This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 00 58 37.10 +58 29 49.3 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J014.6737+58.5024,2461136.5900,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J014.6737+58.5024 20260406.0900 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 06 38.02 +57 55 06.6 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J016.6682+57.9196,2461136.5900,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J016.6682+57.9196 20260406.0900 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 15 40.12 +58 05 33.6 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0463 Cas,2461136.5900,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0463 Cas 20260406.0900 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 11 59.03 +63 39 46.8 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0111584+633946,2461136.5900,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0111584+633946 20260406.0900 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 00 55 19.70 +60 21 54.3 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0055190+602154,2461136.5900,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0055190+602154 20260406.0900 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 14 56.94 +59 42 17.3 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0114566+594210,2461136.5900,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0114566+594210 20260406.0900 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 09 42.37 +62 25 12.4 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1684521,2461136.5900,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1684521 20260406.0900 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 00 58 01.80 +59 33 26.9 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0058007+593326,2461136.5900,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0058007+593326 20260406.0900 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 21 55.07 +61 21 00.8 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0121541+612104,2461136.5900,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0121541+612104 20260406.0900 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 01 55.43 +59 00 17.0 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J010154.82+590013.9,2461136.5900,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J010154.82+590013.9 20260406.0900 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 01 15 49.31 +62 13 53.8 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1688453,2461136.5900,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1688453 20260406.0900 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 06.0900* 00 54 31.45 +61 09 12.9 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 427324889202711808,2461136.5900,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 427324889202711808 20260406.0900 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.57895757 09.01.2026 01:53:31.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461049.57895757 09.01.2026 01:53:31.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last image: 2461136.59026456 06.04.2026 02:09:48.858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23949
Objects passed selection criteria: 23826
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17980.2
Average stars matched: 17431.5 (96.948 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 21:12:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.57895757 09.01.2026 01:53:31.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461049.57895757 09.01.2026 01:53:31.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last image: 2461136.59026456 06.04.2026 02:09:48.858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 213
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 47 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 183158
Objects passed selection criteria: 182632
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 136593
Average stars matched: 131357 (96.1664 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2013216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 5 21:25:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461136.58972727
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:59.457 +61:58:39.69
Second-epoch image center 01:43:39.845 +61:58:57.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0792 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:59.457 +61:58:39.69
Second-epoch image center 01:43:22.827 +61:58:26.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0459 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:43:39.845 +61:58:57.92
Second-epoch second image center 01:43:22.827 +61:58:26.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03444 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wCTvMEkw9e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o89HXNGkKp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zyTjsj2GUw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gUBroSo9V3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30070 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 7.1765 to 45.7634 deg, Dec +55.3578 to +67.3885 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 7.1765 to 45.7634 deg, Dec 55.3578 to 67.3885 deg
Loaded 26008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14273 out of 16167 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16167 out of 30070 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.965914
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.965914
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.1 pix Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wCTvMEkw9e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3738, passed=30070
Got 30070 stars (including 26294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o89HXNGkKp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=12, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3698, passed=29938
Got 29938 stars (including 26206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zyTjsj2GUw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1161, passed=11698
Got 11698 stars (including 10533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gUBroSo9V3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1162, passed=12221
Got 12221 stars (including 11054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12221 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 925.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 925.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012857 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010286 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 787 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 372 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 289 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.99"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 276 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 787 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 396 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.80"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 335 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.49"
Excluding outliers - 335 stars left (next iteration limit 303)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51906_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 51906_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (722.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52007_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 52007_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07129_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 07129_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (629.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10627_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 10627_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:37.20 +62:16:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13807_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 13807_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:02.67 +61:04:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07925_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 07925_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (523.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04733_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 04733_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (69.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03608_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 03608_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:59.457 +61:58:39.69
Second-epoch image center 01:43:39.845 +61:58:57.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0792 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:59.457 +61:58:39.69
Second-epoch image center 01:43:22.827 +61:58:26.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0459 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:43:39.845 +61:58:57.92
Second-epoch second image center 01:43:22.827 +61:58:26.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03444 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pw8YIqkxTV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iGwh8VnEhR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.crSiX9Y1st
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kz6hfpvyj4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 227084 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.9699 to 45.7963 deg, Dec +55.3108 to +67.3977 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.9699 to 45.7963 deg, Dec 55.3108 to 67.3977 deg
Loaded 26306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10789 out of 16766 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16766 out of 227084 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.818320
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.818320
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
1.9 pix Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
15.5 mag. Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Pw8YIqkxTV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=35652, passed=227031
Got 227031 stars (including 191032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 227031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 213516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 213513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 213511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iGwh8VnEhR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=57, blended=35473, passed=226301
Got 226301 stars (including 190511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 226301 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 214552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 788 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 214556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 214559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.crSiX9Y1st (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=7688, passed=78910
Got 78910 stars (including 71122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78910 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kz6hfpvyj4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8113, passed=81832
Got 81832 stars (including 73640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81832 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 925.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 925.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012857 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010286 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 787 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 271 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.86"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 261 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.91"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 787 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 370 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.91"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.86"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 287)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-53-31_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_19-54-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-05_CI_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_211026_TTUQ2b1x1_7314_Doi7ZfGq/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255382.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255394.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255421.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255425.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255431.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255445.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out255450.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out115131.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135167.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out154982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out171707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out180934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out255398.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out255443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91288.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255382_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255382_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:38.90 +62:09:37.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255383_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255383_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (215.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255387_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255387_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:05:18.57 +64:15:30.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255389_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255389_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (671.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255393_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255393_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255394_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255394_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:51.65 +59:41:19.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.064 426094531387630720 014.21735648505 +59.68903687172 12.5422 12.0713 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.064#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255398_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 255398_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255401_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255401_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255408_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255408_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255410_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255410_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255421_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255421_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:21.92 +63:01:12.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255422_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255422_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (313.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255425_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255425_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:03:05.89 +57:50:50.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255431_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255431_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:32.87 +59:38:51.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.026 426094222149988096 014.13897072160 +59.64711825184 12.0664 11.0792 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.026#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255432_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255432_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (375.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255436_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255436_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (334.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255443_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 255443_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255445_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255445_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:14.13 +61:16:00.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.640 510549325186822144 018.56038165059 +61.26683739544 12.3554 11.4446 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.640#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255448_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255448_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (254.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255450_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255450_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:02:15.18 +61:54:07.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.308 522756519899239168 015.56051004190 +61.90134227583 10.3722 9.1948 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.308#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255817_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255817_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255861_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255861_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (229.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255962_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 255962_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (694.