This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1876* 01 45 08.89 +71 19 15.6 10.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0145096+711919,2461135.6876,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0145096+711919 20260405.1876 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1876* 01 18 21.15 +67 56 02.3 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0118190+675607,2461135.6876,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0118190+675607 20260405.1876 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1876* 01 27 15.93 +65 52 07.8 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 525375762751645696,2461135.6876,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 525375762751645696 20260405.1876 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 495198119935408896,2461135.6876,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 495198119935408896 20260405.1876 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1876* 01 53 20.73 +70 54 54.6 12.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461135.6876,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260405.1876 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1876* 02 18 37.04 +68 21 21.6 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 372241,2461135.6876,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 372241 20260405.1876 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58401343 09.01.2026 02:00:48.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
First image: 2461049.58401343 09.01.2026 02:00:48.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Last image: 2461135.68789265 05.04.2026 04:30:23.925 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13215
Objects passed selection criteria: 13114
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8200
Average stars matched: 7894.5 (96.2744 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119188 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 4 23:41:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58401343 09.01.2026 02:00:48.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
First image: 2461049.58401343 09.01.2026 02:00:48.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Last image: 2461135.68789265 05.04.2026 04:30:23.925 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 101546
Objects passed selection criteria: 101220
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 66278
Average stars matched: 63238.8 (95.4144 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2331836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 4 23:43:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461135.68725664
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:10.600 +69:59:22.54
Second-epoch image center 02:23:57.085 +69:59:59.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0219 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:10.600 +69:59:22.54
Second-epoch image center 02:23:53.987 +69:59:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:57.085 +69:59:59.78
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:53.987 +69:59:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01154 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RVAzFAaDm3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TzdxYzVLgV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zcrn0huU4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mMLu0NTyvG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17130 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7395 to 64.5322 deg, Dec +62.8434 to +75.4744 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7395 to 64.5322 deg, Dec 62.8434 to 75.4744 deg
Loaded 15575 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7653 out of 8334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8334 out of 17130 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.962036
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.962036
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
15.4 mag. Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RVAzFAaDm3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1459, passed=17130
Got 17130 stars (including 15650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TzdxYzVLgV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1446, passed=17209
Got 17209 stars (including 15733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17209 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zcrn0huU4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=144, passed=3089
Got 3089 stars (including 2942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3089 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mMLu0NTyvG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=165, passed=3314
Got 3314 stars (including 3147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3314 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06999.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08506_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 08506_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:31.17 +70:25:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06999_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 06999_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:45:08.89 +71:19:15.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:10.600 +69:59:22.54
Second-epoch image center 02:23:57.085 +69:59:59.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0219 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:10.600 +69:59:22.54
Second-epoch image center 02:23:53.987 +69:59:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:57.085 +69:59:59.78
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:53.987 +69:59:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01154 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2Hpn160eim
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4uzBx4Tdvv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XsN9k1CoCs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bE866hUYDV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 130258 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6566 to 64.6850 deg, Dec +62.8434 to +75.4826 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6566 to 64.6850 deg, Dec 62.8434 to 75.4826 deg
Loaded 15630 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6540 out of 8433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8433 out of 130258 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833708
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833708
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
15.6 mag. Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2Hpn160eim (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=11648, passed=130231
Got 130231 stars (including 118319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130231 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4uzBx4Tdvv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=11687, passed=129707
Got 129707 stars (including 117743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129707 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XsN9k1CoCs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=789, passed=25819
Got 25819 stars (including 24968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bE866hUYDV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=887, passed=27329
Got 27329 stars (including 26394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-00-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-01-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-29-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_233913_TTUQ2b1x1_18874_5ccEx8q8/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out12330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150021.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150031.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150039.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150041.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150043.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150044.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150047.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150930.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151034.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151176.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151207.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151519.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151596.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151720.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151823.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out99690.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122370.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58078.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150020_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150020_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:52.94 +70:03:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150021_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150021_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:08.15 +71:44:01.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150025_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150025_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:04.64 +65:24:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150028_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150028_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:46:19.17 +65:35:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150031_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150031_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:03.12 +65:43:48.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.814 519125000488236032 025.26279730157 +65.72987306450 12.9486 12.0945 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.814#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150036_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150036_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:27.35 +70:09:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150039_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150039_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:00.37 +72:55:34.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.456 543706992405123968 057.99810336774 +72.92561712406 12.6300 11.9966 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.456#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150041_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150041_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:44.00 +65:47:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.072 519126928935697792 025.43429868370 +65.79308455890 12.7420 11.9667 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.072#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150043_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150043_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:12.92 +65:27:12.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.307 513306561054044416 024.05341539539 +65.45309786473 11.7685 10.6386 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.307#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150044_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150044_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:37:20.83 +65:30:49.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.121 513307724982960896 024.33751289983 +65.51386519607 12.1659 11.6120 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.121#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150045_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150045_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:00.03 +70:03:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150047_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150047_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:53.82 +65:35:09.