This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065346.09+292927.3,2461136.7197,10.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065346.09+292927.3 20260406.2197 10.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3381727854392915072,2461136.7197,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3381727854392915072 20260406.2197 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J070755.05+294047.7,2461136.7197,9.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J070755.05+294047.7 20260406.2197 9.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7197,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2197 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.7197,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.2197 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7197,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2197 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7197,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2197 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.7197,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.2197 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461136.72012087 06.04.2026 05:16:48.443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 24
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23679
Objects passed selection criteria: 23640
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21269
Average stars matched: 20637 (97.0285 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 00:43:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461136.72012087 06.04.2026 05:16:48.443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 155 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 155532
Objects passed selection criteria: 155202
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125162
Average stars matched: 120360 (96.1634 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1979380 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 00:48:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.71933566
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:54.015 +30:00:00.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0233 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:56.094 +30:00:21.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:54.015 +30:00:00.83
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:56.094 +30:00:21.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00938 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ncL3R4cADN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWF7w2Kx52
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vwkYRAklFZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0m3KJaRoRH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.889510
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.889510
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
4.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
4.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ncL3R4cADN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EWF7w2Kx52 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vwkYRAklFZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=961, passed=18736
Got 18736 stars (including 17770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18736 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0m3KJaRoRH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=952, passed=18631
Got 18631 stars (including 17671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 917.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 917.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012744 (45.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010196 (36.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 565 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 529 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 529 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 561 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.95"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 560 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.54"
Excluding outliers - 560 stars left (next iteration limit 581)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32314.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32352.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11907.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30310.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31379_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 31379_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (188.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31467_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 31467_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (694.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 31614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (987.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31818_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 31818_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (566.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31851_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 31851_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (166.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31960_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 31960_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (94.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32123_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32123_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (506.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32194_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32194_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (596.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32286_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32286_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (581.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32314_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32314_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:01.37 +31:09:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.495 889078571237134080 105.00631966979 +31.14994973088 12.1914 11.7563 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.495#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:33.07 +26:28:46.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.016 871303350866692992 108.88717607224 +26.47948321077 12.2869 11.8531 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.016#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32410_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32410_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (222.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (201.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11907_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 11907_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30310_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 30310_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 08375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (662.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 09925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (465.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05562_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 05562_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (300.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.28 +33:22:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11996_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 11996_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 07128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.69 +27:25:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:53:46.31 +29:29:26.3
07:07:55.06 +29:40:48.4
06:55:30.75 +25:23:24.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:54.015 +30:00:00.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0233 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:56.094 +30:00:21.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:54.015 +30:00:00.83
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:56.094 +30:00:21.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00938 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ij9yMzMEoz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q7xxDLs6FB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qkOSWpq73r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9kJMjpw3eq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.744234
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.744234
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 111 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.9 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
3.8 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ij9yMzMEoz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q7xxDLs6FB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qkOSWpq73r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=7586, passed=84576
Got 84576 stars (including 76928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9kJMjpw3eq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7508, passed=84689
Got 84689 stars (including 77117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84689 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 917.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 917.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012744 (45.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010196 (36.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 568 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.01"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 582 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 561 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.99"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 561 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.51"
Excluding outliers - 561 stars left (next iteration limit 584)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-15-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001745_TTUQ1b1x1_12471_9T1Ocwzv/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178285.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out188658.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192072.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192097.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192107.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192116.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192132.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192138.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192238.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193479.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193867.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193953.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194107.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194117.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194390.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194492.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194502.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194557.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194592.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194656.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194664.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194989.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194993.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195039.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195107.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195151.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195177.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195224.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195258.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195329.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195476.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195506.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195562.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195578.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195735.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out192064.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out195249.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192062_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192062_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (898.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192063_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192063_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (784.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192064_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192064_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:03.57 +26:14:57.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:38.50 +33:14:59.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.241 890517801895485056 107.90973761245 +33.24960604585 14.1209 13.5275 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.241#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192073_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192073_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192089_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192089_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192093_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192093_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (415.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192097_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192097_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:59.63 +25:29:54.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.345 870283661207466752 110.74877697023 +25.49769993589 13.9763 13.5200 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.345#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:40.59 +26:12:14.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192101_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192101_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1045.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:02.00 +27:04:49.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.409 871440313079992192 109.75704981712 +27.07983760812 14.1709 13.6612 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.409#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1208.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192115_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192115_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (316.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192116_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192116_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:55.14 +31:14:09.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.102 886781901902121984 109.72870180050 +31.23524069638 14.3149 13.6913 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.102#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (445.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192120_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192120_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (430.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (813.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192130_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192130_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (178.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192132_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192132_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:32.98 +31:01:55.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.342 886799150491162880 110.63681104598 +31.03169078687 13.6794 13.2466 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.342#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192134_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192134_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (577.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192135_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192135_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:57.32 +27:56:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.716 885041478074023424 109.48753572073 +27.93333830008 13.7912 13.3286 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.716#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.47 +26:48:55.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.861 883391935754719616 108.09781170780 +26.81492778694 12.4237 11.9688 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.861#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192238_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192238_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.55 +24:47:55.