This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2323* 12 22 01.14 -06 03 28.9 11.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7323,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2323 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7323,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2323 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7323,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2323 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2323* 11 57 15.18 -05 56 55.8 13.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7323,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2323 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7323,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2323 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7323,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2323 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.84537233 27.02.2026 08:17:10.169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
First image: 2461098.84537233 27.02.2026 08:17:10.169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Last image: 2461136.73253824 06.04.2026 05:34:41.304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4434
Objects passed selection criteria: 4431
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4157.5
Average stars matched: 3892.75 (93.632 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 00:38:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.84537233 27.02.2026 08:17:10.169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
First image: 2461098.84537233 27.02.2026 08:17:10.169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Last image: 2461136.73253824 06.04.2026 05:34:41.304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 144
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25128
Objects passed selection criteria: 25074
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24030
Average stars matched: 23212 (96.5959 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 00:39:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.73202986
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.182 -10:00:01.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:17.689 -10:02:41.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.182 -10:00:01.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:18.324 -10:02:37.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0897 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:17.689 -10:02:41.89
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:18.324 -10:02:37.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00284 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Spv4AQhBx8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pagTO5MyGn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NgpGYpooSI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits &> /tmp/tmp.URwBjtEK6u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8751 to 188.0898 deg, Dec -15.2831 to -4.6918 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8751 to 188.0898 deg, Dec -15.2831 to -4.6918 deg
Loaded 4293 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3176 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 4517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.854368
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.854368
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
3.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
3.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.8 mag. Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Spv4AQhBx8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=4517
Got 4517 stars (including 4137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pagTO5MyGn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=4553
Got 4553 stars (including 4187 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4553 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NgpGYpooSI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=5281
Got 5281 stars (including 4894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5281 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.URwBjtEK6u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=352, passed=5245
Got 5245 stars (including 4892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20240.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20240_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 20240_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:36.87 -08:36:01.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.466 3591751961324599424 174.15372069526 -08.60058834756 11.7232 11.3244 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.466#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 20244_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:53:50.80 -09:18:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 20245_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:02:04.94 -10:32:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.182 -10:00:01.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:17.689 -10:02:41.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.182 -10:00:01.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:18.324 -10:02:37.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0897 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:17.689 -10:02:41.89
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:18.324 -10:02:37.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00284 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4KiRnJBAzW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cTf7DcNwmJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WOBkUX0UkJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aptdOnHET6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29056 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8751 to 188.1080 deg, Dec -15.2896 to -4.6877 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8751 to 188.1080 deg, Dec -15.2896 to -4.6877 deg
Loaded 4301 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3765 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3765 out of 29056 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.705276
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.705276
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
1.9 pix Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.6 pix fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.6 pix fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.9 mag. Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4KiRnJBAzW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1008, passed=29048
Got 29048 stars (including 27997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29048 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cTf7DcNwmJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1003, passed=28852
Got 28852 stars (including 27808 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WOBkUX0UkJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1856, passed=25720
Got 25720 stars (including 23835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aptdOnHET6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1799, passed=25627
Got 25627 stars (including 23791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-17-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-33-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_003526_TTUQ2b1x1_32136_ZQaka9oJ/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32113.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32121.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32129.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32138.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32164.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32167.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32175.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32184.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32185.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32192.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32201.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32203.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32213.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31930.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32077.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31829_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31829_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:51:33.09 -06:17:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31830_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31830_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31860_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31860_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31864_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31864_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31867_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31867_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31869_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 31869_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31883_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31883_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31900_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31930_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 31930_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31931_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 31931_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31940_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31940_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31960_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31960_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31966_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31966_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31987_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31987_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31997_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 31997_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31998_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31998_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31999_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 31999_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32007_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32007_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32008_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32008_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32011_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32011_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32016_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32016_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32021_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32021_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32024_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32024_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32027_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:24:25.36 -10:29:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32031_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32031_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32035_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32035_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32041_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32041_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32053_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32053_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32055_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32055_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32062_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32062_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32064_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32064_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32067_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32067_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32068_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32068_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32075_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32075_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32077_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 32077_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32079_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32079_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32088_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32088_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32090_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32090_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32094_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32094_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32095_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32095_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32096_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32096_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32103_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32103_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32104_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32104_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32105_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32105_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32107_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32107_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32113_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32113_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:29.99 -08:56:43.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.298 3588757200889003776 175.37491920552 -08.94580296484 14.4525 13.8730 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.298#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32114_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32120_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
Preparing report for the candidate 32120_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32121_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32121_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:20.73 -07:26:41.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.314 3592175204581691392 174.33576727560 -07.44494551847 14.4627 13.8572 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.314#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32123_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32123_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32124_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32126_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32126_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32129_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32129_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:08:51.78 -07:56:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.139 3582466997945503616 182.21546490092 -07.94850354719 14.2744 13.6328 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.139#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32135_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32135_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32138_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32138_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:03.32 -07:14:33.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.803 3592967437069113856 173.51405138708 -07.24247311933 14.5442 14.0359 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.803#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32143_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32143_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32144_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32144_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:22:01.49 -09:21:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32146_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32146_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32147_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32147_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32152_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32155_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32156_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32164_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:21.04 -06:12:33.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.148 3593431362256700800 174.58766507234 -06.20926440168 14.5763 14.0788 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.148#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32167_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:32.51 -09:19:26.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.587 3588641580369533312 175.38540484078 -09.32457659667 14.3477 13.3147 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.587#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32170_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32170_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:35.38 -10:50:12.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.913 3586694585794973568 174.39762323252 -10.83662540506 14.4067 13.8692 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.913#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32171_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32171_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32172_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32172_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32174_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32175_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:45:55.63 -07:18:14.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.551 3592357482994326016 176.48142474245 -07.30379700419 14.1998 13.3020 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.551#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32176_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32184_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32184_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:51:17.15 -09:58:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.889 3587969572606936960 177.82092607691 -09.97288385892 14.5533 14.0779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.889#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32185_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:42:16.67 -12:48:08.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.392 3585501409520240640 175.56944282152 -12.80216998480 14.5090 13.8987 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.392#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32187_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32187_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32192_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32192_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:06.69 -06:20:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.669 3595864822007708160 179.02773761434 -06.34934635961 14.4689 13.8102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.669#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32195_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32195_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32201_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32201_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:01:34.68 -05:53:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.514 3595799813383232640 180.39446717528 -05.89077779571 14.3639 13.8852 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.514#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32203_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32203_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:19.82 -05:43:39.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.578 3596565691950951936 182.58247987249 -05.72814835349 14.6931 14.2773 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.578#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32213_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32213_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:57:54.83 -05:53:34.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.804 3595903854670549120 179.47796519008 -05.89288036610 14.5219 14.0830 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.804#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32218_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32218_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32288_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181
The candidate 32288_fd_Vir-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-34-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0181 did not pass the final checks