This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J288.2572+37.5344,2461136.8128,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J288.2572+37.5344 20260406.3128 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.8128,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.3128 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J301.8900+37.9235,2461136.8128,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J301.8900+37.9235 20260406.3128 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J302.1561+36.8369,2461136.8128,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J302.1561+36.8369 20260406.3128 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.98950343 27.02.2026 11:44:43.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
First image: 2461098.98950343 27.02.2026 11:44:43.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Last image: 2461136.81394457 06.04.2026 07:31:54.811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27697
Objects passed selection criteria: 27616
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 22524.8
Average stars matched: 21895.2 (97.2053 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 02:34:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.98950343 27.02.2026 11:44:43.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
First image: 2461098.98950343 27.02.2026 11:44:43.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Last image: 2461136.81394457 06.04.2026 07:31:54.811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 236
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 118 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 236920
Objects passed selection criteria: 236367
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 193911
Average stars matched: 186714 (96.2885 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2062604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 02:40:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.81166572
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
The image scale is 5.92"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:24.380 +37:59:43.16
Second-epoch image center 19:38:10.657 +37:59:11.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0459 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:24.380 +37:59:43.16
Second-epoch image center 19:38:12.104 +37:59:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:38:10.657 +37:59:11.90
Second-epoch second image center 19:38:12.104 +37:59:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00726 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lchbxzIKcB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gcaTszELyM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UrSYqPkex1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6IPtqsBNh9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36462 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.6157 to 305.0045 deg, Dec +32.0124 to +43.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.6157 to 305.0045 deg, Dec 32.0124 to 43.3705 deg
Loaded 31163 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1986 out of 2233 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2233 out of 36462 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855034
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855034
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.02
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.02
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.2 pix Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
15.0 mag. Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lchbxzIKcB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4454, passed=36462
Got 36462 stars (including 31968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.11"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.31"
Excluding outliers - 896 stars left (next iteration limit 907)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gcaTszELyM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4450, passed=36391
Got 36391 stars (including 31905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.11"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.16"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.13"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.11"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 991)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UrSYqPkex1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1497, passed=17822
Got 17822 stars (including 16309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013047 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010438 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6IPtqsBNh9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1579, passed=18396
Got 18396 stars (including 16808 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18396 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52474.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 52369_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:08.85 +41:40:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 52474_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:12.63 +39:17:05.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.178 2052969598420314496 291.05148462950 +39.28485730522 11.1844 10.3013 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.178#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28134_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 28134_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:53.75 +40:15:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08074_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 08074_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:31.46 +34:42:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.92"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:24.380 +37:59:43.16
Second-epoch image center 19:38:10.657 +37:59:11.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0459 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:24.380 +37:59:43.16
Second-epoch image center 19:38:12.104 +37:59:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:38:10.657 +37:59:11.90
Second-epoch second image center 19:38:12.104 +37:59:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00726 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oslYNnUWm2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QSWeyBJtsQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.34gtrhk1V4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MqKWUXMKOj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 289933 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.5863 to 305.0299 deg, Dec +31.9919 to +43.3713 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.5863 to 305.0299 deg, Dec 31.9919 to 43.3713 deg
Loaded 31292 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1391 out of 2470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2470 out of 289933 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.659513
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.659513
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
1.9 pix Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
15.2 mag. Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oslYNnUWm2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=54567, passed=289884
Got 289884 stars (including 234962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 289884 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.15"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 259519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 259539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.33"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 267085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.37"
Excluding outliers - 887 stars left (next iteration limit 889)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QSWeyBJtsQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=58, blended=55059, passed=293495
Got 293495 stars (including 238063 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 293495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.07"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 254240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.15"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 254260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.14"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 261095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.22"
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 957)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.34gtrhk1V4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=17548, passed=157858
Got 157858 stars (including 140142 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 157858 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013047 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010438 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MqKWUXMKOj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=17304, passed=129199
Got 129199 stars (including 111789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-45-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-28-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_023241_TTUQ2b1x1_24705_GGvxtzIV/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out198633.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out303326.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out303874.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out304752.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out325969.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326085.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326177.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326203.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326263.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326302.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326314.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326381.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326384.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326483.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326529.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326551.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326652.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out326832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out326481.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121842.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out155792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out326021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325969_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 325969_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:35.91 +39:30:20.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325978_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 325978_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:36.58 +38:10:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326021_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
Preparing report for the candidate 326021_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326022_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326022_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:12.41 +35:57:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326085_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326085_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:08.81 +38:08:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.542 2051879600141276288 292.78632535620 +38.13849973191 12.1495 10.7141 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.542#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326100_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326100_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:30.61 +40:21:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326111_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326111_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:24.82 +41:33:37.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326156_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326156_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:59.37 +41:51:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326162_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326162_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:17.99 +38:07:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326177_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326177_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:01.08 +38:36:13.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.543 2099989044947711488 286.75400915839 +38.60442641680 13.4612 13.0460 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326182_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326182_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:53.00 +39:08:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326192_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326192_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:50.98 +38:07:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326203_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326203_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:04.68 +37:09:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.909 2048807191007202304 295.51904504616 +37.15969429723 13.4383 12.9498 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.909#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326219_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326219_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:25.33 +36:12:58.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326251_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326251_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:42.83 +41:47:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326259_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326259_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:48.39 +40:15:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326260_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326260_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:58.13 +39:02:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326263_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326263_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:41.97 +38:26:15.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326286_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326286_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:11.25 +39:40:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326302_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326302_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:49.90 +34:15:56.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326314_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326314_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:37.73 +36:10:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.503 2047908683853475584 297.15698395461 +36.17372679030 13.1444 12.6635 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.503#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326342_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326342_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:47.16 +37:52:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326358_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326358_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:08.59 +37:11:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326360_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326360_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:55.03 +40:36:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326362_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326362_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:04.54 +34:31:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326381_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326381_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:27.23 +36:50:54.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326384_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326384_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:16.12 +36:35:20.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326393_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326393_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:20.93 +41:45:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326394_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326394_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:03.31 +36:49:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326405_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326405_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:53.75 +40:55:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326409_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326409_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:39.94 +34:53:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326430_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326430_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:40.99 +41:06:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326435_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326435_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:21.25 +40:05:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326481_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326481_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:35.65 +39:42:39.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326483_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326483_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:43.67 +41:06:23.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.633 2076829241266946048 296.68230996814 +41.10618732079 13.0673 12.0870 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.633#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326488_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326488_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:21.35 +42:14:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326507_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326507_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:13.48 +41:56:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326529_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326529_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:49.96 +39:42:12.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.428 2074052596463383680 301.70897981689 +39.70327607710 12.7309 12.0845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.428#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326532_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326532_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:22.04 +35:44:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326551_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326551_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:28.51 +35:57:26.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.412 2050509097557530624 288.61879984549 +35.95805894309 12.4075 11.9138 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.412#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326562_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326562_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:27.45 +39:48:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326576_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326576_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:14.69 +36:43:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326586_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326586_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:51.32 +39:47:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326596_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326596_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326601_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326601_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326652_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326652_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:28.16 +36:05:37.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.859 2059154007751836672 302.11637458305 +36.09395194149 10.0188 9.7376 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.859#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326678_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326678_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:30.46 +36:05:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326832_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326832_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:59.91 +40:50:37.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.263 2074523629797019136 302.49943689685 +40.84393184096 11.9009 11.5098 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.263#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326935_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326935_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.17 +36:05:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326976_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 326976_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:13.63 +40:01:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327020_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327020_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:46.50 +35:30:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327036_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327036_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:34.45 +40:37:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327072_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327072_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:23.75 +35:20:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327087_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327087_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:30.18 +37:40:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327094_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327094_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:06.35 +40:56:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327111_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327111_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:58.66 +35:29:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327128_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327128_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:30.57 +35:37:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327147_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327147_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:23.22 +37:07:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327148_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327148_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:10.85 +36:04:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327155_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327155_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:03.64 +34:58:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327161_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327161_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327163_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327163_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:23.23 +40:14:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327187_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327187_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:05.32 +39:03:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327194_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327194_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:19.70 +41:00:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327198_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327198_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:08.22 +41:25:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327200_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327200_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:29.34 +34:35:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327209_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327209_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:24.50 +37:22:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327215_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327215_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:01.73 +34:38:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327228_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327228_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:53.35 +33:35:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327233_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327233_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:25.78 +33:53:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327242_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327242_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327253_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327253_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:28.19 +35:05:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327260_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327260_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:42.97 +40:33:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327264_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327264_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:38.44 +34:27:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327275_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327275_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:13.70 +40:25:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327277_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327277_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:38.22 +35:16:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327280_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327280_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:01.32 +38:45:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327283_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327283_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:11.77 +40:23:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327301_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327301_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:22.68 +36:05:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327312_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327312_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:09.99 +36:05:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327339_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327339_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:15.96 +33:56:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327349_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327349_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:27.81 +34:03:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327352_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327352_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:39.37 +38:46:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327429_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327429_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:23.08 +41:00:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327449_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327449_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:15.92 +37:03:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327461_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327461_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:33.79 +37:17:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327463_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327463_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:08.55 +41:24:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327467_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327467_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:32.76 +41:01:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327470_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327470_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:06.63 +36:49:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327475_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327475_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:05.84 +34:16:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327493_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327493_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:13.08 +36:10:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327504_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327504_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:31.35 +36:18:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327532_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327532_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:50.95 +39:40:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327539_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327539_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:53.75 +39:56:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327542_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327542_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:24.15 +38:36:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327550_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327550_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:53.61 +34:47:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327553_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327553_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:32.86 +36:56:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327563_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327563_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:56.94 +36:43:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327578_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327578_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:23.11 +35:43:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327580_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327580_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:56.50 +37:42:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327624_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327624_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:52.97 +42:02:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327721_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327721_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:49.68 +36:13:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327744_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327744_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:06.39 +35:53:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327749_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327749_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:28.43 +37:41:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327765_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327765_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:13.66 +37:07:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327766_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327766_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:00.01 +35:18:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327802_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327802_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:36.77 +39:56:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327812_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327812_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327827_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327827_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:05.84 +41:24:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327847_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327847_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:00.59 +37:28:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327850_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327850_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:28.12 +38:31:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327888_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327888_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:26.14 +41:58:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327988_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327988_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:00.00 +38:45:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 327991_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 327991_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 328044_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 328044_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:21.01 +40:28:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 328054_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 328054_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 328094_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 328094_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:29.77 +34:50:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 328109_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 328109_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:04.90 +37:02:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 328141_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 328141_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:59.55 +41:36:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40574_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 40574_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:09.15 +34:10:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198503_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
Preparing report for the candidate 198503_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61065_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 61065_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:31.42 +34:42:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155792_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
Preparing report for the candidate 155792_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233771_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 233771_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:34.84 +40:44:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127418_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 127418_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:49.17 +36:23:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150245_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 150245_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:59.61 +37:43:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276789_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 276789_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:08.83 +41:40:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232006_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 232006_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:53.76 +40:15:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112623_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 112623_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:37.84 +36:34:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99248_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 99248_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:24.26 +36:09:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198633_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 198633_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:18.96 +39:22:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.301 2062034590773841024 301.82954390601 +39.37693909558 12.4829 11.6485 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.301#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121842_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
Preparing report for the candidate 121842_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102690_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 102690_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:53.39 +36:16:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103246_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 103246_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:11.92 +36:16:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34319_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 34319_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:45.74 +33:29:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 304752_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 304752_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:59.27 +37:33:06.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216463_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 216463_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:31.05 +40:00:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248978_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 248978_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:21.89 +41:02:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 303874_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 303874_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:03.08 +33:30:00.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 303326_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 303326_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.58 +39:54:27.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279767_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 279767_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 302469_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265
The candidate 302469_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-31-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265 did not pass the final checks