This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4072101717888502912,2461132.9502,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4072101717888502912 20260402.4502 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J281.7670-22.1690,2461132.9502,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J281.7670-22.1690 20260402.4502 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1232 Sgr,2461132.9502,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1232 Sgr 20260402.4502 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461132.9502,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260402.4502 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461132.9502,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260402.4502 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461132.9502,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260402.4502 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461132.95049612 02.04.2026 10:48:32.865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8863
Objects passed selection criteria: 8837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7348
Average stars matched: 7172.75 (97.615 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 1 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-372-gf0c1109d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 2 05:50:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461132.95049612 02.04.2026 10:48:32.865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 81
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 93747
Objects passed selection criteria: 93641
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 79949.2
Average stars matched: 76786.5 (96.0441 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1875392 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 1 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-372-gf0c1109d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 2 05:52:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461132.94994422
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits'
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:11.462 -25:58:18.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:09.358 -25:58:18.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:11.462 -25:58:18.76
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:09.358 -25:58:18.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00788 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bVAisM8Nst
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3VcG2H2695
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xO7UKTh4qz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.shK7S9bhdz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7844 out of 8105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8105 out of 10651 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652325
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652325
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bVAisM8Nst (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=714, passed=10651
Got 10651 stars (including 9923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3VcG2H2695 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=701, passed=10578
Got 10578 stars (including 9862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xO7UKTh4qz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=469, passed=6109
Got 6109 stars (including 5637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.shK7S9bhdz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=6107
Got 6107 stars (including 5612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:11.462 -25:58:18.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:09.358 -25:58:18.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:11.462 -25:58:18.76
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:09.358 -25:58:18.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00788 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JvMFdP76aE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vx7F6AySVT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nnz0UWPdgD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mgzCT9wviP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 108796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Loaded 13477 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9921 out of 11624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11624 out of 108796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.409319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.409319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JvMFdP76aE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=8591, passed=108793
Got 108793 stars (including 100032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vx7F6AySVT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8843, passed=110133
Got 110133 stars (including 101112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nnz0UWPdgD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3687, passed=63430
Got 63430 stars (including 59642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63430 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mgzCT9wviP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=3831, passed=64167
Got 64167 stars (including 60247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-47-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_054915_TTUQ2b1x1_11682_CbE6Wopa/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129948.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129965.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129970.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129974.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129983.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129987.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129988.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129993.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130004.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130005.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130011.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130024.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130025.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130026.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130027.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130030.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130032.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130034.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130035.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130141.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130161.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130226.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130506.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130551.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130577.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130644.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130665.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130673.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130825.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130852.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130871.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130907.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130964.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130989.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129975.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129989.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129998.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130566.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130849.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129948_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129948_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:40.62 -29:34:05.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.089 6759039722201549696 289.16949957521 -29.56795611745 13.4960 12.9058 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.089#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129965_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129965_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:27.39 -29:31:38.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.623 6758664651292916736 291.11405434830 -29.52780771052 13.1199 12.3937 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.623#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129970_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129970_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:55.12 -28:05:41.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.696 6759760207256697984 288.98025642769 -28.09542769789 13.1045 12.4028 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.696#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129974_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129974_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:47.02 -27:17:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.943 6765898265274864896 290.19644641632 -27.29715287674 12.9475 12.4838 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.943#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129975_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 129975_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129983_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129983_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:21.83 -26:32:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.032 4072322483531740800 282.59158392523 -26.54960095516 12.0026 11.0712 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.032#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129985_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129985_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:43.32 -26:24:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129987_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129987_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:58.24 -26:11:47.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.489 6769076029977878912 290.24207977719 -26.19613538213 12.8458 12.0686 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.489#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129988_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129988_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:39.97 -27:46:09.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.879 4071881579368868992 283.16744379903 -27.76933815229 12.3163 11.5817 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.879#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129989_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 129989_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129992_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129992_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:52.57 -29:46:53.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.341 6758458527222669440 291.46947049909 -29.78145514392 12.6214 11.8560 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.341#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129993_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129993_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:09.47 -28:15:02.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.834 6762744384889037568 288.28995024564 -28.25082323064 12.8698 12.1790 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.834#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129997_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 129997_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:51.57 -27:38:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129998_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 129998_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130004_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130004_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.66 -28:43:39.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.174 6759652321975287168 289.07829211201 -28.72801117136 12.4990 11.7818 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.174#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130005_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130005_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:00.73 -28:16:45.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130009_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130009_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:05.65 -27:14:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130011_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130011_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:48.63 -27:19:09.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.228 4072038775166986624 283.20339525482 -27.31982934752 12.4123 11.6812 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.228#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130014_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:41.57 -23:25:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130018_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130018_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:02.26 -23:18:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130024_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130024_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:20.30 -22:04:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.194 6772098926737627904 292.58490054780 -22.07754263515 12.4017 11.5696 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.194#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130025_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130025_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:38.75 -22:37:01.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130026_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130026_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.65 -24:43:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.031 4074803187917560320 283.45603638445 -24.72255317075 10.1585 8.7482 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.031#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130027_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130027_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:24.02 -25:25:16.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.93)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130030_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130030_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:47.31 -29:34:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.727 6758477184560857344 291.94765468978 -29.56846729356 11.6309 10.8701 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.727#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130032_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130032_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:33.00 -28:52:43.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.590 6764724575269362176 292.13727437946 -28.87838284402 10.9111 9.9917 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.590#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130034_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130034_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:26.50 -26:18:54.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.729 6766962115791229056 294.36019906150 -26.31502896714 10.6365 10.2238 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.729#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130035_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:57.36 -26:57:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.938 6765236810248885504 294.48889137207 -26.95685293601 10.2508 9.5243 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.938#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130141_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130141_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:51.53 -28:58:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.320 6764535424909928704 292.21403801357 -28.97431634069 11.2435 10.7867 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.320#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130161_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130161_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:28.34 -26:29:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.892 6766941667450379392 294.61792967585 -26.49601625945 10.9394 9.9776 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.892#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130226_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130226_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:44.21 -28:41:06.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.072 6759526599690230272 290.93391278176 -28.68534111159 11.8494 11.3084 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.072#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130381_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130381_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:36.61 -27:22:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130506_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130506_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:49.27 -28:41:15.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.025 6762349973756108160 287.70617638094 -28.68798889996 12.6427 11.8384 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.025#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130533_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130533_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:56.83 -26:01:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:50.48 -27:52:11.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.560 6765595010521593216 291.45996352228 -27.87022892949 12.8148 12.1851 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.560#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130566_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 130566_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130577_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130577_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:08.63 -26:57:32.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.125 6765376310787501056 293.03512570026 -26.95945031610 13.1883 12.6578 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.125#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130644_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130644_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:27.74 -29:04:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.196 6758704474230086528 291.36599459843 -29.07421612759 12.8444 11.9503 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.196#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130665_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130665_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:37.34 -22:27:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.459 6772357213189860352 291.40454362943 -22.45948812442 13.6091 12.7981 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.459#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130673_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130673_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.70 -23:15:43.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.246 4075394686501090048 284.85298129595 -23.26191085475 12.4787 11.9720 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.246#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130747_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 130747_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130825_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130825_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:11.67 -30:07:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.564 6758429355804510208 291.54873710061 -30.12737288842 13.3192 12.8244 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.564#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130849_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 130849_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130852_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130852_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:18.09 -27:51:51.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.780 6764935131746713728 292.57561911329 -27.86426853703 13.3640 12.6700 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130871_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130871_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:34.69 -26:49:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.123 6765464473577347200 293.64453149888 -26.82742188729 13.5490 13.0077 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.123#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:50.20 -29:37:22.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.503 6752432546367144192 292.95907124898 -29.62294580216 13.2310 12.4950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.503#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130907_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130907_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.03 -29:24:28.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.024 6759373763274294528 289.74627856946 -29.40775074489 13.2435 12.6567 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.024#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130962_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:08.58 -29:25:47.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.609 6758675852567773568 291.53524464604 -29.42981104803 13.3590 12.6281 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130964_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130964_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:47.49 -27:28:12.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.260 6765279588123564672 293.19824564881 -27.47031463277 13.4815 12.7739 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.260#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130973_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130973_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:53.19 -25:53:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130989_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 130989_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_05-48-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks