This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AC Aur,2461136.6614,11.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AC Aur 20260406.1614 11.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050316.28+505146.6,2461136.6614,11.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050316.28+505146.6 20260406.1614 11.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0484 Aur,2461136.6614,10.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0484 Aur 20260406.1614 10.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6614,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1614 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 261662880988460544,2461136.6614,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 261662880988460544 20260406.1614 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J076.3036+50.6244,2461136.6614,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J076.3036+50.6244 20260406.1614 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6614,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1614 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6614,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1614 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J076.2398+49.5618,2461136.6614,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J076.2398+49.5618 20260406.1614 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6614,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1614 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6614,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1614 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 256385049080417792,2461136.6614,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 256385049080417792 20260406.1614 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0532372+501449,2461136.6614,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0532372+501449 20260406.1614 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054136.03+524848.6,2461136.6614,12.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054136.03+524848.6 20260406.1614 12.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050452.00+493333.0,2461136.6614,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050452.00+493333.0 20260406.1614 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050937.96+560247.8,2461136.6614,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050937.96+560247.8 20260406.1614 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0507041+535141,2461136.6614,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0507041+535141 20260406.1614 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J052608.36+501837.7,2461136.6614,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J052608.36+501837.7 20260406.1614 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0539510+555305,2461136.6614,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0539510+555305 20260406.1614 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0517188+513740,2461136.6614,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0517188+513740 20260406.1614 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0518182+501534,2461136.6614,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0518182+501534 20260406.1614 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 4415235,2461136.6614,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 4415235 20260406.1614 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461136.66167841 06.04.2026 03:52:39.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19889
Objects passed selection criteria: 19812
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16199.8
Average stars matched: 15071.2 (93.0338 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122432 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 23:11:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461136.66167841 06.04.2026 03:52:39.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 286
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 71 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140917
Objects passed selection criteria: 140504
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 109904
Average stars matched: 102234 (93.021 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1976920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 23:15:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.66111086
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:26.733 +54:01:24.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:25.359 +54:01:07.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0970 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:39:26.733 +54:01:24.02
Second-epoch second image center 05:39:25.359 +54:01:07.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00575 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dtcSF3CVzS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vtC3jKZUG5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u5HpxpYpZO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.diNxRs6fXt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4455 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4455 deg
Loaded 11842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7480 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 21171 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946929
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946929
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dtcSF3CVzS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1951, passed=21171
Got 21171 stars (including 19188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vtC3jKZUG5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1992, passed=21135
Got 21135 stars (including 19116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u5HpxpYpZO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1463, passed=16388
Got 16388 stars (including 14919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.diNxRs6fXt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1468, passed=16361
Got 16361 stars (including 14889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16301 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16301 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16301 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31151.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33012.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33230.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33600.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33670.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33743.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33762.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out33877.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out34044.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31151_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 31151_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:31.75 +52:10:34.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.767 971618840415210112 094.38261893714 +52.17629370494 11.9256 11.2778 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.767#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31153_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 31153_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:28.82 +57:01:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32496_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 32496_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:46.28 +54:26:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32676_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 32676_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:56.19 +51:37:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32894_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 32894_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.19 +50:18:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33012_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33012_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:00.14 +53:09:53.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.03)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33230_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33230_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:35.88 +52:48:45.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.686 263684333114513024 085.40017663140 +52.81346641748 10.9847 9.5646 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.686#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33600_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33600_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:50.96 +55:53:04.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.072 268187623503769728 084.96232734099 +55.88499227199 10.9561 9.5566 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.072#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33635_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33635_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:05.47 +57:51:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33670_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33670_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:21.37 +54:13:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.664 216171064126865792 089.83909402606 +54.22304305830 12.0930 11.3318 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.664#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33709_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33709_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.50 +55:04:53.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.942 268054715739148800 082.63933707536 +55.08169283842 11.5187 10.1944 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.942#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33743_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33743_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:19.07 +57:48:43.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.092 281496387126148736 082.07884346651 +57.81296056971 11.1612 9.6976 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.092#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33747_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33747_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.56 +54:23:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.83 +50:03:47.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.402 261468645387210112 079.54471061772 +50.06255490460 11.6967 10.5597 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.402#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33774_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33774_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:59.28 +57:53:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33828_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33828_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:47.93 +57:15:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33877_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 33877_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:09.33 +50:30:00.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.185 215131377101043200 083.78797056807 +50.49994535064 12.4707 11.9216 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.185#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34044_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 34044_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:41.54 +58:17:44.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.061 269754354557417088 086.42303097023 +58.29623852164 12.4141 11.7027 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.061#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07284_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 07284_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12298_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 12298_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:27:04.57 +50:07:31.9
05:03:16.93 +50:51:51.2
05:13:20.31 +53:54:42.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:26.733 +54:01:24.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:25.359 +54:01:07.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0970 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:39:26.733 +54:01:24.02
Second-epoch second image center 05:39:25.359 +54:01:07.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00575 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.haefr7WUNR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rah40McpsZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HvjdYQC4qs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zmEfNftjAR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 155080 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4472 deg
Loaded 11908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6184 out of 8396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8396 out of 155080 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.800893
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.800893
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 169 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.haefr7WUNR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=17009, passed=155028
Got 155028 stars (including 137750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rah40McpsZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=17172, passed=155805
Got 155805 stars (including 138361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HvjdYQC4qs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=11404, passed=90688
Got 90688 stars (including 79208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90688 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zmEfNftjAR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=11522, passed=90825
