This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 57 30.94 +23 14 22.5 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 22 02.76 +26 07 07.6 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 25 52.82 +18 41 23.1 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 23 34.52 +22 12 04.8 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 37 25.51 +19 02 41.2 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 36 04.79 +19 13 55.0 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 05.1347* 05 29 32.25 +21 07 02.7 11.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461135.6347,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260405.1347 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461135.63504433 05.04.2026 03:14:17.830 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18600
Objects passed selection criteria: 18527
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12845.2
Average stars matched: 12003.8 (93.4489 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 123200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 4 22:17:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461135.63504433 05.04.2026 03:14:17.830 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 132
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 134605
Objects passed selection criteria: 134316
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 99914.8
Average stars matched: 93297.2 (93.3769 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1961908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Apr 3 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-382-g85e3caff
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 4 22:19:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461135.63438744
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:40.265 +22:01:03.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0816 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:43.063 +22:01:31.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0939 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:40.265 +22:01:03.80
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:43.063 +22:01:31.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OJhBPtOIsu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1IWZppZUj1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qFdcss6hDW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zYkXkQgTpC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec +16.3328 to +27.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec 16.3328 to 27.3474 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9058 out of 10254 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10254 out of 23525 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.945337
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.945337
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OJhBPtOIsu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2582, passed=23525
Got 23525 stars (including 20915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1IWZppZUj1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2595, passed=23514
Got 23514 stars (including 20891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qFdcss6hDW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=528, passed=8598
Got 8598 stars (including 8062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zYkXkQgTpC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, passed=8520
Got 8520 stars (including 7970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8520 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 32185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:43.08 +23:02:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32980_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 32980_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30972_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 30972_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:57:30.94 +23:14:22.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:40.265 +22:01:03.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0816 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:43.063 +22:01:31.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0939 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:40.265 +22:01:03.80
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:43.063 +22:01:31.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1nBX0WLh8Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jH1sOkcI9v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uM3E9GHn9m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eunBeeKdAZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec +16.3196 to +27.3524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec 16.3196 to 27.3524 deg
Loaded 12375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7170 out of 10499 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10499 out of 163644 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769457
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769457
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1nBX0WLh8Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=21410, passed=163589
Got 163589 stars (including 141908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jH1sOkcI9v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=21418, passed=163772
Got 163772 stars (including 142086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uM3E9GHn9m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=4559, passed=68770
Got 68770 stars (including 64118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eunBeeKdAZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=4446, passed=68113
Got 68113 stars (including 63570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
WARNING: Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-13-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-04_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_221507_TTUQ2b1x1_17262_SNhPdS1W/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out174901.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186186.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186191.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186210.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186220.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186233.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186251.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186265.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192849.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194134.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194386.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195555.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195757.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197194.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197334.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197428.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192561.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192717.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197240.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70732.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186186_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186186_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:04.26 +24:45:38.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.795 3440752902747891328 084.51798448156 +24.76061361394 14.3136 13.7434 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.795#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186191_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186191_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.68 +23:25:02.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.017 3418433259083606400 076.85379292216 +23.41793549507 13.3029 12.4926 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.017#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186210_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186210_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:33.34 +19:42:52.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:01.23 +21:41:15.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.311 3402454748087957120 081.50503582005 +21.68774693612 13.5347 12.6959 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.311#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:58.82 +20:34:49.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.350 3399870930123523200 087.49379322158 +20.58046096907 13.5375 12.8904 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.350#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:15.96 +18:37:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.64 +22:52:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:36.65 +20:06:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186233_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186233_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:33.10 +18:07:41.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.734 3398105870363697920 087.13851057154 +18.12754748496 13.6686 12.8327 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.734#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186239_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186239_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:34.31 +21:42:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186244_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186244_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:40.13 +25:11:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:40.23 +18:57:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.59 +19:17:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186251_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186251_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.03 +18:32:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.513 3401357809143517824 080.29620452462 +18.54426627845 13.0239 12.4295 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.513#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.63 +25:17:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186256_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186256_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.74 +19:49:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186258_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186258_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:21.24 +18:32:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186265_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186265_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:39.88 +23:50:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.284 3427749700281064064 086.66609319984 +23.84209730340 12.6382 12.2193 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.284#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186266_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186266_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:02.83 +22:27:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186267_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186267_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:58.33 +24:15:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 186272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:06.54 +22:35:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187282_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 187282_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:43.06 +23:02:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 188044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:30.89 +23:14:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188345_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 188345_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.09 +22:38:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188820_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 188820_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:07.96 +21:23:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189743_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 189743_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190038_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190038_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.71 +22:27:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190704_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190704_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.25 +18:59:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191002_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191002_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.06 +18:13:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.12 +18:34:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.61 +20:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.76 +18:25:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.27 +18:52:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191353_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 191353_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191374_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191374_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.25 +21:18:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191518_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191518_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:54.66 +19:28:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191979_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191979_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.31 +25:47:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:11.38 +19:48:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.92 +20:10:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192189_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192189_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:06.86 +21:33:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192401_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192401_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:40.59 +20:11:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192434_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192434_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.26 +23:00:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192501_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192501_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:02.84 +20:17:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.16 +18:20:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192559_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192559_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:04.03 +24:38:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192561_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 192561_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:52.36 +21:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192717_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 192717_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192849_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192849_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:47.11 +20:51:26.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.819 3402145888400350080 081.94577843886 +20.85728567202 12.7682 11.8830 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.819#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192970_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192970_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:32.33 +23:52:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:29.01 +21:17:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193407_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193407_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.25 +22:45:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193457_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193457_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:56.28 +20:14:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193544_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193544_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.75 +19:32:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193660_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193660_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:18.98 +21:12:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193682_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193682_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:25.67 +24:07:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193774_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193774_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.24 +20:56:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193858_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 193858_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:28.99 +18:44:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194089_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194089_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:57.98 +24:13:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194134_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194134_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.99 +20:07:34.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.471 3402001160885502336 081.05401270299 +20.12593856136 13.1759 12.5174 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.471#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.54 +25:22:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194343_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194343_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:53.51 +18:32:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194386_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194386_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:56.33 +21:49:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.581 3414977360894503808 077.48510045886 +21.82727332212 13.0905 12.0632 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.581#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:43.16 +17:55:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:09.19 +19:14:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194937_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194937_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.58 +25:41:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.70 +23:11:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195174_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195174_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:51.04 +26:06:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195555_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195555_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.44 +19:34:30.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.913 3399298630023475584 086.75226196018 +19.57446548527 13.8268 13.2841 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.913#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195567_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195567_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.96 +19:35:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195655_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195655_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.01 +19:49:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195757_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195757_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.04 +21:30:01.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.420 3403879440280656000 082.31672683488 +21.49995164737 13.7440 12.9419 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.420#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195863_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195863_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:10.40 +19:41:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196002_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196002_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.15 +25:14:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196016_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196016_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:06.94 +24:22:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196050_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196050_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:10.99 +22:50:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196072_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196072_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.12 +19:33:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.30 +25:08:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.44 +22:23:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196261_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196261_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:30.77 +21:44:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196381_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196381_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:44.78 +21:12:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196428_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196428_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:34.57 +21:24:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196496_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196496_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.86 +24:21:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196629_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196629_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.61 +22:45:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196635_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196635_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:40.68 +18:53:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196657_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196657_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:27.43 +18:28:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196765_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196765_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:04.29 +20:48:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196815_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196815_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.55 +21:24:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197178_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197178_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:02.05 +20:33:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197194_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197194_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:30.98 +20:47:16.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.274 3402696395831983744 084.87912182539 +20.78756471834 13.8547 13.2810 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.274#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:27.62 +18:02:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197204_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197204_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.73 +21:46:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 197240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197334_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197334_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:23.83 +22:22:11.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.559 3404088068315199488 082.59917761525 +22.36974697816 14.0116 13.4103 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.559#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197428_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197428_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:30.55 +22:05:20.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.398 3403365349874839296 085.62687533115 +22.08746759397 13.8868 12.9402 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.398#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197495_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197495_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:14.59 +21:13:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197623_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197623_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:40.07 +21:15:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197871_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197871_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.18 +19:46:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 136341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:58.47 +24:44:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.41 +17:54:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89732_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 89732_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:17.02 +21:56:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174901_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 174901_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:55.80 +26:09:37.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.303 3429838428777249664 089.73253420193 +26.16036594973 11.8081 11.2379 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.303#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 29777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-14-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks