This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 50 37.49 -01 08 54.6 13.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J045037.82-010901.5,2461136.6297,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J045037.82-010901.5 20260406.1297 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 45 03.56 -05 50 59.7 12.8 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3200014724469515776,2461136.6297,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3200014724469515776 20260406.1297 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 44 25.09 -05 42 41.8 12.2 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3200067436604266880,2461136.6297,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3200067436604266880 20260406.1297 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 44 35.68 -06 10 18.8 10.2 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3199965285102211328,2461136.6297,10.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3199965285102211328 20260406.1297 10.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 05 18 15.29 +00 34 00.1 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12321560,2461136.6297,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12321560 20260406.1297 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 49 47.39 -06 11 38.6 12.9 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3188294381490159360,2461136.6297,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3188294381490159360 20260406.1297 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 05 12 43.19 -01 28 35.9 13.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051243.28-012836.0,2461136.6297,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051243.28-012836.0 20260406.1297 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 05 05 37.30 -03 59 09.1 11.2 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12274963,2461136.6297,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12274963 20260406.1297 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 44 31.99 -04 56 09.5 12.7 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461136.6297,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260406.1297 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 57 06.47 -01 47 14.7 10.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1008 Ori,2461136.6297,10.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1008 Ori 20260406.1297 10.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 04 44 58.30 -02 37 05.9 9.0 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J044458-0237.1,2461136.6297,9.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J044458-0237.1 20260406.1297 9.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1297* 05 23 20.54 -04 34 12.1 8.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0535 Ori,2461136.6297,8.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0535 Ori 20260406.1297 8.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461136.63001571 06.04.2026 03:07:03.357 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13217
Objects passed selection criteria: 13166
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10625.5
Average stars matched: 9910 (93.2662 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 23:55:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461136.63001571 06.04.2026 03:07:03.357 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 139
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78145
Objects passed selection criteria: 77917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59919.8
Average stars matched: 56146 (93.702 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1923176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 23:57:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.62930117
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.809 -01:58:40.45
Second-epoch image center 05:08:34.474 -02:00:27.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0397 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.809 -01:58:40.45
Second-epoch image center 05:08:31.776 -01:59:46.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:34.474 -02:00:27.04
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:31.776 -01:59:46.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01587 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.flhKMpwDYU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gKd2Z6O5j9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T3jTpXntgQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XZKnwjrgj9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2586 to 85.1119 deg, Dec -7.2866 to +3.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2586 to 85.1119 deg, Dec -7.2866 to 3.3458 deg
Loaded 9339 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7409 out of 7990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7990 out of 14462 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.902554
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.902554
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.1 pix Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.2 mag. Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.flhKMpwDYU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1502, passed=14462
Got 14462 stars (including 12945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gKd2Z6O5j9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1458, passed=14500
Got 14500 stars (including 13020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T3jTpXntgQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1039, passed=10171
Got 10171 stars (including 9126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XZKnwjrgj9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1093, passed=10152
Got 10152 stars (including 9049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10152 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out22573.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20745_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 20745_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21443_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 21443_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.53 -02:22:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21487_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 21487_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22573_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 22573_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:47.26 -00:29:14.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.413 3221252070734546560 080.69680816904 -00.48734320615 12.1214 11.8121 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.413#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07632_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 07632_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:06.04 -01:10:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01864_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 01864_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:36.91 -05:40:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04735_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 04735_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:30.51 -03:15:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.809 -01:58:40.45
Second-epoch image center 05:08:34.474 -02:00:27.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0397 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.809 -01:58:40.45
Second-epoch image center 05:08:31.776 -01:59:46.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:34.474 -02:00:27.04
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:31.776 -01:59:46.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01587 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4lsP0fMjHk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gaOmQJARtj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qth0drnBca
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AJGOKs1vx5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 88009 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2562 to 85.1199 deg, Dec -7.2903 to +3.3485 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2562 to 85.1199 deg, Dec -7.2903 to 3.3485 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6693 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 88009 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769707
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769707
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4lsP0fMjHk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=6760, passed=87985
Got 87985 stars (including 81076 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gaOmQJARtj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=6799, passed=87254
Got 87254 stars (including 80318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qth0drnBca (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4853, passed=47269
Got 47269 stars (including 42379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AJGOKs1vx5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4885, passed=47056
Got 47056 stars (including 42139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47056 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_220741_TTUQ2b1x1_16714_XjhwCXRN/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103730.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103738.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103754.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103755.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103756.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103761.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103762.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103770.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103771.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103773.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103774.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103775.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103781.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103782.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103784.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103792.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103801.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103802.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108986.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109040.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109268.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109415.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109718.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110702.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out98047.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07277.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104641.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16622.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103730_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103730_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:25.97 -03:57:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.275 3201641490579086336 071.10734909457 -03.96399888145 12.8225 12.4157 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.275#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103738_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103738_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:04.43 -05:55:10.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.992 3188353652038834304 072.26956608310 -05.91951510148 12.7704 12.2351 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.992#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103744_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 103744_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103754_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103754_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:55.12 -05:55:25.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.444 3188373202729948160 072.47953215244 -05.92314009579 12.7742 12.2424 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.444#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103755_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103755_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.34 -03:01:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.450 3225796146133729024 071.14746006048 -03.02064730443 12.4699 12.0397 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.450#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103756_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103756_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:29.48 -05:30:33.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.982 3200084096781105664 071.12334480798 -05.50917961889 12.5030 12.0822 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.982#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103761_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103761_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:56.66 -04:28:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.472 3200770020238027392 071.23592021265 -04.47102725883 12.2983 11.8016 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.472#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103762_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103762_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:46.65 -05:49:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.789 3200062621944415872 071.19387542779 -05.82144798774 12.3103 11.6225 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103763_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103763_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.23 -04:53:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103764_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103764_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103769_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 103769_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103770_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103770_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:53.11 -05:41:01.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.464 3200382755923514624 071.97101510621 -05.68291125136 12.4058 11.9694 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.464#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103771_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103771_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:20.63 -05:50:19.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.974 3209192936438541056 080.33540086064 -05.83799884816 13.8772 13.3169 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.974#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103773_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103773_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:32.17 -05:19:08.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.818 3200466211432132864 071.13454896057 -05.31891682761 12.3975 11.9641 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.818#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103774_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103774_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:41.05 -01:50:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.285 3214947367981144064 077.17016654718 -01.84048182572 13.1184 12.3997 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.285#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103775_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103775_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:56.52 -05:34:38.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103781_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103781_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:14.73 -06:08:34.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.302 3187979508847559680 071.81145820026 -06.14279228341 11.8935 11.3321 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.302#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103782_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103782_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:13.32 -05:21:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.187 3200429416448122880 071.80543753142 -05.35189852985 12.0033 11.5118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.187#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103784_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103784_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:02.90 -03:17:24.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103788_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 103788_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103789_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103789_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103792_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103792_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:31.42 -06:12:45.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.815 3199984286037587712 071.37998851311 -06.21313202935 11.3918 10.9214 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.815#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103794_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103794_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:34.56 +00:59:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103801_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103801_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:12.41 -05:36:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.111 3200442335709803264 071.30056080757 -05.60239427494 10.4004 10.0657 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.111#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103802_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103802_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:22.07 -05:08:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.532 3200665227332466688 071.09071054163 -05.14322899767 9.9876 9.6202 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.532#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103805_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 103805_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:05.65 -01:43:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104536_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 104536_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.57 -02:22:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104641_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 104641_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106700_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 106700_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:27.76 +01:56:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107587_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 107587_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:43.05 +00:29:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107618_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 107618_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:42.41 +01:09:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107978_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 107978_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:45.83 -02:04:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108017_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 108017_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:11.59 -00:17:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108347_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 108347_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:31.90 -05:02:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108352_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 108352_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:07.84 -02:17:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108986_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 108986_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:51.01 +01:00:14.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.184 3221756334254131840 080.21216685691 +01.00366164118 13.9252 13.4303 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.184#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109040_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 109040_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:16.83 -03:06:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.134 3210922468229107072 080.81997510889 -03.10863823991 13.6153 13.0695 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.134#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109268_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 109268_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:47.63 -00:43:26.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.845 3220669948046500736 082.94840387512 -00.72382717713 14.0405 13.4064 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.845#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109415_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 109415_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:03.52 +00:18:06.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.574 3221050104191751552 082.26537685323 +00.30172164422 13.8563 13.2397 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.574#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109521_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 109521_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:10.09 +01:28:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109718_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 109718_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:37.29 -04:52:43.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.872 3210261593020982144 079.90410447604 -04.87917267909 14.0020 13.4037 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.872#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109745_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 109745_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:24.97 +01:00:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.771 3221978263804828288 081.85459060190 +01.00398809227 14.0354 13.5240 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.771#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110702_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 110702_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:55.72 +00:16:28.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.418 3221609205855038720 079.23283324419 +00.27441834139 14.1866 13.5465 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.418#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80996_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 80996_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07277_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 07277_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43724_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 43724_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22282_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 22282_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15931_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 15931_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40303_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 40303_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33344_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 33344_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16622_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
Preparing report for the candidate 16622_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98047_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 98047_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:54.24 -02:17:27.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.113 3214120329078892544 080.47610867482 -02.29050650958 14.6192 13.6320 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.113#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46491_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 46491_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:06.06 -01:10:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29352_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 29352_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:54.53 -03:02:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37758_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 37758_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:39.83 -02:03:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36479_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 36479_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:10.96 -02:12:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18230_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 18230_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:43.70 -04:27:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20137_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 20137_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:45.54 -04:12:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16835_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 16835_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:45.66 -04:39:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28253_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 28253_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:28.02 -03:13:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46845_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 46845_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:17.17 -01:04:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13214_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 13214_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:50.78 -05:05:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79648_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 79648_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:50.46 +00:43:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76341_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 76341_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:23.79 +01:10:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09330_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 09330_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.98 -05:45:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81169_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 81169_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:50.79 +00:28:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76639_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 76639_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:45.29 +01:08:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13195_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 13195_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:24.26 -05:10:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72714_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 72714_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:33.16 +01:42:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30718_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 30718_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:24.12 -02:57:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11201_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 11201_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:53.88 -05:27:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09810_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 09810_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:36.90 -05:40:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27382_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057
The candidate 27382_fd_Ori-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_22-07-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0057 did not pass the final checks