Got 90825 stars (including 79233 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-51-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_225326_TTUQ2b1x1_27890_WOKeraoW/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178019.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178035.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178042.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178053.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178054.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178059.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178073.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178081.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178092.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178117.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178124.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178128.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178137.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out178146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185618.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186127.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186313.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186411.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186536.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out187707.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out188361.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out188840.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out189262.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out189448.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192005.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192088.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193061.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141855.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178095.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178101.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178142.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178144.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28410.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28645.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31829.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33827.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66885.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 25s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178019_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178019_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:53.33 +51:36:04.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.089 214750563824096768 089.47098379679 +51.60209363371 15.3169 14.7455 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.089#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178031_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178031_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:24.48 +50:19:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178035_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178035_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:59.60 +50:23:36.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178042_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178042_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:56.12 +50:09:46.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.243 256415496104980864 076.23437080747 +50.16278080813 13.4918 12.8315 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.243#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178044_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178044_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178053_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178053_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.14 +50:53:19.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.991 971780747798522880 091.73781054491 +50.88885392035 14.8346 14.3074 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.991#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178054_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178054_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:02.70 +50:44:34.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.271 256677008073496832 075.76263827210 +50.74320445183 13.3978 12.8552 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.271#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178059_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178059_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:16.18 +51:39:55.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.665 265735953094232704 076.06879816514 +51.66582726125 13.5079 12.8679 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.665#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178071_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178071_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:45.08 +50:20:43.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178081_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178081_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:55.21 +50:07:49.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.255 256580182331399296 075.48016650651 +50.13117842334 12.9386 12.3356 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.255#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178092_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178092_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:01.48 +49:48:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.847 256369694573859200 075.75706174412 +49.81617913005 13.0275 12.3563 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.847#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178095_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178095_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178101_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178101_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178102_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178102_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178104_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178104_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178111_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178111_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:30.18 +51:02:08.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.984 262513250153102336 079.12793320219 +51.03595658462 13.6998 13.0788 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.984#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178117_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178117_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:27.34 +50:09:41.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178120_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178120_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178124_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178124_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.17 +49:43:41.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178128_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178128_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:34.42 +49:26:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.023 256311106923466112 075.64302888045 +49.44780023320 12.6124 12.1317 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.023#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178131_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178131_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178135_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178135_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:36.49 +50:27:10.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.602 256622032492242816 075.65174135616 +50.45340195055 12.7194 12.1789 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178137_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178137_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:20.46 +54:46:13.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.826 996267249706237824 094.08520880465 +54.77058933387 13.9796 13.4774 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.826#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178142_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178142_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178143_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178143_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:10.99 +49:50:53.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.714 256393261055254272 075.79657587853 +49.84735072007 12.6252 12.0149 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.714#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178144_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178144_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178146_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178146_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:22.26 +56:47:28.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.155 268628527666869376 086.59314585354 +56.79159744429 13.0151 12.1331 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.155#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178150_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178150_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:55.41 +53:53:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178151_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 178151_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178173_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 178173_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179468_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 179468_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:55.34 +54:33:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179720_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 179720_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179899_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 179899_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:55.81 +51:37:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180341_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 180341_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180832_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 180832_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:57.00 +51:26:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.999 972078882951799808 091.48781408002 +51.43422455651 11.9912 10.9984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.999#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181040_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 181040_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181152_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 181152_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.50 +54:23:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181435_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 181435_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182526_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 182526_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183200_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 183200_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183413_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 183413_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183516_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 183516_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183715_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 183715_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183985_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 183985_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:46.31 +55:17:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184328_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 184328_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184369_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 184369_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184527_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 184527_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184531_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 184531_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184940_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 184940_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185000_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185000_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:14.17 +50:00:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185054_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185054_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:11.64 +53:10:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185061_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185061_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185190_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185190_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185231_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185231_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185253_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185253_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:46.42 +56:55:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185290_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185290_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185321_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185321_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185363_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185363_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185425_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185425_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185567_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185567_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185618_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185618_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:27.13 +54:43:01.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.313 996268692815263488 093.86308171969 +54.71699949024 14.2318 13.4374 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.313#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185663_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185663_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185664_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185664_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:23.06 +55:21:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185763_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185763_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:25.63 +52:43:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185824_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185824_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185826_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 185826_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186127_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186127_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:08.71 +50:16:44.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.781 211522573779759616 088.28546899307 +50.27832306218 13.9989 13.3902 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.781#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186178_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186178_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186239_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186239_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:30.74 +51:10:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186265_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186265_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:50.03 +50:34:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186313_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186313_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:13.77 +52:10:54.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.182 971598538105816832 094.05781299441 +52.18210568512 13.9539 13.3770 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.182#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186411_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186411_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:36.36 +53:29:52.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.393 266918993246055424 075.90272138943 +53.49898047318 13.6245 12.6155 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.393#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186458_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186458_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:02.16 +51:43:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186524_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186524_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186536_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186536_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.51 +54:15:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.859 996737290927018752 090.96871398948 +54.25026194754 13.8583 13.1572 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.859#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186570_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186570_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186636_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186636_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.05 +52:08:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186760_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186760_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186803_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186803_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:49.26 +51:04:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186858_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186858_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186910_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186910_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:22.77 +50:56:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186918_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186918_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:49.39 +54:19:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186951_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186951_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186968_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 186968_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:06.37 +54:48:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187186_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187186_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:59.65 +53:35:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187263_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187263_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187381_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187381_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187501_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187501_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187513_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187513_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187588_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187588_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187707_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187707_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:17.88 +53:54:27.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.136 995845621356739712 093.82441230402 +53.90823000549 14.2486 13.6815 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.136#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187876_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187876_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187971_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 187971_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188159_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188159_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188199_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188199_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188248_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188248_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:24.27 +55:28:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188252_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188252_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:53.66 +54:11:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188361_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188361_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:38.09 +57:44:03.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.708 999106046994672384 091.90953460950 +57.73512511935 14.2908 13.7342 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.708#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188379_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188379_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188385_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188385_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188557_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188557_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188577_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188577_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:20.75 +50:14:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188689_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188689_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:01.18 +58:12:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188840_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188840_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:08.85 +50:33:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.766 211614653583089792 089.03850436410 +50.55867954422 14.4906 13.7033 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.766#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188982_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 188982_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189001_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189001_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189262_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189262_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:19.83 +52:20:35.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.825 215761053665795072 088.83187707861 +52.34333096039 14.4109 13.8560 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.825#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189441_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189441_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189448_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189448_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:55.75 +51:32:27.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.421 214693565314445312 089.98230914066 +51.54097745403 14.4471 13.8961 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.421#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189515_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189515_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189552_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189552_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189867_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189867_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189893_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 189893_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190007_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 190007_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190034_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 190034_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:37.17 +53:51:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190578_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 190578_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190812_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 190812_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190818_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 190818_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190997_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 190997_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191030_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191030_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:26.37 +54:18:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191051_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191051_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191242_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191242_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191272_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191272_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191295_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191295_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191660_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191660_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191676_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191676_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191981_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 191981_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192005_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192005_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:05.51 +53:42:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.031 263935227924496128 086.27433771671 +53.71462263904 14.4092 13.6552 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.031#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192088_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192088_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:18.22 +56:50:13.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.743 268592209423511552 087.82642462322 +56.83784846496 14.4568 13.8143 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.743#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192544_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192544_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192643_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192643_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192872_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192872_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192875_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192875_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192876_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 192876_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193061_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193061_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:28.06 +53:05:13.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.146 216015723750417792 087.36808120931 +53.08799826384 15.0010 14.4218 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.146#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193094_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193094_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193136_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193136_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193157_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193157_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193237_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193237_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193325_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193325_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193612_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193612_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193652_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193652_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193915_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193915_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193923_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193923_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193997_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 193997_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121974_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 121974_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:47.80 +57:15:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28410_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 28410_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 51762_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:16.90 +50:51:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98888_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 98888_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:44.84 +54:17:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.52 +50:07:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 66885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28645_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 28645_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130580_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 130580_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40760_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 40760_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:23.91 +55:49:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94357_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 94357_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128716_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 128716_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31829_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 31829_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91599_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 91599_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:20.30 +53:54:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:57.04 +56:05:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27904_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 27904_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.15 +50:18:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33827_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 33827_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69531_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 69531_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.67 +52:02:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91864_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096
The candidate 91864_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-52-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0096 did not pass the final checks
