This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461132.9926,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260402.4926 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 02.4926* 18 21 26.82 +01 51 18.4 13.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4276675790505191808,2461132.9926,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4276675790505191808 20260402.4926 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 02.4926* 18 21 33.75 +00 51 11.1 13.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J182134.05-005106.4,2461132.9926,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J182134.05-005106.4 20260402.4926 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 02.4926* 18 09 28.13 -05 08 35.6 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4173862691571715584,2461132.9926,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4173862691571715584 20260402.4926 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.88247860 19.03.2026 09:10:36.151 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461118.88247860 19.03.2026 09:10:36.151 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461132.99285243 02.04.2026 11:49:32.450 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6719
Objects passed selection criteria: 6706
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5606.75
Average stars matched: 5482.75 (97.7884 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 1 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-372-gf0c1109d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 2 06:55:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.88247860 19.03.2026 09:10:36.151 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
First image: 2461118.88247860 19.03.2026 09:10:36.151 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Last image: 2461132.99285243 02.04.2026 11:49:32.450 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57650
Objects passed selection criteria: 57575
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48124.2
Average stars matched: 46205.2 (96.0124 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 160368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 1 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-372-gf0c1109d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 2 06:56:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461132.99232256
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:43.916 -02:01:27.64
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.733 -01:59:57.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.07 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:43.916 -02:01:27.64
Second-epoch image center 17:59:56.892 -01:59:56.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:58.733 -01:59:57.43
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:56.892 -01:59:56.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UgabJlLXbp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4SXTApwSzJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O3XDHGytT7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7SOrv1zHk5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7855 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9709 to 277.8536 deg, Dec -7.3654 to +3.3510 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9709 to 277.8536 deg, Dec -7.3654 to 3.3510 deg
Loaded 5473 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4208 out of 4363 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4363 out of 7855 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.760567
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.760567
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.60
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.6 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UgabJlLXbp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, passed=7855
Got 7855 stars (including 7349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4SXTApwSzJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, passed=7890
Got 7890 stars (including 7375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O3XDHGytT7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=408, passed=4742
Got 4742 stars (including 4330 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4742 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7SOrv1zHk5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=4551
Got 4551 stars (including 4156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20395_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:37.38 -00:06:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20469_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20469_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:13.03 +00:27:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20471_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20471_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:37.30 +01:32:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:43.916 -02:01:27.64
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.733 -01:59:57.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.07 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:43.916 -02:01:27.64
Second-epoch image center 17:59:56.892 -01:59:56.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:58.733 -01:59:57.43
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:56.892 -01:59:56.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ceXl5Hxm9A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SqSwaAC0Zr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ya3Q0xWUbi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mYKNCrJKMg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 68367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9631 to 277.8543 deg, Dec -7.3778 to +3.3510 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9631 to 277.8543 deg, Dec -7.3778 to 3.3510 deg
Loaded 5483 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3983 out of 4688 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4688 out of 68367 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.520803
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.520803
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.4 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ceXl5Hxm9A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=5113, passed=68362
Got 68362 stars (including 63156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SqSwaAC0Zr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=5171, passed=68685
Got 68685 stars (including 63407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.4 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ya3Q0xWUbi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2345, passed=36511
Got 36511 stars (including 34129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mYKNCrJKMg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2322, passed=35057
Got 35057 stars (including 32691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35057 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-10-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_04-11-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_065017_TTUQ2b1x1_5106_H9puqOWS/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20768.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85092.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85094.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85112.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85406.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85431.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85476.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85567.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85630.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85702.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85729.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85799.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85806.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10062.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85089_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85089_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:49.27 -03:30:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85092_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85092_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:09.50 -00:58:45.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.227 4178987652710705536 271.03935057473 -00.98048407202 13.1641 12.1336 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.227#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85094_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85094_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:49.41 -00:38:49.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85103_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85103_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:55.79 -00:15:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85104_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 85104_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85110_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85110_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:59.83 +02:14:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85112_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85112_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:41.57 -01:30:19.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85115_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85115_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.53 +01:59:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85116_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 85116_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85122_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85122_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:33.70 -01:31:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85130_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85130_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:47.80 -02:36:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85132_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85132_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:58.30 +01:49:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85134_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85134_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:13.26 +01:56:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85237_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85237_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:17.65 +01:02:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85295_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85295_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:00.41 +00:35:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85321_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85321_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:48.50 -00:02:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85331_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85331_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.52 -02:32:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85347_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85347_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:53.00 -01:24:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85349_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85349_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.46 -00:37:38.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.675 4373613507311178624 263.19870090284 -00.62778837969 12.5066 11.9251 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.675#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85352_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85352_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:47.65 -00:08:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85392_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85392_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:30.83 -02:38:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85393_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85393_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:25.14 +00:33:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85406_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85406_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:35.75 -02:15:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.486 4178598352570762496 267.39837612308 -02.25137208708 11.6904 10.4252 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.486#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85417_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85417_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:15.59 -00:59:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85418_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85418_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:41.36 -01:42:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85430_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85430_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:40.47 +01:57:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85431_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85431_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.77 +01:42:19.