This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.7882,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.2882 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.7882,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.2882 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7882,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2882 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J085534.69+365902.8,2461136.7882,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J085534.69+365902.8 20260406.2882 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
X Lyn,2461136.7882,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
X Lyn 20260406.2882 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
First image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Last image: 2461136.78855457 06.04.2026 06:55:21.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10168
Objects passed selection criteria: 10147
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8600.25
Average stars matched: 8365.25 (97.2675 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 01:57:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
First image: 2461093.72163340 22.02.2026 05:18:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Last image: 2461136.78855457 06.04.2026 06:55:21.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55436
Objects passed selection criteria: 55274
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43050.5
Average stars matched: 41491 (96.3775 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 155016 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 01:58:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.78790332
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:35.192 +37:57:41.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:36.537 +37:57:38.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:43:35.192 +37:57:41.56
Second-epoch second image center 08:43:36.537 +37:57:38.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00448 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ujTeljR1MF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6uLjsiKuuW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MkGyNqHgq3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pPtSmkoKNL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10321 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 119.9860 to 141.1683 deg, Dec +32.0300 to +43.3754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 119.9860 to 141.1683 deg, Dec 32.0300 to 43.3754 deg
Loaded 6986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4957 out of 5292 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5292 out of 10321 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.911564
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.911564
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.1 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
4.5 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
4.5 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
15.4 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ujTeljR1MF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=776, passed=10321
Got 10321 stars (including 9534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6uLjsiKuuW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=799, passed=10235
Got 10235 stars (including 9422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MkGyNqHgq3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, passed=7040
Got 7040 stars (including 6731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7040 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pPtSmkoKNL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, passed=7004
Got 7004 stars (including 6697 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7004 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out04153.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20613_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20613_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:47.07 +40:07:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09197_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 09197_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:47.74 +42:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04153_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 04153_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:55:34.69 +36:59:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.501 718681245623152896 133.89452081032 +36.98408396519 10.7813 9.4441 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.501#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lyn-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:35.192 +37:57:41.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:43:38.069 +38:00:02.87
Second-epoch image center 08:43:36.537 +37:57:38.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:43:35.192 +37:57:41.56
Second-epoch second image center 08:43:36.537 +37:57:38.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00448 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5u4aJJTvqD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pHHt9iHtWV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q3h9LD4JI8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eVSntYwERo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits and wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 58327 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 119.9105 to 141.2591 deg, Dec +31.9813 to +43.3876 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 119.9105 to 141.2591 deg, Dec 31.9813 to 43.3876 deg
Loaded 7080 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4555 out of 5331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5331 out of 58327 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.0 pix Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
4.0 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
3.9 pix fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
15.6 mag. Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5u4aJJTvqD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3509, passed=58308
Got 58308 stars (including 54702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pHHt9iHtWV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=3533, passed=58654
Got 58654 stars (including 55027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58654 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q3h9LD4JI8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1254, passed=28200
Got 28200 stars (including 26927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eVSntYwERo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1225, passed=28234
Got 28234 stars (including 26993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-18-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-19-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-54-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_015615_TTUQ1b1x1_1997_MSPWNuIj/wcs_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72767.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72768.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72770.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73744.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73775.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73782.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73877.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73961.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74028.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74095.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15712.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22269.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72759.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74338.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72753_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 72753_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72759_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 72759_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72767_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 72767_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:02.20 +33:05:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.782 902197158002864768 122.00929815397 +33.08463167720 13.5800 13.0494 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.782#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72768_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 72768_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:39.06 +38:54:01.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.925 908985405352963968 121.16308020726 +38.90035383241 13.1797 12.7372 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.925#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72770_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 72770_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:00.53 +35:18:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.695 906088948127843712 121.50239880247 +35.30387883387 13.1442 12.5428 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72950_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 72950_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72952_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 72952_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73093_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73093_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73136_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73136_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73148_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73148_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73161_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73161_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73168_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73168_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73197_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73197_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:30.79 +36:26:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73253_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73253_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73274_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73274_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73317_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73317_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73358_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73358_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73370_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73370_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73395_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73395_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73396_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73396_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73408_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73408_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73430_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73430_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73476_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73476_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73485_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73485_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73488_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73488_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73535_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73535_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:52.98 +38:35:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73558_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73558_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73585_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73585_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73616_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73616_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73723_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73723_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73727_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73727_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73736_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73736_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73744_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73744_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:44:10.51 +36:52:53.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.837 717739170317733760 131.04407817842 +36.88151101078 13.1962 12.4990 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.837#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73745_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73745_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:10.44 +32:52:02.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.731 712472509619373440 135.79289770010 +32.86651202899 13.3252 12.7038 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.731#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73762_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73762_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73775_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73775_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:54:36.07 +40:08:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.532 720011792131745408 133.65044333581 +40.14967509153 13.3819 12.8927 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.532#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73777_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73777_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73782_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73782_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:38:16.31 +36:59:49.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.845 909944110773079680 129.56678429996 +36.99600681188 13.5013 12.8274 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.845#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73820_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73820_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73833_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73833_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73854_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73854_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73857_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73857_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73876_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73876_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73877_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73877_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:01.66 +33:36:29.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.428 710409001172505216 130.75761207788 +33.60782089330 13.6582 12.9554 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.428#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73885_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73885_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73903_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73903_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73915_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73915_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73916_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73916_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73917_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73917_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73920_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73920_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73951_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73951_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73952_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73952_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73958_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73958_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73961_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73961_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:02:44.34 +35:34:47.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.910 715262142418018816 135.68381664534 +35.57963914520 13.8491 13.2714 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.910#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73976_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73976_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73984_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73984_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:35.53 +38:27:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.730 910448339934832512 131.64802417497 +38.46532523111 13.5995 12.9274 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.730#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73997_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 73997_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74004_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74004_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74005_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74005_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:00:37.13 +37:37:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74019_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74019_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74027_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74027_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74028_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74028_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:10.90 +37:44:21.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.961 811064411612252032 140.04586648263 +37.73864725091 14.0260 13.4023 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74032_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74032_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74042_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74042_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74051_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74051_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74054_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74054_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74095_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74095_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:54:33.35 +35:15:50.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.638 716748510340331264 133.63876084276 +35.26311363500 13.9787 13.5307 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.638#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74109_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74109_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74115_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74115_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74136_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74136_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74144_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74144_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74147_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74147_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74206_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74206_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74212_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74212_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74218_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74218_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74233_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74233_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74237_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74237_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74240_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74240_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74243_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74243_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74259_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74259_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74266_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74266_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74285_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74285_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74298_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74298_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74302_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74302_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74310_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74310_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74322_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74322_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74327_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74327_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74333_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74333_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74337_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74337_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74338_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 74338_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74340_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74340_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74342_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74342_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74345_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74345_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74349_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74349_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74355_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74355_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74356_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74356_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74357_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74357_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74358_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74358_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74361_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74361_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74362_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74362_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74366_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74366_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74372_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74372_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74378_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74378_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74380_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74380_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74381_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74381_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74387_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74387_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74392_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74392_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74397_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 74397_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44662_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 44662_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:47.74 +42:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 52435_fd_Lyn-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_01-55-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks