This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 40 47.97 +24 07 39.0 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 37 54.37 +20 13 45.8 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J043755.14+201331.7,2461136.6403,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J043755.14+201331.7 20260406.1403 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 11 44.51 +23 27 05.3 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 30 18.32 +23 48 17.4 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 13 42.44 +22 44 02.0 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 05 04 23.98 +19 51 47.8 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 35 50.01 +24 50 00.2 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 25 52.84 +24 25 06.4 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,14.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 14.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 23 02.09 +20 40 56.6 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6403,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1403 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1403* 04 13 02.55 +17 41 45.9 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 46128640250080128,2461136.6403,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 46128640250080128 20260406.1403 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461136.64055387 06.04.2026 03:22:13.854 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9574
Objects passed selection criteria: 9547
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8118.75
Average stars matched: 7932.5 (97.7059 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115644 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 22:31:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461136.64055387 06.04.2026 03:22:13.854 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 190
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70143
Objects passed selection criteria: 70006
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59943.8
Average stars matched: 58091 (96.9092 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1988872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 22:32:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.64004006
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:37:05.921 +22:01:16.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0471 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:37:07.043 +22:01:23.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0518 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:37:05.921 +22:01:16.43
Second-epoch second image center 04:37:07.043 +22:01:23.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00479 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0hiqelPA8w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9gSXk0KS4u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vyqfut00Ie
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VgxHaH7mWg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5122 to 78.0896 deg, Dec +16.4863 to +27.2832 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5122 to 78.0896 deg, Dec 16.4863 to 27.2832 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.977934
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.977934
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0hiqelPA8w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9gSXk0KS4u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=981, passed=12023
Got 12023 stars (including 11026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vyqfut00Ie (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, passed=7333
Got 7333 stars (including 6870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VgxHaH7mWg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=472, passed=7329
Got 7329 stars (including 6850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20726.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20656_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 20656_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:38.52 +23:38:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20659_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 20659_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.79 +24:18:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20671_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 20671_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.26 +17:54:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20707_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 20707_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20726_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 20726_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:04.72 +26:06:15.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.293 151262700852297728 066.76957687311 +26.10437290422 12.0241 10.8628 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.293#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:40:47.97 +24:07:39.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:37:05.921 +22:01:16.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0471 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.001 +21:59:37.88
Second-epoch image center 04:37:07.043 +22:01:23.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0518 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:37:05.921 +22:01:16.43
Second-epoch second image center 04:37:07.043 +22:01:23.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00479 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZGjQTTFBiG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XnQmnARNrk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ZVI5uUQ48
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zMZFSgHMNg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5077 to 78.1095 deg, Dec +16.4682 to +27.2856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5077 to 78.1095 deg, Dec 16.4682 to 27.2856 deg
Loaded 5191 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3474 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.826729
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.826729
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 125 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZGjQTTFBiG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 79904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XnQmnARNrk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=6215, passed=85672
Got 85672 stars (including 79305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5ZVI5uUQ48 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3083, passed=49150
Got 49150 stars (including 45989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zMZFSgHMNg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=2812, passed=49347
Got 49347 stars (including 46473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49347 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-21-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_222256_TTUQ2b1x1_24246_AMZsouQS/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102684.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102689.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102699.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102715.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102720.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102850.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103168.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103509.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103557.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103567.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102702.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103581.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65773.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102684_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102684_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:01.58 +18:46:51.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.26)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102689_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102689_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:20.37 +21:20:17.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.273 144756929205514368 068.58488846987 +21.33806422339 14.0526 13.3369 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.273#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102699_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102699_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:16.68 +18:20:19.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.308 47489973084313600 065.56941154784 +18.33884996705 13.7332 12.8936 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.308#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102702_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 102702_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102715_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102715_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:40.49 +23:42:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.883 3418646907935791104 075.16813698262 +23.70633987821 12.9858 12.3420 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.883#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102720_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102720_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:15.24 +20:38:59.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.02 +22:54:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102724_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102724_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.77 +24:18:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102737_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102737_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.24 +17:54:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102748_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102748_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.69 +19:10:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102754_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102754_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102755_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102755_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102771_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102771_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:47.98 +24:07:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102776_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102776_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102802_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102808_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102808_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.30 +19:28:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102842_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102842_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102847_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102847_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.16 +22:48:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102850_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102850_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:17.86 +18:50:28.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.103 3314594350163308800 067.32443319743 +18.84135717039 12.7036 11.8902 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.103#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102859_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 102859_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102885_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102885_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.32 +22:42:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102906_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102906_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:56.98 +23:57:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102913_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102913_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102926_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102926_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 102927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102935_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102935_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.73 +21:00:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102940_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102940_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.30 +19:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102948_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102948_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102960_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102960_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102961_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102961_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102966_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102966_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102970_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102970_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.46 +23:44:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102973_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102975_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102975_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.75 +25:48:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102980_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102980_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102987_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102987_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102989_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.39 +24:06:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102990_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102990_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.63 +22:10:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102999_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 102999_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103000_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103000_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.05 +23:18:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103001_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103001_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103004_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103004_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:27.14 +19:11:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103011_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103011_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103014_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103014_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103025_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103025_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.89 +21:31:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103030_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103030_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103033_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103033_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103039_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103039_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103042_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 103042_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103050_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103050_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.05 +21:45:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103053_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103053_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.78 +23:55:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103064_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103064_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103079_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103079_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103081_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103081_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103094_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103094_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103095_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103095_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103096_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103096_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103103_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103103_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103108_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103108_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103109_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103109_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103112_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103112_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103121_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103121_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103128_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103128_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.69 +24:19:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103129_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103129_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103139_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103139_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:53.35 +19:30:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103146_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103146_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:37.29 +19:15:35.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.145 48204930520427520 065.15429316987 +19.26039281010 14.0424 13.3343 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.145#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103156_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103156_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103159_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103159_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103161_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103161_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103163_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103163_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103168_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103168_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.10 +20:19:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.789 3411545334131298176 073.49619034603 +20.32585476777 13.9088 13.2108 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103173_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103173_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103194_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103194_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.52 +17:55:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103200_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103200_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103205_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103205_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103207_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103207_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103219_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103219_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103222_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103222_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103223_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103223_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103227_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103227_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103248_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103248_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.87 +21:03:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103272_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103272_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103284_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103284_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103291_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103291_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103298_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103298_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:18.52 +21:23:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103392_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103392_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103406_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 103406_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103407_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103407_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103416_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103416_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103418_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103418_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.47 +23:36:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103479_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103479_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103486_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103486_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103508_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103508_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.58 +23:36:27.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.291 146239689354315008 067.61077809289 +23.60753455968 14.5240 13.7663 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.291#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103512_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103512_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103524_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103524_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103525_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103525_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103537_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103537_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103540_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103540_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103542_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103542_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103548_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 103548_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103550_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103550_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103554_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103554_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103556_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103556_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103557_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103557_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:13.89 +23:20:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.336 148852919258007296 064.80820083003 +23.34372476567 14.4265 13.8370 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.336#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103558_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103558_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103559_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 103559_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103560_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103560_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103561_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103561_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103563_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103563_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103567_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103567_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.08 +22:53:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.178 145951789107603200 068.20468909830 +22.88405625351 14.0970 12.8210 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.178#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103568_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103568_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103572_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103572_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103574_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103574_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103581_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 103581_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103583_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103583_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103590_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 103590_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75295_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 75295_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101928_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 101928_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65773_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 65773_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68305_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 68305_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25705_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071
The candidate 25705_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-22-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0071 did not pass the final checks
