This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461126.7465,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260327.2465 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 19:32:09.11 +60:27:21.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20_00sec_-9_90C_LIGHT_0223_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0222_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20_00sec_-9_90C_LIGHT_0223_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0222_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IY Dra,2461126.7465,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IY Dra 20260327.2465 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 18:23:17.91 +64:20:35.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20_00sec_-9_90C_LIGHT_0223_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0222_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20_00sec_-9_90C_LIGHT_0223_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0229_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0222_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.99188764 19.03.2026 11:48:09.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461118.99188764 19.03.2026 11:48:09.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461126.74681420 27.03.2026 05:55:14.747 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12394
Objects passed selection criteria: 12354
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10103.2
Average stars matched: 9940.5 (98.3891 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119008 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Mar 27 00:58:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.99188764 19.03.2026 11:48:09.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461118.99188764 19.03.2026 11:48:09.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461126.74681420 27.03.2026 05:55:14.747 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 79459
Objects passed selection criteria: 79257
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 64006.2
Average stars matched: 62241 (97.2421 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1996676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Mar 27 00:59:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461126.74628613
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:27.832 +62:00:27.94
Second-epoch image center 18:51:44.416 +62:00:41.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:27.832 +62:00:27.94
Second-epoch image center 18:51:45.632 +62:00:21.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:44.416 +62:00:41.09
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:45.632 +62:00:21.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00597 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D8TS9rbmNk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ooCMHTlWrw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BaGpOfuwWO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QEJjIxvdpV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 10321 out of 17133 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896710
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896710
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.7 pix fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
2.7 pix fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.1 mag. Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.D8TS9rbmNk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1312, passed=17133
Got 17133 stars (including 15798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ooCMHTlWrw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1276, passed=16769
Got 16769 stars (including 15476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BaGpOfuwWO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, passed=8524
Got 8524 stars (including 8137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8524 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QEJjIxvdpV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, passed=8569
Got 8569 stars (including 8160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03761_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 03761_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:33.76 +58:23:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:27.832 +62:00:27.94
Second-epoch image center 18:51:44.416 +62:00:41.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:27.832 +62:00:27.94
Second-epoch image center 18:51:45.632 +62:00:21.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:44.416 +62:00:41.09
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:45.632 +62:00:21.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00597 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MrO1Jdxxs9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KvVYOQsGe6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6aA76rHqIC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XNY57iIYdt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 10623 out of 104238 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.745744
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.745744
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.6 pix fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
2.5 pix fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MrO1Jdxxs9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=9126, passed=104205
Got 104205 stars (including 94969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 104205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KvVYOQsGe6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=8688, passed=102706
Got 102706 stars (including 93895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 102706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6aA76rHqIC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2270, passed=46674
Got 46674 stars (including 44362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XNY57iIYdt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2342, passed=47393
Got 47393 stars (including 45018 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47393 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-48-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-49-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-54-29_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-27_CI_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_005603_TTUQ2b1x1_25843_WEobTLOe/wcs_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out120851.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out121144.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out121157.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120846.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120846_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 120846_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120847_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120847_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:27.00 +61:48:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120849_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120849_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:53.84 +63:10:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120851_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120851_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:52.58 +63:37:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.808 2253272132771257728 281.71799469596 +63.62042083960 12.4472 12.0375 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.808#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120923_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120923_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120942_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120942_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120947_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120947_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120968_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120968_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120979_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 120979_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:24.10 +60:51:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121014_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121014_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:01.40 +59:25:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121022_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121022_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121028_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121028_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121041_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121041_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:59.84 +64:45:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121043_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121043_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121072_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121072_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:51.49 +64:22:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121085_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121085_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:50.70 +63:16:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121088_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121088_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:02.16 +63:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121098_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121098_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121121_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121121_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:29.79 +64:01:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121122_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121122_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:29.43 +62:33:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121123_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121123_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:19.11 +65:23:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121133_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121133_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:04.01 +63:57:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121142_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121142_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121143_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121143_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:22.10 +64:04:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121144_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121144_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:26.95 +65:12:49.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.846 2253918714328936704 282.86330155992 +65.21332192792 13.9122 13.3845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.846#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121151_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121151_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:03.43 +63:00:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121154_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121154_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:35.15 +60:34:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121156_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121156_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:59.30 +65:03:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121157_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121157_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:45.79 +63:25:08.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.635 2160411710015993472 275.44171390436 +63.41850674758 13.9365 13.4613 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.635#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121179_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121179_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:52.88 +64:12:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121193_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121193_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:27.26 +64:27:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121195_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121195_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:19.45 +61:43:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121211_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 121211_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:49.48 +62:20:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95008_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 95008_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19611_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223
The candidate 19611_fd_Dra-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_00-55-14_20.00sec_-9.90C_LIGHT_0223 did not pass the final checks