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.297 4375702923001226240 264.43596010089 +01.70567978477 12.8457 12.2555 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.297#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85446_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85446_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:21.23 -00:33:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85461_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85461_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:38.36 -00:05:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85471_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85471_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:55.01 -00:07:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85473_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85473_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:41.41 +02:05:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85476_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85476_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:18.49 +00:51:51.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.154 4375548613415515520 263.57767687219 +00.86310590221 12.3927 11.1082 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.154#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85488_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85488_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:26.81 -01:24:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85491_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85491_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:42.81 +01:25:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85495_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85495_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.46 +00:52:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85500_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85500_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:00.13 +00:17:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85514_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85514_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:09.34 -02:14:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85518_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85518_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.86 +01:44:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85521_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85521_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:40.88 -02:44:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85529_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85529_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:24.60 -00:44:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85536_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85536_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:11.02 +01:26:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85552_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85552_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:39.48 -02:28:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85565_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85565_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:21.13 -00:05:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85567_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85567_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:10.74 +01:20:13.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.175 4372822756589685632 266.54447845857 +01.33737585886 13.0167 12.0333 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.175#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85569_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85569_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:28.03 +01:05:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85581_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85581_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:44.67 +00:14:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85584_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85584_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.53 +00:04:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85595_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85595_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:37.67 -02:14:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85600_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85600_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:45.34 +00:55:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85606_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85606_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:14.68 +01:08:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85608_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85608_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:43.06 -01:39:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85630_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85630_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:00.97 -00:39:19.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.675 4370648914725457152 265.00419940356 -00.65571552315 12.9514 11.8800 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.675#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85640_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85640_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:33.27 +00:44:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85642_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85642_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:51.67 -02:15:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85649_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85649_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:56.53 -03:01:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85664_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85664_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:23.17 -01:25:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85667_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85667_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:56.31 +01:58:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85677_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85677_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:32.64 +01:16:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85700_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85700_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:24.88 +01:40:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85702_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85702_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:08.79 -03:39:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.448 4269774052946976128 274.78782789870 -03.65118126752 13.1259 11.1239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.448#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85710_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85710_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:23.13 +01:40:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85715_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85715_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:23.67 -02:24:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85719_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85719_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:29.15 -03:21:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85720_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85720_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:09.18 -01:12:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85724_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85724_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:53.78 -00:34:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85729_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85729_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:37.50 -00:18:00.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.865 4371602504841308544 267.90574385419 -00.29944157435 11.2744 9.5897 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.865#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85732_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85732_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:47.46 -01:37:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85745_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85745_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:54.93 +00:00:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.552 4371635352752795264 268.47853146002 +00.00134381383 11.9229 10.1953 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.552#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85762_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85762_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:20.41 +01:29:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85767_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85767_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:04.22 -03:42:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85785_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85785_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:27.18 -01:31:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85790_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 85790_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85799_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85799_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:38.67 -05:12:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.343 4172510017391450880 270.41136438694 -05.20314821176 11.9418 10.3121 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.343#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85806_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 85806_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:08.45 -05:45:56.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.589 4172981394344374144 272.28601297463 -05.76637179056 12.3583 10.7629 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.589#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11685_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 11685_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:56.91 -04:49:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09030_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 09030_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:33.08 -05:22:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20768_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 20768_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:50.62 -02:39:40.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.135 4174817342540677760 272.96166975748 -02.66083929835 11.4920 9.9160 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.135#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66578_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 66578_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:50.94 -00:13:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11128_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 11128_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:59.88 -04:55:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63172_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 63172_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:13.02 +00:27:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52618_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:57.35 +01:20:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10062_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 10062_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21827_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 21827_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_06-49-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks