This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461132.8741,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260402.3741 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461132.8741,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260402.3741 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 02.3741* 17 22 08.66 -13 14 46.4 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461132.8741,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260402.3741 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J171850.00-064439.5,2461132.8741,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J171850.00-064439.5 20260402.3741 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J165403.17-104237.3,2461132.8741,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J165403.17-104237.3 20260402.3741 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0446 Oph,2461132.8741,9.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0446 Oph 20260402.3741 9.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 02.3741* 17 22 14.27 -13 01 04.7 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J172214.46-130105.4,2461132.8741,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J172214.46-130105.4 20260402.3741 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1725233-095547,2461132.8741,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1725233-095547 20260402.3741 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461132.87436650 02.04.2026 08:58:55.266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4589
Objects passed selection criteria: 4579
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3789
Average stars matched: 3728 (98.3901 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111188 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 1 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-372-gf0c1109d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 2 04:27:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461132.87436650 02.04.2026 08:58:55.266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 66
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46994
Objects passed selection criteria: 46915
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38234
Average stars matched: 37063 (96.9373 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 152900 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 1 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-372-gf0c1109d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 2 04:28:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461132.87379523
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.832 -10:00:30.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:33.757 -10:00:08.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.832 -10:00:30.86
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:33.757 -10:00:08.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00759 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ULn6xY2B7H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5mKqpFHU8z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OB5OHYx7Pk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NfvXnc4Xvl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.8 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.8 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ULn6xY2B7H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=458, passed=6287
Got 6287 stars (including 5821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5mKqpFHU8z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=6127
Got 6127 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OB5OHYx7Pk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=274, passed=3338
Got 3338 stars (including 3060 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NfvXnc4Xvl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, passed=3329
Got 3329 stars (including 3052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20204_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 20204_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.01 -12:12:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20208_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 20208_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.21 -06:23:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 20215_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.53 -11:47:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 20231_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.70 -06:38:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.07 -09:32:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.832 -10:00:30.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:33.757 -10:00:08.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.832 -10:00:30.86
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:33.757 -10:00:08.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00759 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LZZQnMWSvD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RhUQVBk47w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QNomlbFx2I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F5siqOnisJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739902
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739902
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LZZQnMWSvD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3753, passed=64663
Got 64663 stars (including 60806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RhUQVBk47w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3159, passed=61397
Got 61397 stars (including 58163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QNomlbFx2I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1485, passed=27420
Got 27420 stars (including 25907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F5siqOnisJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1566, passed=28009
Got 28009 stars (including 26413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-02_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_042256_TTUQ2b1x1_14166_6ynHnnJx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out36413.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79159.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79204.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79243.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79247.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51454.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79020.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79198.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78952_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 78952_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.82 -07:56:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78963_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 78963_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.22 -06:23:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79008_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79008_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.83 -12:43:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79014_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79014_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.21 -14:03:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79020_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 79020_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79066_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79066_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.14 -10:10:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79083_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79083_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.22 -08:49:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79101_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79101_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.69 -09:15:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79104_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79104_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.10 -06:07:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79124_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79124_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.69 -07:33:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79125_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79125_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.95 -08:56:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79147_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79147_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:09.60 -08:21:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79154_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79154_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.58 -08:58:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79159_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79159_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:11.83 -06:46:46.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.335 4340615621469190656 252.29904831912 -06.77938552556 13.3310 12.4849 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.335#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79167_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79167_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.75 -07:07:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79185_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79185_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.10 -11:20:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79189_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79189_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:12.24 -07:32:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79191_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79191_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.74 -10:50:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 79198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79199_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 79199_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79204_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79204_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:24.37 -12:50:57.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.396 4141323091623062144 259.60158773627 -12.84940606136 13.2959 11.3885 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.396#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79214_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79214_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:30.35 -09:15:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79226_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79226_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:26.27 -09:35:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79238_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79238_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.24 -05:51:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79243_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79243_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.11 -06:50:40.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.852 4340054080265771136 255.25013838657 -06.84507121298 13.7484 12.8859 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.852#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79247_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 79247_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:27.72 -06:06:12.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.553 4341091847443326976 254.36543025092 -06.10395365001 13.9379 12.9993 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.553#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.56 -09:33:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.48 -10:59:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58228_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 58228_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:59.95 -07:42:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.00 -12:12:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51454_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 51454_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11527_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 11527_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:34.18 -13:39:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33539_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 33539_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:52.47 -07:54:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.07 -09:32:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62748_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 62748_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:48.43 -05:50:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41558_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 41558_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.26 -09:23:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:54.33 -06:24:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16637_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 16637_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.53 -11:47:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.50 -10:40:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38705_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 38705_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 19815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.75 -12:34:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.70 -06:38:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18100_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 18100_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:11.75 -12:48:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:46.51 -10:37:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37527_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 37527_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:35.70 -10:06:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.73 -10:28:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 28198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:09.06 -11:33:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-02_03-58-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
