This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1052* 05 23 11.05 +26 08 31.4 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6051,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1051 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1052* 04 38 57.11 +27 05 49.2 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6051,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1051 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1052* 05 09 07.35 +26 08 21.4 11.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1252 Tau,2461136.6051,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1252 Tau 20260406.1051 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1052* 04 35 57.81 +28 30 55.3 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IU Tau,2461136.6051,9.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IU Tau 20260406.1051 9.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.1052* 05 19 43.53 +26 10 41.8 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0519436+261035,2461136.6051,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0519436+261035 20260406.1051 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6051,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1051 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461136.6051,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260406.1051 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461136.60543449 06.04.2026 02:31:39.540 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14025
Objects passed selection criteria: 14009
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13160.5
Average stars matched: 12792 (97.2 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119164 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 21:37:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461136.60543449 06.04.2026 02:31:39.540 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 127
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 61 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 115976
Objects passed selection criteria: 115729
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104200
Average stars matched: 100528 (96.476 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1896624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 21:39:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.60485943
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.279 +30:00:51.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:02.501 +30:01:18.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.279 +30:00:51.92
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:02.501 +30:01:18.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01087 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UDUyjyQ5mH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OFou0tY2Kg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RoyZoXivRD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FYNJ1crt6q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UDUyjyQ5mH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OFou0tY2Kg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RoyZoXivRD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1072, passed=13209
Got 13209 stars (including 12124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13209 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FYNJ1crt6q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1074, passed=13150
Got 13150 stars (including 12066 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21232.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21234.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21237.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21255.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21260.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21267.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21271.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21133_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21133_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.72 +31:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21232_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21232_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.27 +32:19:09.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.412 3447488472321936000 081.43074707368 +32.31935305040 12.5469 11.6488 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.412#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21234_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21234_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:33.95 +33:34:25.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.652 182487834647997952 081.14167526508 +33.57373944943 12.3386 12.1373 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.652#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21237_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21237_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:00.52 +30:13:51.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.970 3446948856930081920 081.50213888511 +30.23118500751 12.5789 12.2053 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.970#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21239_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 21239_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21240_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21240_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.66 +31:04:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21253_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21253_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:03.83 +30:21:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.508 3446837011682446080 080.51612112203 +30.35526416337 12.3416 11.9885 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.508#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21255_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21255_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:35.30 +30:38:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.095 3446836771164261632 080.14742739983 +30.64376382257 12.3451 12.0457 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.095#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21260_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21260_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:30.46 +30:07:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.886 156702191032246656 075.37718870275 +30.13001650573 11.8488 10.9309 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:16.46 +33:02:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.764 181666160162204032 076.81883146843 +33.04176383315 12.1906 11.5758 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.764#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21271_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:16.19 +30:37:32.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.458 156404914873307264 077.81737599208 +30.62580023212 12.2668 11.8887 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.458#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21284_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 21284_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 16347_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.15 +32:10:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.39 +30:55:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:35:57.81 +28:30:55.3
05:09:07.35 +26:08:21.4
05:23:11.05 +26:08:31.4
04:38:57.11 +27:05:49.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.279 +30:00:51.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:02.501 +30:01:18.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.279 +30:00:51.92
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:02.501 +30:01:18.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01087 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ODfyDS4fBR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.33veMjsnzw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F2Xpl6t7oy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HxXIluYUR3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ODfyDS4fBR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.33veMjsnzw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F2Xpl6t7oy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=9565, passed=89451
Got 89451 stars (including 79800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HxXIluYUR3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=9414, passed=90198
Got 90198 stars (including 80668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-30-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213226_TTUQ2b1x1_32344_zodLAt94/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150525.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159854.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159858.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159865.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159866.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159867.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159875.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159892.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159895.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159897.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159918.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160700.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160889.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160898.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160909.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161023.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161050.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161065.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161113.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161153.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161214.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161289.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161304.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161337.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161351.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161380.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161402.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161495.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21266.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160812.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159854_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159854_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:24.13 +27:59:14.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.369 3421552264335133184 080.10118183689 +27.98764234420 14.8447 14.1826 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.369#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159858_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159858_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:48.60 +28:58:04.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.520 155220908352927104 072.20296227532 +28.96774021220 14.1144 13.2245 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.520#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159861_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159861_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:37.55 +29:07:45.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.245 155977376648724992 077.65706059693 +29.12964023986 14.0831 13.0800 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.245#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159865_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159865_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:27.31 +26:32:56.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:47.11 +31:22:40.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159867_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159867_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:38.75 +27:22:41.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.187 3421380401218492544 079.91200721908 +27.37774834741 14.5373 13.7458 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.187#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159875_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159875_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:25.71 +30:02:02.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159885_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159885_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.48 +32:25:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.55 +28:28:08.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.327 3421606763174555648 080.04000192814 +28.46970287675 14.1062 13.3628 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.327#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159893_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159893_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:36.50 +27:02:57.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.099 3421213344170456448 080.65128088484 +27.04799924657 14.6623 13.8965 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.099#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159895_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159895_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:26.70 +31:13:21.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.771 171309958922221440 068.11145028176 +31.22279517868 12.9512 12.2192 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.771#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159897_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159897_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:41.94 +29:51:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.089 3446694423067282816 079.42509100621 +29.86509122213 13.8584 12.9493 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.089#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159904_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159904_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.36 +29:22:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159907_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159907_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:40.29 +28:23:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159914_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159914_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.68 +28:44:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159918_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 159918_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:22.36 +33:12:07.