This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3364338184648199936,2461136.6664,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3364338184648199936 20260406.1664 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J104.5763+17.6127,2461136.6664,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J104.5763+17.6127 20260406.1664 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,6.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 6.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,6.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 6.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,7.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 7.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,10.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 10.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3368195129700664576,2461136.6664,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3368195129700664576 20260406.1664 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J070733+2455.8,2461136.6664,9.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J070733+2455.8 20260406.1664 9.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J105.3052+20.3513,2461136.6664,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J105.3052+20.3513 20260406.1664 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3361662969778288512,2461136.6664,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3361662969778288512 20260406.1664 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6664,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1664 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J104.6387+18.0158,2461136.6664,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J104.6387+18.0158 20260406.1664 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6664,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1664 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J104.7458+20.5714,2461136.6664,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J104.7458+20.5714 20260406.1664 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3364464555469134080,2461136.6664,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3364464555469134080 20260406.1664 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J105.1314+19.0055,2461136.6664,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J105.1314+19.0055 20260406.1664 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3364457305562160512,2461136.6664,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3364457305562160512 20260406.1664 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,7.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 7.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,10.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 10.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3368195129700664576,2461136.6664,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3368195129700664576 20260406.1664 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3368194996559622400,2461136.6664,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3368194996559622400 20260406.1664 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3368198810490566784,2461136.6664,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3368198810490566784 20260406.1664 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6664,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1664 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6664,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1664 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0702064+210358,2461136.6664,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0702064+210358 20260406.1664 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6664,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1664 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last image: 2461136.66662823 06.04.2026 03:59:46.679 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 45
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18584
Objects passed selection criteria: 18561
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17188.5
Average stars matched: 16688.2 (97.0896 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 123552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 23:11:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last image: 2461136.66662823 06.04.2026 03:59:46.679 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 367
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116849
Objects passed selection criteria: 116613
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101621
Average stars matched: 98313.8 (96.7455 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1896560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 23:14:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.66610501
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:26.118 +22:01:19.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0852 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:26.438 +22:01:00.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0852 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:26.118 +22:01:19.70
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:26.438 +22:01:00.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yGZa1GNNBZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2O8r07WDUn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.srUldX7RoE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XOPRwce6LC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0354 to 119.5901 deg, Dec +16.4821 to +27.2938 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0354 to 119.5901 deg, Dec 16.4821 to 27.2938 deg
Loaded 13967 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10770 out of 11768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11768 out of 24052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914404
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914404
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yGZa1GNNBZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2144, passed=24052
Got 24052 stars (including 21876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24052 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2O8r07WDUn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2184, passed=23896
Got 23896 stars (including 21676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23896 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.srUldX7RoE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2307, passed=18997
Got 18997 stars (including 16685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XOPRwce6LC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2200, passed=18940
Got 18940 stars (including 16732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31187.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31188.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31193.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31195.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31198.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31216.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31224.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31227.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31228.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31229.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31239.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31245.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31252.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31265.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31270.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31034_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31034_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:31.89 +26:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31043_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31043_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31053_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31053_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31060_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31060_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31061_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31061_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31077_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31077_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31128_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31128_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31148_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31148_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31187_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31187_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:16.19 +20:53:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.297 672932521000255744 116.31756046137 +20.88617465357 11.9588 11.1261 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.297#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31188_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31188_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:45.38 +23:14:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.837 675347392131768192 116.93933591878 +23.24793190957 12.2168 11.7870 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.837#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:49.80 +24:22:59.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.602 868366422166422912 113.45768352237 +24.38304772182 12.1471 11.7781 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31195_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31195_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.65 +21:28:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.950 865396503821188096 114.61128620274 +21.48094970194 12.3379 11.6849 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.950#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31198_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31198_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:45.20 +21:14:44.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.956 673142527721871232 114.68860077237 +21.24557526911 12.2360 11.7198 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.956#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31203_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31203_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.41 +22:23:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31204_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31204_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.85 +23:03:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31216_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31216_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:11.70 +18:22:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.530 671383244694408576 115.04889361660 +18.37158323424 12.4566 12.2469 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.530#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31219_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31219_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:04.30 +22:16:38.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.281 866387503098113408 112.51829073104 +22.27713936467 12.1833 11.7819 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.281#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31224_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31224_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:30.68 +22:38:12.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.030 865766317685341696 113.37814159768 +22.63671899078 12.2427 11.7950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.030#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:06.46 +21:53:31.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.644 865996214397591040 112.27710131979 +21.89194857254 12.1436 11.6397 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.644#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31228_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31228_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:31.87 +22:44:45.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.635 866442414257335168 112.88297102313 +22.74593879745 12.2116 11.8384 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.635#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31229_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31229_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:19.77 +26:05:04.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.916 871695571576276096 113.33249655768 +26.08446469648 12.3340 11.9705 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.916#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31239_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31239_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:22.40 +22:04:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.871 866193439295807360 109.84352341543 +22.07202849007 11.9919 11.3118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.871#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31245_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31245_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:28.58 +24:08:39.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.913 868169124252358528 113.61935924176 +24.14413522146 12.2516 11.7646 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.913#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31252_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31252_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:08.10 +22:32:33.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.015 866421351738004992 112.78405288634 +22.54275762033 12.2827 11.8666 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.015#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31265_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 31265_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:54.89 +25:37:31.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.013 871039163136035840 110.47901808664 +25.62536771585 12.2830 11.7484 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.013#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31270_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 31270_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 10851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:34.88 +22:05:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 04757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 09360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.58 +22:42:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 07610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.41 +23:26:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 26s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:07:33.20 +24:55:45.4
06:58:58.22 +17:50:45.3
06:58:15.90 +17:36:29.6
07:25:24.41 +25:04:41.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:26.118 +22:01:19.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0852 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:26.438 +22:01:00.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0852 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:26.118 +22:01:19.70
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:26.438 +22:01:00.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dP5YSY7GCl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2YCsB8n7BA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K2vHXrCLzV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mqJdxMe7fo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 150538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0340 to 119.6236 deg, Dec +16.4753 to +27.2952 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0340 to 119.6236 deg, Dec 16.4753 to 27.2952 deg
Loaded 13999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9026 out of 11981 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11981 out of 150538 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774089
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774089
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 208 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.0 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
3.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
3.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dP5YSY7GCl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=16511, passed=150509
Got 150509 stars (including 133763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 150509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2YCsB8n7BA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=16925, passed=153524
Got 153524 stars (including 136352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153524 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K2vHXrCLzV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=14946, passed=91540
Got 91540 stars (including 76534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mqJdxMe7fo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=14318, passed=89776
Got 89776 stars (including 75395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230046_TTUQ2b1x1_23030_753yKKHJ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171970.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172006.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172011.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172018.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172021.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172033.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172040.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172044.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172045.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172056.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172058.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172062.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172084.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172092.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172095.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172104.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172113.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172117.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172121.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172131.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172132.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172136.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172141.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172150.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172153.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172156.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172171.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172172.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172185.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172206.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172207.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172233.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172256.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172262.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172284.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172574.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172771.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172815.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172923.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172933.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172940.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172945.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out172959.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out173031.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out173130.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out173231.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out173234.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out173235.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172076.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172133.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172145.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172230.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172825.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172950.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 53s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 19s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171962_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 171962_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:33.90 +19:55:50.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.658 864729718738421760 112.89106667139 +19.93166810228 14.7981 14.3440 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.658#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171970_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 171970_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:49.80 +23:55:18.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.310 867443863191842944 114.95816132013 +23.92202054477 14.4074 13.9369 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.310#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171984_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 171984_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:15.15 +19:37:26.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.865 3364994490009352832 105.81306686120 +19.62390493194 13.5079 12.7944 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.865#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172006_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172006_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.79 +20:28:50.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:00.90 +23:27:06.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.160 3380188709912604288 104.25439668461 +23.45184018807 13.1729 12.7168 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.160#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172018_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172018_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.69 +18:12:32.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.398 3364385532366881280 105.04877328060 +18.20885267136 13.3247 12.8029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.398#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.42 +17:47:43.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.356 3361336689702724992 105.04723375175 +17.79564842339 13.4328 12.7196 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.356#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172028_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172028_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.78 +17:52:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:30.21 +18:01:26.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.554 3364361549269681280 104.62638669908 +18.02508420647 12.7473 12.1029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.554#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172040_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172040_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:42.00 +22:15:31.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172041_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172041_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172044_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172044_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:32.18 +20:00:34.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.234 3365922404808494720 104.63531235845 +20.00930579358 13.1570 12.4864 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.234#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.55 +18:17:47.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.574 3364437415571846400 104.84745903265 +18.29774082265 13.3997 12.7019 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.574#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172056_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172056_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:39.40 +17:44:14.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.500 3361483337066270976 106.91450400909 +17.73715137149 13.9241 13.2672 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.500#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172058_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172058_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:04.95 +20:06:40.