 +06:09:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.284 4477158679138143744 276.85563488405 +06.15389089507 12.8910 12.3753 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.284#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170964_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170964_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:24.74 +02:29:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170975_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170975_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:02.78 +09:25:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170990_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170990_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:24.15 +08:50:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170999_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 170999_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:35.53 +10:02:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171000_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171000_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:09.87 +04:18:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171003_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171003_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:58.95 +08:13:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171005_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171005_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:55.54 +03:56:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171007_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171007_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171013_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171013_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:29.89 +09:35:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171014_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171014_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:14.96 +09:59:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171019_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171019_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:01.18 +04:37:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171020_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171020_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:33.17 +04:17:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171025_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171025_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171038_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171038_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:21.67 +09:05:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171047_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171047_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:31.91 +07:52:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171048_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171048_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.55 +08:27:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171053_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171053_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:23.89 +05:12:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171054_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171054_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:03.90 +06:31:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171060_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171060_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:51.30 +03:00:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171064_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171064_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:29.85 +09:06:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171065_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171065_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171067_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171067_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:27.35 +03:46:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171071_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171071_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:51.26 +07:49:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171077_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171077_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:46.52 +07:55:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171079_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171079_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:57.17 +07:08:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171084_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171084_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:53.06 +09:01:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.722 4479344194709331712 277.97096697761 +09.03088849442 13.5020 12.6892 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.722#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171085_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171085_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:49.79 +08:26:11.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.543 4287099813591044096 281.45793536914 +08.43605759048 12.9322 11.7982 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171102_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171102_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:23.73 +09:06:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171107_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171107_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171108_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171108_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:21.78 +09:41:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171110_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171110_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:19.43 +09:31:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171111_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171111_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:10.43 +09:49:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171113_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171113_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171114_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171114_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:04.48 +04:07:13.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.044 4284102712375224448 277.26810279375 +04.11972988137 11.8423 10.2123 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.044#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171116_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171116_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:11.89 +02:59:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171122_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171122_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.27 +09:02:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171135_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171135_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:53.28 +06:01:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171142_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171142_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:55.92 +09:09:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171150_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171150_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:23.11 +10:01:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171155_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171155_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:07.99 +08:59:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171166_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171166_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171168_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171168_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171169_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171169_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:07.29 +09:41:40.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.433 4480197901076552576 277.28028917360 +09.69494448951 13.5759 12.9802 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.433#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171171_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171171_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171182_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171182_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:20.64 +09:49:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171193_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171193_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:56.08 +09:56:11.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.627 4503623580442388480 280.98314324972 +09.93603913900 13.2067 12.1128 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.627#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171195_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171195_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:17.15 +08:57:03.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.314 4479344714416173184 277.82120136789 +08.95076559363 13.5117 12.9409 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.314#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171196_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171196_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:24.39 +02:38:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171200_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171200_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:47.55 +01:51:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171206_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171206_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:18.51 +09:42:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171209_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171209_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:57.18 +05:41:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171211_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171211_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.15 +06:56:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171220_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171220_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:52.83 +08:05:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171226_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171226_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:38.69 +08:53:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171229_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171229_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:27.07 +09:20:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171230_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171230_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:38.67 +03:06:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171232_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171232_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:23.75 +07:58:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171249_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171249_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171254_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171254_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171255_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171255_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:19.89 +05:24:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171274_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171274_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:00.99 +08:35:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171283_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171283_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:40.21 +04:33:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171289_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171289_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:33.92 +05:27:14.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.418 4283995479952004224 279.64096103123 +05.45383905696 13.1754 12.0322 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.418#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171304_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171304_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:00.75 +09:42:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.033 4479594715885202944 280.75286438842 +09.70909989037 13.6398 12.6198 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.033#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171312_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171312_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171318_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171318_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171324_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171324_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171326_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171326_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171333_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171333_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:52.57 +06:29:14.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.618 4306093292852711808 287.71982722519 +06.48796650367 12.4242 10.8286 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.618#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171341_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171341_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171348_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171348_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171356_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171356_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171371_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 171371_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12977_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 12977_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26517_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 26517_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158436_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 158436_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:09.85 +05:04:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158526_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 158526_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:46.97 +05:24:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 53108_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:04.16 +05:41:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157890_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 157890_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:16.83 +05:01:54.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12932_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 12932_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130690_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 130690_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76107_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 76107_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78274_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
Preparing report for the candidate 78274_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43157_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292
The candidate 43157_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_03-03-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0292 did not pass the final checks
