This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1289* 05 23 12.72 +26 08 34.1 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6289,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1289 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1289* 04 38 58.66 +27 05 55.6 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6289,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1289 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1289* 05 09 07.40 +26 08 19.6 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1252 Tau,2461136.6289,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1252 Tau 20260406.1289 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[D2006] LCG29,2461136.6289,11.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[D2006] LCG29 20260406.1289 11.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1289* 04 37 39.25 +32 37 26.2 10.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0657 Per,2461136.6289,10.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0657 Per 20260406.1289 10.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6289,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1289 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6289,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1289 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DL Aur,2461136.6289,11.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DL Aur 20260406.1289 11.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0472 Aur,2461136.6289,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0472 Aur 20260406.1289 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0454581+311915,2461136.6289,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0454581+311915 20260406.1289 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DV Aur,2461136.6289,10.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DV Aur 20260406.1289 10.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0459206+291419,2461136.6289,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0459206+291419 20260406.1289 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0459534+335905,2461136.6289,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0459534+335905 20260406.1289 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461136.62936164 06.04.2026 03:06:06.846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 48
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16496
Objects passed selection criteria: 16477
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15554.5
Average stars matched: 15058.8 (96.8128 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 22:14:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461136.62936164 06.04.2026 03:06:06.846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 235 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126853
Objects passed selection criteria: 126576
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112378
Average stars matched: 108421 (96.4791 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1955508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 22:20:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.62850229
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:55.960 +30:00:01.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.931 +29:59:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:55.960 +30:00:01.24
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.931 +29:59:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01349 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.goAP36BcdF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Szjsex0CB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gTCwOG9JnG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1nkCTJBcTf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.goAP36BcdF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8Szjsex0CB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gTCwOG9JnG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=867, passed=14935
Got 14935 stars (including 14053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1nkCTJBcTf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=889, passed=14935
Got 14935 stars (including 14032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21142.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21379.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21399.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21401.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21404.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21411.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21414.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21415.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21417.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21424.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21434.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21441.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21443.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21450.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21454.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21458.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21462.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21466.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21469.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21470.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21471.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21474.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21475.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21479.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21480.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21490.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21492.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21494.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05448.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06467.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21142_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21142_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:55.17 +30:20:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.029 156335881862752768 076.98016666687 +30.34092005452 12.1262 11.5604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.029#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.77 +34:09:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.50 +31:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:27.97 +34:07:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.47 +34:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21289_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21289_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.30 +34:07:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.79 +34:10:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:47.62 +28:39:45.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.896 155705827339035904 075.69842866953 +28.66230683881 12.0889 11.4583 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.896#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21399_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21399_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:52.56 +30:25:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.691 156774007182727808 075.21916952730 +30.42132024636 11.8706 10.9604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.691#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:30.48 +30:07:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.679 156702191032246656 075.37718870275 +30.13001650573 11.8488 10.9309 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.679#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:57.84 +32:57:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.951 181131831872059520 080.24094390844 +32.95276005179 12.3650 11.8910 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.951#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:33.89 +34:07:18.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.080 3449520988288857984 084.14141042320 +34.12152881344 12.3837 12.1775 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.080#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21414_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21414_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:41.87 +30:35:25.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.515 157151444611372288 075.42451880276 +30.59039440539 11.7382 10.6949 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.515#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:33.92 +33:34:26.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.390 182487834647997952 081.14167526508 +33.57373944943 12.3386 12.1373 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.390#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21417_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21417_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:03.81 +30:21:19.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.941 3446837011682446080 080.51612112203 +30.35526416337 12.3416 11.9885 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.941#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 21419_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21424_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21424_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:53.21 +30:45:20.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.723 156972739612498816 074.97178422169 +30.75553227959 11.7732 10.7159 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.723#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21425_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21425_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:23.11 +32:31:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21428_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 21428_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:26.06 +31:41:17.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.763 157505246837621504 075.85869371651 +31.68789332305 12.0781 11.3614 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.763#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:16.49 +33:02:30.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.664 181666160162204032 076.81883146843 +33.04176383315 12.1906 11.5758 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.664#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21436_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21436_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:15.00 +33:14:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:51.16 +30:08:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.907 156364847122358784 077.21342651406 +30.14169166750 12.2966 11.8446 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.907#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:26.78 +32:44:49.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.135 3448850187412116864 083.36173887057 +32.74676885077 12.2841 11.7723 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.135#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21450_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21450_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.48 +31:23:51.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.730 180472502851498368 078.69389400240 +31.39758644300 12.4452 11.7561 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.730#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:26.56 +29:22:55.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.821 156559396256992000 074.61092693810 +29.38197552007 11.8887 10.9263 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21458_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21458_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:21.64 +31:46:00.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.591 180543039096228608 078.34032815172 +31.76671573488 12.2094 11.6276 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.591#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21462_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21462_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:10.68 +30:29:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.171 156950577581265024 074.54483348866 +30.48665309731 12.1473 11.4425 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.171#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21466_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21466_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:12.48 +30:33:46.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.511 156966589219341440 075.05213910637 +30.56275691887 12.1804 11.5153 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.511#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21469_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21469_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.28 +33:19:26.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.112 160716821519918208 075.27228762635 +33.32391712242 11.6704 10.4872 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.112#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21470_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21470_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:16.19 +30:37:33.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.491 156404914873307264 077.81737599208 +30.62580023212 12.2668 11.8887 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.491#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21471_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.05 +28:59:09.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.643 155809043994523520 076.20453683894 +28.98597451370 11.9994 11.1156 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.643#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:29.93 +30:45:28.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.766 160019112672473984 073.87495154957 +30.75790501853 12.0795 11.2937 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.766#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:55.57 +30:50:46.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.837 180240639039457024 078.23179275174 +30.84602366230 12.2510 11.6942 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.837#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21479_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21479_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:00.04 +31:12:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.542 157198483095644672 076.00060258022 +31.21420568684 12.2248 11.6046 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.542#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21480_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21480_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.59 +31:07:51.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.369 180451161158108032 077.83154797627 +31.13094944834 12.1818 11.4744 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.369#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:45.95 +32:18:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21490_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21490_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:11.26 +30:08:55.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.011 156728721045731840 075.04704551335 +30.14900775807 12.0594 11.2731 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.011#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:39.32 +34:23:17.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.095 184990529271928960 075.41405484784 +34.38800697858 12.0491 11.0630 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.095#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:42.46 +25:42:12.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.553 153288241788454016 073.67696223086 +25.70343523275 11.9164 10.8959 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.553#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 21504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:01.67 +25:52:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.29 +30:55:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.48 +28:30:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 06467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05448_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 05448_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 02594_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.93 +33:57:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:37:39.25 +32:37:26.2
04:51:03.38 +32:09:53.0
05:09:07.40 +26:08:19.6
05:23:12.72 +26:08:34.1
04:38:58.66 +27:05:55.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:55.960 +30:00:01.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.931 +29:59:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:55.960 +30:00:01.24
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.931 +29:59:31.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01349 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.udisj79kuM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.75b8NMnAp9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7bhc34OMTn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iGgSGr8eKq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.udisj79kuM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.75b8NMnAp9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7bhc34OMTn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=15, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=7422, passed=88241
Got 88241 stars (including 80685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88241 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iGgSGr8eKq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=7612, passed=88400
Got 88400 stars (including 80686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-04-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_220700_TTUQ1b1x1_30771_BmIBDwVP/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160899.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160906.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160910.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160920.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160929.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160932.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160941.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160946.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161708.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161710.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161719.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161771.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161865.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161965.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161987.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162024.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162051.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162175.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162357.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162446.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162449.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162456.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162459.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162478.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162590.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162632.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162636.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52105.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04447.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161963.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43937.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94638.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:25.83 +28:42:44.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.090 3446381027893200384 080.10785451117 +28.71189996055 14.4800 13.8620 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.090#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160906_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160906_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:41.96 +29:51:55.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.186 3446694423067282816 079.42509100621 +29.86509122213 13.8584 12.9493 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.186#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:13.09 +31:10:34.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.380 159669983370913664 069.30498434869 +31.17605196146 13.8559 12.9009 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.380#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:57.52 +27:17:20.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.201 154024777139365376 073.98999576957 +27.28849084762 14.2462 13.4017 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.201#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160919_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160919_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.45 +29:31:23.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160920_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160920_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:38.18 +32:04:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.395 172310067827312640 066.65925008242 +32.07616623488 13.6299 12.9935 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.395#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.16 +29:38:54.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160924_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160924_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:01.39 +33:15:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:28.47 +26:07:17.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.054 151298714153004160 067.36950289572 +26.12061237256 13.5718 12.6633 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.054#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160932_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160932_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:25.67 +30:02:06.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:37.64 +32:42:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:40.93 +32:42:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.451 3448966907445019264 082.42094818317 +32.70354673517 13.7611 13.2318 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.451#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160942_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160942_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.55 +29:52:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 160946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:22.29 +33:12:07.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.990 181115781575088768 079.34413996306 +33.20113264494 11.9382 11.2029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.990#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.70 +34:09:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161097_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161097_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.00 +34:07:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161099_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161099_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.31 +34:07:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.71 +34:10:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:12.71 +26:08:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.67 +32:33:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:58.73 +27:05:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.49 +34:06:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161298_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161298_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.11 +32:26:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.98 +28:31:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161375_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161375_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.39 +33:11:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161405_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161405_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.17 +34:24:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.79 +33:11:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161599_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161599_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.60 +26:10:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161622_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161622_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.15 +31:44:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.58 +33:23:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161708_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161708_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:30.49 +34:10:58.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.379 182766285969899648 080.37689875319 +34.18266353760 13.7572 13.1146 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.379#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.17 +32:55:28.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.391 3448833488579106048 083.83863923725 +32.92430845671 13.7072 13.1782 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.391#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161719_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161719_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:28.80 +29:39:45.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.176 3446534993881687168 080.86964241369 +29.66256557982 13.7932 13.3345 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.176#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161724_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161724_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:32.48 +32:47:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161757_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 161757_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161762_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161762_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:35.28 +29:13:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:28.86 +29:54:21.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.989 156157559117783168 077.86976660271 +29.90674457336 13.7937 13.0964 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.989#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161821_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161821_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.88 +30:56:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161865_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161865_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:55.88 +32:37:35.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.080 180877123132234112 080.98260666216 +32.62615763211 13.9555 13.4517 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.080#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161881_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161881_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:08.54 +33:13:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161885_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161885_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.82 +32:21:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.00 +30:28:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161963_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 161963_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.58 +32:27:50.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.640 161306533412484992 070.86466927817 +32.46359497835 13.6732 12.7563 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.640#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161987_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161987_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.98 +32:03:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.688 181318577048584960 077.77092281176 +32.05012719733 13.6289 12.6802 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.688#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161989_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161989_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.56 +33:19:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:29.38 +34:32:18.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.905 173654293807134080 070.87221839848 +34.53857981443 14.0910 12.3219 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.905#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162031_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162031_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:12.32 +33:46:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162051_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162051_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:35.97 +33:07:57.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.131 181114377124045568 079.40124048956 +33.13270794507 14.1704 13.7674 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.131#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162086_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162086_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:07.94 +27:11:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.00 +33:06:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162175_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162175_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:05.18 +34:13:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.319 182067310108186240 078.77200142343 +34.22389546057 12.2383 10.6467 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.319#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:50.94 +32:54:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162357_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162357_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:20.81 +31:00:30.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.30 +34:01:33.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.173 3449329638906036608 084.43554514491 +34.02554088335 14.2616 13.2924 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.173#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:37.06 +27:48:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.076 154744652314583936 071.40475447973 +27.81007298137 14.1901 13.4107 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.076#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162449_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162449_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:45.66 +34:29:38.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.432 182086998238387200 079.44144351739 +34.49482370041 14.0193 12.7588 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.432#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162456_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162456_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:34.28 +32:52:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.621 3449195189250036992 084.39263257000 +32.87051927391 14.7438 14.1374 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.621#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:19.28 +33:16:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.871 3449078885831453696 082.83113649191 +33.27210444900 14.5935 14.0612 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.871#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162478_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162478_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.72 +27:29:43.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.527 3442258305964637824 082.00815519709 +27.49500738340 14.0958 13.1067 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.527#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:03.36 +33:20:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162590_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162590_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.69 +33:28:23.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.147 3449251917176599808 084.43691712798 +33.47322718432 14.3346 13.4124 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.147#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162632_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162632_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:52.76 +29:55:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.154 3446716069702376448 079.72009045349 +29.92540849447 14.3748 13.5266 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.154#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162636_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 162636_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:47.10 +33:39:49.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.41 +32:53:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43937_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 43937_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 18929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.91 +33:57:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.29 +30:55:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111528_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 111528_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:01.64 +25:52:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 148160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:26.18 +25:14:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.37 +32:09:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 42363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:39.26 +32:37:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.37 +26:08:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 04447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.52 +31:18:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.24 +32:10:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.48 +28:30:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 150745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.03 +30:38:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.002 156405670787865344 077.98337734106 +30.63645278619 12.4202 10.8004 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.002#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08993_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 08993_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 94638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19673_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 19673_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.78 +33:55:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 52105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:02.47 +31:54:59.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.200 157525587802767360 076.26072452794 +31.91601174547 13.9759 12.3544 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.200#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108063_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 108063_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:09.48 +26:11:40.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.755 151311702134104320 067.28901833576 +26.19424684261 10.2108 9.2988 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.755#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_22-06-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