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256063_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256063_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256082_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256082_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256246_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256246_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (278.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256316_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256316_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:59.04 +57:47:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256336_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256336_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:23.63 +60:44:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256406_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256406_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256409_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256409_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (336.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256460_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256460_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:16.19 +61:08:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256469_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256469_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256471_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256471_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256494_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256494_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:03:46.56 +61:03:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256513_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256513_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (732.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256555_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256555_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (329.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256578_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256578_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (529.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256589_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256589_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256620_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256620_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (700.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256624_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256624_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (476.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256702_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256702_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256703_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256703_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256710_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256710_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (443.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256734_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256734_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (414.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256743_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256743_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (316.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256753_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256753_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:03:36.65 +61:03:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256765_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256765_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256775_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256775_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (221.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256802_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256802_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (478.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256822_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256822_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (586.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256823_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256823_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256828_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256828_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (327.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256845_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256845_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (728.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256847_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256847_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (676.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256885_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256885_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:08.33 +58:49:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256895_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256895_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (616.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256915_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256915_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (174.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256923_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256923_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (100.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256930_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256930_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (544.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256935_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256935_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (484.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256954_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256954_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (338.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256978_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256978_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (537.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256993_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 256993_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (286.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257004_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257004_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (429.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257023_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257023_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (574.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257080_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257080_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (507.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257093_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257093_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (577.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257168_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257168_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (641.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257176_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257176_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (290.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257191_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257191_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (426.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257204_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257204_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (303.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257205_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257205_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257227_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257227_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (161.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257233_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257233_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (171.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257235_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257235_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:40.71 +60:46:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257237_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257237_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257257_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257257_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (763.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257258_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257258_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257263_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257263_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257298_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257298_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (172.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257317_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257317_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (309.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257338_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257338_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (506.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257369_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257369_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257386_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257386_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257392_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257392_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (547.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257411_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257411_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (193.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257446_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257446_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (367.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257447_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257447_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (454.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257468_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257468_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (766.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257469_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257469_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257472_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257472_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257497_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257497_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257507_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257507_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (742.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257527_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257527_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257568_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257568_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257605_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257605_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (634.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257634_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257634_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (447.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257646_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 257646_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223868_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 223868_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132379_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 132379_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180934_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 180934_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19326_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 19326_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64973_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 64973_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:53.87 +63:36:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85457_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 85457_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (352.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72005_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 72005_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63463_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 63463_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (626.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70238_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 70238_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (489.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63116_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 63116_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 32950_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93255_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 93255_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (300.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46060_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 46060_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (717.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148374_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 148374_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:11.57 +59:57:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187623_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 187623_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109275_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 109275_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:36.78 +61:28:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97114_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 97114_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:44.51 +62:06:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135167_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 135167_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154982_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 154982_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91288_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 91288_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156718_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 156718_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113774_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 113774_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171707_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 171707_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72902_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 72902_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44494_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 44494_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (453.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39511_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 39511_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (194.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64514_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 64514_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (467.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31404_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 31404_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95505_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 95505_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173403_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 173403_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:42.98 +58:52:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239349_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 239349_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110267_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 110267_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (273.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94365_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 94365_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:37.28 +62:16:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115274_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 115274_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:40.93 +61:16:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115131_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 115131_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42686_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 42686_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121833_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 121833_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:02.85 +61:04:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38328_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009
The candidate 38328_fd_Cas-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-05_21-09-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0009 did not pass the final checks