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.936 3365258441519881856 105.27105490748 +20.11100593678 13.3508 12.6753 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.936#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:18.32 +18:47:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.912 3364830456618800000 105.07549395188 +18.79104399500 13.4198 12.9404 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.912#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172084_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172084_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.35 +18:30:15.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.005 3364774484605477632 105.23078314282 +18.50481421516 12.9744 12.3338 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.005#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172092_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172092_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:31.60 +19:49:29.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172095_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172095_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:36.02 +17:45:44.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.815 3364335607667295360 104.65035088929 +17.76189814302 12.8434 12.3342 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.815#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:02.61 +19:04:07.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.036 3365052386169475584 104.51086811478 +19.06863112556 12.8135 12.1536 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.036#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172109_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172109_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172113_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:15.29 +17:43:20.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.103 3364253281733941248 104.56490470051 +17.72243864218 12.6819 12.0501 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.103#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172117_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172117_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:36.89 +17:35:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.403 3361326553579990016 104.90250176023 +17.58458420861 12.6747 12.2385 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.403#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172121_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172121_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:40.96 +22:09:01.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172131_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172131_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:01.02 +18:37:14.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.412 3364779294968639488 105.50372261170 +18.62155520882 13.1300 12.4602 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.412#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172132_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172132_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:34.95 +22:07:46.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.976 3367946777516300032 104.39590307733 +22.12958222401 13.0459 12.5909 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.976#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172133_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172133_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172136_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172136_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:29.49 +17:59:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.957 3364354883480449024 104.62301545553 +17.99288405348 12.9114 12.2313 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.957#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172141_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172141_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:44.07 +18:26:31.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.255 3364443256727045760 104.68457538289 +18.44212425858 12.7585 12.1841 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.255#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172145_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172145_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172146_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172146_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:03.62 +23:27:50.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.009 3380158713861090048 105.01651110327 +23.46458098686 12.8902 12.4099 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.009#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172150_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172150_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:25.58 +22:39:10.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.653 3380007118695697280 104.35712503521 +22.65189486789 12.9277 12.2668 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.653#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172153_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172153_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:28.81 +18:00:48.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.572 3364366703230296704 105.11912829391 +18.01224668695 12.4011 12.0224 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:01.72 +17:38:36.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.361 3361339605982436096 105.50679237004 +17.64326400797 13.3633 12.8942 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.361#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:33.14 +19:18:46.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.867 3365072173080987008 105.13853612439 +19.31312698401 12.7356 12.0872 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.867#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172171_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172171_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:18.95 +17:49:53.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.859 3364348969307118848 104.57863233234 +17.83024202831 12.5539 11.9147 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.859#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172172_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172172_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:01.52 +23:33:32.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.719 3380533372448343040 105.25805956688 +23.55914071906 13.0136 12.4966 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.719#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172184_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172184_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172185_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172185_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:06.58 +17:58:18.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.767 3364355227077871872 104.52616994286 +17.97067318055 12.5398 12.0061 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.767#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:14.88 +18:24:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172206_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172206_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:23.22 +17:43:37.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.456 3364241663846052736 104.59590747116 +17.72611317833 12.5564 12.1293 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.456#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172207_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172207_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.92 +18:04:52.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.512 3364371028259759232 105.04805843999 +18.08119572500 12.6381 12.0475 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.512#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172230_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172230_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172233_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172233_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:14.93 +17:37:52.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.311 3361319436816014848 105.31135218765 +17.63077000100 12.3385 11.6804 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.311#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172252_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172252_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:18.49 +17:52:39.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.921 3364343987145054336 104.82648316909 +17.87629627424 11.6988 11.0623 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.921#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172262_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172262_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:46.45 +18:34:00.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.978 3364456858885558784 104.69221158663 +18.56621029540 11.5900 11.0205 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.978#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172273_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172273_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:58.23 +17:50:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:25.74 +17:51:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.127 3364349145404193024 104.60627704981 +17.86221336896 10.2196 9.6117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.127#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172290_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172290_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172291_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172291_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172292_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172292_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172309_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172309_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172368_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172368_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172384_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172384_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172405_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172405_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172453_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172453_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172455_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172455_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:24.47 +25:04:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172474_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172474_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172479_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172479_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.69 +23:56:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172525_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172525_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172546_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172546_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172564_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172564_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:28.93 +19:15:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.24 +24:32:03.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.810 868430674877262720 112.97624590890 +24.53432858922 12.9633 12.2403 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.810#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172585_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172585_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:28.35 +18:20:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172596_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172596_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.11 +18:14:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172599_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172599_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.37 +21:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172662_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172662_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172697_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172697_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172698_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172698_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.50 +19:28:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172704_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172704_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.53 +19:09:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172727_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172727_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172733_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172733_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.09 +23:05:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172745_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172745_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172771_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172771_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:53.93 +23:53:40.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.794 867540517135131520 116.72553891508 +23.89428467435 13.9658 13.5385 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.794#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.18 +18:53:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.45 +22:40:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.78 +21:27:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:27.90 +25:27:42.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.981 871555315124181760 112.61708052216 +25.46270163062 13.8982 13.3178 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.981#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.81 +21:21:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172828_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172828_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:35.35 +22:37:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:39.85 +21:25:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.010 865535896982915712 113.16663356441 +21.42047855294 14.2636 13.7745 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.010#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:38.60 +26:01:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:47.25 +18:57:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.61 +25:44:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172893_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172893_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:08.09 +24:52:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172919_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172919_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:08.61 +20:50:27.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.605 673632879844343680 117.78605294145 +20.84097503388 14.1682 13.6459 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.605#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172920_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172920_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172923_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172923_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:29.22 +20:44:07.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.758 673662669737475072 116.87206936183 +20.73491908263 14.3584 13.6903 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.758#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172932_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172932_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.87 +21:26:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:47.25 +19:15:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.864 671897850495741696 116.19733204984 +19.25431604821 14.4774 13.9716 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.864#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.66 +23:02:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.834 866507354162727808 112.39008746005 +23.04629078929 14.1893 13.7980 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.834#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.08 +22:26:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.653 869232115775080448 110.12534222597 +22.43540188131 14.1129 13.5865 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.653#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172948_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172948_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172950_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 172950_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172956_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172956_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:17.31 +18:31:43.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.027 3170417589436468992 112.32235451575 +18.52782666591 14.4116 14.0232 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.027#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172960_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172960_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172979_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172979_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172985_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172985_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172998_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 172998_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173005_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173005_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173010_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173010_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:01.03 +19:22:17.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.699 671955437417156608 115.75445708179 +19.37175439424 14.2884 13.5907 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.699#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173035_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173035_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173037_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173037_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173051_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173051_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173052_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173052_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173062_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173064_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173064_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173074_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173074_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173081_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173081_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:30.99 +25:14:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173091_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173091_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173092_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173092_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173098_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173098_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173099_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173099_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173108_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173108_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173114_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173114_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173118_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173118_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173120_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173120_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173127_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173127_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173128_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173128_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173130_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173130_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:36.24 +21:26:02.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.755 865305789816233728 114.40032983246 +21.43491942584 15.1134 14.7409 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.755#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173165_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173165_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173168_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173168_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173173_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173173_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173175_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173175_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173176_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173176_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173186_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173186_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173200_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173200_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173201_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173201_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173203_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173203_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173217_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173217_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173219_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173219_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173231_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173231_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:11.12 +21:42:27.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.488 674710126360974464 116.04705431546 +21.70791958031 14.4746 13.5787 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.488#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173234_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173234_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:28.17 +20:16:15.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.186 672792131405398912 115.61764504081 +20.27129391095 15.0008 14.4873 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.186#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173235_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173235_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:51.60 +18:14:53.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.520 671227320200945664 116.46494495878 +18.24841230104 15.1249 14.7169 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.520#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173242_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173242_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173262_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173262_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173263_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173263_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173266_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173266_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 173275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 114926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70707_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 70707_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:34.92 +22:05:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 86021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 28779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17540_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 17540_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27088_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 27088_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:33.20 +24:55:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75018_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 75018_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 47884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.37 +23:26:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 61021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.54 +22:42:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 67227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114417_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104
The candidate 114417_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-59-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0104 did not pass the final checks