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.357 181115781575088768 079.34413996306 +33.20113264494 11.9382 11.2029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.357#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160133_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160133_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:11.07 +26:08:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160192_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160192_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.64 +32:33:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160239_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160239_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.14 +32:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160270_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160270_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.96 +28:31:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160299_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160299_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.33 +33:11:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160309_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160309_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.90 +26:55:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160430_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160430_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.81 +33:11:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160483_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160483_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:47.03 +29:10:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160527_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160527_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.67 +30:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160530_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160530_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.13 +32:25:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160599_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160599_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.71 +29:45:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160623_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160623_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:58.57 +32:57:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160649_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160649_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.75 +33:23:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160650_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160650_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.08 +31:44:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:08.68 +33:20:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160669_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 160669_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160679_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160679_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.03 +31:46:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160700_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160700_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:25.30 +27:00:29.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.804 3442172780279067392 082.35563561679 +27.00871166985 14.0103 13.2705 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.804#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160738_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 160738_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160796_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160796_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.08 +31:04:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160803_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160803_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:52.98 +30:28:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160812_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 160812_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160825_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160825_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:30.88 +32:40:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160850_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160850_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:12.35 +33:46:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160852_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160852_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:50.44 +33:29:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160860_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160860_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:27.08 +30:56:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160861_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160861_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:57.70 +34:00:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160879_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160879_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.87 +32:03:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160889_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160889_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:08.07 +27:11:41.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.605 153906545280683776 075.03487142660 +27.19538814166 13.9314 13.0115 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.605#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.12 +31:15:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160898_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160898_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:52.49 +33:28:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.944 181186704374030720 080.21964545716 +33.47167672541 13.8357 12.8972 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.944#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160909_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160909_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:36.15 +33:07:56.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.294 181114377124045568 079.40124048956 +33.13270794507 14.1704 13.7674 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.294#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160955_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160955_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:16.99 +33:06:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.02 +29:22:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160977_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160977_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:16.67 +30:56:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160981_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 160981_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.84 +32:23:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161000_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161000_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.51 +32:27:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161023_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161023_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:30.21 +32:25:14.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161048_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161048_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:11.53 +34:12:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161050_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161050_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:24.29 +32:46:19.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.875 160757091133309056 073.85029834828 +32.77188211771 14.1614 13.2973 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.875#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161065_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161065_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:34.58 +28:59:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.784 155633195148766080 076.89403748337 +28.99631361612 14.7064 13.8125 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.784#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161081_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161081_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:50.79 +32:54:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161100_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161100_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:51.39 +32:23:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161101_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161101_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:48.76 +31:57:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161113_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161113_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:52.30 +26:28:46.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.202 3421640225263768960 077.46844359089 +26.47922171137 14.1527 13.2575 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.202#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161146_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161146_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.21 +28:14:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161153_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161153_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:03.34 +33:20:05.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.560 184723249163962624 075.51444636323 +33.33582890601 13.2459 11.3876 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.560#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161214_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161214_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:05.82 +29:33:56.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.380 3446503417280792704 080.02484980397 +29.56539948054 14.5487 13.6437 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.380#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161289_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161289_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.71 +27:29:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.306 3442258305964637824 082.00815519709 +27.49500738340 14.0958 13.1067 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.306#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161304_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161304_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:03.44 +31:14:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.117 180499956282445696 077.76449995356 +31.24419229327 14.1839 13.0843 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.117#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161337_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161337_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:12.15 +30:28:38.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.024 3446656867872989568 080.80075805378 +30.47704511045 14.8860 14.2000 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.024#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161351_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161351_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:22.00 +32:12:12.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.582 3448692373133308288 083.09179278934 +32.20301814940 14.6272 13.9644 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.582#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161380_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161380_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:49.15 +31:32:03.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.540 3447147486279503232 082.70559745843 +31.53432788645 14.4948 13.4334 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.540#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161402_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161402_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:47.37 +32:46:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.004 181598711996262272 077.19720629244 +32.76864887240 14.9232 14.3624 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.004#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161495_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 161495_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:33.34 +26:24:23.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.155 153714169400715392 074.63924265427 +26.40660509412 14.7883 13.8430 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.155#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50770_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 50770_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21266_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21266_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:54.67 +33:43:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.602 181933753804480384 078.47856285717 +33.73175524426 14.5614 14.0607 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.25 +32:53:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.40 +30:55:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 19818_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.75 +33:55:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.81 +28:30:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 50193_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.47 +32:09:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150525_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 150525_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:55.98 +30:38:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.865 156405670787865344 077.98337734106 +30.63645278619 12.4202 10.8004 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.865#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 115934_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.34 +26:08:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.72 +31:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.16 +32:10:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 62033_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-31-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
