This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.7988,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.2988 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.7988,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.2988 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2294446644207582464,2461136.7988,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2294446644207582464 20260406.2988 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2294333355853898624,2461136.7988,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2294333355853898624 20260406.2988 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1657315390039369856,2461136.7988,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1657315390039369856 20260406.2988 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2294362497208611456,2461136.7988,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2294362497208611456 20260406.2988 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2294370021991306752,2461136.7988,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2294370021991306752 20260406.2988 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 06.2988 2461136.7988 11.03 18:23:25.93 +80:05:47.5
111.79534 27.89465 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 2294454203348818432 | 18:23:30.12 +80:05:49.2 (Gaia DR3) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification)
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 2294454203348818432,2461136.7988,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 2294454203348818432 20260406.2988 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
First image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Last image: 2461136.79914289 06.04.2026 07:10:35.946 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8567
Objects passed selection criteria: 8551
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7510.25
Average stars matched: 7317 (97.4268 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 02:12:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
First image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Last image: 2461136.79914289 06.04.2026 07:10:35.946 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 62
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48787
Objects passed selection criteria: 48659
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39528.8
Average stars matched: 38179.8 (96.5873 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 02:13:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.79854044
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 15:59:56.789 +77:29:55.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0135 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 15:59:59.753 +77:29:27.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:56.789 +77:29:55.07
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:59.753 +77:29:27.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00822 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AgAwarnaDL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.szZYdYAzsL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0vV2XNussI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xPRNl6uW5z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10765 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5822 to 286.3500 deg, Dec +70.5010 to +82.7990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5822 to 286.3500 deg, Dec 70.5010 to 82.7990 deg
Loaded 12405 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6306 out of 6625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6625 out of 10765 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862642
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862642
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
3.8 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
3.8 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AgAwarnaDL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=718, passed=10765
Got 10765 stars (including 10035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.szZYdYAzsL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=710, passed=10700
Got 10700 stars (including 9980 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0vV2XNussI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=902, passed=7398
Got 7398 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xPRNl6uW5z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=904, passed=7355
Got 7355 stars (including 6449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7355 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20677.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20677_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20677_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.80 +76:59:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.414 1707070043543037440 239.18938197675 +76.99902384037 10.3780 8.8683 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.414#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 15:59:56.789 +77:29:55.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0135 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 15:59:59.753 +77:29:27.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:56.789 +77:29:55.07
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:59.753 +77:29:27.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00822 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xclGnGKRmN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zUUOtNPoMk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xKbVvjG1n8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uUdl08hlzH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 60396 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5125 to 286.3499 deg, Dec +70.3888 to +82.7989 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5125 to 286.3499 deg, Dec 70.3888 to 82.7989 deg
Loaded 12591 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5904 out of 6724 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6724 out of 60396 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736626
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736626
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
3.5 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
3.5 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
15.4 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xclGnGKRmN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3499, passed=60372
Got 60372 stars (including 56803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zUUOtNPoMk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3416, passed=60362
Got 60362 stars (including 56856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xKbVvjG1n8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4307, passed=31803
Got 31803 stars (including 27479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uUdl08hlzH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4214, passed=31751
Got 31751 stars (including 27521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31751 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-09-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_021111_TTUQ2b1x1_28058_rXvzM5Tk/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74149.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74156.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74171.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74182.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74184.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74194.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74196.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74209.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74215.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74218.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74251.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74252.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74254.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75223.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74169.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74230.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 31s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74149_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74149_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:46.01 +80:15:38.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.357 2294439222504401152 270.43696275196 +80.26125224431 13.2309 12.7595 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.357#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74156_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74156_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:56.15 +78:48:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.943 2293876616147932928 270.72974685043 +78.81622733102 13.0381 12.5284 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.943#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74169_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74169_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74171_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74171_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:09.78 +79:57:46.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.623 2294414754074072832 272.29481600604 +79.96294752036 12.7386 12.2415 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.623#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74182_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74182_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:08.67 +75:46:39.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.210 1656049847859413760 264.53689383656 +75.77665639268 12.8639 12.3358 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.210#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74184_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74184_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:22.26 +79:39:06.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.278 2294380703573365504 271.84605423189 +79.65196975644 12.5864 12.0699 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.278#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74189_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74189_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74194_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74194_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:20.26 +79:35:14.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.141 2294334249207094912 273.58411022990 +79.58713243681 12.5726 12.1754 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.141#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74196_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74196_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:01.06 +78:32:15.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.582 2293852869272565888 271.75915007179 +78.53799149284 12.3706 11.9187 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.582#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74209_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74209_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:51.56 +79:20:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.595 2294324731560382720 273.71760763844 +79.34220063901 12.3249 11.6243 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.595#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74215_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74215_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:50.70 +77:18:27.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.071 1657033949422352384 268.46350655513 +77.30784716226 12.4295 12.0337 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.071#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74218_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74218_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:59.83 +76:52:30.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.082 1656988762070183808 267.25057008795 +76.87516123111 12.2407 11.7132 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.082#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74229_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74229_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74230_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74230_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74231_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74231_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74236_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74236_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74249_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74249_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74251_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74251_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:45.33 +79:07:08.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.839 2293967012323407488 271.94392152369 +79.11956261577 11.3561 10.7444 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.839#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74252_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74252_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:42.79 +78:46:19.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.924 2293862253777303680 271.68522265052 +78.77230613945 11.4230 10.9041 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.924#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74253_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74253_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:30.86 +74:35:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.841 1655718383759627008 263.13100115706 +74.59309241340 11.3642 10.8760 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.841#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74254_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74254_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:13.28 +78:42:18.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.88)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74258_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 74258_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74639_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74639_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:05.66 +79:38:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74651_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74651_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:05:05.81 +76:59:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74659_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74659_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:28.93 +80:57:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74672_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74672_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:50:26.00 +74:12:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74703_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74703_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:46.82 +79:43:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74905_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74905_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:44.08 +77:01:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74909_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74909_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:24.76 +80:15:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74945_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74945_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:30.60 +74:55:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74950_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74950_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:39:37.80 +79:47:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74991_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 74991_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:50.19 +76:49:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75045_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 75045_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:26.97 +81:20:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75223_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 75223_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:31.78 +74:34:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.589 1700588869173833856 225.38013518093 +74.57931996092 14.2001 13.7074 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.589#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41659_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 41659_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:09.27 +78:18:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16915_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 16915_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:49.19 +75:26:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46153_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 46153_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:05.02 +80:00:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43531_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 43531_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_02-10-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