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.965 870701986725508864 107.33589843678 +24.79864859571 9.8190 9.4770 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.965#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192423_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192423_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.12 +27:55:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192704_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 192704_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.54 +27:49:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193200_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 193200_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193427_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193427_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (893.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193479_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193479_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.25 +25:34:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.026 3381765512666147712 103.86289037737 +25.57225994847 11.7168 9.9574 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.026#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193541_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193541_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193863_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193863_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.17 +32:21:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193867_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193867_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.48 +26:48:55.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.711 871972304909586048 112.16495949822 +26.81512109585 13.1654 12.3655 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193868_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193868_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:48.01 +25:27:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.32 +32:38:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.313 890334905008276096 107.70544152321 +32.63437294620 12.8497 12.0219 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.313#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 193999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (347.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194037_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194037_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:46.96 +34:14:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194094_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194094_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (455.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:49.30 +33:27:21.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.975 892741289284207744 114.20510373823 +33.45604428798 13.7380 13.3474 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.975#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194117_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194117_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.68 +30:33:09.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.836 886538561938074496 108.30272611877 +30.55210950012 13.2191 12.7701 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.836#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194317_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194317_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (372.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194327_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194327_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194335_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194335_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (247.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194390_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194390_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.60 +28:12:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.437 883795314787681280 107.91457057156 +28.21001192769 13.5474 13.1044 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.437#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194392_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194392_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.10 +25:18:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.12 +27:02:09.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.035 884138534213003776 104.51308036297 +27.03563819303 13.3062 12.7361 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.035#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194502_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194502_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.46 +26:04:31.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.759 3381889070285428224 104.86776312283 +26.07554400582 13.4516 12.9725 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.759#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194557_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194557_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:52.03 +27:10:49.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.709 884152385485598208 105.21516229854 +27.18114325886 13.8091 13.4037 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.709#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194586_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194586_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (541.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.69 +26:19:42.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.881 3385045012255457920 102.69431088574 +26.32906315895 13.3463 12.5664 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.881#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 194601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194656_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194656_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.80 +24:59:46.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.783 882718519242610816 107.10650952121 +24.99573170676 13.7400 13.2464 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.783#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194664_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194664_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.78 +26:19:08.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.867 871329601706596864 109.45634871377 +26.31798964208 13.3192 12.5289 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.867#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194681_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194681_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194703_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194703_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194766_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194766_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194792_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194792_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.47 +25:50:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194820_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194820_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:30.99 +25:14:44.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.305 870179654279588608 110.37922450309 +25.24618947434 14.1659 13.4579 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.305#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194947_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194947_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (189.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194973_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194973_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:24.84 +25:21:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:29.23 +28:53:50.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.663 885387618078318464 109.62248816465 +28.89883883310 14.5164 14.0198 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.663#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194993_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 194993_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.19 +27:27:35.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.653 883519960139663488 108.95929286285 +27.45835339091 13.9330 13.3504 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.653#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195039_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195039_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.87 +30:35:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.702 888951444502760960 104.30313151347 +30.58701474408 13.8924 13.4560 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.702#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (357.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.46 +34:46:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.852 896712416046423040 109.38427300492 +34.77493114617 13.8189 13.3347 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.852#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195135_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195135_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.22 +29:53:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.116 886265440675076224 109.27917604081 +29.88339258572 14.0849 13.4264 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.116#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195151_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195151_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:08.28 +27:43:14.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.630 883763295806999680 108.03501036250 +27.72074681339 14.1092 13.6075 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.630#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195177_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195177_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.28 +28:25:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.580 885313916439549952 108.51709019569 +28.42098349478 14.0326 13.3436 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.580#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195197_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195197_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (85.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195224_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195224_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.12 +31:15:19.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.658 891848726359604096 112.59603158377 +31.25480810143 14.0480 13.3686 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.658#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195229_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 195229_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195249_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195249_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.81 +27:40:22.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195258_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195258_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.22 +31:46:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.166 891973761447657728 113.25926251797 +31.76995400171 13.8274 13.2939 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.166#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195329_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195329_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:35.53 +28:46:03.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.154 885150673322342912 110.89735908841 +28.76757354955 14.3190 13.8726 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.154#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195476_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195476_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:31.90 +30:51:57.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.898 886051654381784576 111.13204216137 +30.86568178674 14.2392 13.7579 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.898#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195506_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195506_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:30.09 +27:56:56.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.612 873050444779433984 111.37568938115 +27.94811932687 14.4375 13.9178 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.612#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195562_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195562_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:18.98 +29:12:46.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.758 884814360203958400 106.07930431043 +29.21183526611 13.9663 13.4586 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.758#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195578_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195578_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:13.49 +26:47:06.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.756 883412757756217088 109.05602742741 +26.78416373035 14.1231 13.5604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.756#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195735_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 195735_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:30.35 +29:36:27.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.437 885680363048901632 111.62637402102 +29.60607472213 14.2272 13.6985 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.437#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 195754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (453.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:48.03 +26:59:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (988.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (566.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12135_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 12135_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:30.74 +25:23:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120235_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 120235_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (788.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139725_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 139725_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1067.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82500_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 82500_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:46.28 +29:29:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (201.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (565.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36797_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 36797_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.02 +29:40:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95581_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 95581_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (691.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68829_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 68829_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (466.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188658_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 188658_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.01 +28:38:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.156 887572760000130176 103.32762804144 +28.64141269370 13.9225 13.4258 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.156#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77726_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 77726_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87040_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 87040_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (458.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (164.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (301.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (175.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178285_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 178285_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.89 +29:41:05.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.814 887763383533393920 104.06642759899 +29.68362074907 12.1233 11.3263 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.814#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 178271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (871.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (664.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (695.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59769_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 59769_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95453_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 95453_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (270.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.69 +27:25:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-06_00-16-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
