This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 03 02.00 +03 22 53.8 9.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,9.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 9.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 41 33.11 +08 54 52.6 12.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 06 22.60 +07 54 07.5 12.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 09 22.88 +02 43 50.1 13.4 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 07 06.93 +09 45 03.5 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 38 06.32 +05 00 08.9 13.5 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 00 13.31 +02 06 58.3 14.7 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.2150* 10 07 13.13 +05 46 19.2 15.0 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.7150,14.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.2150 14.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461136.71524030 06.04.2026 05:09:46.762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6599
Objects passed selection criteria: 6577
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5518.5
Average stars matched: 5208.75 (94.3871 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112056 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 00:13:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461058.87957345 18.01.2026 09:06:25.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461136.71524030 06.04.2026 05:09:46.762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 171
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38275
Objects passed selection criteria: 38139
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32815
Average stars matched: 31047 (94.6122 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 6 00:14:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.71471644
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:13.446 +05:58:49.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0832 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:14.596 +05:58:45.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0796 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:13.446 +05:58:49.28
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:14.596 +05:58:45.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00490 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9zxUdRWkuw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7LCFts1nBE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KC0az5GoHA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lqT8Cc039u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3190 to 162.3131 deg, Dec +0.6159 to +11.3378 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3190 to 162.3131 deg, Dec 0.6159 to 11.3378 deg
Loaded 4762 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 3983 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3983 out of 7065 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.859046
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.859046
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9zxUdRWkuw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, passed=7065
Got 7065 stars (including 6535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7LCFts1nBE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, passed=7072
Got 7072 stars (including 6542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7072 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KC0az5GoHA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, passed=6331
Got 6331 stars (including 5926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6331 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lqT8Cc039u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, passed=6313
Got 6313 stars (including 5912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20340.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 20340_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20901_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 20901_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:28.25 +06:03:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20930_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 20930_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:44.12 +07:45:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20952_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 20952_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:13.17 +03:13:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:03:02.00 +03:22:53.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:13.446 +05:58:49.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0832 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:31.152 +06:01:10.35
Second-epoch image center 10:17:14.596 +05:58:45.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0796 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:13.446 +05:58:49.28
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:14.596 +05:58:45.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00490 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AyvapL4ywe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ZlPnuInsH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KwnFe9BUzJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l8wj0phXWQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3030 to 162.3131 deg, Dec +0.6160 to +11.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3030 to 162.3131 deg, Dec 0.6160 to 11.3418 deg
Loaded 4769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 4077 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4077 out of 40894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736338
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736338
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
1.9 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.5 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AyvapL4ywe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1744, passed=40882
Got 40882 stars (including 39070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7ZlPnuInsH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1745, passed=40944
Got 40944 stars (including 39124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KwnFe9BUzJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1594, passed=35305
Got 35305 stars (including 33668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l8wj0phXWQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1546, passed=35146
Got 35146 stars (including 33555 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-06-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-07-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-06_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_001026_TTUQ2b1x1_20903_szghp13c/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55179.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55653.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55672.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54185.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55473.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56047.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 52460_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:24.11 +02:26:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 52530_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:02.00 +03:22:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52787_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 52787_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52856_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 52856_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 52947_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 53325_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 53413_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53489_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53489_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53528_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53633_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53645_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53648_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53648_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53662_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53793_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53793_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53853_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53853_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53871_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53871_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53888_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53904_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53911_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53927_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53927_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 53931_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53947_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53947_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53957_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53957_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53965_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 53965_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54036_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54036_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54080_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54124_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54124_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54127_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54127_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54185_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 54185_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54233_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54233_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54236_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54236_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54252_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 54252_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54257_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54257_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54262_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54262_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54298_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54298_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54302_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54302_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54325_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54325_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54359_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54359_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54385_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54385_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54405_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54409_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54409_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54505_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54505_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54542_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54542_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54595_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54595_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54615_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54615_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54624_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54624_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54652_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54652_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54668_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54668_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54690_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54690_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54691_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54691_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54733_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54733_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54752_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54752_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54757_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54757_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54760_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54760_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54784_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54784_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54815_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54815_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54881_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54881_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54891_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54891_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54949_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54949_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:20.80 +05:15:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54959_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54959_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54961_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:02.86 +09:22:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54978_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54978_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54997_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 54997_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55027_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55027_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55033_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55033_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55034_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55034_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55080_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55080_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:03.89 +03:15:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55083_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55083_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55101_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55101_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55130_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55130_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55179_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55179_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:10.52 +04:50:00.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.373 3849276478110190848 149.79413636336 +04.83373289039 14.3776 13.6571 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.373#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55211_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55211_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55224_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55224_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55266_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55266_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55432_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55432_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55456_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55456_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55468_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55468_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55473_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 55473_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55493_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55493_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55525_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55525_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55581_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55581_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55593_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55593_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55601_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55601_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55606_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55606_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55610_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55610_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55653_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55653_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:06.54 +01:53:32.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.595 3835993351149481472 151.02732108645 +01.89221173478 14.9790 14.3512 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.595#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55657_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55657_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55672_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55672_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:31.85 +02:06:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.169 3834791894177960192 149.38272924197 +02.10585194942 14.9959 14.3151 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.169#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55719_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55719_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55724_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55724_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55727_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55727_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55770_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55770_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55826_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55826_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55837_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55837_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55850_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55850_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55874_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55874_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55899_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55899_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55932_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55932_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55959_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55959_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55960_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55960_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55980_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55980_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:37.69 +06:31:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55987_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55987_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55993_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 55993_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56022_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56022_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56047_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 56047_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56051_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56051_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56063_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56063_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:03.77 +08:59:53.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.763 3876003754650737408 155.51551039282 +08.99822382765 14.9883 14.5811 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.763#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56074_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56074_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56083_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56083_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56096_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56096_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56098_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56098_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56114_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56114_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56140_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 56140_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-06_00-09-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