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.072 513347964539461504 022.47496553315 +65.58588219434 11.7428 11.2926 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.072#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150080_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150080_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:07.45 +65:11:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150185_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150185_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:45.26 +65:20:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150285_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150285_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:33.46 +65:17:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150328_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150328_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:43.63 +65:38:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150333_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150333_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:21.70 +65:13:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150401_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150401_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:57.22 +65:21:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150402_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150402_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:28.74 +65:18:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150417_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150417_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:19.24 +65:22:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150457_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150457_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:36.19 +65:41:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150480_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150480_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:27.66 +65:07:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150552_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150552_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:28.65 +65:28:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150651_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150651_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:18.36 +65:32:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150672_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150672_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:27.36 +65:09:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150693_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150693_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:35.36 +65:29:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150715_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150715_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:07.16 +65:28:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150854_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150854_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:54.51 +65:23:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150890_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150890_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:59.60 +65:04:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150892_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150892_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:04.89 +65:13:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150895_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150895_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:48.01 +65:09:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150930_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150930_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:31.13 +65:34:30.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.859 513265118908072960 022.12873845592 +65.57473022708 11.6970 10.5957 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.859#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150935_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150935_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:56.64 +67:56:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150990_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 150990_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:26.51 +65:11:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151011_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151011_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:03.42 +65:08:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151034_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151034_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:57.57 +65:43:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.555 513363666939784064 021.98846796986 +65.72295017984 11.5065 10.1983 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.555#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151135_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151135_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:16.81 +65:25:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151144_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151144_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:48.57 +65:46:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151176_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151176_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:24.15 +65:51:47.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.345 525284984323874560 021.34973324284 +65.86251572657 11.7242 10.3961 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.345#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151207_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151207_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:08.43 +65:52:25.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.780 525297280809453056 021.03561201332 +65.87366418590 11.9937 11.4482 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151231_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151231_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:49.44 +70:52:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151255_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151255_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:12.58 +65:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151284_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151284_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:52.09 +67:15:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151287_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151287_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:04.22 +66:05:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151318_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151318_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:42.73 +65:09:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151379_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151379_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:28.68 +65:27:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151393_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151393_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:36.26 +70:35:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151468_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151468_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:28.10 +71:05:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151499_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151499_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:17.63 +68:25:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151519_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151519_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:34:41.30 +67:43:30.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.088 517482879873227904 038.67256726275 +67.72469969446 12.5571 11.4707 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.088#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151596_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151596_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:25.45 +65:21:42.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.651 513249455171161856 022.35617533127 +65.36200528850 12.2551 11.2478 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.651#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151640_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151640_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:32.07 +68:36:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151663_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151663_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:40.88 +65:46:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151720_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151720_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:07.88 +65:55:34.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.300 525390842377270528 021.28180779201 +65.92565598331 11.9898 10.6907 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.300#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151745_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151745_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:07.87 +65:47:28.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.283 525295154806456192 021.03278047522 +65.79122716163 12.2013 11.1533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.283#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151823_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151823_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:49.37 +65:04:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.972 513235470757816960 022.45380171547 +65.07133872240 11.9190 10.7379 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.972#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151934_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 151934_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:11.81 +67:38:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12330_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 12330_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:48.79 +72:20:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.539 543480213833557760 056.45289694363 +72.34686753703 12.4635 11.8334 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.539#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122370_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 122370_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96906_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 96906_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28304_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 28304_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113983_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 113983_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:15.39 +68:44:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142474_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 142474_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:58.83 +69:31:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51772_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 51772_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:08.91 +71:19:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63786_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 63786_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:31.27 +70:25:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99690_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 99690_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:16.27 +66:08:52.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.572 525389090030615424 021.81812191044 +66.14791953108 12.4463 11.6925 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58078_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 58078_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121557_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 121557_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 53046_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:38.59 +71:09:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33366_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 33366_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:26.45 +72:25:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19530_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 19530_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:21.32 +71:19:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24861_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 24861_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:13.41 +70:52:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113492_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 113492_fd_Cas-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_23-30-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks